Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Muslims Would Not Tolerate Multiculturalism in Islamic Countries -Top Academic:

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Last Online
    1 Week Ago @ 10:08 AM
    Ethnicity
    Celto-Germanic
    Ancestry
    Irish, Scottish
    Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    Location
    North Ireland
    Gender
    Family
    Married
    Politics
    National Socialist
    Religion
    Ethnic Catholic
    Posts
    1,118
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,327
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,343
    Thanked in
    731 Posts

    Muslims Would Not Tolerate Multiculturalism in Islamic Countries -Top Academic:


    Professor Afshin Ellian has warned that bleats of “multiculturalism” are a one-way street as Muslims in Europe oppress historic minorities in their own lands and have no intention of showing “tolerance”.


    The Iranian-born professor of law argues that while Muslim migrants are quick to claim their customs under “multiculturalism”, they have no intention of reciprocating.


    Writing in Elsevier magazine, Dr. Ellian says Muslims rapidly learn the rules of multiculturalism and push for their place in society but have no intention of adopting any sort of progressive ideals.


    “The Islamic world is not multicultural. New migrants in Europe rapidly learn the rules of multiculturalism — claim your place in society! Minorities do not take the progressive ideals, but the despotism of their country of origin as a starting point”, he stated in the Dutch weekly Elsevier.


    The professor points out that while economic migration is normal, workers usually migrate within their own region. Giving examples of Afghan and Pakistani workers in Iran, and Zimbabweans in South Africa Dr. Ellian notes that migration does not usually bring forth multicultural societies.


    Explaining this, the professor wrote: “The reason is discrimination: an Afghan worker in Iran remains a second-class citizen who is continuously exposed to humiliation, discrimination and exploitation.”


    The professor contends that outside the West, minorities are harshly oppressed, pointing to the fate of Kurds in Turkey and Syria.


    Contrasting the fates of migrants to the West and outside the West, Dr. Ellian said it is “unthinkable” that minorities in Muslim countries would behave as Muslims do in Europe and elsewhere.


    The professor argued that despite Iranians and Afghans, for example, sharing religious and cultural characteristics, it would be “unthinkable in Iran” that Afghans there should demonstrate, for example, for the Taliban. Dr. Ellian notes that migrants would not be allowed even to demonstrate in favour of the current government.


    “Political and cultural minorities should lead an invisible existence,” he adds.


    Asserting that “the Islamic world is not multicultural”, the professor declares how, despite their sharp elbows as a minority in Europe, Muslims would be outraged at the idea of mass immigration of non-Muslims to their lands.


    Dr. Ellian writes: “Globalisation in Islamic countries has not produced multicultural societies there. It is unthinkable in most Muslim countries that a significant number of Europeans would like to settle there. “From Morocco to Pakistan or Iran: mass immigration of Europeans are excluded. In most Islamic countries non-Muslims, and especially Europeans, are not allowed to own land, homes, or businesses. So multicultural advocates have never looked at the world,” the professor contends.


    The professor, who has spent a lifetime criticising political Islam, observes: “The Islamic world is not multicultural and is not going to be multicultural. It is only the Western countries which have had to become multicultural at breakneck speed. So the migration is one-way.


    Dr. Ellian suggests that the speed at which migrants from monocultural countries learn to exploit Western multiculturalism is “almost unbelievable”, and slams the left for creating and nurturing the ideology.


    As a result of this, he said migrants from the Middle East have begun to hold left wing parties “hostage”, lamenting that, in the Netherlands, local Labour party branches are in minority hands — “a true multicultural mafia”, as he puts it. Despite their joining of, and commandeering of, left wing parties, the professor warns Muslims involved in European politics tend to be anything but progressive. Mass Muslim migration combined with multiculturalism, will lead to an era of “multicultural backwardness”, Dr. Ellian warned.


    Source: Breitbart, 2 Sept 2016.



    if there is ever a revolution French style, then it's the lecturers who should be the first . . .


    It's not a question of 'if there is ever a revolution' but when will there be a revolution and on what scale? Like the French one small or the Russian.big!

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jagdmesser For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Senior Member Tripredacus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Last Online
    6 Hours Ago @ 09:52 PM
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    German
    Ancestry
    Germany, Poland, Italy
    Subrace
    Don't know
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    New York New York
    Location
    United States
    Gender
    Family
    Single adult
    Occupation
    Software Engineer
    Politics
    Fascism
    Religion
    I Am
    Posts
    296
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    16
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    36
    Thanked in
    23 Posts
    Not multiculturalism in the normal sense, but they aren't 100% intolerant of others. I know there are well known examples of Christians living in countries that practice Sharia law, but I do not know the details of how this works.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Tripredacus For This Useful Post:


  5. #3
    Senior Member Aelfgar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Last Online
    Sunday, November 18th, 2018 @ 10:27 AM
    Ethnicity
    English
    Ancestry
    8/16 English, 1/16 Scott. English, 3/16 Irish English, 4/16 Irish
    Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    Location
    England
    Gender
    Politics
    Nationalist / Eclectic
    Religion
    Agnostic
    Posts
    550
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    440
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    393
    Thanked in
    240 Posts
    Suppose for the last fifty years in Western Europe there had been laws prohibiting mosque building, the burqa/niqab and halal meat. Would that have stopped the Muslims coming here for a wealthier life? I doubt it, and it wouldn't stop them coming now.

  6. #4
    Moderator "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member

    GroeneWolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Dutch
    Subrace
    Don't know
    Country
    Netherlands Netherlands
    State
    Utrecht Utrecht
    Gender
    Age
    36
    Family
    Single adult
    Religion
    Germanic Heathendom
    Posts
    3,036
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    255
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    386
    Thanked in
    206 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Tripredacus View Post
    Not multiculturalism in the normal sense, but they aren't 100% intolerant of others. I know there are well known examples of Christians living in countries that practice Sharia law, but I do not know the details of how this works.
    You mean the so called dhimmi, where the dhimmi has to pay a certain tax and has to submit to all kinds of humiliating treatments. Alto it some time ago since I last read up about it. But remember that Jews can also submit to this state (alternatives are dead or conversion), while those who do not belong to the people of the book can only pick between dead or conversion.
    The sense of honor is of so fine and delicate a nature that
    it is only to be met with in minds which are naturally noble or
    cultivated by good examples and a refined education.
    - Sir Richard Steele

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to GroeneWolf For This Useful Post:


  8. #5
    Senior Member The Mercian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Last Online
    Thursday, June 6th, 2019 @ 08:00 PM
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    Anglo-Celtic
    Ancestry
    Mercian, Ulster & Midlothian
    Subrace
    Nordid & North-Atlantid
    Country
    England England
    State
    Mercia Mercia
    Location
    Nottingham
    Gender
    Zodiac Sign
    Sagittarius
    Family
    Single adult
    Occupation
    Research Scientist
    Politics
    Nationalist
    Religion
    Anglo-Saxon Heathenry
    Posts
    96
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    70
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    88
    Thanked in
    48 Posts
    Of course not, that won’t stop them coming here and demanding it. It disgusts me how much lee-way we give these people in the West. We will die through our kindness.

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to The Mercian For This Useful Post:


  10. #6
    Senior Member Uwe Jens Lornsen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Last Online
    2 Days Ago @ 09:39 AM
    Status
    Prolonged Absence
    Ethnicity
    German
    Ancestry
    Jutland
    Country
    Germany Germany
    State
    Schleswig-Holstein Schleswig-Holstein
    Gender
    Age
    48
    Zodiac Sign
    Taurus
    Family
    Widowed
    Politics
    cons. old fashion worker class
    Religion
    Philosophical Archaic Christian
    Posts
    824
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    412
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    249
    Thanked in
    204 Posts
    These Arabs fleeing their "evil" empires fifty years ago , feel , that they are going to get outsourced
    ( umvolkt , re-folked ) by new immigrants .

    Immigrants being replaced by immigrants .

    Easy as that .
    Mk 10:18 What do you call me a good master, no-one is good .

  11. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Last Online
    1 Week Ago @ 10:08 AM
    Ethnicity
    Celto-Germanic
    Ancestry
    Irish, Scottish
    Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    Location
    North Ireland
    Gender
    Family
    Married
    Politics
    National Socialist
    Religion
    Ethnic Catholic
    Posts
    1,118
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,327
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,343
    Thanked in
    731 Posts

    Migrants Want Eurabia, Globalists Using Migrants to Destroy The West - Islam Academic.


    A highly regarded researcher and academic has warned that Muslims in Europe view migration as the start of the Islamisation of the continent. Prof. Abdessamad Belhaj also detailed how globalists are using Muslim migrants to turn Western countries into socially divided societies of easily-controlled consumers.


    The scholar of Islam and social sciences warned that large numbers of migrants are “calamitous” for the European people, and that neoliberal elites see Islamic terrorism, and state bankruptcy and collapse as collateral damage in their pursuit of endless wealth. In an interview with Hungary’s Institute for Migration Research, Professor Belhaj discussed what he calls the Islamic moral economy. He summarised this economy as based around the belief that “if there is money, it is because of Islam, and if there is Islam it will bring money”.


    The Moroccan academic, who works in countries across Europe, stated that Muslim migrants view “all property as ‘given’ and not ‘acquired’ by work”. Professor Belhaj revealed that Muslims, therefore, believe that by taking Europe’s land, Muslims will be granted wealth.


    He contended: “In Islamic discourses, migration is seen as a beginning of the Islamisation of Europe, the rich land that will change the fate of Islam, from a religion of the poor to a religion of the rich. “This is of course a paradox since the poor can only make Europe poorer. Furthermore, immigration is justified as victory to the community”, Professor Belhaj added, and labeled the Islamic moral economy “disastrous”. The professor disclosed that “state law has no weight compared to the law of God”, for Muslims, and so they establish parallel societies in Europe.



    This state of affairs is perfect for neoliberalism, Professor Belhaj argued, as Muslim zones in European states “disrupt social cohesion and peripheralise societies”. Professor Belhaj said elites in Europe “encourage migration and accommodate Islam”, and described the harmony between Muslim migrants and neoliberalism as “structural, and not accidental”.


    The academic commented: “Migration is useful for the neo-liberal model of the borderless, minimal, global society, but is calamitous for the European citizens as a whole.” Professor Belhaj asserted that dignity, freedom of expression and the middle classes are “outdated” for neoliberalism. Neoliberals’ desire, he said, is for society to have “minimal cohesion”, no middle class, and a state which doles out a “minimal income that should be used for consumption”.


    Belhaj, who has authored four books and had more than fifty studies published in international publications, cautioned that as a result of the globalist system, “sustained poverty … is going to be the fate of a considerable portion of people in the West”


    The professor noted: “European citizens see every day how immigrants evolve in a parallel economy and who display ethics that do not meet European ethical standards and do not serve local interests.”


    Calling European “panic” over the migrant wave “justified and legitimate”, Professor Belhaj said: “It is a moral panic of resistance to the neo-liberal order, and rejection of the peripheralisation of Europe”.



    Today, we've got to defeat a globalist conspiracy of elites, the media, our own politicians and many of the population, even BEFORE tackling the INVASION.

    Breitbart, 14 Aug 2016.

    It may be a while yet, but it will result in a European civil war with savagery on the level of the 1917 Bolshevik revolution.

  12. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Last Online
    1 Week Ago @ 10:08 AM
    Ethnicity
    Celto-Germanic
    Ancestry
    Irish, Scottish
    Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    Location
    North Ireland
    Gender
    Family
    Married
    Politics
    National Socialist
    Religion
    Ethnic Catholic
    Posts
    1,118
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,327
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,343
    Thanked in
    731 Posts

    Wombs as weapons


    millions will go to the north to conquer it by populating your territory with our children. The wombs of our women will give us victory... . No amount of atomic bombs will be able to dam up the tidal wave comprising human beings in their millions that one day will leave the southernmost and poor part of the world, to engulf the relatively open spaces of the wealthier northern hemisphere.


    The vast majority of British Muslims live in England - 2,660,116 (5.02% of the population) at the time of the 2011 UK census, an increase of 75% in one decade.


    The single largest group, 38%, are of Pakistani descent. The number of Pakistanis in England grew from about 10,000 in 1951 to more than 1.2m today. As one writer quaintly puts it, "The demographics of British Pakistanis have changed considerably since they first arrived in the UK." In proper English, this means they are breeding prodigiously. They are multiplying at ten times the rate of the indigenous population. In the 2011 census 90% of them gave their religion as Islam.


    Large-scale immigration to Britain from Pakistan began in the 1950s, when Pakistanis could enter Britain without restriction as British subjects under Labour's 1948 British Nationality Act. Most of these were economic migrants from rural areas in Punjab and Gujarat, who came with a view to returning to Pakistan once they had made enough money in Britain. They were largely single men who found employment in the UK's industrial and service sectors.


    As immigration increased alarmingly, legislation meant to limit it inadvertently had the opposite effect. It barred new workers from the Commonwealth but, crucially, allowed those who were already in Britain to arrange jobs and vouchers for their relatives and friends, thus turning a movement of temporary workers into a permanent immigration of families and friends. At this time, this meant mainly Pakistanis. In the five years between 1961 and 1966 the Pakistani population in our land grew by more than 400%, from about 25,000 to 120,000.


    This included settlers from the Mirpur district when the town and its surrounding areas were submerged by the waters of the Mangla dam on the river Jelhum, the 12th largest dam in the world. About 100,000 people were displaced. The UK government was one of the international guarantors for the irrigation project, and so the displaced were awarded migrant status to the UK as part of the compensation package.


    Mirpuris make up around 70% of the British Pakistani population. The biggest concentrations are in northern towns such as Bradford, Leeds, Derby, Rochdale, Blackburn and Huddersfield.


    Thousands more Muslims fled to our country following the 1971 war of secession after which East Pakistan became Bangladesh. The East End of London is now inhabited largely by settlers and their descendants from a region in the north-east of Bangladesh named Sylhet (a reality not reflected in EastEnders, in which most of the characters remain indigenous chirpy Cockneys, admitted by the BBC's controller of drama production John Yorke when he said EastEnders may be significantly white compared with the real East End).


    In 1972 another 30,000 Asians, mostly Gujaratis of Indian origin, expelled from Uganda by President Idi Amin, also came to our country. Virtually all of these too were Muslims. Amin said he'd had a dream in which Allah told him to order the expulsion.


    Between 1973 and 1981 a further 82,000 Muslims came as settlers, most of them being the dependants of men already here. For a while after that the number of new arrivals decreased but then, exactly 50 years after Labour's 1948 Nationality Act, which unrealistically gave all 800m Commonwealth citizens the right to settle in our country, another Labour government passed another act, which once again allowed in all and sundry. Among the new beneficiaries were many asylum seekers, who only needed to be prepared to tell silly lies to be allowed in, with no means of ever getting them out - for this pernicious new legislation, the cause of many of our woes, was the Human Rights Act. Word soon spread around the third world that the English were extraordinarily tender-hearted - and it would have been an offence to universal common sense not to audaciously lead a people like that around by the nose. Having heard that kindness reigned in England, foreigners came in their hundreds of thousands from all over the third world. Many of them were Muslims.


    And so it has to come to pass that in just a few decades, by a malignant, unfortunate combination of circumstances, more than 3m Muslims have settled in our country, 5% of the total population, from all over South Asia, Africa and the Middle East.


    No one planned this. It was never anyone's policy. The Labour politicians who encouraged mass immigration did not anticipate such an accumulation of Muslims, and remain in denial.


    The only people to appreciate what was happening were the rulers of Saudi Arabia and other Muslim countries, who, at some point in this massive influx, realised it provided an opportunity to launch the long-awaited third wave of Muslim imperialism, following the Arab and Ottoman waves. Victory could be achieved not with a military assault but through the wombs of Muslim women.


    The clash between us and Islam is not primarily a military one but a demographic one. While we are being responsible on an already overcrowded planet by not having too many children, Muslims are having babies deliberately and consciously in order to populate the earth.


    The population of the Muslim world rose from 15% of the world's population in 1970 to almost 20% by 2000. It is expected to reach 23% by 2025. The population of the Arab world alone has risen in the last 50 years from 80m to 320m. Half of that population is under 20. Osama bin Laden had no fewer than 54 siblings and he himself fathered 25 children (one of whom married a British woman).


    And Muslims everywhere are being urged by their leaders to go north. As Algerian leader Houari Boumediene said to the General Assembly of the United Nations in 1974 with startling frankness,


    One day, millions will leave the southern hemisphere to go to the northern one. But not as friends. Because they will go there to conquer it; and they will conquer it by populating your territory with our children. The wombs of our women will give us victory... . No amount of atomic bombs will be able to dam up the tidal wave comprising human beings in their millions that one day will leave the southernmost and poor part of the world, to engulf the relatively open spaces of the wealthier northern hemisphere.


    In that very same year, the Islamic Conference in Lahore ended its meeting with a resolution that included the precept to increase the then modest flow of immigrants to Europe and to dominate the continent through "demographic preponderance".


    This is logical. If you wished to challenge the supremacy of a society that was secure and had powerful weapons, what would you do? Would you meet it on its own terms by launching a costly and destructive assault or, if time was unimportant, would you prefer to employ a version of a more subtle attack? Would you, in fact, seek to infiltrate it in order to attack it from within? The main point of Carl von Clausewitz's classic On War is the vital importance of outnumbering your enemy in the right place at the right time. What better tactic can there be then, if time is on your side and the enemy stupidly allows it, than gradually building up your forces in his own country? All the old battle terms such as front line and outflanking cease to have any meaning but the same aim, victory, is achieved.


    Eventually, though it is already too late, our indigenous leaders will realise the problem was more serious than they thought. If the intruders remain, they shall dominate us - that, by then, will be clear and inevitable. Will we agree to be superseded, and start on the way to extinction without a struggle? By then we may be so decadent this is indeed possible. Politically, the question will be, can any state, however tolerant, afford to harbour increasingly powerful foreigners over whom it has no control? Obviously the answer is no.


    So what will the politicians do? The intruders will remain safe while the waffling continues among the politicians, who, glowing with righteousness on our behalf, will continue to defend the intruders' human rights. The politicians will claim, still without a referendum, to be representing justice, compassion and the great heart of the indigenous people. Before, as members of a securely dominant race, they could afford to lose touch with reality, and amuse themselves with abstractions. "Live and let live" is a piece of patronage that can be afforded by the consciously secure. But reality is encroaching. Indigenous politicians are already petrified of saying anything meaningful about Islam infiltrating politics, as the problem becomes the defining issue of our age, the 21st century's greatest problem. It already appears insoluble and we could easily have a curious epoch when deeply demoralised politicians leave office rather than have to take action on it.


    Our country has lost all sense of belief in itself and, because of this, has lost the will to defend itself, allowing it to be taken over by settlers and their descendants full of a sense of injury and entitlement to power.


    A February 2015 study presented to Parliament showed 14 parliamentary constituencies with more than 25% Muslim population. At Friday prayers in the 1,500 mosques in our country, many of which were built with Saudi money, the faithful are exhorted by their imams to greatly multiply, to "bear at least five children each couple". Five children each couple is nowadays rather a lot. But the situation is even worse than that. Muslims, remember, are bigamists or even trigamists. So a male Muslim with two wives will produce at least ten babies; if he has three wives, 15 babies. The mosques are conducting an organised replacement of our population. Demography is being used as a political weapon.


    The heavy concentration of Muslims in several of our towns multiplies their influence. More than a million Muslims now live in London, where they already make up an eighth of the population, and Muslims now either dominate or vie for domination in Birmingham, Blackburn, Bradford, Dewsbury, Leicester, east London and the periphery of Manchester.


    Sociologist Eric Kaufmann found that Caribbean and East European settlers soon picked up the ambient secularism and low birthrates of our society but that there was no change in the fecundity of Muslims between the first and second generations.


    In Birmingham, Pakistanis made up 7.1% of the population in 1991, a figure that will nearly triple, to 21%, by 2026. The Barrow Cadbury Trust, which gathered the data, noted that this increase would be by the breeding of the town's numerous young Pakistanis rather than by immigration.


    The number of Muslims in our land is now doubling each decade. Half of them are under 25. If you think about it for only a few seconds and do a bit of basic arithmetic, this is terrifying. Within ten years Birmingham, Slough, Luton, Blackburn and Bradford will have Muslim majorities observing sharia law. By 2060 Muslims will occupy all the top political and military positions in our land, in place to plot a coup d'état.


    Our intellectuals, politicians and most journalists do not comprehend that their daily manipulation of language, their routine decoupling of words from reality, their increasing imprecision in the use of words, will end in this catastrophe.


    With information censored and distorted by government and media alike, the wishes and fears of the indigenous people shamefully disregarded, the role of history, culture and tradition dangerously neglected, a major problem exists for any judgement, any meaningful debate, about the renewed mortal threat posed by a resurgent Islam using wombs as weapons.


    ******


    The above is a chapter from David Abbott's latest book, Offensive Diatribes, published by Sparrow Books, 256 pages paperback. To buy Offensive Diatribes contact Sparrow Books: sparrowbookpublishers@gmail.com.


    The left complained about world overpopulation and argue that white Europeans reduce our birthrates, have abortions and so on while the Islamic world breeds like rats. The first people to take out are the open borders activists because without them the jihadists would never have gained access to our countries. After them take out diversity officials, human rights lawyers, left wing charities, university departments and so on. These are the support networks and supply lines for Islamic jihad and without them, the jihad will fail. The left knows exactly what it is doing and pretends to be ignorant of the problem. Francis.


    Wombs as Weapons | Liberty GB 04 Dec 2016.


  13. The Following User Says Thank You to jagdmesser For This Useful Post:


  14. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Last Online
    1 Week Ago @ 10:08 AM
    Ethnicity
    Celto-Germanic
    Ancestry
    Irish, Scottish
    Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    Location
    North Ireland
    Gender
    Family
    Married
    Politics
    National Socialist
    Religion
    Ethnic Catholic
    Posts
    1,118
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,327
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,343
    Thanked in
    731 Posts

    Muslim Migrants Secretly Hate Christians, Seek to Outbreed Them


    Muslim Migrants Secretly Hate Christians, Seek to Outbreed Them - Arabic Translator:


    A translator who has lived in Germany since the 1990s has revealed that Muslim migrants believe “Germany should be Islamised”, and loathe their hosts, according to a new report.


    Working with asylum seekers in migrant centres, the 39 year old translator says she learnt that Muslims seek to “destroy” Christians, through having more children, and preach hatred towards people of other faiths.


    Catholic website Kath.net, which has been looking into reports that Christians are discriminated against in German refugee camps, arranged a meeting with the Eritrean after being contacted by a German politician aware of the Catholic news agency’s work. Grateful for the “open-minded reception and support” she was given by Germany after arriving as a refugee in 1991, the woman began to volunteer in asylum centres five years ago to “give something back”.


    A Christian but presumed to be Muslim by migrants and other staff volunteering and working at the shelters, the translator of Arabic immediately discovered “Christians are oppressed, intimidated and harassed by Muslim refugees. This is normal.”


    The woman has worked in several migrant centres and discloses that their security staff and other translators, who are almost all Muslim, are part of the problem. “They have mostly grown up here, are well-educated and are professionals, and they give a first impression of having a cosmopolitan outlook”, she says. However this changes as soon as they are “among themselves”, the translator says. When migrant centre staff believe non-Muslims are out of earshot, “they then show their true face and how they want Germany to be Islamised. They despise our country and our values”.


    Horrified by what she heard, but curious to learn more, she chose to continue concealing her religion and decided to check out study sessions in nearby mosques. “Pure hatred against non-believers is preached, and children are brought here from an early age here in Germany. It’s very similar in asylum housing, where Muslim boys refuse to play with Christians”, she informs the Catholic news agency. Attempts to mediate, where the translator would say “You’re a Muslim, he’s a Christian. What difference does it make?” typically garner responses like “I don’t play with Christians. My parents hate them too”, she reports.


    The Eritrean was also shocked by attitudes shown by the migrants when she brings up the topic of contraception methods with the women, who often have several children young. “Some women told me ‘We will multiply our numbers. We must have more children than the Christians because it’s the only way we can destroy them here”, she recalls. When the translator objected to this sentiment, and pointed out that it’s Christians who are helping them, she says she was told that defending Christians is a sin.


    Since May 743 Christians have been subjected to attacks in Germany’s asylum system, with the vast majority of perpetrators being Muslim according to a report released last month. 416 of the victims reported having been physically assaulted, 44 sexually assaulted and 314 said they have received death threats. In addition, the perpetrators in 205 of the cases were guards at asylum homes — individuals who are paid to protect the migrants in their care.


    Arabic Translator: Muslim Migrants Secretly Hate... | Breitbart
    , 16 1 2016.
    Islam's strategies and goals are not hidden. Islam orders Muslims:
    to hate, kill (Jihad),
    subjugate (Dhimmitude), rape (have sex with what your right hand possess, that is slave),
    deceive (Taqiya) and extort money (Jizya) from non-Muslims.
    Islam ALSO orders Muslims to emigrate to spread Islam (Hijra).

    That’s how islamic expansion and conquest has worked for 1400 years.

    Why is that our leaders and our peoples refuse to comprehend this and acknowledge this?

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to jagdmesser For This Useful Post:


  16. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Last Online
    1 Week Ago @ 10:08 AM
    Ethnicity
    Celto-Germanic
    Ancestry
    Irish, Scottish
    Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    Location
    North Ireland
    Gender
    Family
    Married
    Politics
    National Socialist
    Religion
    Ethnic Catholic
    Posts
    1,118
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,327
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,343
    Thanked in
    731 Posts

    Serious consequences of Muslim inbreeding


    MUSLIMS are INBRED


    The darkest hour is just before dawn. A huge swath of this planet, from the Straits of Gibraltar to the Philippine Sea, has been held in a synthetic, forced nightfall for nearly fourteen centuries. But the sunrise is coming, it is coming sooner rather than later, and this light will be the life of men.


    Everywhere in the western world, people look at the savage violence that is a daily occurrence in the Muslim world and shake their heads in stunned disbelief. A pastor of a very small Christian flock in Florida burns a Koran. Weeks later at literally the global antipode, Muslim imams drive through neighborhoods in a vehicle with loudspeakers attached, calling the townsfolk to riot. The townsfolk respond, and before it is all over, at least 22 innocent people are dead at the hands of these townsfolk, with at least two of them beheaded. How is this possible? How can this be? How can human behavior and culture be so monstrously different? Is this difference attributable to nothing more than environmental nurture theory?


    No. There is something else. There is a catalyst — absent in every other culture on earth — that has poisoned the cultural soil, thus yielding the fruit of bad harvest for nearly 1,400 years. That catalyst is inbreeding. As a direct result of ‘inbreeding’, the Muslim population is mentally developmentally disabled on a mass scale.


    All human cultures display strict prohibitions against inbreeding and consanguineous marriage. Incest is a universal taboo. This is a transcendent anthropological fact. As a Roman Catholic, I attribute this to what is called “The Natural Law.” Every human person without exception is created by God with a deep, innate knowledge of good and evil, right and wrong. Stabbing someone in the neck for no reason whatsoever is just as wrong here in Lone Tree, Colorado as it is in the Amazon basin, as it is on the high plateaus of Mongolia.


    But there is one culture, one faux “religion,” that expressly condones and encourages consanguineous marriage and breeding. That system is Islam, and the document that explicitly ratifies incest is the Koran, specifically Sura 4 verse 23:
    Prohibited for you (in marriage) are your mothers, your daughters, your sisters, the sisters of your fathers, the sisters of your mothers, the daughters of your brother, the daughters of your sister, your nursing mothers, the girls who nursed from the same woman as you, the mothers of your wives, the daughters of your wives with whom you have consummated the marriage — if the marriage has not been consummated, you may marry the daughter. Also prohibited for you are the women who were married to your genetic sons. Also, you shall not be married to two sisters at the same time — but do not break up existing marriages.


    Sounds like an exhaustive list — but it is not. It is the most lax incest prohibition in all of human culture. There is a massive omission: cousins only once removed. In the Muslim culture, marriage and breeding between first cousins has existed since day one. Mohammed himself married Zaynab, who was his father’s sister’s daughter. Mohammed and Zaynab were direct first cousins.


    Marrying your first cousin is the genetic equivalent of marrying your half-sibling. Think of your own family. Let’s say your dad has a sister, who is “Aunt Linda” to you. Your dad and Aunt Linda, being full siblings, have exactly the same genetic constitution. Their family trees prior to their generation are identical. Therefore, if Aunt Linda has any children, who are your first cousins, they are, in genetic terms, 50% identical to you. You share one of your two genetic constituencies with your cousins, thus making them genetically the same as a half-sibling would be.


    First cousin marriage for just one generation is extremely risky in and of itself. This is why virtually every other culture on earth frowns upon or expressly prohibits it, and treats it as a cultural taboo. When two people come together who carry so many similar genetic alleles, the chance of an undesirable recessive trait expressing itself in their offspring soars. Now, understanding that single-generational risk, understand that Muslims have been marrying their first cousins, or closer, over and over again for 1,400 years. Sit in stillness for a moment with the full, terrifying gravity of this.


    The Reproductive Health Journal reports the following rates on consanguinity in Muslim countries. Where a statistical range has been recorded, I have used the lower parameter:

    Algeria: 22.6%
    Bahrain: 39.4%
    Egypt (North): 20.9%
    Egypt (Nubia-South): 60.5%
    Iraq: 47.0%
    Jordan: 28.5%
    Kuwait: 22.5%
    Lebanon: 12.8%
    Libya: 48.4%
    Mauritania: 47.2%
    Morocco: 19.9%
    Oman: 56.3%
    Palestine: 17.5%
    Qatar: 54.0%
    Saudi Arabia: 42.1%
    Sudan: 44.2%
    Syria: 30.3%
    Tunisia: 20.1%
    United Arab Emirates: 40.0%
    Yemen: 40.0%

    Muslim men are never, ever allowed to be around, see, converse with or otherwise interact with any females outside of their families. However, they are permitted to act as chaperones for their female first cousins. If your first cousin is the only person of the opposite sex you ever get to interact with, is it any surprise that Muslims are marrying their first cousins more as the rule than as the exception?


    According to the BBC, 55% of Pakistani-Britons are married to a first cousin, and as a corollary to that produce “just under a third” of all children in the UK with genetic illnesses, despite being only 3% of the total births.


    As a direct result of inbreeding, the Muslim population is the only population on earth that is mentally and physically devolving. This inherent weakness makes Muslim populations more susceptible to nefarious, oppressive leadership and mass manipulation. The amount of objective evidence supporting this statement is colossal and obvious.


    “. . . et lux in tenebris lucet et tenebrae eam non conprehenderunt.” (and the light shines in the darkness and the darkness does not comprehend it.)

    Originally published as “The Keystone of the Islamic Milieu: Inbreeding”


    The One About MUSLIMS BEING INBRED | Barnhardt 26 Nov 2018.

    Islam is entirely compatible with British values and our national way of life. Theresa May, London 23 March 2015.


    There're a reason Muslim countries have the highest number of birth defects...30% higher than western counties – INCEST.

    Muslims being Islamic:

    Paddington St Mary's Hospital Paddington is a few minutes from Little Arabia, the erstwhile Edgware Road. Local community west of Edgware Road and south of St Mary's is predominantly Middle-Eastern/Arabic/Muslim. I have known a few friends working in St Mary's hospital and all have said the same thing, the reason the hospital is so busy is because of the Arab community, put another way the reason Little Arabia is there at all is because the hospital is so handy.

    A walk up Edgware Road will reveal a very unusual number of disabled and mentally handicapped people, using wheelchairs and other aides. My nurse friends all say that the health issues are incest related. Successive generations have interbred and come over, once they were allowed to, in order to receive the free service of the NHS. The entire community is related to one another to some degree. It's shocking in so many ways but is never recognised or addressed.

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to jagdmesser For This Useful Post:


Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 9
    Last Post: Wednesday, September 12th, 2018, 09:25 AM
  2. Muslims want to turn Australia into an Islamic State
    By Blutwölfin in forum Australia & New Zealand
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: Saturday, September 23rd, 2006, 05:09 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •