Page 56 of 58 FirstFirst ... 6465152535455565758 LastLast
Results 551 to 560 of 573

Thread: Coronavirus/COVID-19: Global Terror

  1. #551
    Active Funding Member
    „Friend of Germanics”
    Skadi Funding Member
    Ţoreiđar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Online
    3 Hours Ago @ 02:01 AM
    Ethnicity
    Scandinavian
    Gender
    Posts
    2,743
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,836
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,867
    Thanked in
    938 Posts
    Sign the declaration against draconian Covid-19 measures:

    As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection.

    The Great Barrington Declaration
    As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection.

    Coming from both the left and right, and around the world, we have devoted our careers to protecting people. Current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health. The results (to name a few) include lower childhood vaccination rates, worsening cardiovascular disease outcomes, fewer cancer screenings and deteriorating mental health – leading to greater excess mortality in years to come, with the working class and younger members of society carrying the heaviest burden. Keeping students out of school is a grave injustice.

    Keeping these measures in place until a vaccine is available will cause irreparable damage, with the underprivileged disproportionately harmed.

    [Read more: https://gbdeclaration.org]
    A nation is an organic thing, historically defined.
    A wave of passionate energy which unites past, present and future generations

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Ţoreiđar For This Useful Post:


  3. #552
    Senior Member Verđandi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Last Online
    Wednesday, September 12th, 2018 @ 03:42 PM
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Country
    Luxembourg Luxembourg
    Location
    Asgĺrd
    Gender
    Age
    36
    Family
    Two sisters
    Occupation
    Wyrd-weaver
    Posts
    3,692
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    410
    Thanked in
    269 Posts

    Belgium: Second worst country in Europe for coronavirus infections

    Quote Originally Posted by Verđandi
    The virus isn't spreading in Flanders this time, but in Brussels and Wallonia, mainly due to migrants not caring for anti-COVID-19 measures. The cops don't dare to enforce the rules in migrant areas and this is what happens. 1 out of 7 tests is Brussels is a positive one. The Netherlands went in semi-lockdown, the rest of Europe will soon follow as the crisis intensifies, no doubt.


    Belgium is now the second-worst country in Europe in terms of coronavirus infections per 100,000 inhabitants in the last fortnight, according to the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC).

    The latest update to the ECDC map on infections shows a total of 16 countries in the hardest-hit category, meaning they have had more than 120 new infections per 100,000 inhabitants in the last two weeks.

    Leading the figures is the Czech Republic, with 433 new cases, with Belgium not far behind with 364 as of the latest update. This new position is the result of a drastic change over the weekend, which saw the country move from 5th on Friday to 2nd today as infection numbers surpassed Franc, Spain and the Netherlands.

    New infections have been surging in Belgium, especially in Brussels and Wallonia regions, with experts warning that if figures do not change, further action will have to be taken.

    The sixteen European countries currently past the threshold ( and marked as dark red) are:

    The Czech Republic,
    Belgium,
    The Netherlands,
    Spain,
    France,
    The United Kingdom,
    Iceland,
    Slovakia,
    Luxembourg,
    Romania,
    Malta,
    Slovenia,
    Ireland,
    Austria,
    Hungary
    Portugal.

    Not Ruling Out A Lockdown

    Reacting to the continuing rise in the main indicators of the Covid-19 epidemic over the weekend, federal health minister Frank Vandenbroucke has declined to rule out a new lockdown.

    Speaking on Sunday, Vandenbroucke said he was not ready to guarantee anything.

    “The only thing I can guarantee is that if we work together and all do the same things, we have the best chance of achieving what we want to achieve: to keep the schools open, keep businesses working and allow the hospitals to cope.”

    For Dr Erika Vlieghe, an advisor to the national security council, the trend is not only “dramatic” but also “terrifying”.

    “If we already had a corona barometer, it would now be orange. But our country is clearly on its way to red,” she warned, speaking on the VRT’s De Zevende Dag.

    Jules Johnston
    The Brussels Times

    Brusselstimes

  4. #553

    World doctors alliance



    An independent non-profit alliance of doctors, nurses, healthcare professionals and staff around the world who have united in the wake of the Covid-19 response chapter to share experiences with a view to ending all lockdowns and related damaging measures and to re-establish universal health determinance of psychological and physical wellbeing for all humanity.



    OPEN LETTER TO THE UK GOVERNMENT, GOVERNMENTS OF THE WORLD AND THE CITIZENS OF THE WORLD



    INTRODUCTION


    We were told initially that the premise for lockdown was to ‘flatten the curve’ and therefore protect the NHS from being overwhelmed.It is clear that at no point was the National Health Service (NHS) in any danger of being overwhelmed, and since May 2020 covid wards have been largely empty; and crucially the death toll from covid has remained extremely low.



    We now have hundreds of thousands of so-called ‘cases’, ‘infections’ and ‘positive tests’ but hardly any sick people. Recall that four fifths (80%) of ‘infections’ are asymptomatic (1) Covid wards have been by and large empty throughout June, July, August and September 2020. Most importantly covid deaths are at an all-time low. It is clear that these ‘cases’ are in fact not ‘cases’ but rather they are normal healthy people.



    So-called asymptomatic cases have never in the history of respiratory disease been the driver for spread of infection. Rather it is symptomatic people who spread respiratory infections - not asymptomatic people.(2)



    It is also abundantly clear that the ‘pandemic’ is basically over and has been since June 2020. (3)



    We have very highly likely reached herd immunity and therefore have no need for a vaccine.



    We have safe and very effective treatments and preventative treatments for covid, we therefore call for an immediate end to all lockdown measures, social distancing, mask wearing, testing of healthy individuals, track and trace, immunity passports, the vaccination program and so on. There has been a catalogue of unscientific, non-sensical policies enacted which infringe our inalienable rights, such as - freedom of movement, freedom of speech and freedom of assembly. These draconian totalitarian measures must never be repeated.



    LOCKDOWN


    • Covid has proved less deadly than previous influenza seasons – There were 50,100 flu deaths from December 2017 to March 2018 in England and Wales. There were 80,000 flu deaths in 1969. To date we have circa 42,000 covid related deaths in the UK.
    • We have never locked down society for a respiratory virus before.
    • The basis for lockdown was a mathematical model by Professor Neil Ferguson. His modelling which predicted half a million deaths in the UK has been roundly condemned as being not fit for purpose. His estimated death figures were clearly wrong by a factor of 10 or 12 times. (1)
    • Professor Ferguson’s modelling was not even peer reviewed before being acted upon by several nations. Eminent epidemiologists such as Professor Gupta from Oxford University were ignored, they estimated the death count would be far lower in the UK.
    • Professor Ferguson has a long track record of woeful modelling he was entirely wrong about sars, mers, mad cow’s disease (CJD), and swine flu. Why did the world listen to him again? (2)
    • Countries which did not lock down Sweden, Japan, Taiwan, South Korea and Belarus have all done significantly better than us in terms of percentage of population deaths. They also have herd immunity and intact economies.
    • Lockdown did not save lives, and this has been published in the Lancet ‘….in our analysis, full lockdowns and wide-spread COVID-19 testing were not associated with reductions in the number of critical cases or overall mortality.’ (3)
    • The vast majority of deaths occurred in elderly and very elderly people
    • The vast majority of deaths occurred in people with pre-existing serious health issues such as cancer, cardiovascular disease, Alzheimer’s, diabetes etc
    • Covid poses virtually zero risk to the under 45’s who have more chance of being struck by lightning than dying from covid.
    • Covid poses a very small risk for healthy under 60 year olds who have a greater chance of accidental drowning than dying from covid.
    • The entire nation was essentially placed under house arrest. We have never isolated the healthy before.
    • Isolating the sick and those who are immunocompromised makes sense. Isolating the healthy has hampered the establishment of herd immunity and makes no sense.
    • To put it into perspective we had 115,000 smoking related deaths in the UK in 2015 compared to the 42,000 deaths from covid.
    • We usually have around 600,000 deaths every year in the UK, roughly 1600 deaths per day.




    COLLATERAL DAMAGE THE CURE IS WORSE THAN THE VIRUS


    • Placing the public under virtual house arrest has caused untold damage to both physical and mental health.(1)
    • Ventilating patients instead of oxygenating patients proved to be a deadly policy and an unwarranted failure. Ventilation resulted in many unnecessary deaths. (2)
    • Sending infected people from hospitals to care homes placed the elderly and frail under unnecessary risk and resulted in many unnecessary deaths. (3)
    • Blanket Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders were imposed on thousands of people without their consent nor the consent of their families – this is both unlawful and immoral and lead to unnecessary deaths in care homes. (4)
    • Hospitals became essentially ‘covid only’ centres vast numbers of patients were wilfully neglected, resulting in many thousands of unnecessary deaths. (5)
    • The government’s own report estimates that some two hundred thousand (200,000) people will die as a direct result of lockdown – not the virus. Hospitals being closed, suicide and poverty will result in more deaths than the virus. (6)
    • The cure is worse than the disease!




    DEATH CERTIFICATES (1)


    • The majority of people who died had significant comorbidities, such as Alzheimer’s, cancer, cardiovascular disease and diabetes.
    • Counting death certificates with a ‘mention’ of covid as being a death caused by covid is a gross misrepresentation of the facts and has vastly over exaggerated the death toll.
    • The rules for the signing of death certificates have been changed solely for covid by the Coronavirus 2020 Act.
    • Doctors do not even need to have physically seen the patient in order to sign death certificates.
    • The Act has removed the need for a confirmatory medical certificate for cremations.
    • Autopsies have virtually been banned, no doubt leading to misdiagnosis of the true cause of deaths; and also reducing our understanding of the disease itself.
    • Worse still, care home staff who largely have no medical training are able to give a statement as to the cause of death.
    • Covid was put on death certificates merely on the ‘suspicion’ of people having covid. This may well be unlawful, since it is a crime to falsify death certificates.
    • People who die within 28 days of a positive pcr test are deemed to have died from covid, even if they die in a car crash or from a heart attack; clearly over inflating the death toll (2)




    ECONOMIC RUIN


    • Reports now estimate that as many as six and a half million (6,500,000) people in the UK will lose their jobs as a result of lockdown. (1)
    • It is well known that poverty directly adversely affects health, we can expect to see many people suffering with poor health and resulting in many premature deaths, as a direct result of lockdown.




    CENSORSHIP


    • Government have acted maliciously in censoring doctors, nurses and NHS staff. The people have the perfect right to hear what is going on in hospitals, and the medical profession have a duty to look after the public and to reassure them. (1)
    • The medical profession have not been allowed to let the public know that covid wards have been empty for months, nor that covid deaths have reached an all-time low for months, and this has unnecessarily added to the public’s distress and anxiety.
    • Doctors and scientists with views that differ from the government narrative have had their videos and articles removed from the internet




    TESTING - FALSE POSITIVES


    • PCR tests cannot be verified for accuracy as there is no ‘gold standard’ against which to check them. The virus has not been purified. (1)
    • PCR tests cannot detect viral loads and are prone to false positives. (2)
    • A positive PCR test does not mean that an individual is infected nor infective. (3)
    • In fact approximately 90% of the PCR positive ‘cases’ are false positives. We therefore have no second wave and no pandemic. (4 , 5)
    • The government’s report estimates a false positive rate of between 0.8 to 4.0 % using data from other viral infections – not from covid (6)
    • Viral fragments may remain in people’s bodies for several weeks following recovery from infection. (7)
    • The crisis will never end if we are waiting for zero positive tests. Everyone has probably had a cold caused by a coronavirus and will likely have a few viral fragments matching those of the cousin SARS-CoV-2 virus (8)
    • Testing healthy asymptomatic individuals is non-sensical, unscientific and a colossal waste of money. The governments moon shot daily testing program will cost Ł100 Billion roughly two thirds of the annual NHS budget.
    • Antibody testing is not the gold standard as many people have T-cell immunity, and antibodies may not circulate following recovery from infection.




    HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE


    • The controversial drug Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has been unfairly smeared, by the WHO, CDC, NIH and the media.
    • However HCQ has very firm support from, amongst others: Professor Harvey Risch epidemiologist from Yale, The American Association of Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS), American Frontline Doctors, the Henry Ford Health System and Professor Didier Raoult microbiologist and infectious disease specialist - to name but a few. (1)
    • The Lancet was even forced to retract a study on HCQ after it was revealed by the Guardian newspaper that they had been completely fabricated and written by a sci-fi writer and a porn star. Even following this astounding revelation HCQ was still banned in most countries. (2)
    • HCQ according to AAPS has a ninety per cent (90%) cure rate when given early and alongside zinc (3)
    • HCQ is safer than many over the counter drugs such as aspirin, Benadryl and Tylenol.
    • The AAPS also point out that there has never been a vaccine as safe as HCQ. (4)
    • HCQ has been licensed for over sixty years and has been safely used by billions of people worldwide. There is a very small risk of arrythmia which is easily monitored.
    • Why was HCQ banned then? Could it be that there are no huge profits to be made from this out-of-patent drug?
    • HCQ was used to great effect in the Sars1 outbreak of 2005 (5)
    • In short had HCQ been available then there would not have been a pandemic !




    PREVENTION


    • Preventative measures such as hydroxychloroquine or vitamins D, C and zinc should have been recommended for the public. (1)
    • Early calcifediol (25-hydroxyvitamin D) treatment to hospitalized COVID-19 patients significantly reduced intensive care unit admissions (2)
    • Vit D reduces the severity of covid. (2,3)
    • Voluntary isolation of the frail - should they so choose; in combination with preventative measures would have been a far better strategy. The rest of society could and should have continued as normal.





    • VACCINE



    • A rushed vaccine is clearly not in the public’s best interest
    • Indemnifying vaccine manufacturers against all liability is also clearly not in the public’s best interest




    CONFLICTS OF INTEREST


    • Chief Scientific Officer Sir Patrick Vallance has Ł600,000 worth of shares in GSK Glaxo Smith Klein. He has in recent years sold Ł5 million of shares in GSK which he ‘earned’ whilst chief of GSK (1)
    • Sir Chris Whitty, Chief Medical Officer UK, accepted over Ł30 million in funding from the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation to study malaria vaccines. (2)
    • It has become clear that members of SAGE, Public Health England (PHE), World Health Organisation (WHO), Centre for Disease Control (CDC), National institute for Health (NIH) etc have many conflicts of interests. They all accept very large ‘donations’ from the pharmaceutical and vaccine industry. These conflicts of interests may well have effectively corrupted their integrity. (3)
    • It is also clear that governments are heavily lobbied by the pharmaceutical industry and the vaccine industry, again this may have compromised their integrity. (4)




    CUI BONO? WHO BENEFITS?


    • Vaccine manufacturers will make trillions from this, as will track and trace manufacturers, and the pharmaceutical industry stand to make trillions from covid testing.
    • Prime minister Boris Johnson announced the new ‘moon shot’ testing will cost Ł100 Billion, approximately two thirds of the annual NHS budget.
    • Surely these vast sums would be far better spent on treating all of the neglected patients who have been wilfully neglected during lockdown and who now face huge waiting lists.




    CONCLUSIONS

    We have effective and safe treatments and preventative medications for covid, therefore there is no need for any lockdown restrictions and associated measures. The pandemic is essentially over as can be seen by the consistent low death rate and hospital admissions over the past four months.


    We demand the immediate and permanent ceasing of all lockdown measures.


    Lockdowns do not save lives, that is why they have never been used before. Civil liberties and fundamental freedoms have been unnecessarily removed from the public and this must never happen again.


    Preventative measures such as Hydroxychloroquine, vitamin C, Vitamin D and zinc must be made readily available to the public.


    Isolation must be voluntary. People are perfectly capable of making their own assessment of the risks and must be free to go about their lives as they so choose. People must have the right to choose whether to isolate or not.


    Likewise, businesses must have the right to remain open if they so choose.


    We demand that doctors, nurses, scientists and healthcare professionals must be permitted free speech and never be censored again.


    Professor Mark Woolhouse epidemiologist and specialist in infectious diseases, Edinburgh University Member of the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behaviours, that advises the Government stated that -


    ‘…Lockdown was a monumental disaster on a global scale. The cure was worse than the disease.’

    I never want to see national lockdown again. It was always a temporary measure that simply delayed the stage of the epidemic we see now. It was never going to change anything fundamentally, however low we drove down the number of cases,’We absolutely should never return to a position where children cannot play or go to school.’I believe the harm lockdown is doing to our education, health care access, and broader aspects of our economy and society will turn out to be at least as great as the harm done by Covid-19.’(1)


    The World Doctors Alliance agree fully with Prof Woolhouse’s assertions, he is right! We must never lockdown again!NB the term ‘covid’ has been used to represent Sars-CoV-2 and Covid-19



    WORLD DOCTORS ALLIANCE

    worlddoctorsalliance.com
    16/10/2020 · An independent non-profit alliance of doctors, nurses, healthcare professionals and staff around the world who have united in the wake of the Covid-19 response chapter to share experiences with a view to ending all lockdowns and related damaging measures and to re-establish universal health determinance of psychological and physical wellbeing for all humanity.
    19 X 2020.


  5. The Following User Says Thank You to jagdmesser For This Useful Post:


  6. #554
    Senior Member Verđandi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Last Online
    Wednesday, September 12th, 2018 @ 03:42 PM
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Country
    Luxembourg Luxembourg
    Location
    Asgĺrd
    Gender
    Age
    36
    Family
    Two sisters
    Occupation
    Wyrd-weaver
    Posts
    3,692
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    410
    Thanked in
    269 Posts

    Sign of the COVID-19 times: Job ad for a dishwasher gets more than 6,000 applications and position handing out flyers attracts 2,800 would-be workers

    • Sydney woman opens up about the struggle to find work during the pandemic
    • Karen Perkins had a successful business that was derailed because of COVID
    • One job she applied for had 2,800 applicants, others ads have over 6000


    Daily Mail

    Competition for work during the COVID-19 pandemic is seeing thousands of hopefuls apply for the same job.

    One employment ad on Seek for a dishwasher in Sydney saw over 6,000 applicants, while a position for someone to hand out flyers on the street prompted almost 2,800 responses.

    A Sydney woman who applied for the role doing street promotion spoke candidly about her struggles trying to find work during the coronavirus crisis.



    Karen Perkins is currently receiving JobSeeker after her business was derailed by the pandemic and she's now applying for up to 30 positions a month.

    But with so much many other also applying for the same job, she told Daily Mail Australia the process is becoming increasingly disheartening.

    'I have a medical condition and have partial work capacity which restricts me from working full time. I'm also in my 50s,' Ms Perkins said.

    'I was applying for a few office and administration jobs prior to COVID and there were about 100 to 200 applicants per job.

    'But in the month of August it's was least 600 or higher for every job.'

    For the past decade Ms Perkins had been running a successful business called Clear and Clutterfree as a professional organiser.

    The interesting and unusual profession was made famous by the Japanese Tidying Up queen Marie Kondo in her smash hit Netflix show.

    'I help people set up for success and bring a bit of organisation in their home or office,' Ms Perkins said.



    She learned art of tidying up while working for the Salvation Army.

    Ms Perkins would often be called out to collect items from homes which had been gathering dust in the corner.

    She became so good at deciding what to keep and where to put it, others starting calling on her services professionally.

    'The work tends to be very one-off and sporadic, but I was getting regular inquiries and clients', she said.

    But since the onset of the coronavirus, her business has been decimated.

    But despite the strain on the jobs market, official ABS unemployment figures recently improved, dropping from 7.5 per cent in July to 6.8 per cent in August.

    Ms Perkings said in the past two weeks she has noticed the number of job applicants for each role have declined, but she's not convinced the situation is actually getting any better.

    'I think people are just giving up because they're tired of seeing these high numbers,' she said.

    'They think what's the point, the competition is too high.'


  7. #555
    Senior Member Verđandi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Last Online
    Wednesday, September 12th, 2018 @ 03:42 PM
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Country
    Luxembourg Luxembourg
    Location
    Asgĺrd
    Gender
    Age
    36
    Family
    Two sisters
    Occupation
    Wyrd-weaver
    Posts
    3,692
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    410
    Thanked in
    269 Posts

    Thousands of the world’s top scientists are finally speaking out against lockdowns. Let’s pray it’s not too little, too late



    More than 7,000 top scientists and doctors have signed a declaration calling for politicians to reconsider their entire approach to Covid, and to adopt a herd immunity strategy. Why didn’t this happen seven months ago?

    In its first few days, almost 3,000 medical and public health scientists, over 4,000 medical practitioners, and an astonishing 65,000 members of the public have added their names to a backlash against government state-sanctioned Covid restrictions. If you wish to sign yourself, you can do so here.

    The declaration was co-written by Professor Sunetra Gupta of the University of Oxford, whose level-minded and wise counsel on Covid I have been plugging for months. The other two authors are American: the illustrious Dr Jay Bhattacharya of Stanford and Dr Martin Kulldorff of Harvard. Hardly bug-eyed risk takers (although they may well be presented as such in the mainstream media).

    But despite a recent invitation to advise the UK parliament, Gupta’s words have thus far gone completely unheeded. In fact, it has been suggested that she and other ardent anti-establishment voices were brought in only as a ruse to placate the significant faction of the scientific community that has refused to blindly follow ‘the science’. If that was Boris and co’s plan, however, it has backfired, because Gupta and her colleagues are not giving up that easily.
    Too big to ignore

    Make no mistake: this is no half-cocked social media petition that politicians can comfortably ignore, regardless of the number of signatories. This is an official document with a title, the Great Barrington Declaration, after the town in Massachusetts where Gupta travelled to write it up.

    Its arguments will not be new to anyone familiar with the statements of Gupta and others on the lockdowns. “Current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short- and long-term public health,” it begins, adding that waiting for a vaccine “will cause irreparable damage.” Instead, it calls for “focused protection” – essentially, letting the healthy out as normal to develop herd immunity while cocooning the elderly.

    But herd immunity is wrongthink to much of the public; they associate it with “letting the virus rip,” and infer that it will involve the bovine culling of an entire demographic. There are two things to remember about this. First, the body of evidence strongly suggests that the virus has long since reached endemic status pretty much everywhere, and people already have herd immunity anyway. Why else have Covid deaths essentially flatlined ever since the April peak?

    Second, since there is not a scrap of evidence that any restrictions slow or stop the virus, haven’t we been “letting the virus rip” anyway? It is called Covid-19 for a reason – it was spreading freely around the world well before Christmas of last year. How slow do people think this virus is? The reason Covid deaths fell as quickly as they rose back in spring is because the disease had all but run its course. The Great Barrington Declaration does not engage with this model of the virus (the only one I have seen that fits the facts) and so I fear that, in not being adamant enough, it could alienate both sides.

    Between two stools?

    For instance, the declaration lists a series of preventative measures that vulnerable people “should use” to avoid infection. Again, in my opinion only a hazmat suit and full laboratory quarantine can protect a person from an endemic respiratory virus. Nevertheless, the “think of Granny!” brigade should be satisfied with this part.

    Establishment quacks are already being wheeled out to finger-wag about the “dangerous idea” of herd immunity, and also to throw about the newly coined phrase “long Covid”, referring to lasting fatigue and other effects some people are claiming after surviving the virus.

    These commentators, along with moronic social media commentators, often describe herd immunity as “genocidal”. This hyperbole was especially prevalent when Sweden was said to be aiming for herd immunity (it never was). You may have noticed, though, that when the issue of mandatory vaccines comes up, herd immunity suddenly becomes very important. Strange…

    Of course, herd immunity is far from genocidal. In fact, as one Twitter user with a good memory pointed out, wasn’t the UK’s plan from the very beginning about reaching it?

    When the history of this outbreak is written, one hopes that the Great Barrington Declaration will be an important moment when the tide turned away from the lockdown evangelists and towards the interests of the common people. One thing is certain: it is not before time.

    Russia Today

  8. #556

    'Emperor New Clothes'


    An 83-year old great-granny from Yorkshire has become an overnight celebrity in Britain merely for saying what millions think (but are afraid to say), about the never-ending Coronavirus lockdown charade.



    It’s the 19th folk tale from Denmark which helps us to explain what has been going on- before our very eyes- in Britain in 2020. In Hans Christian Andersen’s The Emperor’s New Clothes, a pair of weavers, who are actually swindlers, promise the Emperor they will make him a new set of clothes that will be invisible to those unfit for their positions, or unusually stupid. But they make him no clothes at all and make everyone believe that the clothes are invisible to them. The Emperor parades, totally naked, but everyone is too scared to say that he is wearing no clothes.



    "Nobody would confess that he couldn't see anything, for that would prove him either unfit for his position, or a fool", Andersen wrote.
    But one little child hasn't read the script. "But he hasn't got anything on!" he cries. The word gets round – and soon everyone is mouthing the truth.



    We're in exactly the same situation in Britain today. Those 'Inside the Tent’ know that the establishment narrative on ‘Covid‘ lockdowns is false, predicated as it is on ramped-up not-fit-for-purpose PCR tests which give out a very high level of false positives, and the most generous classification of Coronavirus deaths. But the ‘Inside the Tenters’ know they’ll be regarded as 'unfit for their positions' if they dare state the truth.



    They all have to go along with the state-sponsored B.S.
    They all have to make the case for ‘lockdowns’- whether they are re-branded as ‘fire-breaks’ or ‘circuit breakers’, even though they know that countries which didn’t lockdown got much better results. They all have to trash any dissenting views. The public too can see something is not right with the official narrative but are frightened of expressing their doubts for fear of being castigated for not taking COVID-19 seriously enough. ‘You oppose lockdowns- then you support letting the deadly virus rip’, has been the gas-lighting technique used to keep people quiet. Enter Maureen Eames. In an interview with BBC Yorkshire the straight-talking great-grandmother from Barnsley said exactly what she thought. ‘I’m 83 and
    I don’t give a sod’, she said. ‘I think it’s all ridiculous, we should never have been in lockdown’.



    This was the 2020 equivalent of Hans Christian Andersen’s little child- who also didn’t ‘give a sod’, simply declaring ‘But he hasn’t got anything on’ when he saw the Emperor stark naked. It had exactly the same effect. Millions of people who were too frightened to say ‘It’s ridiculous, we should never have been in lockdown’, finally found the courage to mouth that obvious truth. Thousands of Twitter users- myself included- said Mrs Eames should be our Prime Minister. That‘s how refreshing it was- after all the B.S., all the spin and all the lies to hear someone finally saying what the rest of us were thinking.



    Mrs Eames also raised another question, that millions will have wanted to ask- but again were too afraid to say. “How can we get the country on its feet, money-wise? Where’s all the money?"



    Where indeed is all the money? How on earth can the UK afford any more lockdowns- when we are already over Ł2 trillion in debt? Weren’t we told before 'COVID-19' that there was no ‘magic money tree’. Where did one suddenly appear from?



    Mrs Eames also brought up World War Two, but not in the way the lockdown zealots- who weren’t even around in the 1940s, have. ‘I never thought I would feel like I was in Italy when Germany invaded’ Maureen said. She echoed the real WW2 spirit when she said ‘Life has to go on’. WW2 was about keeping calm and carrying on, not hiding behind the sofa all day being terrified.



    She also, quite gloriously, punctured the ‘Cult of the Government Scientist’.
    "We need the government to get rid of the scientists. I didn’t vote for a scientist. Scientists should go back to their universities and laboratories. I didn’t vote for Mr Whitty (the pro-lockdown Chief Medical Officer), and I wish Mr Hancock (Health Secretary) would stop saying things that are foolish. We need to get back to business", she said.



    In her short interview (and subsequent follow-ups), Maureen Eames has done more to shatter the official COVID-19 lockdown narrative of the government- and the so-called ‘Opposition’, than any television ‘talking-head' or 'pundit'.


    "I look at it this way - I’ve not got that many years left in me and I’m not going to be fastened in a house when the government have got it all wrong", she said.

    For the last seven months, we’ve heard patronising ‘expert‘ after patronising ‘expert‘ tell us what should be done with the elderly to ‘protect’ them, and now at last we have a senior citizen giving us her own view- which is ‘No one is going to tell me to stay at home’. Mrs Eames didn’t just speak for the elderly this week (my parents are both in their 90s and agree with her statements wholeheartedly), she spoke for the whole of Britain.


    Unlike our globalist government, our globalist ‘Opposition’, our gutless, over-paid MPs or our town hall tin-pot despots pushing for their areas to pushed into a higher lockdown tier. Unlike most of our feather-bedded ‘commentariat’ or ‘Inside the Tent’ broadcasters, who always ask the ‘wrong‘ questions at press briefings. These have been shown up big time in 2020. No one, I hope, will ever listen to a word the courtiers to power ever say again. The Emperor has no Clothes. The more people say it, the sooner the lockdowns end and the sooner our lives get back to normal.



    Sputnik Maureen Eames and Britain's 'Emperor New Clothes' COVID-19 Moment

    26 X 2020.

    ‘The Emperor has no clothes’ is very much part of Globalist mass control of behaviour.

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to jagdmesser For This Useful Post:


  10. #557
    Senior Member Verđandi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Last Online
    Wednesday, September 12th, 2018 @ 03:42 PM
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Country
    Luxembourg Luxembourg
    Location
    Asgĺrd
    Gender
    Age
    36
    Family
    Two sisters
    Occupation
    Wyrd-weaver
    Posts
    3,692
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    410
    Thanked in
    269 Posts

    Covid’s Spread Could Be Entirely Out of Our Hands

    Quote Originally Posted by Verđandi
    British press is actually aware of genetics.
    Juliet Samuel, Telegraph, October 23, 2020

    Every so often, another of those stories pops up. Two doctors in one Australian family are dead from Covid. Four members of one New Jersey family have succumbed, likewise three brothers in Iran. A whole family – mother, father and child – have died from it in the UK. Each time, surely, it raises the question: why? You can blame testing failures, poverty, too few distancing measures or too many, for crowding families together, or any other political or economic factor you choose. But perhaps we spend too little time considering the hundreds of factors that have little to do with our politicians: some families, for example, may be genetically predisposed to get severe Covid.

    Over the summer a UCL scientist called Karl Friston attracted a flurry of media interest when he suggested that the reason for different Covid outcomes in different countries may be something he termed “immunological dark matter”. The idea was that some populations simply happen to have more existing immunity to Covid-19, perhaps due to the particular mix of coronaviruses they have caught and fought off in the past. This, rather than Germany’s exemplary competence and early testing capacity, may be why that country has not suffered as much from the pandemic as many of its neighbours, he theorised.

    Even more nightmarish for government policy, our genetic makeup also seems to affect our propensity to get severely ill and die. One study by the Covid-19 Host Genetics Initiative found that for some Covid patients with a particular set of genes, being in blood group A seemed to be associated with a higher risk of respiratory failure, whereas being in blood group O had the opposite effect. Another study from the Max Planck Institute in Germany looked at those with especially poor Covid outcomes and found they disproportionately possessed a set of genes inherited from Neanderthals. What’s more, these mutations are especially prevalent in people of South Asian origin, who have been so severely affected by Covid, and almost non-existent in those from East Asia.

    The genetic picture is extremely complex, however. Like South Asians, black Britons and African Americans have suffered especially bad outcomes from Covid, yet Neanderthal DNA is largely absent from African populations. A study by scientists at Regeneron, a biotech company, found that there may be another gene also associated with poor Covid outcomes and more prevalent in people of African origin. So it isn’t just down to one killer gene, but a person’s susceptibility could well be profoundly affected by her genome and such genetic factors may be just as important as social problems like poor health and poverty in explaining why certain countries and populations seem to be so much more vulnerable than others.

    Telegraph

  11. #558
    Senior Member Verđandi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Last Online
    Wednesday, September 12th, 2018 @ 03:42 PM
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Country
    Luxembourg Luxembourg
    Location
    Asgĺrd
    Gender
    Age
    36
    Family
    Two sisters
    Occupation
    Wyrd-weaver
    Posts
    3,692
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    410
    Thanked in
    269 Posts

    Corona Virus Concentration Camps

    Eurocanadian

    By Elwin Ransom.



    The corona virus ‘pandemic’ seems to have brought out the worst of western governments. Imposed lockdowns, denial of religious services, a mask mandate, and more restrictions yet to be implemented but having been promised. Our governments have seemed to embrace these newfound powers, granted to them by the supposed democratic mandate of a fearful population (a population they intimidated and made compliant). Yet in some ways, the power elite, or the ‘Cathedral’, have over played their hand.

    Covid Totalitarianism

    Many people are conscious of the many contradictions and lack of consistency surrounding the pandemic. These include how thousands of people could riot, in memory of a drug addict who may or may not have died as a result of a seemingly violent arrest, without being affected or causing a corona virus cases to spike. Or better yet, how the only people who seem to be threatened by Covid-19 are of the same demographics that find the seasonal influenza a challenge. Many people, and not just those in my intimidate circle, have iterated these statements before; unfortunately, they remain in a state of double think, or hypernormalisation. They know what their senses and rationality are telling them, yet they still follow mainstream media and politicians. They do not try to harmonize the contradictions but rather, one moment they express and advocate one view, and the next they will espouse its opposite.

    My hope is that this internal tension will cause such people to lose faith in the establishment and revert to their own perception to make judgments. Alas, the imposing of a split perception seems to be the purpose of current events and the responses to them.

    By most accounts, Canada has responded poorly to the pandemic. We have taken on the largest Covid-19 related deficit and debt. In most provinces, to visit a business or public facility (those that are permitted to open), one has to volunteer a name and contact information, or risk being denied service. Slippery slope aside, the constant monitoring and recording of where citizens find themselves is a hallmark of totalitarian governments. Considering there are alternative, less panopticon-esque means of informing people about a localized outbreak, these policies would seem to imply there is another parallel agenda being implemented. Canada has already developed a smartphone monitoring contract tracing app, and there are talks about adopting a digital “health passport” to coincide with the release of the Covid-19 vaccine.

    Theresa Tam, Canada’s chief public health officer, has stated prior to the Corona pandemic that vaccines should be mandatory and that those who refuse a vaccine in times of pandemic should be incarcerated. Take a listen:



    Mrs. Tam is also very likely a plant from the Chinese government. Effectively, the Canadian government has begun to lay the groundwork of partial totalitarian rule. The people are pliant, fearful, and agreeable, with no binding ideology or identity that could be used to define themselves apart from the Canadian state.

    The above should not be controversial. Even those who support the government’s actions and responses to corona must be able to admit that for the duration of this ‘pandemic’, the Canadian government has acted more authoritarian and totalitarian than we are accustomed to. Those that support the government could even say that the dangers of corona warrant such a strong response. Yet, as we saw after the 9/11 attacks, governments do not surrender emergency powers, and once freedoms are lost, they are seldom restored.

    Quarantine Camps

    With such historical precedents and the contemporary context, questioning our governments and demanding accountability is prudent. A member of Ontario’s provincial parliament demanded such accountability. MPP Randy Hillier, in accordance with his job, brought to light the existence of federal invoices for what have been described as “quarantine isolation camps”. These recent invoices are also notable because they include the mass procurement of riot control equipment and weapons. Here's the clip of Hillier inquiring about the nature of these camps:



    Hillier’s questions were buried and went uncommented upon by mainstream media. There were those on Twitter who were sharing clips and invoices, and from these the developments seemed concerning. The government has not denied the existence of these camps. Firstly, it was claimed that they were for those entering Canada from foreign countries, so that they could observe a 14-day quarantine. Then it was claimed that the “facilities in question” are meant to provide shelter for homeless people. These documents do refer to the ‘pandemic’, but also say that these camps could be used to “house individuals for numerous other reasons”.

    Now granted, in my own personal theorizing, I never really saw concentration camps or their American FEMA equivalents as likely developments. After all, we are told from birth the evils of Hitler and his concentration camps. President Trump sets up border outposts to detain illegals and he is accused of orchestrating a new Holocaust. As such, for a state to literally engage in the types of actions that they themselves have officially and utterly vilified, is outstanding. What is even more outstanding is that we have the documents and the intentions they imply. All the state would need to do to alleviate concerns is to be transparent, and not evil.

    Leaked Emails

    Once knowledge of the corona camps had been made known, we saw whistle blowers leak other documents. The most notable one was an alleged email from a Liberal Party member. This email lays out the alleged plan of the Liberal government to transform Canada fully into a totalitarian state. It states that upon continued lock downs in 2021, the Canadian government will default and become a client state to the IMF. Under the IMF, a basic minimum income will be implemented, which will require those who participate in the system to be vaccinated (for everything, not just corona as in this system the individual is owned by the state) and forfeit the right to ever own private property. Those who decline will still see their assets and property seized and will be interned as a public health danger.

    I will link a video that goes over the article I just linked above regarding the leaked email:



    Granted, this information is unverified and there is no way prove if the email is genuine or not. The camps themselves are undeniable, but the subsequent releases are questionable. Only time will tell, and the machinations of governments can change. This email does fill in the picture and seems to present a coherent narrative, one far more coherent than official government statements.

    Liberals Fail to Debunk "Conspiracy"

    Now, it would seem that enough Canadians are aware of the existence of these camps that the system deems a response is warranted. CBC, Canada’s state broadcast agency, has decided to debunk this “conspiracy” and denounce those who believe in it:



    What struck me was that the anchor and the Prime Minister never really debunked anything. All they said was that conspiracy theories are bad, and that the citizenry should trust “reliable” sources. They never denied the existence of the camps or explained how the “conspiracy theorists” were errant in their interpretation. They did not consider the views or concerns of the electorate, and instead ignored them completely as if such views did not warrant acknowledgment. “Just watch CBC and believe Trudeau”. That was the grand “debunking”.



    True or not, concentration camps or homeless shelters, should not a democratically elected leader be concerned when a portion of the population has such fear, so little trust in the government? Is that not a damning indictment over your governorship? Should not the Prime Minster, in humility and repentance, apologize to the nation and explain the benign reality of the situation? Is this not why we have and are told to love democracy? Its transparency and its affirming of the sovereign will of the people? No, the concerns of citizens can be dismissed as the power of democracy never came from the people, but was farmed from the people via their submission to the system.

    What I find most damning and most telling is that if the quarantine camp narrative was false, it would be easy to disprove. A free, open discourse would obliterate the claims of “conspiracy theorists” if they were in error. Would not the establishment love that? The Liberals love to be vindicated and smug in their victories. This would be the perfect opportunity for them to humiliate us. Yet our concerns are not addressed, and we are condemned for said concerns. Condemned, not shown to be in error. Is it not the job of the Prime Minister, their duty and calling, to be the steward of the nation? The father to his people?

    Invoices for Population Control and Construction of Quarantine Sites

    There are Canadians who have utterly lost faith in the government and believe the state is doing or will do future harm to them. A just leader, aware and humble in his position ought to ask for forgiveness and explain himself, yet this is not how Trudeau operates. He has no qualms with using Orders in Council (the Canadian equivalent of Executive Orders), as he did to impose gun restrictions after the Nova Scotia shootings. Trudeau has given us no reason to trust him, yet expects us to trust him as if his position, not his actions merit how we are to view him. I guess those who do not align with Trudeau, those who consider government overreach and tyranny, are not worth engaging with, convincing, or debunking. I guess such people are defective and not owed anything even should we participate in the democratic system. We are to be ignored, or made to go away, as the state only exists for those who align with the state, and not the people or nation.

    The first 2 links cover the same order for 36,000 thousand capsules of tear gas. The third link, which is titled, "A Request for Information Regarding Service Provides for Federal Quarantine/Isolation Sites for the GoC", lays out that in accordance with current Orders in Council the Canadian government has ordered the construction of quarantine sites and is looking to contractors to construct more.

  12. #559
    Active Funding Member
    „Friend of Germanics”
    Skadi Funding Member
    Ţoreiđar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Online
    3 Hours Ago @ 02:01 AM
    Ethnicity
    Scandinavian
    Gender
    Posts
    2,743
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,836
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,867
    Thanked in
    938 Posts
    A nation is an organic thing, historically defined.
    A wave of passionate energy which unites past, present and future generations

  13. #560
    Funding Member
    „Friend of Germanics”
    Funding Membership Inactive
    Nachtengel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    German
    Gender
    Posts
    6,403
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    201
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,182
    Thanked in
    686 Posts
    European countries go on lockdown due to 'second wave':

    Britain's Boris Johnson: 'No Alternative' To Strict New Coronavirus Lockdown

    Angela Merkel urges Germans to cooperate on coronavirus lockdown

    Austria reimposes coronavirus lockdown amid surge of infections

    Belgium announces second coronavirus lockdown

    However, there is a decreased fatality rate this time around:

    The raw case fatality rate (CFR, the reported number of COVID‐19 deaths divided by the total number of cases) is an important indicator to quantify the severity or treatment efficacy. In many countries, the pandemic had experienced two waves to date. To our knowledge, no studies have compared the CFR between the two waves. In this work, we reported the CFR of 53 countries or regions with the highest COVID‐19 death tolls. Of them, 43 had lower CFR estimates in the ongoing second wave than in the first wave. We discussed the possible reasons. Also, we compared the two‐wave pattern of COVID‐19 with those of influenza. Influenza activities in the pre‐pandemic era provided an indicator for seasonality of climate in a country. The sharp drop in influenza activities in 2020 could an indicator of the effects of social distancing.
    Decreased Case Fatality Rate of COVID‐19 in the Second Wave: A study in 53 countries or regions

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to Nachtengel For This Useful Post:


Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •