Results 1 to 1 of 1

Thread: Your thoughts may not be your own & here’s why

  1. #1
    Sound methods Chlodovech's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    22 Hours Ago @ 11:36 AM
    Ethnicity
    Flemish
    Ancestry
    Frankish
    Country
    Holy Roman Empire Holy Roman Empire
    Gender
    Politics
    Völkisch traditionalist
    Religion
    Catholic
    Posts
    3,123
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,432
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,476
    Thanked in
    1,073 Posts

    Your thoughts may not be your own & here’s why



    Ever wondered how societal norms change and seem to change right across the west all at roughly the same time. Ever wonder who or what sets the rules and boundaries for political discourse.

    There’s a bizarre notion going around that societies likes and dislikes, choices and actions are results of some sort of naturally occurring evolutionary steps. The acceptance of Homosexuality for example is widely believed to come about as the result of a random collective awakening. While legalisation across the west started more than 50 years ago it’s only as recently as 20 years ago that it became widely accepted in mainstream society but how ? Did people just hear it had been legalised and just got used to it over the years all by themselves.

    Social engineering is a discipline in social science that refers to efforts to influence particular attitudes and social behaviors on a large scale, whether by governments, media or private groups in order to produce desired characteristics in a target population.

    Social engineers use the scientific method to analyze and understand social systems in order to design the appropriate methods to achieve the desired results in individuals and groups. Unbeknown to just about everyone Social engineering is as prevalent taxes.

    Western governments are using social engineering as a gradual process of destroying all traditions, languages, religions, individuality, national institutions, family, law and order in order to re-assemble society in the future as their utopia. This utopia will have no notion of gender, traditions, morality, god or even family. This subversive assault on the consciousness of the west through academia has been specifically put in place to achieve certain goals. It was the Frankfurt School theorists who poisoned the well of Western academic institutions which churn out generation after generation of indoctrinated robots regurgitating their skewed version of past and present. This is done by not just the media but advertising, schools and just about every form communication and expression.

    People are taught and clearly understand that if for example Germany had won the war then they would have used propaganda and re education to tailor society to what they wanted. but the same people (just about everyone) has no clue or interest in that the same tactics are being used today. This is no hidden conspiracy. Those doing it are open and proud of their work. their are countless interviews with the agencies hired and they even boast about it on their company websites. Its just that the population itself doesn’t want to know.



    What is the Overton window?

    The Overton window is the range of ideas tolerated in public discourse.The term is named after Joseph P. Overton, who stated that an idea’s political viability depends mainly on whether it falls within this range, rather than on politicians’ individual preferences. According to Overton, the window contains the range of policies that a politician can recommend without appearing too extreme to gain or keep public office in the current climate of public opinion.

    Serious politicians can only act within the acceptable range. Shifting the Overton Window involves proponents/agencies of policies outside the window persuading the public to move and/or expand it. Proponents of current policies, or similar ones, within the window seek to convince people that policies outside it should be deemed unacceptable. The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum—even encourage the more critical and dissident views. That gives people the sense that there’s free thinking going on, while all the time the presuppositions of the system are being reinforced by the limits put on the range of the debate.

    Again we will highlight homosexuality. Roughly 25 years ago the British National party in UK was condemning it’s practice and running on a platform to ban it outright. Something which even before it became illegal to criticise they dropped as it had fallen so far outside of the Overton window it was politically pointless to pursue. Using the BNP futher as a example and this no doubt goes for most Nationalist parties and right wing groups. Forceful repatriation of non ethnic Europeans. As little as 17 years ago this was still thought of as a election winner and viable solution to the ills of the west, but now only the day dream of the most extreme fringe micro orgs. While still legal to advocate for its so far outside of the Overton window that it’s utterly pointless to champion.

    As powerful as Western governments are even they like to outsource their most important work and shifting the Overton window in their preferred direction is about as important as it gets. It’s well known and documented that Saatchi & Saatchi where hired by the Blair Government in UK to shift public opinion on a range of important issues. and today right across the west Hundreds of agencies are hired on long & short term contracts to completely change the public’s collective psyche. This is why ORDER15 advocates a different path for serious political thinkers and activists. Even if a traditionalist/patriotic/Nationalist party is able to find itself in opposition or say the third largest party it still has to continually water down its policies to stay relevant and within the Overton window. The Front National in France is key example of this becoming little more than a 1980s conservative party and still they haven’t managed electoral success in terms of the presidency.

    So the electoral path is totally fruitless for our aims. One can only imagine in some decades so called Nationalist parties will have gone from trying to in prison gays to fighting to keep opposite sex relations legal it really is that severe a utopia we could be headed towards.

    The traditionalist rights resources are woefully limited and putting all its time and said resources into fighting this losing battle electorally is a crime all in itself. Its understood we are fighting a losing battle against demographics but we are also fighting the clock against the public’s ever shifting mindset, one we simply can not keep up with.

    Source: Order15.com
    “Remember that all worlds draw to an end and that noble death is a treasure which no-one is too poor to buy.” - C. S. Lewis, The Last Battle

  2. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Chlodovech For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. Mediterranean Europe & Its People - Your Thoughts?
    By J.Yaxley in forum Politics & Geopolitics
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 1 Hour Ago, 08:33 AM
  2. Can Atheists Say ‘Thoughts & Prayers’?
    By Nachtengel in forum Agnosticism, Atheism, & Irreligion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Friday, June 15th, 2018, 05:08 AM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: Tuesday, October 10th, 2017, 12:47 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •