Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: People Change Their Moral Values To Benefit Themselves Over Others

  1. #1
    Funding Member
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member

    Nachtengel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    German
    Gender
    Posts
    5,812
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    64
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    575
    Thanked in
    342 Posts

    People Change Their Moral Values To Benefit Themselves Over Others

    According to an old adage, if someone tells you "it's not about the money but the principle," chances are it is about the money. A new study published in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B finds that people are quick to change their moral values depending on which rule means more cash for them instead of others.

    The study, titled "Equity or equality? Moral judgments follow the money," was conducted by Peter DeScioli, an Assistant Professor in Department of Political Science at Stony Brook University and Associate Director of the Center for Behavioral Political Economy, and colleagues.

    "Previous research emphasizes people's personalities, genes, and upbringing as the main source of moral values and disagreements about morality," said DeScioli. "We found that people also adjust their moral values depending on which principle benefits them the most. Our moral principles are more flexible and self-serving than we would like to admit."

    In the study, participants worked in pairs to transcribe a paragraph for a cash reward. One participant was the Typist who transcribed three paragraphs and the other was the Checker who transcribed one paragraph, selected randomly from the Typist's paragraphs. If the two partners' transcriptions matched, then they together earned a cash reward. Crucially, it was up to the Typist to decide how to divide this reward money.

    The Typist could divide the money evenly, 50% each, or according to the work each person did, 75% for the Typist who transcribed three paragraphs and 25% for the Checker who transcribed one paragraph. Most Typists in this situation took the larger share of the pie, consistent with self-interest.

    But it wasn't only the Typists' choices that were self-interested. Participants also rated the morality and fairness of each division rule: equality (equal payoffs) or equity (payoffs proportional to work). These moral judgments, too, were self-interested. Participants assigned to be Typists thought equity was more fair and moral, whereas participants assigned to be Checkers thought equality was more fair and moral.

    Moreover, when the researchers measured moral values before and after participants were assigned to roles, people were caught in the act: Their moral values changed in a few minutes to favor the rule that gave them a larger share of the money.

    DeScioli points out that the finding translates to many situations in which people need to divvy up resources such as family members dividing an estate, business partners dividing profits, citizens deciding how tax dollars will be spent, or nations dividing territory.

    "Our selfishness does, however, have some limits," emphasized DeScioli. In the last experiment, the researchers removed the justification for an unequal division by asking both partners to transcribe one paragraph. In this scenario, most Typists (78%) shared the reward equally rather than taking the larger share. And, Typists no longer shifted their moral judgments in the self-interested direction.

    The researchers conclude that the "Pursuit of self-interest is tempered, however, by the constraints of coordination. People seek not only to benefit themselves but also to persuade other people that they are morally right in doing so."
    https://www.sciencedaily.com/release...1030163046.htm

  2. #2
    Senior Member Neophyte's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Last Online
    1 Day Ago @ 10:43 PM
    Ethnicity
    Scandinavian
    Subrace
    Nordic + some Atlantid
    Country
    Sweden Sweden
    Gender
    Age
    46
    Family
    Single adult
    Politics
    Blut und Boden
    Posts
    1,933
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    49
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    37
    Thanked in
    26 Posts
    All I see is some researcher who managed to repackage cognitive dissonance to get some research grants and a publication to his name.

    I guess that he finds that quite OK. Now.

  3. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Neophyte For This Useful Post:


  4. #3
    Anachronism "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member

    Huginn ok Muninn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ancestry
    Germany, Norway, England
    Subrace
    Nordeby
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    Texas Texas
    Gender
    Zodiac Sign
    Leo
    Family
    Single adult
    Politics
    Farther right than you.
    Posts
    2,967
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    498
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    633
    Thanked in
    300 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Neophyte View Post
    All I see is some researcher who managed to repackage cognitive dissonance to get some research grants and a publication to his name.

    I guess that he finds that quite OK. Now.
    Eager to prove his own theory, I guess.
    Most people think as they are trained to think, and most people make a majority.

  5. #4
    Munchkin
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member

    LillyCaterina's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Last Online
    @
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    English/Irish/French
    Ancestry
    England/Ireland/France
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    Indiana Indiana
    Gender
    Zodiac Sign
    Gemini
    Family
    Married
    Occupation
    Deli Shift Leader/Manager
    Politics
    Centrist
    Religion
    Christian
    Posts
    538
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,402
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    797
    Thanked in
    426 Posts
    Self-interest is not necessarily a bad thing as long as it doesn't involve hurting others. But I won't alter my morals to get ahead. And I have no respect for anyone who would.
    Not all in life is at it appears to be.

  6. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to LillyCaterina For This Useful Post:


  7. #5
    Senior Member Meister's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Last Online
    4 Hours Ago @ 11:27 PM
    Status
    Prolonged Absence
    Ethnicity
    German
    Subrace
    Don't know
    Country
    Australia Australia
    Gender
    Posts
    660
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    34
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    42
    Thanked in
    24 Posts
    This is what I have always thought about Hollyweird. If those actors thought it would benefit them they would support baby seal clubbing if told to.
    I grew up on a belief of honour, courage and the old world values. The world isn't about that anymore, preferring to die a slow death of fast food and cheap thrills.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Meister For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. Gallup: 81% Don’t Think Americans Have Good Moral Values
    By Chlodovech in forum The United States
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: Friday, June 14th, 2019, 12:19 PM
  2. Replies: 2
    Last Post: Thursday, December 1st, 2016, 12:14 AM
  3. Puritan Values or MBA Values?
    By Nachtengel in forum Protestantism
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: Tuesday, May 4th, 2010, 12:46 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •