Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: So sad: Trans people could 'face rape charges' if they don’t declare sexual history, warns trans activist

  1. #1
    Sees all, knows all Chlodovech's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    5 Days Ago @ 07:14 AM
    Ethnicity
    Flemish
    Ancestry
    Frankish
    Country
    Holy Roman Empire Holy Roman Empire
    Gender
    Politics
    Völkisch traditionalist
    Religion
    Catholic
    Posts
    3,167
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,477
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,552
    Thanked in
    1,109 Posts

    So sad: Trans people could 'face rape charges' if they don’t declare sexual history, warns trans activist

    'By forcing transgender people to disclose their history to prospective partners the law is not only infringing their human rights it’s also reinforcing the bigoted idea that trans people are in some way abhorrent'



    Source: Independent

    A transgender activist has highlighted the issue of gender identity in legal sexual consent, warning that trans people in the UK may face rape charges and potentially jail if they fail to disclose their gender history to their sexual partners.

    Sophie Cook, a LGBT speaker, trans activist and the first transgender newscaster to appear on European terrestrial TV, says that under UK law, deceiving someone about the nature of a sex act makes them incapable of informed consent.

    This means penetrative sex may amount to rape if the partner claimed they were unaware of a transgender person’s history.

    Under Section 2 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 it is an offence if a defendant intentionally penetrates the vagina or anus of a person, where the other person does not consent and where the defendant does not reasonably believe the other person consents.

    Section 74 of the act gives the definition of consent: “A person consents for the purposes of this Act if he agrees by choice and has the freedom and capacity to make that choice.”

    Non-disclosure of gender history can thus be seen as deception and a breach of the Sexual Offences act, challenging the “freedom and capacity” of a partner to consent to sexual activity.

    Ms Cook says: “Transgender people are entitled to a private life and the personal choice as to how much of their history they disclose, to the extent that our personal details are locked by HM Revenue & Customs.

    “By forcing transgender people to disclose their history to prospective partners the law is not only infringing their human rights it’s also reinforcing the bigoted idea that trans people are in some way abhorrent and something that people need to be warned about.”

    The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) says it will not automatically prosecute trans people for having sex by deception and each case is treated separately. CPS also has guidelines surrounding transgender equality.

    This has been disputed by LGBT activists who argue ambiguity in the system leaves it open to abuse and personal prejudice.

    Pervious cases in the public eye have highlighted these ambiguities.

    In November 2015, lawyers for Gayle Newland, the young woman jailed for eight years for duping a female lover into thinking she was a man to embark on a sexual relationship, lodged an appeal against her sentence.

    Legal experts warned at the time that the severity of the jail term created a “dangerous precedent” for transgendered people, pointing out that Newland’s sexual assault jail term was tougher than some given to people convicted of manslaughter or child rape.

    Speaking in a recent Transjustice conference in London aimed at creating strategies for addressing urgent issues faced by trans and gender non-conforming people in the criminal justice system, Ms Cook reinforced the issue saying: “At what point should the disclosure be made? As you’re snuggling up in bed? And run the risk of a transphobic assault and potentially worse… Or maybe trans people could be made to wear a handy badge on their clothing identifying their history.

    “If trans people have to disclose this why shouldn’t everyone?

    “Surely a racist could complain to a judge that he felt used after realising that the woman he slept with had previously had a black partner, or the homophobe object when discovering that his girlfriend had ‘experimented’ with other women at Uni.”
    "If we were going to stand in darkness, best we stand in a darkness we had made ourselves.” ― Douglas Coupland, Shampoo Planet

  2. #2
    Funding Member
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member

    Ţoreiđar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Online
    39 Minutes Ago @ 05:31 PM
    Ethnicity
    Scandinavian
    Ancestry
    East Norwegian + distant Finnish
    Subrace
    Nordid + reduced CM
    Y-DNA
    I1a1
    Country
    Norway Norway
    Location
    Sweden
    Gender
    Age
    29
    Occupation
    Traditional Craftsman
    Politics
    Family, Nation & Nature
    Religion
    Heathen Worldview
    Posts
    2,295
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,145
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,300
    Thanked in
    635 Posts
    “If trans people have to disclose this why shouldn’t everyone?

    “Surely a racist could complain to a judge that he felt used after realising that the woman he slept with had previously had a black partner, or the homophobe object when discovering that his girlfriend had ‘experimented’ with other women at Uni.”
    I like the sound of that.
    A nation is an organic thing, historically defined.
    A wave of passionate energy which unites past, present and future generations

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: Monday, December 17th, 2018, 12:17 PM
  2. EU: Brussels Warns Of Trans-Atlantic Rift Over Airline Passenger Data
    By Phlegethon in forum Articles & Current Affairs
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: Friday, September 5th, 2003, 01:52 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •