Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: We Can’t Trust Conservatives

  1. #1
    Funding Member
    „Friend of Germanics”
    Funding Membership Inactive
    Nachtengel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last Online
    Saturday, April 17th, 2021 @ 11:09 PM
    Ethnicity
    German
    Gender
    Posts
    6,432
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    201
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,238
    Thanked in
    727 Posts

    We Can’t Trust Conservatives

    The center-right government of Austria persecutes Identitarians. The center-Right government of Poland bans Identitarians.

    Both governments are seen by many Identitarians as models for nationalist governance, Poland in particular. Yet the recent actions of these governments cast doubt on that impression.

    The German-speaking offshoot of Generation Identitaire, Identitarian Movement (IB), has recently become public enemy number one. After it was revealed IB had received a donation from the Christchurch shooter, the group was hit with a terrorism investigation, and leaders’ houses were raided. That investigation is led by Left-wing prosecutors in Graz, but conservatives in power are doing little to halt this miscarriage of justice.

    Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz has said the government may ban IB over this one donation. “Our position is very clear,” Kurz said last month. “No form of extremism must be allowed to have a place in our society, whether it be radical Islamists or rightwing fanatics.”

    His opinion was echoed by his nationalist vice chancellor, Heinz-Christian Strache. “Any connection to the brutish murders in Christchurch has to be ruthlessly cleared up,” the Freedom Party leader stated. He added, “The Freedom party has nothing to do with the Identitarians.”

    In 2016, Strache had defended identitarians as “young activists from a non-leftwing civil society.” Now he and his party want them excised from Austrian society. Strache blocked Identitarian leader Martin Sellner on Twitter and continues to condemn the patriotic movement. Sadly, most of his party has followed his lead.

    The Upper Austrian state government voted to will bar anyone associated with IB from state employment. Both conservatives and nationalists voted in favor of the measure to punish anyone who may have ever liked an IB post.

    FPO Defense Minister Mario Kunasek announced last week his department would reinstate its prohibition on Identitarians serving in the military. Kunasek’s defense ministry had previously loosened this prohibition.

    FPO Transportation Minister Norbert Hofer, who nearly became president in 2017, says the Identitarians need to be isolated from polite society and declared he would never have a beer with Sellner.

    It’s odd that a party which pursues and champions Identitarian policies would seek to ban actual Identitiarians from the government and society.

    Austrian Interior Minister Herbert Kickl is a notable exception to FPO cucking. Kickl argued there is no direct link between the identitarians and the Christchurch shooter. He himself is currently fire for speaking at an Identitarian event in 2016, where he said they are “like-minded people.” That act prompted Kurz to strip Kickl of his oversight of Austria’s intelligence services. “Far-Right extremism has no place in any political party,” Kurz declared last week. “Any sort of involvement with the Identitarians must stop. Looking away is not an option.”

    The FPO used to stand up for the Identitarians. When IB was prosecuted as a “criminal organization,” FPO leaders condemned the prosecution as ridiculous. “The activities of the Identitarians seem very similar to those of organizations like Greenpeace. If that standard is to be maintained, then most likely many organizations would have to be criminally charged, and democracy cannot endure that,” FPO justice spokesman Harald Stefan said last May.

    But the one donation has seemingly changed the FPO’s stance. Identitarians are now dangerous extremists in the party’s eyes. This virtue signaling is done to placate Kurz and his party, which makes the FPO appear as the weaker party.

    The conservatives and supposed nationalists of the FPO attack the Identitiarians to bolster their anti-extremism credentials. It’s similar to the ruling Law and Justice Party’s strategy in Based Poland.

    American Renaissance founder Jared Taylor was banned from Europe at Poland’s request last month. This request may have been made over talks Mr. Taylor delivered in Poland earlier this year. He had spoken in Poland last September without incident, but his talks in February drew the scrutiny of Polish police. Authorities told the organizer of the February event that that the gentlemanly race realist spreads “a totalitarian ideology” and the organizer would be held responsible for Taylor’s scary speech.

    The group had to change venues for both talks to avoid police harassment. Taylor left Poland without any problems. His return to Europe in late March–to speak at the Scandza Forum in Sweden–was blocked in Zurich. There he was informed he has a three-year ban from the Schengen area thanks to Poland and was deported back to America.

    Right-wing Swedish activist Jonas Nilsson was banned from Poland in 2018. Richard Spencer was banned from the Schengen area by Poland in 2017. The Polish foreign ministry claimed Spencer’s views “pose a threat to all those who hold dear the values of human rights and democracy” and “are in conflict with the legal order” of Poland.

    Conservative foreign minister Witold Waszczykowski stated that Spencer “should not appear publicly, and especially not in Poland.” Waszczykowski has fully supported Poland’s resistance against migrant acceptance and once said “no state has the duty to accept immigrants.”

    His party, the Law and Justice Party (PiS), has a complicated relationship with its own nationalists. PiS appeals to the “far-Right” when it comes election time but always makes a point to condemn their extremism.

    PiS’s relationship with the nationalists’ famed Independence Day rally illustrates this tension. International media whined that the 2017 rally featured signs that warned of white genocide and expressed racial pride. PiS leaders were quick to condemn these expressions while delivering qualified praise of the rally.

    Waszczykowski condemned the “reprehensible” incidents at the rally he said encouraged “patriotic behavior.” PiS’s powerful chieftain Jaroslaw Kaczynski called these ethno-nationalist sentiments “disgraceful rubbish” and alien to Polish tradition.

    Yet, PiS still supports the nationalist-led Independence day rally. Last year, the party was instrumental in overturning Warsaw’s ban on the march. PiS parliamentary caucus deputy chief Tadeusz Cymanski explained to Reuters his party’s strategy on nationalists. According to Cymanski, the party wishes these Right-wing groups would not have representation in parliament and views them with contempt. However, the party realizes nationalists represent a vital constituency and they must be appealed to.

    “It is in the interest of democracy, in the interest of our state that extreme groups, either left or right-wing, have no representation in parliament,” Cymanski told Reuters in 2018. “Any association [of nationalist groups with PiS] is painful and unpleasant, I reject it with shame, but I think it would be better even if I, or my faction, were associated with them rather than these forces were to gain in force.”

    The National Radical Camp (ONR) has no parliamentary representation in spite of its large rallies and substantial influence. This is due largely to PiS’s tough stance on immigration and implicit defense of Polish homogeneity. ONR’s leaders admit the ruling party has copied their rhetoric and they seem pleased by it.

    Unlike in Austria, Polish conservatives don’t want to ban or suppress their own nationalists. They merely want them out of power, contained and not expressing rhetoric that embarrasses Poland in the eyes of globalists. At the same time, PiS does not want foreign Identitarians and nationalists to visit and speak in their country.

    Poland’s migration policy is commendable but its government is not the ideal some nationalists think it is. Poland is still heavily dependent on the European Union and America and maintains a careful balancing act to retain that support. This balancing act apparently requires condemnation of nationalist rhetoric and the banning of identitarians.

    A more extreme example of the “suppress nationalists/adopt nationalist rhetoric” is seen in Vladimir Putin’s Russia. Putin has sent numerous nationalists to jail and banned multiple groups while proclaiming himself a nationalist. Nationalists have been imprisoned for such offenses as carrying banners that read, “Russian power in Russia.” That apparently counts as spreading “extremism” in Russia. In the 2000s, Putin suppressed the ethno-nationalist Rodina party because it incited “racial hatred.” The real reason for the suppression was Rodina’s threat to Putin’s United Russia Party.

    While Putin’s government harasses nationalists and jails them, it still relies on them to support the regime. Nationalist groups were instrumental to the organization of rallies for Russia’s National Unity Day and provided many of the fighters for the war in Donbass. However, those groups that organized the National Unity Day–the Movement Against Illegal Immigration and Slavic Union–are both currently banned and their leaders in jail or in exile.

    Putin has created or subverted several nationalist groups to act as controlled opposition and reaffirm his power. This includes the Liberal Democratic Party, which is the third largest party in Russia. Those that don’t fall in line suffer the fate of the Slavic Union.

    Other Eastern European conservatives with power have a similar relationship with their Right-wing opponents. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban’s government has taken suppresionary actions against the nationalist Jobbik party while adopting many of its policies. In some ways, Orban’s Fidesz has moved to the Right of Jobbik. Ukraine’s conservative government faces mounting pressure to suppress their ultranationalists, even though these patriots have led the fight against Russian separatists.

    Nationalists in Western Europe face ostracism from their center-Right countrymen. Conservative candidate Francois Fillon endorsed Emmanuel Macron in the 2017 French presidential election following his elimination. Even though he had copied much of the rhetoric and policies of Marine Le Pen, he could not endorse her. “The National Front, the party created by Jean-Marie Le Pen, has a history known for its violence, its intolerance. Its economic and social program would lead France to bankruptcy and, to that chaos, you would have to add the European chaos of exiting from the euro,” Fillon said. “I assure you: Extremism can bring only misery and division to France. So, there is no option but to vote against the extreme Right I will, therefore, vote for Emmanuel Macron.”

    Popular nationalist parties like the Sweden Democrats, Alternative for Germany, and Vlaams Belang are explicitly kept out of center-Right coalitions. Besides the FPO, the only nationalist parties to join in government coalitions are the Danish People’s Party and Italy’s Lega. Lega’s coalition partners are not conservatives but the populist Five Star Movement. Arguably, the Italian nationalists have been the most successful in exploiting their situation and has implemented solid immigration and cultural policies. Lega has also not been forced to disavow or persecute fellow nationalists.

    A few folks on the Dissident Right look to the Italian coalition as a model for other nationalists. Instead of the center-Right, they say we should ally with Left-wing populists. However, Italy is a unique situation that cannot be replicated in other countries. The Five Star Movement is amorphous and based primarily on outrage against corrupt elites. It isn’t really ideological, which allows it to work with national populists. The same can be said for the Yellow Vests in France. But all other westerns Leftists see nationalists as a greater enemy than the establishment and would never work with us.

    Whether nationalists make coalitions with center-Right cucks or amorphous populists, they should see the Freedom Party as a warning. When you let yourself be dominated by your coalition partner, you end up sacrificing your own.

    Austria and Poland are both advancing in a positive direction, but neither government is going to be the West’s savior. Identitarians still need to build our own institutions, advance our own ideas, and enact our own agenda. We cannot trust conservatives, no matter how sympathetic they may seem, to conserve our civilization.
    https://www.counter-currents.com/201...conservatives/

  2. #2
    6th army lives matter
    Chlodovech's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Flemish
    Ancestry
    Frankish
    Country
    Holy Roman Empire Holy Roman Empire
    Gender
    Religion
    Catholic
    Posts
    3,794
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,199
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3,269
    Thanked in
    1,511 Posts
    Never punch to the right, which is what Poland and Austria are doing. In that case you're doing the work of the left - and afterwards the left will still come after you. But center right parties aren't even conservative in the West, they're at best somewhat rightwing liberals - and they never learn nor understand simple things like how demographics decide elections.
    “War is waged by men; not by beasts, or by gods. It is a peculiarly human activity. To call it a crime against mankind is to miss at least half its significance; it is also the punishment of a crime.” - Frederic Manning, The Middle Parts of Fortune

  3. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Chlodovech For This Useful Post:


  4. #3
    Senior Member
    Astragoth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Last Online
    1 Hour Ago @ 02:47 AM
    Ethnicity
    Anglo-American
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    New York New York
    Gender
    Posts
    1,087
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,123
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,105
    Thanked in
    608 Posts
    A National Socialist cares about his race. A conservative cares about his money. Its one of the best lines from George Lincoln Rockwell and it's very true. Conservatives are useless. Worse than useless.
    In the USA they are in full support of open borders so corporations can have cheap labor.

  5. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Astragoth For This Useful Post:


  6. #4
    Senior Member
    schwab's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Last Online
    1 Week Ago @ 04:18 PM
    Status
    Prolonged Absence
    Ethnicity
    Alsatian/Suevi
    Ancestry
    germanic/alsatian/Elsaesser
    Subrace
    Child of Creator God
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    Oregon Oregon
    Gender
    Family
    Married
    Occupation
    retired - Aerospace Quality Engi
    Politics
    independent
    Religion
    Born again Christian,
    Posts
    843
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    771
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,032
    Thanked in
    504 Posts
    Where is that huge tax break for the middle class?

  7. #5
    Senior Member
    Uwe Jens Lornsen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Last Online
    Monday, November 9th, 2020 @ 09:45 AM
    Status
    Prolonged Absence
    Ethnicity
    German
    Ancestry
    Jutland
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Country
    Germany Germany
    State
    Schleswig-Holstein Schleswig-Holstein
    Gender
    Age
    50
    Zodiac Sign
    Taurus
    Family
    Widowed
    Politics
    cons. old fashion worker class
    Religion
    Philosophical Archaic Christian
    Posts
    1,057
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    564
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    330
    Thanked in
    272 Posts
    Never voted Conservatives , except once on basic local town mayor election ,
    since the only other candidate had been Social Democrats , and I had been still disgruntled about former chancellor Gerhard Schröder .

    This shows , that overall federal politics also have influence down to basic local elections .

    For the Conservatives , I agree , that they have though some diverse wings inside their party , they mainly are opportunists , and care about their money .

    The predudice , fueled by the Conservatives , that the Socialists would be unable to handle money , is unfortunately based upon personal greed ;
    that would mean , that their understanding of fundamental economics is no
    "society" or "commune" or "common wealth" , but in their view , economics
    run well , when the single person is able to accumulate wealth , and the
    "conservative" part about is , to keep accumulating wealth , though the personal greed wants to "preserve" the conditions , even on the cost of local ressources , like nature as wood and fish for example being "neighbour's" wealth , not the "own" wealth .

    But they were successfull , indicating , that around 1/3 of the population really is of that mentallity , and the conservatives will be voted by many immigrants , since those immigrants are in Europe for opportunity and personal greed .
    Mk 10:18 What do you call me a good master, no-one is good .

    Gylfaginning 1.39 But on wine alone Odin in arms renowned Forever lives.

  8. #6
    Senior Member
    SaxonPagan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Last Online
    Wednesday, March 31st, 2021 @ 12:02 AM
    Ethnicity
    English
    Ancestry
    English, Anglo-Saxon
    Country
    England England
    Location
    South Coast
    Gender
    Zodiac Sign
    Aries
    Family
    Married
    Occupation
    Self Employed
    Politics
    Free Speech / Anti-EU
    Religion
    Pagan
    Posts
    5,039
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,590
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,678
    Thanked in
    1,443 Posts
    Having recently read some books pertaining to post-war Britain, I now realise that the Tories were never really a party that put national interests first.

    For many of them, their first loyalty was towards the Empire and upon its collapse they soon became committed (albeit less zealously than the Labour party) to a 'multicultural society'. There were numerous self-described 'progressives' within the Tory ranks and only a few true Nationalists and traditionalists - probably just about enough to give the party its 'right-wing' label (and thus maintain the charade of two opposing forces) but never enough to prevent the nation's demise. In the final analysis, most of them were merely economic conservatives trying to protect their own wealth.

  9. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to SaxonPagan For This Useful Post:


  10. #7
    Anachronism
    „Friend of Germanics”
    Funding Membership Inactive
    Huginn ok Muninn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ancestry
    Germany, Norway, England
    Subrace
    Nordeby
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    Texas Texas
    Gender
    Zodiac Sign
    Leo
    Family
    Single adult
    Politics
    Farther right than you.
    Posts
    3,172
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    851
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    998
    Thanked in
    504 Posts

    Some exchanges with American "conservatives"

    I had to preserve these posts, as they will likely go up in smoke...

    This is from a Gateway Pundit article entitled:

    INDOCTRINATION: George Soros To Pump A Billion Dollars Into Higher Education To Focus On Climate Change

    Elric 19 hours ago
    Oh, no! HELL, NO! Nobody should be allowed to dictate what is taught in our schools because they have money. That goes for the Chinese, the Arabs, and Nazi collaborator George Soros.

    Crusader Elric 14 hours ago
    This old trope again? Soros was serving only Soros at that time. If Hitler were in charge today, he would have removed Soros and his organization from this world at the earliest opportunity (and what have our politicians done? Nothing.) Soros is a communist subverter of all traditional values, and would not be tolerated by a far-right dictatorial regime.

    cletus Crusader 11 hours ago
    Nazis aren't "far right", they are squarely on the left end of the political spectrum. A government powerful enough to enforce fascism under a totalitarian regime is 100% leftist. Add in the socialist policies such as free cars (volkwagens) everyone was guaranteed, the state paid for healthcare, with the "right to a job" to go along with the hatred of capitalism and they're clearly leftist - probably far leftist. The American political right is about limited government and the rights and freedoms of the individual citizen in a free market, capitalist economy. This is diametrically opposed to what you claim is "far right"; it would have to be so far right that it looped around in a circle right back to where the left resides.

    Crusader cletus an hour ago
    Is that how you want these gois to think, "cletus?" (Sounds like someone is mocking rural southerners here...) You get to define "the right" as sitting back and doing nothing, while "activists" on the left are given a free hand to destroy our people and culture? Is that your plan? Do you really think everyone is enough of a simpleton to think of politics as a one-dimensional string with a left and a right on it? With "friends" like you, who needs enemies?

    The original meaning of "right" was the traditionalism represented by the throne and the altar. It had nothing to do with "free markets" or "limited government." The French Revolution and the Empire that followed pretty much proved that a strong central government would run roughshod over "limited government," freedom, and "independence." Ask any of the small counties or principalities of the Holy Roman Empire how they fared as Napoleon ground down their "independent" states piecemeal.

    It's a given these days that you MUST have a strong central government, or other strong central governments will destroy you. All that is left to decide is WHAT YOU STAND FOR. Are you all going to allow the anti-white communists to define everything for you, including that being on the "right" means doing nothing while they pulverize traditional society? What, are you stupid? I want to stand for my people, my culture, and the lands that are ours, and to pulverize the enemies within that are actively trying to destroy that. If we don't do that, we are not "conserving" anything at all.

    ----

    Peter789 Crusader 10 hours ago
    Whaaat? Hitler was a socialist. Soros would be his right-hand man. Top advisor.

    Crusader Peter789 2 hours ago
    Sure, why not? And the German Democratic Republic was both Democratic and a Republic. Make up all the bovine excrement you want to, but Hitler absolutely got rid of the communists within a year or two. Did it. Done. What have you "limited government" libertarian sit-on-your-asses done? Well, you defended the communists' FREEDOM to subvert and destroy our people and culture from within for decades. And here we are... your daughters are sex fodder for invading third-worlders and your sons are convinced they want to be castrated. You? You belong to an obsolete demographic cohort, boomer. Time to shut up and die.

    Oh yeah... "winning" with libertarianism.

    ----

    topjkl19 hours ago Soros spends a billion, Steyer spending 2 billion, Bloomberg spending 2 billion. Of course democrats don't like big money in politics

    Crusader topjkl14 hours ago So what is it that these communist billionaires have in common with each other? And with Jacob Schiff, who funded Trotsky? Hmm? Here's a hint... it doesn't end in "-ist."

    Athanacious1952 Crusader10 hours ago Don’t start with the antisemitism please. We have enough problems without igniting that monster.

    Crusader Athanacious195210 hours ago Oh, I was thinking that they all shared a hatred of European-descended people and our culture, but now that you mention it...

    See how they demonize other people for recognizing what they are doing? They are the ones with the power, but somehow the problem is when we notice they are subverting and destroying us. How many ethnic Russians and Ukrainians were murdered between 1917 and 1941? And simply for being who they were? You want that to happen again? It's an ethnic struggle, and always has been. And who tries to convince you it's not one?

    Carl Evans Crusader7 hours ago • edited He's right though. ANd me myself, I'm not a racist but can see his reasoning.

    Athanacious1952 Crusader10 hours ago I distinctly remember 5-10 million Ukrainian kulaks being murdered in the early 1930s by a little Georgian dictator who had been a russian Orthodox seminarian who got kicked out because of his demonic views. He didn’t have a drop of Jewish blood. Do you really want to go there?

    Crusader Athanacious19522 hours ago That doesn't sound like Kaganovich, the Bolshevik who thought it up and carried it out.


    [02-10, 17:07] Chlodovech: cats may have a reason for meowing too

    [02-10, 17:08] renownedwolf: same reason as the missus then.. give me stuff/affection..though she doesnt need me to let her out in the garden for a poo..

    [02-10, 17:09] Chlodovech: that's more than I can say of Thoreidar

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Huginn ok Muninn For This Useful Post:


  12. #8
    Senior Member Verđandi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Last Online
    Wednesday, September 12th, 2018 @ 02:42 PM
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Country
    Luxembourg Luxembourg
    Location
    Asgĺrd
    Gender
    Age
    37
    Family
    Two sisters
    Occupation
    Wyrd-weaver
    Posts
    7,200
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    540
    Thanked in
    356 Posts

    Conservatives Won’t Say It: The Problem Is ‘Systemic Anti-Whiteness’

    Ilana Mercer, American Renaissance, May 6, 2021

    Institutionalized, systemic anti-whiteness, yoked to white hot, hatred of whites:

    That is the creed that is fast becoming entrenched across state and civil society in the U.S.

    Chiseled down, these are also the building blocks of Critical Race Theory, a specious, sub-intelligent concoction, originated by subpar intellectuals.

    The Critical Race project now pervades private and political life.

    A further twist of the screw (or the shrew) was delivered recently by Vice President Kamala Harris, who insists on yammering about white America’s historic racism.

    In practice, whites are being singled out for a punishing, institutionalized program of reeducation, subjugation and continued intimidation.

    Dangerous in isolation, the entrenchment of anti-white animus is indisputable. It is made worse in combination with the conservative cognoscenti’s inability to come out with it. Too many conservatives euphemize our anti-white culture.

    In particular, they will typically deflect from any anti-white outrage du jour by dubbing it identity politics: “Boohoo. Democrats are dividing us via identity politics.” This is an obfuscation.

    Here’s why: Blacks are not being pitted against Hispanics. Hispanics are not being sicced on Asians, and Amerindians aren’t being urged to attack the groups just mentioned. Rather, they’re all piling on honky. Hence, anti-white politics or animus. The multicultural multitudes are gunning for whites and their putative privilege.

    The tarring of whites is now close to becoming a curricular requirement in education (primary, secondary, tertiary), and from entertainment to technology, anti-white racial “redress” is the all-important object of industry.

    When they are not lamenting Democrat-driven, divisive “identity politics”; conservatives will wax to you about Marxism and communism. The anti-white theoretical kudzu enervating every aspect of life is, apparently, just a manifestation of the radical Left’s Marxism. Or, so you are told. This further downplays the anti-white project of the purveyors of Critical Race policy prescriptions.

    Put it this way: If your first response to “Kill the Farmer, Kill the Boer,” chanted by South Africa’s murderous Julius Malema, is, “Marxism, identity politics” — you are going to come short in the survival department.

    Incitement To Kill In South Africa

    In South Africa, inciters of black-on-white violence are known to rile the crowds with this anti-white chant. Born into “freedom,” after 1994, these haters can hardly read and write. Is a complex political theory, Marxism, then driving illiterates to slaughter whites in ways that beggar belief?

    This is made-in-America suicidal nonsense on stilts!

    American “analysts” have coated the sustained ethnocidal attacks ongoing against white South Africans with this more respectable intellectual patina.

    The South African National Congress’s problem, however, is not communism; it’s white-hot hatred of whites.

    This is not to say that endemic corruption, statism and state-capture by industry are not economic realities in South Africa. They are.

    The definition of “state-capture” is “private actors subverting the state to steal public money.” In the U.S., private actors, Deep Tech, acting with state imprimatur, encroach on the rights of innocent civilians to make a living and partake in the national conversation. Potatoes, potahtoes.

    In truth, the ANC guards the goose that lays the golden eggs. South Africa’s economy is not socialized, but is, rather, “based on private enterprise, [in which] the state participates” energetically. The economies of the West are at best Third-Way systems, too, neither free nor entirely state-controlled.

    As an organizing principle, however, South Africa’s political, economic and social institutions are firmly anti-white. They imperil whites as a principle.

    Theoretical Escapism Retards Action

    To sum, anti-white ideology is not to be conflated, as conservatives habitually do, with Marxist ideology. Very plainly, communism did not revolve around the exclusive blackening of whites. Stripped of bafflegab, this is Critical Race’s central project.

    Confusing Americans about this anti-white atavism gripping the country does a disservice to the pigmentally cancelled — those affected. For clear language and clear thinking mediate adaptive actions.

    Theoretical escapism retards adaptive action.

    So, when conservatives insist that Critical-Race based politics in Congress and across corporate America are a manifestation of Marxism or identity politicking — it is more than a hollow exercise in intellectual casuistry: it prevents innocents, (the pigmentally cancelled) from acting adaptively to protect their lives, their futures and those of their progeny.

    Crippled as they are by self-serving fear, conservatives have accepted the Left’s terms of debate. Those dictate that, to warn of systemic hatred against browns and blacks is racially virtuous; but to fear the same for whites is incorrigibly racist.

    For fear of being dubbed racists, media conservatives simply look the other way, refusing to acknowledge the unadulterated, anti-white hue of American society.

    Ditch the intellectual crutches. Concentrate on the crux. You are dealing with anti-whitism. Communism, Marxism and identity politics serve here as respectable intellectual crutches.

    In using intellectual fig leaves to conceal anti-whitism, conservatives simply alight on similarities in the methods of current thugs and communism’s mass murderers. The anatomy of thuggery is always similar. The foot soldiers of communism, fascism and the American Left are alike because the methods of thugs are alike, not because Critical Race policies and practices amount to communism.

    Ultimately, if quibbling about communism and identity politics becomes an obstacle to facing the reality of systemic anti-whiteness — then these theoretical crutches are an affront to reality and, by default, a grave error.

    Amren

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to Verđandi For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. Do You Trust? Who Can You Really Trust?
    By White Iceland in forum Psychology, Behavior, & Neuroscience
    Replies: 69
    Last Post: Tuesday, October 24th, 2017, 08:25 PM
  2. Who Do You Not Trust?
    By Hoarsewhisper in forum Psychology, Behavior, & Neuroscience
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: Sunday, May 22nd, 2011, 12:51 PM
  3. Who Do You Trust?
    By Roderic in forum Politics & Geopolitics
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Tuesday, October 12th, 2010, 12:52 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •