Are McCulloch and SNPA biased?

**Stríbog** · Thursday, February 6th, 2003

Recently it seems to me more and more that McCulloch and SNPA are biased in favor of Mediterranean non-Aryans and against Eastern European Aryans. The dark Irish, Scots and Welsh which he lists as Atlanto-Med or "Paleo-Atlantid" are in fact Pictish, remnants of pre-Aryan dark peoples who spoke non-IE languages. Yet McCulloch and SNPA consider them more assimilible than blonde, blue-eyed Eastern Europeans such as the ones I posted? This doesn't seem fair...
Based on my personal experience, Poles and Russians actually tend to be significantly lighter in hair and eye than the average British citizen, due to the Mediterranean blood lingering in Britain. I think this bias occurs because it is the traditional Western Europea vs. Eastern Europe cultural bias, rather than any kind of scientifically justified subracial classification. I would have no problem with children of mine marrying Aryan Slavs; I would definitely have issues with them marrying a Mediterranean like Catherine Zeta-Jones or Sean Connery.

**Von Braun** · Thursday, February 6th, 2003

Northwestern Europe is the purest area. France, Great Britain, and Germany created the current world order. What did the Poles and Russians do? Many of them are impure. Many of them have mixed with our most dangerous enemy.

**GreenHeart** · Thursday, February 6th, 2003

I would judge by the individual. Overall though, I'd most preferably have my kids marry a Hallstatt, or some other blue eyed nordish type.

**Stríbog** · Thursday, February 6th, 2003

Northwestern Europe is the purest area.

Purest in terms of what? Britain and Ireland are the most phenotypically heterogeneous region of Europe that I have seen. There are no significant Meds in Poland or Russia.

Many of them have mixed with our most dangerous enemy

A few have, I would hardly say many. Revilo Oliver stated that England actually saw the most mixing with Jews, because after Cromwell readmitted them, they secured their social status by marrying into landed English gentry. He believed that all English nobility had significant Jewish blood. The English had little problem with this, being largely money-oriented, especially in their imperial days. The same was true of Holland when the Jews took refuge there from the Inquisition. England and Holland probably have the most Jewish admixture, because they have historically been by far the most tolerant of them.

**GreenHeart** · Thursday, February 6th, 2003

After all, I don't want my grandkids to look like this......

**GreenHeart** · Thursday, February 6th, 2003

Originally posted by NordischesBlutundEhre
Purest in terms of what? Britain and Ireland are the most phenotypically heterogeneous region of Europe that I have seen. There are no significant Meds in Poland or Russia.

A few have, I would hardly say many. Revilo Oliver stated that England actually saw the most mixing with Jews, because after Cromwell readmitted them, they secured their social status by marrying into landed English gentry. He believed that all English nobility had significant Jewish blood. The English had little problem with this, being largely money-oriented, especially in their imperial days. The same was true of Holland when the Jews took refuge there from the Inquisition. England and Holland probably have the most Jewish admixture, because they have historically been by far the most tolerant of them.

Thats a bunch of crap. Most English people didn't like the jews either. Just read some Rudyard Kipling. He satired the jews quite often and talked of entirely blue eyed towns, and he wrote during the Imperial period.

**Von Braun** · Thursday, February 6th, 2003

Originally posted by NordischesBlutundEhre
Purest in terms of what?

Round-eyed, pale skinned, fine feautred people (commonly referred to as white people).

Britain and Ireland are the most phenotypically heterogeneous region of Europe that I have seen. There are no significant Meds in Poland or Russia.

So it is better to mix with people who look like Vladmir Lenin than it is to mix with people who look the the Beatles?

x_rofl

Perhaps you have influences that have biased you towards the, um, yellow side of things.

By the way, IMHO the most "phenotypically heterogeneous" parts of Europe would be the ones where you actually have significant nonwhite admixture. In parts of Spain, Portugal and Italy, you get people who look very white, like the rest of us. Then there are some who look very semitic. There is no such significant semitic influence further north in western Europe (Britain, France, Germany.) You also do see huge variation in Poland. There are Poles who have light hair and eyes, and whose eyes are round, and then there are light haired Poles with epicanthic folds, and then Poles with black, COARSE hair and epicanthic folds. That is a bigger spectrum than you see in the unmixed parts of western Europe.

**Von Braun** · Thursday, February 6th, 2003

Originally posted by NordicPower88
After all, I don't want my grandkids to look like this......

NP, what are they?

**Stríbog** · Thursday, February 6th, 2003

English Jews were responsible for much of the Imperial policy. Many of the "English" absentee landlords who initiated the Potato Famine against Ireland were Jewish. English Jews with names like Moses and Solomon also initiated the Boer War to gain control of South African diamonds and gold. Why do you think Britain was the first European country with a Jewish leader, Prime Minister Disraeli? To deny that Britain was under considerable Jewish control for the last few centuries is to ignore the obvious.