Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 28

Thread: Climate Change - a CON

  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Last Online
    7 Hours Ago @ 11:34 PM
    Ethnicity
    Celto-Germanic
    Ancestry
    Irish, Scottish
    Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    Location
    North Ireland
    Gender
    Family
    Married
    Politics
    National Socialist
    Religion
    Ethnic Catholic
    Posts
    1,475
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,587
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,717
    Thanked in
    935 Posts

    ‘Climate Change: The Facts’ Was the BBC’s Biggest Lie Ever

    The increasingly unwatchable and slavishly woke BBC plumbed new depths last night. It gave a prime time slot to a piece of environmental propaganda so blatant, shameless, and dishonest it might just as well have been a political broadcast on behalf of Extinction Rebellion.

    Even the programme’s title was a lie.


    Climate Change: The Facts was a farrago of alarmist cliches, exaggerations, and untruths which have been debunked on numerous occasions.


    It lied about the cause of wildfires; it lied about heatwaves; it lied about storms and floods; it lied about polar melting; it lied about sea levels; it lied about coral reefs; it lied about droughts.


    Yet many viewers may well have been taken in because the programme was presented with breathy earnestness and apparent authority by the doyen of TV wildlife ‘experts’ Sir David Attenborough. And accompanied by the kind of dramatic footage and stirring music guaranteed to bypass the brain and appeal directly to the emotions — as all the most effective propaganda does.


    “If you liked Triumph of the Will then you’re going to love Our Planet,” I wrote recently of Attenborough’s new Netflix series, which uses exactly the same techniques: amazing nature photography; manipulative music; a trembly voiceover making all manner of scientifically dubious assertions in order to scare the viewer into the appropriate state of climate fear.



    But Climate Change: the Facts was more unscrupulous and dishonest still.



    What I found particularly objectionable was its use of emotive trickery to help deceive the viewer into buying its specious arguments.


    For example, on the subject of heatwaves, we were shown heartbreaking footage of thousands of flying foxes (giant fruit bats) in Australia which had dropped dead out of the trees during a particularly hot spell last November in Queensland. “There was a deafening sound of babies crying,” said the voiceover of a distraught Australian conservationist, over images of piles of dead bats, and an orphaned baby bat being hand fed some milk from a bottle. “This is climate change in action,” muttered an unnamed Australian. “We need to wake up!” said another.


    The unwary viewer might easily have been gulled into drawing two erroneous conclusions from this.


    First, that the bats really had been killed by “climate change”. (Which they hadn’t. This was an extreme weather event of the kind which, no doubt, has killed many thousands of flying foxes on previous occasions in history — only without the presence of camera crews to record the incidents.)


    Second, that the world divides into two kinds of people: those who love the planet and cute baby bats and who consequently believe in the urgency of combating climate change; those who don’t give a damn. (Which is another entirely false premise. It is quite possible to care very much about the natural world without buying into the false claims of green-ideology driven, anti-growth, anti-human environmental activists.)


    Paul Homewood has been through its various claims with a fine-tooth comb and found many to be misleading and inaccurate.


    Among his criticisms:



    • Attenborough shows a surface temperature chart of dramatically rising temperatures but a) fails to mention that the more accurate satellite temperature data shows no increase since 1998; b) fails to explain why temperatures rose sharply in the early 20th century, long before CO2 emissions began to rise significantly; c) fails to mention that since the 19th century, Earth has been emerging from the Little Ice Age — probably the coldest period since the end of the Ice Age.




    • The extreme weather bogeyman. Various talking head ‘experts’ assure us that heat waves are getting more intense. But last summer’s heatwave in the UK — cited as evidence of this — was no hotter than the summer of 1976; nor was the recent one in Queensland when temperatures reached 42 degrees C — also cited — anywhere near as bad as the one in 1972 when temperatures reached 49.5 degrees C. In fact, Homewood notes, there is considerable evidence that heatwaves are actually becoming less common.




    • Michael Mann (quoted as an expert witness): “You’re going to get more rainfall, more superstorms, worse flooding. We’re seeing the effects of climate change now play out in real time” Homewood: Maybe one of the most dishonest parts of the programme. Even the IPCC can’t find any long term trends in tropical cyclone activity or flooding. And severe tornadoes are have become much less common in the US.




    • Attenborough: “Rising seas are already displacing hundreds of thousands of people from already vulnerable coastal areas.” Homewood: Pure hyperbole. Where is the evidence to support this claim? Sea levels have been rising steadily since the mid 19th century.




    • On polar ice caps, it is claimed that ice loss from Antarctica and Greenland is “worse than expected”. Homewood: In fact, according to NASA, the Antarctic is actually gaining ice. It is symptomatic of the whole programme, that Attenborough does not mention this inconvenient fact. As for Greenland, I’m not sure what the experts were “expecting”, has any relevance at all. What we do know though, is that temperatures in Greenland are no higher now than they were in the 1930s.




    • Attenborough: “In the last three years, repeated heat stress has caused a third of the world’s corals to first bleach and then die.” Homewood: There is absolutely no evidence for this, and I have not even seen that claimed about the Great Barrier Reef. And as we now know, the death of GBR corals was drastically overstated. Indeed, as scientists like Peter Ridd and local reef experts have long maintained, corals quickly recover from bleaching, which was just as bad in the 18thC.




    • In sum, where in reality there is increasing doubt and debate among scientists on the issue of ‘climate change’, this #fakenews documentary pretended the opposite: that the weight of evidence points unquestionably to an imminent climate catastrophe which can only be averted if we take concerted global action now.




    • “It may sound frightening but the scientific evidence is that if we have not taken dramatic action in the next decade we could face irreversible damage to the natural world — and the collapse of our societies,” said Attenborough. [Fact check: there is not a single piece of scientific evidence which suggests anything of the kind. Perhaps that’s why he covered himself with the word “could.”]




    • “What is happening now in the next few years will profoundly affect the next thousand years,” he declared elsewhere. [Fact check: no it won’t; barely in the slightest. The planet is 4.5 billion years old. It’s perfectly capable of taking care of itself, regardless of our ludicrous delusions otherwise.]




    • This isn’t science. This is the purest political activism — and it’s quite extraordinary that the BBC, theoretically committed by its charter obligations to fair and accurate broadcasting, should have allowed itself to be used as a platform for such blatant fearmongering, misinformation, and propagandising.




    • The BBC supposedly represents the entire viewing population. (Otherwise, why should we all be forced to fund it with our compulsory annual £154.50 per household licence fee?) Yet here it is speaking on behalf of a narrow clique of mostly metropolitan, left-liberal types who pay lip service to the green religion because it’s such an easy way of publicly signalling their virtue. Those many of us — perhaps the majority of the population — who, with good reason, are sceptical about the global warming scare are treated with utter contempt, as if our opinions don’t matter.


    Anyone with an even rudimentary grasp of the climate debate knows, for example, that Michael Mann, James Hansen, and Naomi Oreskes are key members of the climate industrial complex with a long track record of aggressive political activism on behalf of the environmental movement. Yet here they were being presented by the BBC — and by Attenborough — as if they were dispassionate, wholly trustworthy climate experts.

    Even by the BBC’s abysmal standards, this programme was a disgrace: an insult to the intelligence, a betrayal of the Reithian principles on which the BBC was founded, and a shameless piece of propaganda on behalf of the watermelons who would destroy our civilisation.

    As for Sir David Attenborough, it’s time this whispery voiced, gorilla hugging, walrus scaring Malthusian was recognised for what he is: not as a national treasure but as a national embarrassment long, long past his sell-by date.



    For the 90% of thickoes and youngsters, this was a scare story of massive proportion which they will all believe. The Western media class is now full Communist in terms of propaganda and brainwashing.


    Delingpole: ‘Climate Change: The Facts’ Was the BBC’s Biggest Lie Ever 21 Apr 2019.

    MSM think for us

    and that’s the object of MSM whether its Brexit, Climate Change, Mass Migration, LGBT, Globalism, EU, etc.

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jagdmesser For This Useful Post:


  3. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Last Online
    Sunday, September 29th, 2019 @ 09:42 PM
    Ethnicity
    Germanic New World - South African
    Ancestry
    German, Dutch, Belgian, French, English, Irish
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Gender
    Zodiac Sign
    Pisces
    Family
    Single adult
    Religion
    Spiritual
    Posts
    198
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    42
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    86
    Thanked in
    41 Posts
    Weather and climate changes naturally over the course of time, however they want to make it seem that it happens unnaturally and humans are to blame.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to GermanicAfrican For This Useful Post:


  5. #13
    Senior Member Sigurdsson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Last Online
    1 Day Ago @ 12:52 AM
    Ethnicity
    Anglo-Canadian
    Ancestry
    England & Norway
    Country
    Canada Canada
    Gender
    Age
    20
    Zodiac Sign
    Taurus
    Politics
    Nationalism, Monarchy, Traditon
    Religion
    Protestant
    Posts
    208
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    62
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    95
    Thanked in
    68 Posts
    This is why our lands are dying

  6. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Last Online
    7 Hours Ago @ 11:34 PM
    Ethnicity
    Celto-Germanic
    Ancestry
    Irish, Scottish
    Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    Location
    North Ireland
    Gender
    Family
    Married
    Politics
    National Socialist
    Religion
    Ethnic Catholic
    Posts
    1,475
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,587
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,717
    Thanked in
    935 Posts

    Swedish Greens Euro Candidate Demands EU Take ‘Climate Refugees’




    Swedish Green Party candidate for the European Parliament Pär Holmgren has demanded the European Union do more to distribute so-called climate refugees from Africa and the Middle East.



    Holmgren, who is running to become an MEP next month and is second on the party list, has said he wants to make climate change his focal issue if he wins a seat.

    “Everything that has to do with ecological sustainability and social sustainability is connected. If we do not succeed in this transition to a sustainable society, where the climate issue and biodiversity and other issues are important, then there will be even greater stress on our societies,” Holmgren said in an interview with Europa Portalen.

    Holmgren believes responding to climate change also involves welcoming migrants from the Middle East and parts of Africa that he claims could become uninhabitable.

    According to the green politician, the European Union should be doing more to not only distribute migrants from regions affected by climate change but also combat poverty.

    “Unfortunately, because of the big players today, we are on the road to three degrees of warming in 2100. And somewhere along the way, much of Africa and the Middle East will actually become more or less uninhabitable,” he said.

    Recent opinion polls have shown the Greens struggling in Sweden with a poll from April 13th showing the party with only 4% of the vote, the threshold for entering the European Parliament.


    The Swedish Greens have been known to make controversial remarks in the past, such as when Lars Ahlfors, chairman of the local Greens in the town of Eslöv, said, “There is another party that wants to persuade immigrants to relocate. We think that if you do not enjoy multiculturalism, there should be an opportunity to give a helping hand to move.”

    The remarks, suggesting that Swedes who do not like multiculturalism should pack up and leave, led to accusations of totalitarianism by Social Democrat politician Henrik Månsson.

    Green Party candidate Alice Bah Kuhnke, who heads the party’s EU election list, has also been criticised for suggesting in 2017 that Islamic State radicals should be welcomed back to Sweden and helped to reintegrate into society.

    Swedish Greens Euro Candidate Demands EU Take ‘Climate Refugees’ 23 Apr 2019.


    The population of Africa will quadruple from 1 billion to 4 billion by 2100 - a fact
    . If we continue to accept them and give them ‘social’ they’re coming to Europe and that's the end of Europe.


    Swedish Green Party candidate for the European Parliament Pär Holmgren has demanded the European Union do more to distribute so-called climate refugees from Africa and the Middle East - what right does this dangerous individual luny 'nutter' have to invite them to Sweden on behalf of the Swedish people? He owns only his own few processions but not Sweden to give away.


    None of those London trendy eco-loons walked there saving the planet in the process, they were bussed in, etc. and one even flew in. Hypocrisy.

  7. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to jagdmesser For This Useful Post:


  8. #15
    Grand Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Last Online
    Thursday, October 31st, 2019 @ 04:26 AM
    Ethnicity
    English
    Ancestry
    English, Anglo-Saxon
    Country
    England England
    Location
    South Coast
    Gender
    Zodiac Sign
    Aries
    Family
    Married
    Occupation
    Self Employed
    Politics
    Free Speech / Anti-EU
    Religion
    Pagan
    Posts
    5,040
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,584
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,600
    Thanked in
    1,395 Posts
    I'll never take these climate change fanatics seriously until they address the issue of exponential population growth in the Third World.

    Bringing Africans into Europe en masse is the last thing we need because their carbon footprint will quadruple and thus make the problem (that our 'eco-warriors' profess to be tackling) even worse!!!

  9. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to SaxonPagan For This Useful Post:


  10. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Last Online
    7 Hours Ago @ 11:34 PM
    Ethnicity
    Celto-Germanic
    Ancestry
    Irish, Scottish
    Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    Location
    North Ireland
    Gender
    Family
    Married
    Politics
    National Socialist
    Religion
    Ethnic Catholic
    Posts
    1,475
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,587
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,717
    Thanked in
    935 Posts

    500 Scientists Write U.N.: ‘There Is No Climate Emergency’


    More than 500 scientists and professionals in climate and related fields have sent a “European Climate Declaration” to the Secretary-General of the United Nations asking for a long-overdue, high-level, open debate on climate change.



    Just as 16-year-old Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg addressedthe U.N. Climate Action Summit in New York accusing world leaders of robbing her of her future, scientists were begging the United Nations to keep hysteria from obscuring facts.



    “Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific,” the declaration states. “Scientists should openly address the uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of global warming, while politicians should dispassionately count the real benefits as well as the imagined costs of adaptation to global warming, and the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of mitigation.”

    The scientists underscored the importance of not rushing into enormously expensive climate action before fully ascertaining the facts.

    “There is no statistical evidence that global warming is intensifying hurricanes, floods, droughts and suchlike natural disasters, or making them more frequent,” they declared. “However, CO2-mitigation measures are as damaging as they are costly. For instance, wind turbines kill birds and bats, and palm-oil plantations destroy the biodiversity of the rainforests.”


    The signatories of the declaration also insist that public policy must respect scientific and economic realities and not just reflect the most fashionable frenzy of the day.


    “There is no climate emergency. Therefore, there is no cause for panic and alarm,” they note. “We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy proposed for 2050.” “If better approaches emerge, and they certainly will, we have ample time to reflect and adapt. The aim of international policy should be to provide reliable and affordable energy at all times, and throughout the world,” they state.


    In particular, the scientists criticize the general-circulation models of climate on which international policy is currently founded as “unfit for their purpose.”
    “Therefore, it is cruel as well as imprudent to advocate the squandering of trillions on the basis of results from such immature models,” they propose. “Current climate policies pointlessly, grievously undermine the economic system, putting lives at risk in countries denied access to affordable, continuous electrical power.”


    “We urge you to follow a climate policy based on sound science, realistic economics and genuine concern for those harmed by costly but unnecessary attempts at mitigation,” they declare.





    Unfortunately Greta is autistic and the "cimate change" is her phobia. Her tears/emotions are genuine, the reasons are not, she believes the crap which is told by the MSM.

    500 scientists know and tell it that: man made CO2 causing globull warming is a crock!

    The left want us to believe in Unicorns, fairy tales and lies like they do. This is the same bunch who tell us their are 100 genders.



    500 Scientists Write U.N.: ‘There Is No Climate Emergency’

    24 IX 2019.


    Civilized Europe is being ruined by been overrun with a mass invasion of stoneage Africans and medieval religious fanatical muslims.

    If you mention this, your ‘racist’ better to believe and talk about the latest globalist ‘fairy tales’ – climate change.



  11. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to jagdmesser For This Useful Post:


  12. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Last Online
    7 Hours Ago @ 11:34 PM
    Ethnicity
    Celto-Germanic
    Ancestry
    Irish, Scottish
    Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    Location
    North Ireland
    Gender
    Family
    Married
    Politics
    National Socialist
    Religion
    Ethnic Catholic
    Posts
    1,475
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,587
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,717
    Thanked in
    935 Posts

    George Soros Emerges as Major Funder of ‘Global Climate Strike’ Groups


    George Soros financed radical environmental groups partnering in this week’s “Global Climate Strike” to the tune of nearly $25 million, according to a new report.



    At least 22 of the left-wing activist groups listed as partners in the Global Climate Strike received $24,854,592 in funding from liberal billionaire George Soros between 2000-2017 through his Open Society Network, Joseph Vazquez reportedThursday for the Media Research Center.


    Though ostensibly ignited by the protests of 16-year-old Greta Thunberg, the Global Climate Strike has borne from the outset the indelible fingerprints of well-funded, radical environmental activists. As it turns out, much of the funding has been coming from professional disrupter George Soros.


    Among the organizations receiving Soros funding were Fund for Global Human Rights, Global Greengrants Fund, 350.org, Amnesty International, Avaaz, Color of Change, and People’s Action. Each of these groups has climate-related agendas and goals spanning from reducing global carbon emissions to less than 350 parts per million and 100% “clean energy,” to the elimination of new fossil fuel projects and a “green civil rights movement.”


    Other major donors have included Democrat presidential candidate Tom Steyer’s NextGen America as well as the Sierra Club, which has reportedly received millions from former Mayor Michael Bloomberg.





    George Soros Emerges as Major Funder of ‘Global Climate Strike’ Groups 29 IX 2019.


    Breitbart

    Naive to think that public conscientiousness suddenly awoke. Nothing happens by accident. It has to be planned and financed.

    Usual culprits.

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to jagdmesser For This Useful Post:


  14. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Last Online
    7 Hours Ago @ 11:34 PM
    Ethnicity
    Celto-Germanic
    Ancestry
    Irish, Scottish
    Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    Location
    North Ireland
    Gender
    Family
    Married
    Politics
    National Socialist
    Religion
    Ethnic Catholic
    Posts
    1,475
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,587
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,717
    Thanked in
    935 Posts

    Corbyn’s Brother Brands Extinction Rebellion a Soros-Funded Globalist Scam, Trashes Open Borders



    Piers Corbyn, Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn’s Brexiteer climate-sceptic elder brother, has lambasted Extinction Rebellion as a Soros-funded, EU- and UN-backed scam to transfer money from ordinary people to corporations.




    Speaking to YouTube personality and former UKIP candidate Carl ‘Sargon of Akkad’ Benjamin, the physicist, weather forecaster, and former Labour councillor warned viewers that “climate policy is there to control you, not climate. “The political origin of [Extinction Rebllion] is the globalist supernationals, the mega-rich. They’re funded by George Soros, among others, he spent 24 million dollars on the group which set up the so-called climate strike,” Corbyn alleged. “They are orchestrated by the mainstream media and tolerated deliberately by all the governments in the world, just about, bar very few,” he continued. “If you and I were to have a demonstration about Yemen, the war and arms, and so forth, we would be swept off the street in half an hour, right?” he told Benjamin. “Or if the miners’ strike had have tried to occupy London like they did, they would have had the horses against them straight away, they’d be swept away — so [Extinction Rebellion] are completely tolerated by the powers that be,” he added.



    According to Corbyn, the purpose of the “climate crisis” campaign is to shake down ordinary taxpayers to “give huge amounts of money to large organisations, mega-corporations, to build wind farms, and develop more unnecessary batteries, or whatever. At the same time, there will be handouts to the banks and so forth who are otherwise going to be facing a big economic crisis” — all in the name of “combatting climate change”.It’s a way of handing out money to failing businesses in the West who are suffering under China and India’s competitiveness,” he claimed.



    “The United Nations talks about redistribution of wealth, but if you look at it, it’s redistribution upwards, absolutely upwards. The more and more the globalists are taking power and influence under the guise of the United Nations and the European Union to redistribute wealth, it’s redistribution upwards,” he said.
    He added that “the development of the Third World is being held back by climate policy” — for example, by discouraging the construction of coal-fired power stations which could provide electricity, and leaving women exposed to poisonous fumes from cooking on open fires.


    Segueing into the subject of “globalist control and globalist exploitation” more generally, the veteran left-winger added that when it comes to “things like the European Union open borders… Tony Blair doesn’t want open borders to help anybody who’s coming or staying here; he wants open borders to hold down wages in Britain, and the mega-corporations want open borders to destroy the British working class and remove industry from Britain and send it to places where workers can be even more exploited. There’ll be super-exploitation of steelworkers in India or whatever [instead].”


    He asserted that “the European Union, United Nations, and the climate change propaganda which we’re being subject to now are all from the same source: globalist mega-corporation world domination.”


    Corbyn conceded that some climate activists may be well-intentioned, having been “brainwashed by the BBC 24/7”, but said it was “worrying… that youth these days, a lot of them are questioning nothing” — believing that even veteran left-wingers like himself must support “plastic in the sea” and be in league with Donald Trump if they do not subscribe to climate change orthodoxy and “oppose the European Union”.


    On the subject of the Labour Party led by his brother Jeremy, the elder Corbyn declined to criticise its leadership directly, but suggested that he was “surrounded by people who have an agenda which is really very pro-EU, and very Remainist, and in the end would be the opposite to the trajectory which he set out to achieve when he got elected as leader” — a reference to Jeremy’s very long and well-documented pre-leadership history as a Brexiteer.


    In terms of his own preferred policy solutions to Britain’s energy and environmental needs, the elder Corbyn said the focus should be on research into thorium-type nuclear reactors and once again mining coal and building coal-fired power stations, which “can be made clean in the sense that all the smoke, with modern equipment, can be removed”.Environmental movements, he suggested, should refocus their efforts on traditional causes like improving biodiversity, planting trees, and preserving hedgerows.




    Piers is a brilliant physicist who made his own way in the world. Jjeremy is an academic failure who made his way in the world living on taxpayers' money.


    Whereas the other one is the red sheep.




    Corbyn’s Brother Trashes Open Borders, Brands Extinction Rebellion a Soros-Funded Globalist Scam31 X 2019.


  15. The Following User Says Thank You to jagdmesser For This Useful Post:


  16. #19
    Funding Member
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member

    Finnish Swede's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Finnish Swede
    Ancestry
    Father: Swedish, Mother Finnish Swede
    Subrace
    Sub-Nordid - Nordid - Baltid mix
    Country
    Sweden Sweden
    State
    Scania Scania
    Gender
    Age
    21
    Zodiac Sign
    Pisces
    Occupation
    Student
    Politics
    No specific ideology
    Religion
    Lutheran
    Posts
    2,001
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    415
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,574
    Thanked in
    1,418 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by SaxonPagan View Post
    I'll never take these climate change fanatics seriously until they address the issue of exponential population growth in the Third World.
    Personally I would like to see these two things being kept separately ... even as they might have connections. In the end ... all what we'll do might have influences to our environment/climate (if we just look long/deep enough).

    Today's leaders/globalists/leftists (who are in charge/in power) have really said very little about World's population growth. Even less what comes to any ideas/proposals/actions to stop it (use your wild imagination now). More like ... that has been given us as ''a fact'' (a matter). We have lots of ''responsibilities'' ... at least if you're living in Western World ... but making kids (and no matter how many of those) ... is seen every humans one kind of personal right/decision (or part of global humans rights). Except in Chine (few decades ago)? Should it still be that way? Is that really so special/personal matter that it can not be limited/controlled anyway? If yes ... then why? Do we simply tend to behave too tactful in (''too emotional'') matters like these (one weakness of humanity)? Even so much that our behavior is purely irrational? I have another name for that: Stupidy!
    Or will somebodies religions/personal believes eliminate some real options (price of humans life ... and is that a saint matter)?

    Mother Earth is already fucked up because of humans population growth (= much quicker than it will be via any Climate Change).

  17. #20
    Senior Member Uwe Jens Lornsen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Last Online
    1 Day Ago @ 07:56 PM
    Status
    Prolonged Absence
    Ethnicity
    German
    Ancestry
    Jutland
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Country
    Germany Germany
    State
    Schleswig-Holstein Schleswig-Holstein
    Gender
    Age
    48
    Zodiac Sign
    Taurus
    Family
    Widowed
    Politics
    cons. old fashion worker class
    Religion
    Philosophical Archaic Christian
    Posts
    992
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    497
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    289
    Thanked in
    239 Posts

    Smile

    It isn't solely a Down Under conspiration , conspiracy theory .

    The East Asian countries like China have large economical growth ,
    thus releasing more fumes , smokes and gasses into the air .

    Gone are the times of the 1980s of China being a bicycle country like the Netherlands and Denmark .


    I don't think , that people deny global warming , but are better off in
    colder climates , when global warming occurs .
    Mk 10:18 What do you call me a good master, no-one is good .

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 8
    Last Post: Friday, September 30th, 2011, 05:00 AM
  2. Polar Climate Change May Lead to Ecological Change
    By Hersir in forum Natural Sciences & Environment
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Monday, September 12th, 2011, 02:48 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: Wednesday, May 4th, 2011, 03:58 AM
  4. Replies: 10
    Last Post: Thursday, April 7th, 2011, 01:42 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •