Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14

Thread: Globalism

  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Last Online
    1 Hour Ago @ 10:23 PM
    Ethnicity
    Celto-Germanic
    Ancestry
    Irish, Scottish
    Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    Location
    North Ireland
    Gender
    Family
    Married
    Politics
    National Socialist
    Religion
    Ethnic Catholic
    Posts
    1,306
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,476
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,577
    Thanked in
    851 Posts

    EU Parliament Rubber Stamps Arch-Globalist Lagarde as New Head of Central Bank


    Christine Lagarde, the globalist lawyer who ran the International Monetary Fund (IMF) until last week has had her appointment to the top of the European Central Bank (ECB) rubber-stamped by the European Union’s powerless Parliament.




    Nominated by the European Commission to lead the central bank of the 19 EU nations that share the Euro single currency earlier this year, Lagarde stands to take over the role on November 1st.


    The vote Tuesday by the European Parliament is one of the steps towards that confirmation but is no more than a rubber-stamping exercise. Europe’s Parliament, elected and convened to provide the continental power-bloc with a fig-leaf of democracy, can’t actually reject the selection and merely votes to endorse the choice.


    As happened in 2012, if the Parliament does vote to reject a candidate the European Council can merely appoint the individual anyway. In the end, the vote was 394 in favour and 206 against, with 49 abstentions.


    Lagarde, who wasfound guiltyof criminal negligence in 2016 over her behaviour while French finance minister which the court found allowed misappropriation of government funds, has been a persistent and powerful supporter of globalisation and an opponent of national sovereignty.


    In 2016, Lagarde made an intervention in the Brexit debate just days before the British people went to the polls and ultimately delivered the largest democratic mandate in British history to leave the European Union, when she characterised the British as being narrow-minded. In interventions that Brexit campaigners said were deliberate interventions on the democratic process, the IMF which Lagarde led warned voting for Brexit would cause a recession, cost half a million jobs, reduce GDP, and collapse house prices.


    The British government, too, predicted dire economic results if the country even voted to leave the European Union in a persistent campaign against independence then known as ‘project fear’. In stark contrast to the claims, the British economy has actually outperformed other leading European economies since the vote.


    Lagarde has also been an unfailing ally to the mass migration lobby in her time at the IMF, even going so far to lecture the Spanish government on the importance of opening its borders to migrants to help balance the books. The advice to take millions of migrants was despite Spain already experiencing one-third youth unemployment, and the experience across Europe in the wake of the 2015 migrant crisis being of new arrivals being significantly less productive.





    Lagarde, like von der Leyen, are the protagonists of new hyper-neo-feudal absolutism of global dictatorship of the
    very few. Against all of us.

    Aesop : Greek 620 BC - 560 BC
    "We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to high office."
    "Better to starve free than be a fat slave."



    EU Parliament Rubber Stamps Arch-Globalist Lagarde as New Head of Central Bank17 IX 2019.



    The politburo or political bureau is the executive committee for communist parties like in the former USSR. Members were appointed like the in the European or EUssr ruling parliamentary commission and council.

  2. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Last Online
    1 Hour Ago @ 10:23 PM
    Ethnicity
    Celto-Germanic
    Ancestry
    Irish, Scottish
    Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    Location
    North Ireland
    Gender
    Family
    Married
    Politics
    National Socialist
    Religion
    Ethnic Catholic
    Posts
    1,306
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,476
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,577
    Thanked in
    851 Posts

    The only candidate wins! EU lawmakers pick Christine Lagarde to head European Central Bank.


    Former IMF chief Christine Lagarde is set to become the first female president of the European Central Bank. The European Parliament chose her with no other contender for the job.



    Lagarde won a comfortable majority of 394 votes, while 206 European legislators voted against her and 49 abstained during the parliament’s plenary meeting in Strasbourg on Tuesday.

    However, not everyone was happy with her nomination. Some MEPs sarcastically pointed out that the outcome was not surprising as there were no other contenders to vote for. Others noted that Lagarde did not even bother going to the meeting.

    Notably, the European Parliament gives only a non-binding opinion on whether or not a person is suitable to fill the role. However, her appointment looks set to be formalized by EU leaders at October’s European Council summit, shortly before the current ECB chair Mario Draghi resigns.

    If approved, her eight-year term as the head of one of the world’s most powerful financial institutions will start on November 1.

    Lagarde, a former lawyer, was the first woman to serve as a finance minister from G7 countries and then the first to head the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in 2011. She resigned from the IMF earlier this year to get nominated for the top job at the ECB.




    R T: The only candidate wins! EU lawmakers pick Christine Lagarde to head European Central Bank 18 IX 2019.


    Fixed!

    I’m just one of the boys or is it girls.

    Will our 'fake news' MSM examine or critize this?

  3. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Last Online
    1 Hour Ago @ 10:23 PM
    Ethnicity
    Celto-Germanic
    Ancestry
    Irish, Scottish
    Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    Location
    North Ireland
    Gender
    Family
    Married
    Politics
    National Socialist
    Religion
    Ethnic Catholic
    Posts
    1,306
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,476
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,577
    Thanked in
    851 Posts

    Zionists call for world dictatorship by rabbis


    Faced with a loss of control over the Western world’s financial system and thus a loss of power, the Elders of Zion are publicly calling for a theocracy and death for those who disobey it.
    Of course, nobody but a few fanatics is paying attention to them. Instead, the Jews are about to be liberated from thousands of years of slavery. This may be hard to digest for non-religious, rational people, but it is what the objective, real-world facts show.


    Last week, the Sanhedrin, a group claiming to have a divine right to rule humanity, called for “a Bible-based international organization to replace the United Nations.” This would be composed of a group of 70 nations which obey the Elders of Zion. To inaugurate this, they are building the altar of the Third Temple and planning to make animal sacrifices on it. They also call for Noahide Laws to be applied to all of humanity.
    https://www.breakingisraelnews.com/117830/70-nations-hanukkah-altar-third-temple/



    As Pastor Chuck Baldwin and others point out, “Noahide Law calls for the death of anyone practicing idolatry (defined as any type of worship other than Talmudic worship).” Furthermore, he warns, they are calling for “the establishment of an international court based in Jerusalem that ultimately would be given the power to execute (via decapitation) anyone who commits ‘blasphemy.’”
    https://chuckbaldwinlive.com/Articles/tabid/109/ID/3929/Noahide-Law-Not-Sharia-Law-Is-The-Threat.aspx


    To make this perfectly clear, they are calling for the execution of Hindus, Buddhists, Christians, Muslims, etc. unless they submit to the Elders of Zion. These are the people behind the thwarted plot to kill 90% of humanity.


    The so-called God these people claim to obey, as written in the Catholic Bible, says, among other things, that anyone other than Moses or Aaron who tries to look at God will be “stoned or shot by arrow.” Exodus 19:13
    https://www.catholic.org/bible/book.php?id=2&bible_chapter=19


    Their God also asks for human sacrifice:
    “You will give me the first-born of your children.” Exodus 22:28
    https://www.catholic.org/bible/book.php?id=2&bible_chapter=22


    Furthermore, “God” asks for:
    “gold, silver and bronze; materials dyed violet-purple, red-purple and crimson, fine linen, goats’ hair; rams’ skins dyed red, fine leather, acacia wood; oil for the light, spices for the anointing oil and fragrant incense; cornelian and other stones to be set in the ephod and breastplate.” Exodus 25:3-7
    https://www.catholic.org/bible/book.php?id=2&bible_chapter=25


    Okay, so we have a so-called “God” that threatens to kill people with stones or arrows, asks for human sacrifice, and demands gifts such as gold and “rams’ skins dyed red.” I’m sorry, but I would think the almighty Creator of the Universe would at least use lightning bolts to kill people and could conjure up as much gold as he/she/it wanted.



    A rational, scientific explanation leads us to conclude we are dealing with a group of sophisticated human slavers hiding behind a “God” image, and not the Creator of the Universe.


    Anyway, after this request for treasure, the so-called “God” went about killing Jewish leader after Jewish leader until a blindly obedient group appeared. Their descendants are the Sanhedrin, who claim and can recite an unbroken lineage going back to the time of Moses. In other words, these people have been helping enslave the Jews for thousands of years. Now, behind the nice words, they are trying to enslave the rest of humanity and promising to kill those who do not obey them.


    Having been brought up as an atheist, I was completely non-plussed when Japanese military intelligence told me the group that invited me to join them in a plan to kill 90% of humanity (I have it on tape) was “the Elders of Zion.” To avoid implicating ordinary Jews, etc., I have, for the sake of simplicity, been calling this secret group of human slavers “the satanists.”


    The horrible thing about all this is that they very nearly succeeded. It was only the Pentagon and the Asians, working together, who managed to stop this horrific plan.


    So now let’s look at why recent world events would lead these Sanhedrin slavers and their ilk to think the world might be ending. Let’s start with the events in the U.S. Here, Pentagon sources explain, “the September 30th, 2019 fiscal year end (today) coincides with the expiration of the central bank …




    Zionists call for world dictatorship by rabbis, but face defeat instead30 IX 2019.


  4. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Last Online
    1 Hour Ago @ 10:23 PM
    Ethnicity
    Celto-Germanic
    Ancestry
    Irish, Scottish
    Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    Location
    North Ireland
    Gender
    Family
    Married
    Politics
    National Socialist
    Religion
    Ethnic Catholic
    Posts
    1,306
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,476
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,577
    Thanked in
    851 Posts

    How the Merkel Government Makes up Its Statistics


    In reality, German government debt levels have been going up during Merkel’s 12-year reign – and this despite a booming economy.

    October 3, 2018


    Since the founding of the Federal Republic in 1949, the German government always used to be known for sound accounting, especially when it came to public finance.


    No longer. A closer look at the finances of the German government reveals that it is not true that the government is reducing its debt level. The official debt/GDP ratio may be improving but, properly calculated, the debt level is actually going up.


    The German government uses fiscal accounting. This means you purely look at revenues and expenditures of a specific year and the resulting difference ends up yielding a budget surplus or a deficit.


    Companies do it differently — and properly. They have also to consider future liabilities, like pension payments. Each additional promise for future payments needs to be accrued on the balance sheet and leads to a higher future liability.


    Real world parallels


    In the real world, the same holds true for government promises, like future payments for health care and pensions. Whenever a government changes the law that result in future payment obligations, like setting a lower retirement age and/or promising higher pensions, this increases the future liabilities and therefore the overall debt level of a government.


    Not so in the surreal world of politics. The reason is simple: If the German state were to use proper accounting methods, one would immediately see that such a promise made would increase the public debt level significantly.


    Contrary to her image of reliability and circumspection, during the reign of Angela Merkel the debt level of the Federal Republic increased by 12% of GDP in 2016 alone, due to higher pension payments and a lowered retirement age.


    The consequences are no secret. In a report, the German finance ministry highlights these burdens and calculates that, in order to prevent future tax increases, it would be necessary to put aside between 1.2% and 3.8% of GPD per year already today. This equals between 36 and 115 billion euros.


    Doubly stupid


    The German government pursues a strange policy indeed. On the one hand, it is not investing in the country, therefore undermining the future ability to generate income and wealth and forcing German savings abroad, fostering unsustainable trade surpluses. On the other hand, it is increasing the hidden liabilities, which will become an unmanageable burden in the future.


    The current government, consisting of a (shrunk) grand coalition of Merkel’s CDU/CSU and the Social Democrats (SPD), continues moving in the same direction at full speed. Investments will be reduced even more while pension levels will be guaranteed for a longer time. In 2045, this decision alone is estimated to lead to higher expenses of 100 billion euros per year.


    The total level of unfunded liabilities is estimated to be in the range of 3,500 billion Euro. Of these, at least 1,000 billion are the result of the policies implemented by the governments of Angela Merkel in the last 12 years.


    Failed migration policy


    One way out of the conundrum Germany faces — high pensions and social welfare spending in a society that is aging and shrinking as rapidly – would be to attract migrants. While there is broad political consensus on that goal, what is forgotten by most is that migration only ends up being a net positive for society if immigrants are as productive as the existing population. Work force participation and average income need to be on the same level.


    Here comes the rub. Already before the migrant crisis of 2015, German immigration policy going back to the 1960s fell well short of that goal. We now have decades worth of reliable economic statistics that most migrants from Muslim countries – a very large part of the German migrant population — have a significantly higher risk of being poor and of receiving social welfare.


    Workforce participation and average income are thus significantly lower than in the existing population. In future, there is no improvement in sight. Quite the opposite. A main reason for the recent migration wave lies in the fact that many migrants are attracted by Germany’s generous social welfare levels.


    Better qualified and better educated migrants much prefer the United States, Canada and Australia. They find these English-speaking destinations more attractive not just because of having no language problem, but also because of their much lower levels of taxes and social contributions.


    Thus, instead of smartly operating in the migration sector — securing the funding of the welfare state for existing citizens of Germany — the kind of immigration Germany embraces actually leads to a higher financial burden and further increases the hidden liabilities of the German government.


    The idealists look away


    That is a fiscal reality that none of the idealists so keen on open immigration care to understand or be concerned about. Curiously, they do not even notice the inconsistency between their adamant warning cries about old-age poverty and the migration policies they favor.


    Wherever one stands on the policy issue itself, the facts remain the facts. The uncontrolled migration wave due to the open border policies of Angela Merkel has increased the problem. Migrants from Muslim countries have a lower work force participation and on average significantly lower incomes than all other migrant groups and Germany’s population.


    The future costs resulting from the migration wave of 2015 alone are estimated to be in the range of 900 billion Euro. If the children of these migrants fail to integrate into the labour market – which, given past experience, is highly likely – the total costs can easily reach 1,500 billion euros, according to actuarial studies by Professor Raffelhüschen at the University of Freiburg.



    The list is long


    Compared with these numbers, the other financial burdens created by the governments of Angela Merkel – notable though they are – almost pale. Germany’s famed, but failed “Energiewende,, exiting nuclear power and embarking on an unplanned and poorly organized shift towards renewable energy, will cost German consumers at least 500 billion euros. Germans already have to contend with the highest prices for power in Europe, double the level of France.


    The failure to address the root causes of the eurozone crisis – which I have discussed several times in The Globalist (here and here) — will also lead to additional burdens for Germany. It is fair to assume that the unwillingness of Angela Merkel to deal with excessive debt burdens and diverging competitiveness will cost Germany – in which form remains to be seen – at least 1,000 billion euros over the coming years.


    Economic disaster


    Trying to assess the total economic damage done by Angela Merkel and her governments over the past 12 years leads to a disturbing calculation. The total costs of the policy decisions made under her tutelage amount to between 3,700 billion and 4,700 billion euros.


    That is why speaking of Germany as a “rich country” is a travesty. Germany’s politicians in the Age of Merkel have focused on spending the previously accumulated riches, instead of doing the prudent stuff, i.e., investing to secure future incomes and welfare.


    Once this becomes more mainstream knowledge, one can count on significant political turbulence. Nobody likes waking up from their dream of being a rich country. Somehow people are starting to recognize what has gone wrong over the last years as can be seen in the polls.


    Coming from over 40% of the national vote, Angela Merkel’s CDU-CSU currently polls at 28%. Meanwhile, her partner in government, the Social Democrats, are firmly on track to political irrelevance, currently polling at around 17% nationally.


    Meanwhile, the Alternative for Germany (AfD) – with its policy mix of anti-migration and socialist redistribution — is gaining broad acceptance. Unfortunately, this will not make things any better.


    Conclusion


    Germany is a poor country and we are soon to find out. No pleasant outlook and a disastrous result of Angela Merkel’s policies.



    The Globalist: How the Merkel Government Makes up Its Statistics - The ... 22 X 2019.






    Germany and the other EU nations are countries ‘occupied’ and managed by the jewish Rothschild bankers. Merkel and Macron are just Rothschild Satrap appointees. Musical chairs, rigged and managed elections go a long way in hiding this.


    For Germans today's Germany is a concentration camp run by Globalist satrap Merkel with the aim of replacing the German people with 3rd World immigrants and their issue.




    Satrap - Wikipedia

    The satrap was in charge of the land that he owned as an administrator, and found himself surrounded by an all-but-royal court; he collected the taxes, controlled the local officials and the subject tribes and cities, and was the supreme judge of the province before whose "chair" (Nehemiah 3:7) every civil and criminal case could be brought.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to jagdmesser For This Useful Post:


Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Nationalism Versus Globalism
    By Caledonian in forum Political Theory
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Sunday, November 21st, 2010, 07:42 AM
  2. A Question on Globalism
    By rainman in forum Strategic Intelligence
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Saturday, March 21st, 2009, 02:00 AM
  3. The Trouble with Globalism
    By Vojvoda in forum Political Theory
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: Sunday, March 28th, 2004, 10:52 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •