Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 37 of 37

Thread: United Nations / UN

  1. #31
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Last Online
    10 Hours Ago @ 08:17 PM
    Ethnicity
    Celto-Germanic
    Ancestry
    Irish, Scottish
    Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    Location
    North Ireland
    Gender
    Family
    Married
    Politics
    National Socialist
    Religion
    Ethnic Catholic
    Posts
    386
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    329
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    450
    Thanked in
    252 Posts

    No to Marrakesh! – The UN’s Sinister Blueprint for Globalist Migration Hell

    “Marrakech C’est Non!” says one of the banners wielded by the Gilets Jaunes at the protests in Paris this weekend: “No to Marrakesh!”



    This refers, of course, to the United Nations conference in Marrakesh, Morocco later this week: the one where the world’s nations are being asked to sign away their sovereignty, their freedoms and their identity in one of the most pernicious agreements ever devised by the UN: the justly infamous UN Global Compact on Migration.



    Lots of countries have already announced that they are not going to sign, among them the U.S, Hungary, Poland, Austria, Italy, Israel, Bulgaria and Australia.

    There’s a clue as to how toxic this compact is: when even a country as emasculated and politically correct as Australia finds it too much to swallow.

    But perhaps a bigger clue as to its toe-curling, achingly right-on, surrender-monkey awfulness is offered by the countries which are planning on signing up to it. These include Leo Varadkar’s Ireland and Justin “President Bieber” Trudeau’s Canada: arguably the two Western nations you’d least want to be living in right now because they are currently in the hands of politically correct bedwetters bent on destroying every last vestige of their national identity and replacing it with some kind of squishy, globalist melting pot where people of all colours and creeds hold hands under a rainbow.



    Another country which is planning on signing it is the United Kingdom. Which is bizarre to the point of incomprehensibility when you discover what this UN Global Compact on Migration entails.

    Essentially it’s a globalist masterplan for making migration easier. Much, much easier.

    Not the kind of migration that you or I might approve of: say, eager computing graduates from the universities of Cluj Napoca coming to bolster our tech economy with their Python programming skills; me spending a few years in Singapore/Costa Rica/Switzerland/the U.S. or wherever in order to ride out the coming Corbyn terror; kids like my eldest boy moving to the low tax, entrepreneur-friendly environs of Hong Kong to make their fortune; win-win situations which work to the advantage both of the migrant and the host nation…

    I mean the kind of migration we most of us dread: the one where hordes of mostly unskilled, sometimes criminally deviant males of fighting age descend on our civilised home nations from their considerably less civilised countries – at best to overburden our infrastructure and exploit our overgenerous welfare systems, at worst to destroy us from within.

    It’s happening right now across the West: the stone-throwing, wall-scaling, MS-13 tattooed migrant caravans swarming towards the U.S. southern border; the gangs of sullen youths who’ve turned St Denis – the cathedral where most of France’s kings are buried – into a cross between Lagos and Mogadishu; the Muslim ghetto kids who’ve helped Malmo in Sweden become the rape and grenade-attack capital of Europe; the hassly Africans who dog your every step through the tourist sites and beaches of Italy, importuning you to buy stuff you don’t want; the millions of migrants Angela Merkel invited into Germany, now adding impressively to the country’s rape and murder statistics…

    You’ll never guess what the United Nations’ solution to this problem is. Actually, knowing the UN as we all do, you probably will.

    Yep: the UN’s solution is to make it illegal to talk about this problem.


    Here is the relevant section of the UN Global Compact on Migration:


    OBJECTIVE 17: Eliminate all forms of discrimination and promote evidence-based public discourse to shape perceptions of migration

    33. We commit to eliminate all forms of discrimination, condemn and counter expressions, acts and manifestations of racism, racial discrimination, violence, xenophobia and related intolerance against all migrants in conformity with international human rights law. We further commit to promote an open and evidence-based public discourse on migration and migrants in partnership with all parts of society, that generates a more realistic, humane and constructive perception in this regard. We also commit to protect freedom of expression in accordance with international law, recognizing that an open and free debate contributes to a comprehensive understanding of all aspects of migration.

    To realize this commitment, we will draw from the following actions:
    a) Enact, implement or maintain legislation that penalizes hate crimes and aggravated hate crimes targeting migrants, and train law enforcement and other public officials to identify, prevent and respond to such crimes and other acts of violence that target migrants, as well as to provide medical, legal and psychosocial assistance for victims.


    The excuse being bandied about by defenders of this outrageous document is that it is not legally binding. No, indeed. But that’s the excuse that believers in one-world government always use to mask their sinister scheming. It was the same with the UN’s Agenda 21 all those years ago at the 1992 Rio Earth Summit. People signed up to it because it supposedly wasn’t binding. But it very quickly became an excuse for all manner of green lobbyists and politicians and left-leaning pressure groups and local governments to force through policies as if it were binding.


    If you want to read more about the threat of the UN Migration Compact, this piece by UKIP’s David Kurten is a good place to start. It’s still more thoroughly discussed and dismantled by Stefan Molyneux in this hour-long video. Molyneux comes up with some pretty shocking statistics on the damage done by mass migration – and the unpopularity thereof in the countries that have to put up with it.


    78% of European citizens want tighter control of immigration.

    50% of Kenyans say they would move to another country (and they don’t mean Somalia or Zimbabwe, by the way) if they could.

    12 Germans have to work in order to pay the costs of every one of the two or three million migrants Angela Merkel invited into the country.

    In 2017 the Swedish government spent $18.6 billion paying for refugees – 19% of its annual budget.

    Why would any country on earth sign up to a deal so very obviously against the interests of its nationals?

    It’s very simple: the globalist political elite doesn’t respect nation states nor does it give a damn about the views of ordinary people. Indeed, it despises them so much that it would much rather make their views illegal than listen to what they have to say.

    That’s why the Gilets Jaunes are setting France ablaze; that’s why thousands of protestors are out on the streets of London following Tommy Robinson and the #BrexitBetrayalMarch; that’s why they elected Matteo Salvini in Italy, Viktor Orban in Hungary, Jair Bolsonaro in Brazil; that why Donald Trump is president of the USA.


    We are living in an era of world revolution. And the globalists – as embodied by the kind of George-Soros-financed campaign groups pushing that suicidal UN Global Compact for Migration – are on the wrong side of history.


    No to Marrakesh! – The UN’s Sinister Blueprint for Globalist 09 Dec 2018.


    Our UK government is completely ignoring the petition to not sign up to this UN Migration Pact, despite the fact that is has passed 140,000 signatures. When a petition reaches 100,000 it legally should be discussed in parliament.
    Our political representatives are bribed, told what to do with the guise 'you know better' and 'it's for the common good.'

  2. #32
    Member Wuotans Krieger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Last Online
    5 Hours Ago @ 01:39 AM
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ancestry
    1/2 German, 3/8 English, 1/8 Welsh
    Y-DNA
    R1b
    mtDNA
    V10b
    Country
    England England
    Location
    Northumbria
    Gender
    Zodiac Sign
    Scorpio
    Family
    Parent,Co-habiting
    Occupation
    Retired
    Politics
    Strasserite National Socialist
    Religion
    Wodenist
    Posts
    580
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    260
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    145
    Thanked in
    105 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by schwab View Post
    ABOLISH the UN, which stands for United Nonsense.
    And what if anything would you replace it with? It is the only collective organisation which can oppose the Washington-Tel Aviv axis.

  3. #33
    Member Wuotans Krieger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Last Online
    5 Hours Ago @ 01:39 AM
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ancestry
    1/2 German, 3/8 English, 1/8 Welsh
    Y-DNA
    R1b
    mtDNA
    V10b
    Country
    England England
    Location
    Northumbria
    Gender
    Zodiac Sign
    Scorpio
    Family
    Parent,Co-habiting
    Occupation
    Retired
    Politics
    Strasserite National Socialist
    Religion
    Wodenist
    Posts
    580
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    260
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    145
    Thanked in
    105 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by jagdmesser View Post
    Our UK government is completely ignoring the petition to not sign up to this UN Migration Pact, despite the fact that is has passed 140,000 signatures. When a petition reaches 100,000 it legally should be discussed in parliament.
    Our political representatives are bribed, told what to do with the guise 'you know better' and 'it's for the common good.'
    That is incorrect. It can be considered for debate but Parliament is under no legal obligation to debate it.

  4. #34
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Last Online
    10 Hours Ago @ 08:17 PM
    Ethnicity
    Celto-Germanic
    Ancestry
    Irish, Scottish
    Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    Location
    North Ireland
    Gender
    Family
    Married
    Politics
    National Socialist
    Religion
    Ethnic Catholic
    Posts
    386
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    329
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    450
    Thanked in
    252 Posts

    The Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration


    More UN Chicanery.


    • The Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration -- which seeks to criminalize criticism of migration -- is nothing more or less than a dangerous effort to weaken national borders, to normalize mass migration, to blur the line between legal and illegal immigration, and to bolster the idea that people claiming to be refugees enjoy a panoply of rights in countries where they have never before set foot.
    • One thing about the agreement, in any event, is irrefutable: almost nobody in the Western world has been clamoring for this. It is, quite simply, a project of the globalist elites. It is a UN power-grab.




    It is something else, too: it is an effort to enhance the clout of the UN's largest and most influential power bloc -- namely, the Arab and Muslim states. Briefly put, whatever this deal is or is not, it is definitely not good news for the West, for freedom, or for national identity and security.



    The Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration -- which seeks to criminalize criticism of migration -- is nothing more or less than a dangerous effort to weaken national borders, normalize mass migration, blur the line between legal and illegal immigration, and bolster the idea that people claiming to be refugees enjoy a panoply of rights in countries where they have never before set foot. Pictured: Migrants walk towards a holding camp in Dobova, Slovenia on October 26, 2015. (Photo by Jeff J Mitchell/Getty Images)



    In Britain, the rage over Muslim rape gangs and Theresa May's Brexit foul-up is spreading. In Germany, anger about Merkel's recklessly transformative refugee policies is mounting. In France, the growing cost of immigrant freeloaders to taxpayers has sparked the most sensational public demonstrations since 1968. In Italy and Austria, opponents of the Islamization of Europe now hold the reins of power. Elsewhere in Western Europe, more and more citizens are standing up to their masters' open-borders dhimmitude.


    Yet much of this principled and patriotic resistance may turn out to be for naught, thanks to the so-called Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration, which is scheduled to be signed by representatives of the UN member states at a December 10-11 conference. Supporters of the compact are quick to reassure its critics that it is not a binding treaty and that it reaffirms the concept of national sovereignty. Nevertheless, when you come right down to it, it is nothing more or less than a dangerous effort to weaken national borders, to normalize mass migration, to blur the line between legal and illegal immigration, and to bolster the idea that people claiming to be refugees enjoy a panoply of rights in countries where they have never before set foot.


    As for the 34-page-long document itself, it is written in the kind of numbing, abstraction-heavy prose that will be familiar to anyone who has ever read anything issued by the UN. It declares that "migration is a defining feature of our globalized world, connecting societies within and across all regions, making us all countries of origin, transit and destination." It states that the goal of the Global Compact is "to create conducive conditions that enable all [!] migrants to enrich our societies through their human, economic and social capacities, and thus facilitate their contributions to sustainable development at the local, national, regional and global levels." It also affirms that:

    "[w]e must save lives and keep migrants out of harm's way. We must empower migrants to become full members of our societies, highlight their positive contributions, and promote inclusion and social cohesion. We must generate greater predictability and certainty for States, communities and migrants alike. To achieve this, we commit to facilitate and ensure safe, orderly and regular migration for the benefit of all."


    There is a lot more where this came from, and it is not entirely clear what most of it means. Is it just a load of empty, feel-good rhetoric, or is it meant to commit signatories to specific action? What does it mean to say that the Global Compact "mainstreams a gender perspective" or that "a whole-of-government approach is needed to ensure horizontal and vertical policy coherence across all sectors and levels of government"? On the other hand, the document certainly does appear to encourage illegal migration. It unambiguously urges governments to feed their citizens propaganda about the delights of migrants and migration and to "sensitiz[e] and educat[e] media professionals on migration-related issues and terminology" and, in effect, to strong-arm journalists who refuse to play ball. Some readers of the document say that it calls for the criminalization of any criticism of migration, although its backers deny this.


    One thing about the agreement, in any event, is irrefutable: almost nobody in the Western world has been clamoring for this. It is, quite simply, a project of the globalist elites. It is a UN power-grab. As the Guardian reported last year, Louise Arbour, the hack put in charge of this project, "regards the global compact as a chance to shift world opinion on the need to address future migration, in the same way that the UN had managed to persuade the world it needed to address climate change." In short, this is yet another reminder that the UN is run by power-hungry busybodies who see it as their job not to respond to and act upon world opinion but to shape it and, if necessary, punish it.


    It is something else, too: it is an effort to enhance the clout of the UN's largest and most influential power bloc – namely, the Arab and Muslim states. Just check out the UN website devoted to this Global Compact -- it's illustrated by a picture of a young man and woman holding their index fingers and thumbs together to form a heart. She is in hijab. Repeat: she is in hijab. Briefly put, whatever this deal is or is not, it is definitely not good news for the West, for freedom, or for national identity and security. It seems fitting that the December 10-11 signing ceremony will take place in Marrakesh, Morocco.


    US President Donald J. Trump, to his credit, saw through this mischievous piece of work last December, when he announced that the U.S. wanted nothing to do with it. He got flak for that move. In a UN vote this past July, the Global Compact was approved by every member nation except for the U.S. But then at least some media starting paying attention and a resistance formed. In recent weeks, more and more governments have said that they are not going to sign the deal after all. So far, the list includes Australia, Austria, Bulgaria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Denmark, the Dominican Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Japan, Poland, Slovakia, and Switzerland.


    In several other Western European countries, the issue is still being debated. I suspect the situation in Norway, where I live, is not unique. Most of the political parties here ardently support the Global Compact and, in the run-up to the signing ceremony, have striven -- with the collaboration of the country's mainstream media -- to keep this potentially controversial agreement out of the public eye in the run-up to the signing ceremony. After a handful of alternative news and opinion websites sounded the alarm about the deal, however, it was reported on December 5 that the Progress Party had forced the government to allow a parliamentary discussion of the proposed accord.


    Alas, the Big Three countries of Western Europe are all in. Theresa May has committed her government to the deal. Ditto Angela Merkel. Emmanuel Macron has stuck to his line that the Global Compact is "admirable." What's more, thanks to Justin Trudeau, whose mantra continues to be "diversity is a source of strength," Canada is on board as well.


    So while there is no need to worry that the Global Compact will supersede the U.S. Constitution any time soon, there is legitimate reason for concern that this devious deal will constitute yet another obstacle to citizens of the free world who care about protecting and preserving their countries -- but whose elites are dead set on thwarting their will.


    More UN Chicanery Dec 9 2018.
    Chicanery is using cleverness to cheat people.

    Merkel, May and Macron – the childless 3, intent on making a Stauffenberg, a Cromwell and a Robespierre.

  5. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jagdmesser For This Useful Post:


  6. #35
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Last Online
    10 Hours Ago @ 08:17 PM
    Ethnicity
    Celto-Germanic
    Ancestry
    Irish, Scottish
    Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    Location
    North Ireland
    Gender
    Family
    Married
    Politics
    National Socialist
    Religion
    Ethnic Catholic
    Posts
    386
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    329
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    450
    Thanked in
    252 Posts

    UN Migrant Pact Petition UK Foreign Aid Dept Responds


    The British government has finally issued a response to the rapidly growing official petition against the United Nations Global Compact for Migration which was rubber-stamped in Marrakesh on Monday.



    Petitions reaching 10,000 signatures are entitled to a Government response, while petitions reaching 100,000 signatures must be considered by the Backbench Business Committee of the House of Commons for a full parliamentary debate — the petition against the UN Compact for Migration has already passed 120,000 signatures.



    Just days before the United Kingdom signed up to the controversial agreement, the Government finally issued its response. Curiously, the task fell not to the Prime Minister herself, the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) which deals with international relations, or the Home Office which is tasked with managing immigration, but the unpopular Department for International Development (Foreign Aid).

    The department has come under criticism in the past for doling out over £14 billion a year to countries including China, an arguably hostile superpower governed by a Communist dictatorship, North Korea, an unarguably hostile power governed by a Communist dictatorship, and the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, a nuclear-armed state which is about to launch its own space programme.


    The choice of DfID as petition respondent may do little to assuage signatories’ concerns that the UN Compact forms part of a wider globalist agenda on migration.

    In its response, the Government is clear that its confidence in the compact has not been dented, and that it still has their full backing. “The Compact is not legally binding,” the response assures, before adding vaguely: “It creates a framework to allow countries to work together to make global migration more beneficial for everyone.” The Government also insists that the compact “respects the sovereignty of all states to decide who enters their territory” and “does not establish a ‘human right to migrate’ or create any new legal categories of migrant.”

    This stands in stark contrast to the assessment of the United States, which pulled out of the compact last year: “We will decide how best to control our borders and who will be allowed to enter our country,” the Americans insisted. “The global approach in the [compact] is simply not compatible with U.S. sovereignty.”

    The British government notes in passing that it is “aware that a small number of countries have chosen not to endorse [the Global Compact].” This rather underestimates the scale of the revolt against the UN scheme, as the United States has been joined by Australia, Hungary, Austria, Poland, Croatia, Bulgaria, Slovenia, Slovakia, Latvia, and the Czech Republic in rejecting it, with Matteo Salvini’s half of Italy’s populist coalition government also declining to endorse it and the Belgian coalition government actually breaking up over the prime minister’s decision to back it.

    All this would tend to suggest it is more than the non-binding, aspirational, and essentially toothless document that its proponents — including the British government — have sold it as.

    The Backbench Business Committee is yet to announce when or if it will arrange for the compact — which the UK agreed to in Marrakech on Monday and will sign officially in New York on December 19th — to be debated.

    "The British government notes in passing that it is “aware that a small number of countries have chosen not to endorse [the Global Compact].”
    What cunning f cks the British gov are. Yes, it's a "small number" among the entire 193 countries who endorsed this evil pact - the vast majority being 3rd world shiitholes - but it's a significant number among the white western countries who are the countries that these shiithole invaders are stampeding into and the countries that these globalist f cks want to flood with these fecund freeloaders. British people this evil pact will be your end - STOP THIS NOW.


    UK FOREIGN AID DEPT RESPONDS TO UN MIGRANT PACT PETITION 11 Dec 2018.

  7. #36
    Member Wuotans Krieger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Last Online
    5 Hours Ago @ 01:39 AM
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ancestry
    1/2 German, 3/8 English, 1/8 Welsh
    Y-DNA
    R1b
    mtDNA
    V10b
    Country
    England England
    Location
    Northumbria
    Gender
    Zodiac Sign
    Scorpio
    Family
    Parent,Co-habiting
    Occupation
    Retired
    Politics
    Strasserite National Socialist
    Religion
    Wodenist
    Posts
    580
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    260
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    145
    Thanked in
    105 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by jagdmesser View Post
    Chicanery is using cleverness to cheat people.

    Merkel, May and Macron – the childless 3, intent on making a Stauffenberg, a Cromwell and a Robespierre.
    Wasn't Hitler also childless?

  8. #37
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Last Online
    10 Hours Ago @ 08:17 PM
    Ethnicity
    Celto-Germanic
    Ancestry
    Irish, Scottish
    Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    Location
    North Ireland
    Gender
    Family
    Married
    Politics
    National Socialist
    Religion
    Ethnic Catholic
    Posts
    386
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    329
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    450
    Thanked in
    252 Posts

    French Generals Accuse Macron of “Treason” Over UN Migration Pact


    Open letter says French citizens have another reason to “revolt”



    A group of French military generals have written an open letter to Emmanuel Macron accusing the French President of committing “treason” by signing the UN migration pact.

    The pact, which was signed by 164 nations on Monday, including France, is not legally binding but greases the skids for unlimited migration to be treated as a human right and criticism of mass migration to be treated as hate speech.

    A letter written by General Antoine Martinez and signed by ten other generals, an admiral and a colonel, as well as former French Minister of Defense Charles Millon, warns Macron that the move strips France of more sovereignty and provides an additional reason for “an already battered people” to “revolt”.

    The letter accuses Macron of being “guilty of a denial of democracy or treason against the nation” for signing the pact without putting it to the people.

    “The French state is late in coming to realize the impossibility of integrating too many people, in addition to totally different cultures, who have regrouped in the last forty years in areas that no longer submit to the laws of the Republic,” states the letter, adding that mass immigration is erasing France’s “civilizational landmarks”.

    According to British MEP Janice Atkinson, the UN pact would lead to Europe being flooded with 59 million new migrants within the next 6 years.


    Warning that the plan would lead to European countries having their “culture and identity crushed,” Atkinson also pointed out that the pact could lead to hate speech laws that make it illegal to use the term “illegal migrants,” replacing it instead with “irregular migrants”.

    “It will be illegal not to use their prescribed language,” warned Atkinson, adding that European citizens could “say goodbye to your democracy and your way of life” if the pact is implemented.

    President Macron’s approval rating has sunk to 18% amidst a wave of protests riots against a number of issues, including fuel taxes and mass immigration.



    Read the full letter from the French generals below


    Mister President,

    You are about to sign the “Global Compact on Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration” on 10 and 11 December, which establishes a genuine right to migration. It may impose itself on our national legislation through pre-existing treaties or the principle of common responsibility set out in this pact.

    It seems to us that the only sovereignty that will remain with France will consist in freely setting the way in which the objectives of the pact will have to be implemented. You can not give up this new part of the national sovereignty without a public debate whereas 80% of the French population considers that it is necessary to stop or regulate drastically the immigration. By deciding alone to sign this pact, you would add an additional reason for revolt to the anger of an already battered people. You would be guilty of a denial of democracy or treason against the nation.

    In addition, the finances of our country are drained and our debt is growing. You can not take the risk of an expensive call for air migration without first showing that you will not have to resort to more taxes to meet the objectives of the pact. On the other hand, you must be able, in terms of security, to curb the consequences linked to the arrival of extra-European populations. Finally, you can not ignore that the very essence of politics is to ensure security on the outside and harmony within. However, this concord can be obtained only if it maintains a certain internal coherence of the society alone capable of allowing to want to do together, which becomes more and more problematic today.

    In fact, the French state is late in coming to realize the impossibility of integrating too many people, in addition to totally different cultures, who have regrouped in the last forty years in areas that no longer submit to the laws of the Republic.

    You can not decide alone to erase our civilizational landmarks and deprive us of our carnal homeland.
    We therefore ask you to defer the signing of this pact and call by referendum the French to vote on this document. You are accountable to the French of your actions. Your election is not a blank.

    We support the initiative of General MARTINEZ against the signature of this pact which must be adopted by the Member States of the UN at the Intergovernmental Conference of Marrakech.


    General Antoine MARTINEZ

    Charles MILLON – Former Minister of Defense

    General Marc BERTUCCHI

    General Philippe CHATENOUD

    General André COUSTOU

    General Roland DUBOIS

    General Daniel GROSMAIRE

    General Christian HOUDET

    General Michel ISSAVERDENS

    Admiral Patrick MARTIN

    General Christian PIQUEMAL

    General Daniel SCHAEFFER

    General Didier TAUZIN

    Colonel Jean Louis CHANAS

    French Generals Accuse Macron of “Treason” Over UN Migration Pact 15 Dec 2018.
    All European leaders are guilty of Treason, with the few notable exceptions.
    There can only be one outcome and that is serious civil strife.
    ALL globalists and globalist supporters are guilty. The day will come too when they are made pay.

  9. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jagdmesser For This Useful Post:


Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Similar Threads

  1. The 11 Nations Of The United States
    By GroeneWolf in forum The United States
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: Thursday, May 24th, 2018, 04:37 PM
  2. President Obama Addresses the United Nations
    By Ediruc in forum The United States
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: Thursday, September 30th, 2010, 03:04 AM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: Thursday, December 18th, 2003, 07:07 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •