Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 37

Thread: United Nations / UN

  1. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Last Online
    6 Hours Ago @ 08:17 PM
    Ethnicity
    Celto-Germanic
    Ancestry
    Irish, Scottish
    Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    Location
    North Ireland
    Gender
    Family
    Married
    Politics
    National Socialist
    Religion
    Ethnic Catholic
    Posts
    386
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    329
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    449
    Thanked in
    251 Posts

    A new UN agreement, which almost all member states plan to sign in December, propagates the radical idea that borders must be opened and a “new world” created, where mass migration – for any reason – is something that must be promoted, enabled and enshrined as a “human right.”


    The agreement also directs national governments to de-fund and suppress all forms of counter-expression to mass migration within their countries. Critics who oppose migration and open borders should undergo “sensitization training”, according to the text of the agreement. Free speech will die.


    Unsurprisingly, none of the countries that plan on signing the migration agreement have consulted their citizens regarding whether they want to open their national borders to mass migration. The global pact is being signed in secret, without public debate.


    The unelected UN elites and their obedient vassal states understand that public debate risks jeopardizing their project. But do not be deceived into thinking the agreement will hold little power if it is allowed to proceed. The creators of the agreement are even boasting about the “real change” that will result from the secret global pact.


    The finalized text of the agreement, the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration, is a major step towards the elimination of functioning borders and “puts migration firmly on the global agenda. It will be a point of reference for years to come and induce real change on the ground…” according to Jürg Lauber, the representative of Switzerland to the UN — who led the work on the agreement together with the representative of Mexico.


    It cannot be stressed enough that this agreement is not about refugees fleeing persecution, or their rights to protection under international law. Instead, the agreement propagates the radical idea that migration — for any reason — is something that needs to be promoted, enabled and protected. Almost all UN member states, except for the United States, Austria, Australia, Bulgaria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Israel and Poland, are expected to sign it.


    Gatestone reports: The UN has denied that migration is being made into a human right. “The question of whether this is an invidious way to start promoting a ‘human right to migrate’ is not correct. It’s not in the text; there’s no sinister project to advance that,” Louise Arbour, the UN special representative for international migration, recently said.


    The UN has no interest in admitting that the agreement promotes migration as a human right; until recently there has been little debate about it.


    More debate might risk jeopardizing the entire project. The wording of the agreement, as documented below, leaves little doubt, however, that with the signing of the agreement, migration will indeed become a human right.


    The agreement is divided into 23 objectives toward which the signatories apparently wish to work. Objective number three, for instance, envisions the promotion and enabling of migration through a number of means. Signatory states commit to:
    “Launch and publicize a centralized and publicly accessible national website to make information available on regular migration options, such as on country-specific immigration laws and policies, visa requirements, application formalities, fees and conversion criteria, employment permit requirements, professional qualification requirements, credential assessment and equivalences, training and study opportunities, and living costs and conditions, in order to inform the decisions of migrants.”


    States, in other words, are not only supposed to open their borders for the migrants of the world, but should also help them pick and choose their future country by providing them with comprehensive information about each country they may wish to settle in.


    The service level envisioned to facilitate more migration is also high. Countries are called upon to:
    “Establish open and accessible information points along relevant migration routes that can refer migrants to child-sensitive and gender-responsive support and counselling, offer opportunities to communicate with consular representatives of the country of origin, and make available relevant information, including on human rights and fundamental freedoms, appropriate protection and assistance, options and pathways for regular migration, and possibilities for return, in a language the person concerned understands.”


    Once migrants have arrived at their chosen destination, the signatory countries commit to:
    “Provide newly arrived migrants with targeted, gender-responsive, child-sensitive, accessible and comprehensive information and legal guidance on their rights and obligations, including on compliance with national and local laws, obtaining of work and resident permits, status adjustments, registration with authorities, access to justice to file complaints about rights violations, as well as on access to basic services.”


    Migrants are, evidently, citizens of a new world, in which all countries must spring to the assistance of anyone who has chosen to travel and reside there for whatever reason. Borders may exist in theory, but the UN — comprising nearly all governments of the world — is working hard at making them disappear in practice.


    Migrants, according to the agreement, must also be “empowered to realize full inclusion and social cohesion” in their new countries (objective 16). This means, among other things, that countries must:
    “Promote mutual respect for the cultures, traditions and customs of communities of destination and of migrants by exchanging and implementing best practices on integration policies, programmes and activities, including on ways to promote acceptance of diversity and facilitate social cohesion and inclusion.”


    All cultures are equal and must be equally respected. Presumably, this means that, for example, the tradition of female genital mutilation (FGM), which almost all Somali women experience in Somalia, must be acknowledged in London and Paris as deserving of “mutual respect” in the same way that it would back in Mogadishu.


    The agreement goes on to enumerate the work that states must initiate to accommodate migrants. “National… policy goals regarding the inclusion of migrants in societies, including on labour market integration, family reunification, education, non-discrimination and health” should be developed. In addition, the host country should facilitate “access to decent work and employment for which they are most qualified, in accordance with local and national labour market demands and skills supply.”


    In other words, newly arrived migrants in, say, Europe, should have the same, or at least very similar, rights to education, the labour market and health care, as Europeans, who have worked hard and paid taxes for half a century to gain access to those very same things. Europeans, of course, will have to pay for all of this out of their tax money.


    The authors of the agreement evidently do not expect it to go down all that well with their populations. An agreement to facilitate mass migration into primarily Western countries from the rest of the world (there is no migration to speak of in the opposite direction) may prove a bit much for people in the West. The agreement therefore clearly signals that any disagreement with the agenda will not be accepted and that the signatory states will work to dispel “misleading narratives that generate negative perceptions of migrants.”


    To make this objective a reality, the signatory states first commit to:
    “Promote independent, objective and quality reporting of media outlets, including internet-based information, including by sensitizing and educating media professionals on migration-related issues and terminology, investing in ethical reporting standards and advertising, and stopping allocation of public funding or material support to media outlets that systematically promote intolerance, xenophobia, racism and other forms of discrimination towards migrants, in full respect for the freedom of the media.” (Objective 17)



    This is Orwell on steroids.


    Almost all UN member states will sign an agreement that says media outlets that disagree with government policies will not be eligible for public funding? On top of this, the agreement claims, bizarrely, that it is being written “in full respect for the freedom of the media”, as if that is going to make anyone actually believe it.


    Second, the signatory states commit to:
    “… eliminate all forms of discrimination, condemn and counter expressions, acts and manifestations of racism, racial discrimination, violence, xenophobia and related intolerance against all migrants in conformity with international human rights law.” (Objective 17)


    The agreement, conveniently, offers no definitions of what constitutes “racism” or “xenophobia” in this context. What, for example, is “related intolerance”? Is criticism of UN migration policies, for instance, “intolerance”?


    Originally, all UN member states, minus the United States, had approved the finalized text of the agreement and appeared ready to sign it in December. Recently, however, more states have announced that they are withdrawing from the agreement. In July, Hungary withdrew from the agreement. Hungarian Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto described it as “entirely against Hungary’s security interests,” and added:
    “This pact poses a threat to the world from the aspect that it could inspire millions [of migrants]. Its main premise is that migration is a good and inevitable phenomenon. We consider migration a bad process, which has extremely serious security implications.”


    In July, Australia also indicated that it would withdraw from the agreement, at least in its present form. According to Minister for Home Affairs Peter Dutton:
    “We’re not going to sign a deal that sacrifices anything in terms of our border protection policies… We’re not going to surrender our sovereignty – I’m not going to allow unelected bodies dictate to us, to the Australian people.”


    In November, both the Czech Republic, and Poland announced that they were very likely to withdraw from the agreement and Croatian President Kolinda Grabar-Kitarovic wrote in a statement that she would not be signing the agreement. “Our sovereign principles on securing our borders and controlling migration flows are absolutely the priority for us”, said Polish Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki.


    Also just this month, Austria announced that it also would not be signing the agreement. “We view some points of the migration pact very critically, such as the mixing up of seeking protection with labour migration,” Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz said.


    The European Union immediately criticized Austria’s decision. “We regret the decision that the Austrian government has taken. We continue to believe that migration is a global challenge where only global solutions and global responsibility sharing will bring results” said an unnamed spokeswoman from the European Commission.


    This is, by the way, the same EU that is supposedly going to be “cracking down” on migration. If you are “cracking down” on migration, why are you signing agreements that will facilitate and exponentiate it as a human right?


    UN Global Pact Vows To Open Borders, Make Migration... 23 Nov 2018.


    UN breakdown and how its used


    UN 193 countries: 57 muslim, 56 african, 28 EU (plus US, Australia, Russia, Ukraine etc)

    The UN is a muslim and black institution. Of course they only want their own self interests.

    The universal problem today is ‘overpopulation.’ Who is overpopulating? The blecks and the muslims.


    The UN’s aim is one world government and the one world government will be the UN.

    This Human Rights "Freedom of movement" is a globalist ploy by jewish financiers, the Rothschilds Inc., to change the world so they have total control.


    With the GCM / the global compact on migration they are installing the New World Order / NWO. Briefing A global compact on migration - European Parliament


    Mass Migration is simply vote rigging to seize power and hold it. Once they have it they won’t be relinquishing it.


    The Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) (formerly Organization of the IslamicConference) is the second largest inter-governmental organization after the United Nations which has membership of 57 states spread over four continents.

    Did Nero fiddle while ROME burned? For one thing, thefiddle didn’t exist in ancient Rome. Music historians believe the viol class of instruments (to which ... The Roman historian Tacitus wrote that Nero was rumored to have sung about the destruction of Troy while watching the city burn.


    Of course the UK will sign up and there will be no public debate about the UN pact.

    Put these this first post together with the second which I have copied from before and you get the picture.
    Arab countries take on migrants or refugees. No migrants or refugees would go to Africa or Asia.
    This is about the Globalists remaking Europe as the euSSR without Europeans.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to jagdmesser For This Useful Post:


  3. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Last Online
    6 Hours Ago @ 08:17 PM
    Ethnicity
    Celto-Germanic
    Ancestry
    Irish, Scottish
    Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    Location
    North Ireland
    Gender
    Family
    Married
    Politics
    National Socialist
    Religion
    Ethnic Catholic
    Posts
    386
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    329
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    449
    Thanked in
    251 Posts

    UN Migration Pact - COLLAPSING?


    How many more countries will reject the UN’s attempt to flood first world nations with unlimited immigration, especially from the Muslim world?


    So far, the United States, Hungary, Austria, Czech Republic, Poland, and Croatia have announced their intention NOT to sign the United Nations Global Migration Pact, which is scheduled to take place in Morocco in December.

    Peter Dutton of Australia has also just said: “We’re not going to surrender our sovereignty – I’m not going to allow unelected bodies dictate to us, to the Australian people.

    So far, Canada appears ready to sign, but what about the rest of Western Europe? I wonder if any of the oil-rich Arab countries will refuse to sign, considering that none of them have agreed to accept even one Muslim refugee?

    The UN Pact To Dump Millions of Third World, Culturally Incompatible State Dependent Leeches into your Neighbourhood on your Watch




    COLLAPSING? How many more countries will reject the UN’s ...


    UN = NWO politburo

    How many countries will it take to pass this?
    Will it pass if it is unanimous?
    Will the countries that do not sign it, be obligated to follow it?
    Will Brazil, China, Denmark, Italy, Japan, Russia and Switzerland sign?


    UN 193 countries: 57 muslim, 56 african, 28 EU (plus US, Australia, Russia, Ukraine etc)

    The UN is a muslim and black institution. Of course they only want their own self interests.


    193 – 10 (approx) = pass

    The africoon and muslim nations will vote for it, because it’s in their interests, but it’s meaningless for them and will not negatively effect them.

  4. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Last Online
    6 Hours Ago @ 08:17 PM
    Ethnicity
    Celto-Germanic
    Ancestry
    Irish, Scottish
    Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    Location
    North Ireland
    Gender
    Family
    Married
    Politics
    National Socialist
    Religion
    Ethnic Catholic
    Posts
    386
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    329
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    449
    Thanked in
    251 Posts

    Merkel: EU States Must Prepare to Hand National Sovereignty over to Brussels


    German Chancellor Angela Merkel has said that European Union (EU) member states must be prepared to transfer powers over to Brussels at a debate on the ‘tensions’ between globalisation and national sovereignty.


    “Nation states must today be prepared to give up their sovereignty,” Merkel said, speaking at an event organised by the Konrad Adenauer Foundation in Berlin on Wednesday. “In an orderly fashion of course,” Merkel said, explaining that — while Germany had given up some of its sovereignty in order to join the EU, national parliaments were in charge of deciding whether to sign up to international treaties.


    Trust and the willingness to compromise are vital in addressing tensions between sovereignty and globalisation, asserted the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) leader, highlighting the controversial UN migration pact, debate over which has continued to split her own party.


    Merkel condemned the fact that, in discussions over whether Germany should join a fast-growing number of nations pulling out of the agreement, “there were [politicians] who believed that they could decide when these agreements are no longer valid because they are representing The People”.“[But] the people are individuals who are living in a country, they are not a group who define themselves as the [German] people,” she stressed.


    Earlier in the day, the Chancellor had previously accused critics of her plans to sign up to the Global Compact for Safe and Orderly Migration, which declares migration ‘inevitable, necessary and desirable’, of advocating “nationalism in its purest form”. “That is not patriotism, because patriotism is when you include others in German interests and accept win-win situations,” insisted Merkel, paraphrasing her French counterpart Emmanuel Macron, who recently claimed that “patriotism is the exact opposite of nationalism [because] nationalism is treason”.



    Battling disastrous poll ratings at home in France, as well as massive protests, Macron travelled to Berlin at the weekend, where he told the Bundestag that “the Franco-German couple [has] the obligation not to let the world slip into chaos and to guide it on the road to peace”. “Europe must be stronger… and win more sovereignty,” the French president said, demanding EU member states surrender national sovereignty to Brussels over “foreign affairs, migration, and development” in addition to “an increasing part of our budgets and even fiscal resources”.



    MERKEL: EU STATES MUST PREPARE TO HAND NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY OVER TO BRUSSELS 24 Nov 2018.



    Merkel, the jewish, Polish Bolshevik who hates Germany, and sidekick Macron are MAD globalists who should both be in an asylum.

    What does that say for those that voted for them.

    I am convinced that this Mad Dictator Merkel is setting up another war, first civil which will then become global.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to jagdmesser For This Useful Post:


  6. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Last Online
    6 Hours Ago @ 08:17 PM
    Ethnicity
    Celto-Germanic
    Ancestry
    Irish, Scottish
    Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    Location
    North Ireland
    Gender
    Family
    Married
    Politics
    National Socialist
    Religion
    Ethnic Catholic
    Posts
    386
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    329
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    449
    Thanked in
    251 Posts

    ‘Hypocritical’ UK Govt to Sign UN Migration Pact Despite Pledge to Control Borders


    While debate on the UN migration pact rages worldwide, with a growing number of nations following the United States in withdrawing, the major deal has seen little discussion in the United Kingdom.



    Britain’s ruling Conservative Party made pledges to reduce immigration “from the hundreds of thousands to the tens of thousands” in the 2010, 2015, and 2017 general elections, a promise they have not yet made significant progress in keeping. Indeed, net migration to Britain still runs at over 270,000 a year, and former Tory chancellor George Osborne has suggested the party’s leadership never intended to honour the pledge.

    Either way, signing the United Nations’ so-called Global Compact on Migration for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration would be a major step away from ever realising that commitment, a campaign group has said. British peer Lord Green of Deddington submitted two parliamentary questions to the government this week in which he requested information on whether, and how, the globalist pledge to ease and “enhance” migration would fit with the Conservatives’ long-standing promise to bring it under control and reduce it.

    Several recent polls have indicated that controlling immigration levels remains an important topic for British voters. A press release by Migration Watch UK, the London-based campaign group which Lord Green leads, said of the pact: “The UK Government should make it clear that it will not sign… If they have any regard for their election promises it would be entirely hypocritical to do so.”


    Alp Mehmet, vice-chairman of Migration Watch UK, remarked on the UN deal itself, saying: “The Compact appears to have been drafted by diplomats whose aim seems to be to ‘normalise’ mass immigration from the developing world to the West at a time when the public are very clear that they find the scale and pace of such flows to be unsustainable and unacceptable.”

    During drafting, British negotiators called for clauses recognising that it is the right and obligation of states to control their own borders, and that there should be a distinction between refugees and economic migrants, but they were not incorporated into the final text.

    While legal professionals have said the compact acts will create a legal framework that lawyers will interpret at the national level to advance mass migration, it has received little attention or debate in the United Kingdom, where the political space remains consumed by Brexit.

    Yet as the UK works to extract itself from one multinational framework and makes a bid for freedom, it may have inadvertently sleepwalked into another, signed by an ostensibly conservative government which pledged to the people in three consecutive elections to control immigration levels.

    Breitbart London has reported on the several nations which have decided the document makes an unacceptable grab on national sovereignty and the right to self-determination, however, following the decision of U.S. President Donald Trump to withdraw his country from the compact in December 2017. President Trump said at the body’s New York headquarters in September: “Migration should not be governed by an international body unaccountable to our own citizens. “Ultimately, the only long-term solution to the migration crisis is to help people build more hopeful futures in their home countries: make their countries great again.”

    Others nations withdrew after the final text of the agreement was set, declaring they would not be signing up to the compact in December. Among those that have confirmed, or indicated they are rethinking joining, are Australia, Poland, Israel, Switzerland, Austria, Hungary, the Czech Republic, Bulgaria, and Croatia.



    ‘Hypocritical’ UK Govt to Sign UN Migration Pact Despite Pledge to Control Borders 25 Nov 2018.


    Globalism = SLOW KILL of Europeans by Population replacement
    Globalists = Bankers & Ruling elite + most of Parliament.
    Meantime - Panem Et Circum (multicult MSM, Social media, booze, dope and porn ) to sedate the people. And we wonder why so few object or protest.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to jagdmesser For This Useful Post:


  8. #25
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Last Online
    6 Hours Ago @ 08:17 PM
    Ethnicity
    Celto-Germanic
    Ancestry
    Irish, Scottish
    Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    Location
    North Ireland
    Gender
    Family
    Married
    Politics
    National Socialist
    Religion
    Ethnic Catholic
    Posts
    386
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    329
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    449
    Thanked in
    251 Posts

    40% of Germans Fear UN Migration Pact Will Result in More Migrants


    40% of Germans say they fear the UN Migration Pact will give migrants additional asylum rights.



    The Insa Institute carried out a survey of 2,062 Germans between Friday and Monday, asking them to respond to the statement: “I fear that the signing of the UN Migration Pact could lead to additional claims for asylum.”

    Deutsche Presse-Agentur reports that 40% responded they feared the UN declaration would give migrants greater rights to asylum in Germany and almost an equal number either responded “don’t know” or did not answer, while just 22.7 % said they did not perceive any risk of increased asylum seekers.


    The migration pact, due to be signed between the 10th and 11th of December in Marrakesh, Morocco, would require signatories to open up welfare systems to illegal aliens as well as “commit to eliminat[ing] all forms of discrimination” with measures including state promotion of “diversity” and the prevention of “hate speech.”

    While the United Nations claims the agreement is non-binding, legal experts have said that it is drafted in a way that creates a framework for asylum laws and occupies a “legal grey area.”


    The survey was conducted for the Union of Values — a union of thousands of conservative members of Chancellor Angela Merkel’s Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and its Bavarian sister party the Christian Social Union (CSU) — with its Federal President Alexander Mitsch saying that the CDU/CSU must take its members’ concerns seriously and ensure the Bundestag and Federal Government do not make commitments that could become binding. “Therefore, at least in a protocol statement to be adopted, should it be stipulated that Germany rejects any future legal liability as a consequence of the pact,” Mr Mitsch said.

    The CDU are set to meet for their party conference in early December — before the signing of the UN document in Morocco — but Chancellor Merkel has already signalled in the strongest terms her support for the compact, attacking concern over the controversial agreement as “nationalism in its purest form.”



    Breitbart London reported that internal documents from the Federal Foreign Office revealed Merkel’s government was the main architect of the pact, claiming they had been working on the agreement since 2016 — shortly after the chancellor unilaterally suspended the EU’s asylum rules and invited over one million migrants from the Global South into Europe.


    40 Per Cent of Germans Fear UN Migration Pact Will Result in More Migrants 28 Nov 2018.

    The EU/UN/globalists plan to continue swamping Europe with more and more immigrants (VOTERS) in order to hold democratic control. They want to increase the replacement so that it will be beyond stopping.

    Will there be a 'Germany' after Merkel?

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to jagdmesser For This Useful Post:


  10. #26
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Last Online
    6 Hours Ago @ 08:17 PM
    Ethnicity
    Celto-Germanic
    Ancestry
    Irish, Scottish
    Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    Location
    North Ireland
    Gender
    Family
    Married
    Politics
    National Socialist
    Religion
    Ethnic Catholic
    Posts
    386
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    329
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    449
    Thanked in
    251 Posts

    Populist Italian Government Latest to Back Out of UN Migration Pact


    The populist Italian coalition government has announced they will not be signing the controversial UN global migration pact and that the matter will be voted on in parliament instead.



    Interior Minister Matteo Salvini announced, “the Italian government will not sign anything and will not go to Marrakesh, it must be sent to the chamber to discuss it. The Italian government will make parliament choose,” Il Giornale reports.



    The statement was backed up by Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte who added, “We, therefore, consider it appropriate to put the debate to parliament and to put the definitive choices back on the outcome of this discussion, as was decided by Switzerland. In Marrakesh, the Government will not participate, reserving the right to adhere or not to the document only when parliament has pronounced itself.”



    The populist-conservative Brothers of Italy, which is a traditional ally of Salvini’s League despite not being in the ruling coalition, have also pushed for Italy to renounce the pact but say they fear a parliamentary vote could see the Five Star Movement (M5S) and left-wing parties vote to sign it. “Salvini says that if there is no agreement with the M5S, we will return to parliament, but if we vote freely, the M5s and the left would say yes,” Giorgia Meloni, leader of the Brothers of Italy (FdI) said and added that she hoped the parliament would vote no to the pact.



    Italy has become just the latest country to reject the UN migrant pact, which Breitbart London revealed earlier this week had been developed by the German government under Chancellor Angela Merkel since 2016.



    Italy joins the United States, Hungary, Austria, Australia, Israel and several other countries who have also rejected or signalled they would reject the pact with Hungarian Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó saying, “The goal of the UN Global Compact for Migration is to legalise illegal immigration, which is totally unacceptable and violates the sovereignty of member states, including that of Hungary.”


    Populist Italian Government Latest to Back Out of UN Migration Pact 29 Nov 2018.

    “Salvini says that if there is no agreement with the M5S, we will return to parliament, but if we vote freely, the M5s and the left would say yes,” Giorgia Meloni, leader of the Brothers of Italy (FdI) said

    - in every European Country it should be PUT TO A NATIONAL REFERENDUM.

  11. #27
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Last Online
    6 Hours Ago @ 08:17 PM
    Ethnicity
    Celto-Germanic
    Ancestry
    Irish, Scottish
    Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    Location
    North Ireland
    Gender
    Family
    Married
    Politics
    National Socialist
    Religion
    Ethnic Catholic
    Posts
    386
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    329
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    449
    Thanked in
    251 Posts

    N-VA torpedoes plans to sign Belgium up to UN migration pact


    The signature by Belgium of the United Nations pact on migration, promised to the assembly by prime minister Charles Michel in New York in September, looked to be in jeopardy this week as the coalition party N-VA threatened not to back the proposal to sign.


    “We will not sign off on this text,” said a spokesperson for Theo Francken, federal secretary of state for asylum and migration and a man tipped as a future N-VA leader. According to the party, the Global Pact for Migration is in conflict with the Belgian government’s own governing accords, established in 2014. The pact would also help perpetuate the “illegal migration chaos” which is at present “destroying Europe,” the spokesperson said.



    The migration pact rises out of an idea launched two years ago by the former UN secretary-general Ban Ki Moon,” explained Nicolas Van Nuffel, part of the advocacy team for the NGO partnership CNCD-11.11.11. “There were long negotiations lasting two years between the member states, resulting in an interesting text which defines 23 objectives to be attained to allow migration to take place correctly in the interests of everyone.”



    The discussion of the pact, Van Nuffel said, represented a return to multilateralism, with all parties seated at the table until two months ago, when two member states pulled out – the United States and Hungary, both of whose leaders – Donald Trump and Victor Orban – have taken a hard-line approach to migrants entering their territory from neighbouring lands.



    Not only were NGOs in the field consulted as part of the negotiation, the Belgian government detailed a senior diplomat to cover nothing else – a sort of migration attaché. In addition, government representatives – including none other than Theo Francken – also took part in negotiations.



    The lack of the backing of the N-VA, the largest party in the government, places Michel in a difficult situation. Back in September, he took to the podium in the UN and said “My government will sign the global pact on migration in Marrakesh in December.” Without the backing of his main coalition party, he will not have the authority to do anything of the sort, leaving Belgium in the unenviable company of Trump’s America and Orban’s Hungary.



    Speaking to the RTBF, Nicolas Van Nuffel tried to place the pact in context: “You have to understand that this is a declaration which is absolutely not binding. This is not a new Geneva Convention which is mandatory on states. The interesting thing about a declaration like this, at a time when multilateralism is ill, and our migration policies are ailing, is that it changes the way of looking at things, and puts in place long-term objectives to allow us to treat migration for what it is: a phenomenon deeply anchored in the history of humanity.”


    N-VA torpedoes plans to sign Belgium up to UN migration... 15 Nov 2018.

    Article 19 Human Rights Charter, United Nations:
    "Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers."


    Speech is NOT free, if it's vetted by Political Correctness.



    Tyrant Merkel is going quietly through her fourth term but she is only more determined to be absolutely ruthless on flooding Europe with third world leech invaders.

  12. #28
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Last Online
    6 Hours Ago @ 08:17 PM
    Ethnicity
    Celto-Germanic
    Ancestry
    Irish, Scottish
    Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    Location
    North Ireland
    Gender
    Family
    Married
    Politics
    National Socialist
    Religion
    Ethnic Catholic
    Posts
    386
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    329
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    449
    Thanked in
    251 Posts

    UK is on course to sign UN Migration Pact this month without Parliamentary debate

    PetitionsUK Government and Parliament

    Petition


    The UK should not agree the UN's Global Compact for Migration


    The UN's Intergovernmental Conference will be held in Marrakech, Morocco on 10 and 11 December 2018. Like Hungary, the UK should not sign.


    Parliament will consider this for a debate


    Sign this petition


    108,287 signatures


    100,000
    Parliament considers all petitions that get more than 100,000 signatures for a debate
    Waiting for less than a day for a debate date

  13. #29
    Senior Member Theunissen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Last Online
    8 Hours Ago @ 05:30 PM
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ancestry
    North Western Europe
    Country
    South Africa South Africa
    State
    Transvaal Transvaal
    Location
    South Africa
    Gender
    Posts
    386
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    75
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    117
    Thanked in
    76 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by The Mercian View Post
    Cultural Marxists have fully infiltrated most positions of power. When I realised this it was a horrific black pill.

    The way I see it is we have a few options; cut ourselves entirely from their systems, or infiltrate them ourselves. Sadly I see neither happening, all I’m seeing is them being ridiculed but still gaining more and more power.
    The problem is that they've infiltrated and infected institutions of education. That's why it isn't really possible to get rid of them by only changing government. They'd persist after that.
    Examples on which fields they are strong:
    - Universities, especially social sciences and humanities departments have a lot of cultural Marxist professors.
    - Schools / The teachers come from those universities and were educated and influenced by cultural Marxists.
    - Churches / The clergy has been trained by Cultural Marxists and hence they changed their teaches in this regard.

    That system gets self-perpetuating. The professors train the teachers, the teachers train and influence the pupils, those pupils become students, of those students become teachers and some even professors, positions from where they can influence students and pupils again.

    To get rid of that, you'd need something like a decent purge.

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to Theunissen For This Useful Post:


  15. #30
    Senior Member schwab's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Last Online
    52 Minutes Ago @ 01:29 AM
    Ethnicity
    alsatian
    Ancestry
    germanic/alsatian/Elsaesser
    Subrace
    Child of God
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    Oregon Oregon
    Location
    Rogue River
    Gender
    Family
    Married
    Occupation
    retired - Aerospace
    Politics
    independent
    Religion
    Born again Christian,
    Posts
    102
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    148
    Thanked in
    64 Posts
    ABOLISH the UN, which stands for United Nonsense.

  16. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to schwab For This Useful Post:


Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. The 11 Nations Of The United States
    By GroeneWolf in forum The United States
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: Thursday, May 24th, 2018, 04:37 PM
  2. President Obama Addresses the United Nations
    By Ediruc in forum The United States
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: Thursday, September 30th, 2010, 03:04 AM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: Thursday, December 18th, 2003, 07:07 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •