Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 30 of 30

Thread: Deadliest Birthrate Affecting All of Humanity

  1. #21

    The “Population Control” Taboo



    We are told that climate change is an existential threat to humanity, and yet unsustainable population growth rarely comes up in the conversation. Fossil fuels, cow farts, and plastic straws all receive more attention than the effects of a ten billion people being on the planet. Whites are regularly told not to have kids to save the planet, yet no one else is. Think about the dozens of articles which feature images of white babies and a headline directed at white yuppies. These articles aren’t directed at blacks, Indians, or the Chinese.




    Rapid population growth is not coming from urban white liberals who barely reproduce. The Third World, particularly Africa, is driving the world’s unsustainable population growth. But public figures have to tread lightly on this matter. They don’t want to be accused of racism or “population control.” While we are told we need dramatic action to save the Earth from climate change, population growth must be ignored at all costs. Those who dare to mention it must face opprobrium.



    Senator Bernie Sanders is learning this lesson. At a CNN town hall on climate change, the Democratic presidential candidate was asked by an audience member: “Empowering women and educating everyone on the need to curb population growth seems a reasonable campaign to enact. Would you be courageous enough to discuss this issue and make it a key feature of a plan to address climate catastrophe?” That same audience member admitted that population growth discussion is “poisonous for politicians, but it’s crucial to face.”



    Bernie said he would make it a part of his plan to address climate change. He framed it as a matter of “women’s reproductive rights” to appeal to his audience. “The Mexico City agreement which denies American aid to those organizations around the world that allow women to have abortions or even get involved in birth control to me is totally absurd,” he said. “So I think, especially in poor countries around the world where women do not necessarily want to have large numbers of babies, and where they can have the opportunity through birth control to control the number of kids they have, is something I very, very strongly support.”



    Conservatives went ballistic over Sanders’ comments, with cries of eugenics ringing loudly. They were particularly incensed that someone would suggest that Third Worlders should get abortions. It’s not like Americans don’t have that option . . .



    Sanders has not retracted his comments, nor have liberals criticized them. The Washington Post
    dismissedconservative critics who said Bernie wants poor people to abort their kids.
    This was a different reaction than President Emanuel Macron received to his own comments on population control in 2017. Macron was asked by an African reporter about why there was no Marshall Plan for his continent. The strange neoliberal offered a reasonable answer:
    The challenge of Africa is completely different, it is much deeper. It is civilizational today. Failing states, complex democratic transitions, the demographic transition. . . . One of the essential challenges of Africa . . . is that in some countries today seven or eight children [are] born to each woman.



    Macron’s comments were derided by conservatives, liberals, and Leftists alike. They were racist, colonialist, and eugenic, according to his critics. Leftists, unlike with Sanders, were particularly irate. “It is concerning to see the casual manner in which a head of state can play into racist stereotypes of the African continent and African women,wroteNPR contributor Viviane Rutabingwa. She claimed several African nations are economic powerhouses with tremendous gender equality.




    The difference between Sanders and Macron’s comments is that the French President didn’t make them in the context of climate change; it was specifically about Africa. Sanders didn’t specify who should receive birth control, and emphasized his strong support for women’s empowerment. It was easier to call Macron a condescending racist. He was telling strong, independent, and intelligent Africans how many kids they should have; only a chauvinist would say such a thing!



    Sanders and Macron both espouse terrible politics and are no friends to whites. Regardless, they both were right to note the problem of unsustainable population growth. The responses to their sensible comments shows why most Western figures stay silent – nobody wants to be labeled a eugenicist.



    However, the Third World’s population bomb will harm us all. The West’s immigration problems will get worse than they already are once Africa’s population doubles. Environmental devastation will increase. War and genocide will become even more common on the Dark Continent. This is all due to a population problem that Western leaders prefer to ignore.



    The American Right is partially responsible for this denial. They attack anyone who even brings up this problem, and think the idea of birth control in the Third World is abominable. Mainstream Republicans support laws that prevent America from giving money to groups that provide abortion to the Third World. Conservatives champion books that claim birth control aid is an insidious form of Western colonialism. Alex Jones claims that the globalists want to enact eugenic population control to achieve their diabolical schemes. “Post-liberals” who sympathize with nationalism and immigration restrictions think Africans should be encouraged to have as many children as possible. There is no thought given to where these children may go when they grow up.



    You are not allowed to talk about population growth. Only libtards, treehuggers, globalists, and Margaret Sanger fanboys would want to do anything about it. Just think of the millions of new Constitutional fundamentalists that will be born in the Congo!



    It’s not an original idea to say that conservatives are no friend to identitarianism, but this criticism is further cemented by their obtuseness on population growth. Conservatives refuse to tackle one of the Earth’s great problems because of the pro-life movement’s influence. They would rather watch the world burn than deviate from their talking points.





    Any government that wants to reduce immigration and environmental devastation must aggressively push family planning in the Third World. These problems will come to our countries one way or another. It’s time to act now and dispense with the American Right’s delusional consensus.


    Leftists position on this subject is clear: they don’t want few hundred million of people having some sort of civilization, they want billions living sustenance life.


    Greta Thunberg never mentions population control, neither does the Guardian newspaper like to discuss it. The assumption seems to be that the human carrying capacity of Europe, and of the Earth in general is infinite.
    The usual move when awkward facts concerning the population explosion of the developing world, especially Africa, are raised is to retort that we, not they are the polluters. This of course is a non-sequitur, but it invariably draws a round of applause.


    The management of the Zoo was top notch as long as the White man was at the helm. But then the new ‘native’ keepers let the beasts ‘govern’ themselves. Subsequently, after insane multiplication, they tore down the walls, ate their managers, and spread to every nook and corner.


    The pro-life cause for White people is our cause, but not for any other races. If the West stopped feeding the Global South their numbers would collapse, though probably not before they flooded the Global North (as they are already trying to do). We must encourage the birth of more White babies and discourage the birth of non-White babies.


    This. We must always keep what’s best for whites in mind. It’s why Christian deontological ethics can be a problem for us at times.


    The “Population Control” Taboo - counter-currents.com

    24 IX 2019.



  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to jagdmesser For This Useful Post:


  3. #22
    Wild Cat
    „Friend of Germanics”
    Funding Membership Inactive
    Gareth Lee Hunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Last Online
    3 Days Ago @ 01:44 AM
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    English/German American
    Ancestry
    England and Germany
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    Indiana Indiana
    Location
    A peaceful oasis.
    Gender
    Zodiac Sign
    Cancer
    Family
    Married
    Occupation
    I work at home.
    Politics
    Not a Republicrat.
    Religion
    Nondenominational Christian
    Posts
    1,428
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3,910
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,877
    Thanked in
    927 Posts
    I think much of the African and South American turd world population explosion can be attributed to early white imperialists exporting their established religion to these backward tribes, especially the absolute 'pro-life' tenets of Catholicism.

    Now, the faucet can't be turned off due to the globalist agenda concerning the creation of one semi-intelligent race of interracial mutants that are docile and totally dependent on the Jews in charge of managing their cheap labor pool.
    Aside from an ever increasing number of mortals who have willfully chosen to worship Satan and his minions, our battle has always been against the powers and principalities operating surreptitiously throughout this twisted world.

  4. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Gareth Lee Hunter For This Useful Post:


  5. #23
    Senior Member
    SaxonPagan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Last Online
    Wednesday, March 31st, 2021 @ 12:02 AM
    Ethnicity
    English
    Ancestry
    English, Anglo-Saxon
    Country
    England England
    Location
    South Coast
    Gender
    Zodiac Sign
    Aries
    Family
    Married
    Occupation
    Self Employed
    Politics
    Free Speech / Anti-EU
    Religion
    Pagan
    Posts
    5,039
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,590
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,678
    Thanked in
    1,443 Posts
    From the OP: As immigration, both legal and illegal, continues flooding into the United States of America — it also pours into Canada, Australia and Europe. Note that all Western countries stabilized their populations since 1970 by averaging 2.0 children or less per female.

    Unfortunately, as first world countries created stable and sustainable societies since 1970, their leaders chose unending immigration from overloaded third world countries.
    I still believe that my generation (..dare I mention the Boomers? ) behaved responsibly by having fewer children during the 70's and 80's, but of course nobody could foresee the huge demographic explosion in Africa nor the fact that so many of them would be 'invited' into Europe.

    Such has been the scale of this INVASION that were we to even try and outbreed them on our home soil this would be futile. Our enemies can ship them in much faster - by a factor of at least 10!!! - than we can multiply and those being imported are primarily young males so their objective could not be much clearer.

    There is no rationale for uncontrolled immigration. We had it when our populations were increasing and then we had it when they were falling; they poured in when foreign labour was (allegedly) required and they continued to pour in when we had massive unemployment. They’ve been called immigrants, migrants, refugees, asylum seekers and even ‘guest workers’ to disguise the real agenda, which is and always has been racial replacement.

    I’m sure that there are many White people today who realise, if only subconsciously, that there’s a White genocide programme taking place but they suffer from various forms of denial. Some will repeat empty slogans about ‘enrichment’ and ‘diversity’ in the hope that by using positive language they can effect a positive outcome. Others, more realistic, know what is in store but are unable to verbally express their innermost dread; almost as if, by mentioning it, they fear they’ll bring it about.

    Enoch Powell touched upon this mindset in his immortal “Rivers of Blood” speech:

    Above all, people are disposed to mistake predicting troubles for causing troubles and even for desiring troubles: "If only," they love to think, "if only people wouldn't talk about it, it probably wouldn't happen." Perhaps this habit goes back to the primitive belief that the word and the thing, the name and the object, are identical.
    He was quite right, and it's only by belatedly addressing this issue in all its gravity that we can even begin to stave off what appears to be our inevitable fate.

  6. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to SaxonPagan For This Useful Post:


  7. #24
    Senior Member
    velvet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last Online
    Sunday, March 8th, 2020 @ 03:10 AM
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    German
    Ancestry
    Northern Germany
    Subrace
    Faelid
    Country
    Germany Germany
    State
    North Rhine-Westphalia North Rhine-Westphalia
    Gender
    Age
    47
    Zodiac Sign
    Sagittarius
    Family
    Married
    Occupation
    Pestilent Supremacy
    Politics
    Blut und Boden
    Religion
    Fimbulwinter
    Posts
    5,000
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,295
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,476
    Thanked in
    672 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Gareth Lee Hunter View Post
    I think much of the African and South American turd world population explosion can be attributed to early white imperialists exporting their established religion to these backward tribes, especially the absolute 'pro-life' tenets of Catholicism.
    Interestingly, the "third-world breeding programmes" (and one really must call them that) are all products of the post-imperial era. Bread-for-the-world, SaveTheChildren, SOS-Children, RedCross and whathereallis date back to around 100 years ago, when the imperialist business became considerably smaller or ended alltogether. Guised as "charities", and all run by christians, they started the breeding programme for the third world, specially Africa.

    While having 10-15 births per women was always common, the survival rate was that only 2-3 of these children ever reached adulthood. These charities raised the survival rate to 7+, while not promoting birth control, opening the ever-cycle of growing poverty, making for "great" advertising pictures of starving children, accelerating the donation flow from white countries to Africa (a shocking more than 6bio flow from Germany alone each year through those "charities", some math with the other European countries easily results in 40-50bio/year, all in addition to officially provided "development aid" to those countries) and making things worse every year.

    The result of these policies is that Nigeria currently is one the "youngest" country on earth with an average(!) age of just 19 years, Uganda holds the record with just under 15 years (Japan 42,9, Germany 42,1). Could imagine that other black countries like Somalia, Ivory Coast or Zimbabwe are not far behind that figure either. Given that the "generation cycle" there is just 15 years (not like in white countries 25 years), they tend to double (or more) their population every 15 years. Talk about demographic time bomb...

    Even if birth control would be promoted and enacted now for those countries, it's far too late to solve the overpopulation by birth control alone.
    Ein Leben ist nichts, deine Sprosse sind alles
    Aller Sturm nimmt nichts, weil dein Wurzelgriff zu stark ist
    und endet meine Frist, weiss ich dass du noch da bist
    Gefürchtet von der Zeit, mein Baum, mein Stamm in Ewigkeit

    my signature

  8. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to velvet For This Useful Post:


  9. #25
    Senior Member
    SaxonPagan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Last Online
    Wednesday, March 31st, 2021 @ 12:02 AM
    Ethnicity
    English
    Ancestry
    English, Anglo-Saxon
    Country
    England England
    Location
    South Coast
    Gender
    Zodiac Sign
    Aries
    Family
    Married
    Occupation
    Self Employed
    Politics
    Free Speech / Anti-EU
    Religion
    Pagan
    Posts
    5,039
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,590
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,678
    Thanked in
    1,443 Posts
    Incidentally, you can follow Africa's rabbit-like population growth here

    To sum up, there's another nig nog coming into the world every second and at least 50 more must have popped out since I began writing this post






  10. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to SaxonPagan For This Useful Post:


  11. #26
    Senior Member
    Coillearnach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Last Online
    Monday, October 12th, 2020 @ 08:16 PM
    Ethnicity
    Anglo-American
    Ancestry
    Anglo-Celtic
    Gender
    Age
    32
    Family
    Married
    Occupation
    Vagrant
    Politics
    Nativism/Nationalism
    Religion
    Summum bonum
    Posts
    426
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    397
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    391
    Thanked in
    190 Posts
    This guy has a lot to do with it



    Norman Borlaug

    He's responsible for at least a billion people and their exponential spawn not dying of starvation (for lurkers: no, I don't take perverse glee in such expansive suffering) and figuring how to self-regulate. Not very often in history has a single man done such incalculable damage.

    Horrific quotes: Food is the moral right of all who are born into this world.

    Almost certainly, however, the first essential component of social justice is adequate food for all mankind.

  12. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Coillearnach For This Useful Post:


  13. #27
    Munchkin
    „Friend of Germanics”
    Funding Membership Inactive
    LillyCaterina's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Last Online
    Friday, April 30th, 2021 @ 12:29 AM
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    English/Irish/French
    Ancestry
    England/Ireland/France
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    Indiana Indiana
    Gender
    Zodiac Sign
    Gemini
    Family
    Married
    Occupation
    Deli Shift Leader/Manager
    Politics
    Centrist
    Religion
    Christian
    Posts
    606
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,637
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    919
    Thanked in
    486 Posts
    Feeding masses of starving people only enables them to breed more starving people... DUH!

    I think most people have emotional issues that clearly get in the way of their rational thought processes.
    Not all in life is at it appears to be.

  14. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to LillyCaterina For This Useful Post:


  15. #28

    A Demographic Theory of War | Gunnar Heinsohn's Youth Bulge Options



    Today approximately 44% of the world’s 7.2 billion people are under 24 years old - and 26% are under 14. A staggering 82% live in less developed regions of the world – primarily sub-Saharan Africa and Asia. Currently, the global median age is 29.2 years, a sharp contrast to Europe, for example, where the median age is 41. Of the 20 states with the lowest median ages worldwide, 18 are in sub-Saharan Africa. The UN predicts that the median age will rise to 42 years by the century’s end, and with it the world’s population will increase to 10.9 billion people. Developing and least developed countries have the highest fertility rates and many are expected to triple in population by 2100. The populations of Burkina Faso, Malawi, Niger, Mali, Somalia, Uganda, Tanzania and Zambia are predicted to increase by 500%. In these countries demographic pressure is already responsible for food scarcity, water scarcity, malnutrition, and disease.




    The
    Youth Bulge Theory attempts to explain and to predict social conflict, migration, conquest and war, and was first introduced by the CIA in 1995 (The Demographic Backdrop to Ethnic Conflict: A Geographic Overview). Youth bulge specifically refers to a disproportionate percentage of a state population being between the ages of 15 and 24 years old. But the main point of the Youth Bulge Theory is that an excess in especially young adult male population predictably leads to social unrest, war and terrorism, as the third and fourth sons that find no prestigious positions in their existing societies rationalize their impetus to compete by religion or political ideology.




    In his study Söhne und Weltmacht(Sons and World Power: Terror in the Rise and Fall of Nations; 2003) German genocide expert Gunnar Heinsohn investigated family size in various societies in relation to the frequency of violent conflict since 1500 A.D. He concluded, that the presence of large numbers of young men in nations that have experienced population explosions — all searching for respect, work, sex and meaning — tend to turn into violent countries and become involved in wars. Heinsohn’s demographic materialism is not concerned with the absolute size of populations, but rather with the share of teenagers and young men. If the population under the age of 20 becomes 40% or more compared to the total, society is facing a youth bulge. Serious problems start when families begin to produce three, four or more sons. Faced with limited resources, the surplus sons' competition for power and prestige does only leave six options: #1 Violent Crime, #2 Civil War, #3 Revolution, #4 Emigration, #5 Genocide, and #6 War of Conquest or Colonization.




    Youth bulge can be seen as one factor among many in explaining social unrest and uprisings in society. But Heinsohn essentially claims that most historical periods of social unrest are lacking external triggers (such as rapid climatic changes or other catastrophic changes of the environment). Even most genocides can be readily explained as a result of a built-up youth bulge, including European colonialism, 20th-century fascism, the rise of Communism during the Cold War, the Arab Spring, and ongoing conflicts such as in Somalia, South Sudan, Central African Republic or in Mali.Since more than a decade Heinsohn keeps warning Western politicians about the too many angry young men outside the Euro-American world today — above all, too many Muslim young men in the Middle East and Sub-Saharan Africa. He considers them one of the principal threats to the West in the first quarter of the 21st century, and illustrates this also in the recent examples of Afghanistan and Iraq: Since 1950, Iraqi fathers of all ethnic and religious groups have sired, on the average, three to four sons. They produced a youth bulge. Saddam Hussein canalized this youth bulge in the options #4 to #6 (genocide, war of conquest, numerous Iraqis went into exile). Following Saddam's removal from power the competition for positions of power was transformed into a civil war (option #2) that is being driven by a massive wave of sons. It may not be easy to recognize the current violence as a civil war, because the Americans and their allies are fighting on one of the sides. But the fact that this was a civil war would become clear through its continuation once the US at her allies withdraw. The same phenomenon could be seen — according to Heinsohn — in Afghanistan (see video clip HERE) where the enormous surplus of sons could never be absorbed, in spite of the recruitment of large numbers of police and military personnel. War would therefore inevitably continue in one way or another even after the withdrawal of Western troops.










    A Demographic Theory of War | Gunnar Heinsohn's Youth ... 23 XII 2019.




    "Global elites view the White Western world as the main obstacle standing in the way of a future world government. Multiculturalism is a tool used by such elites to dismantle White Western civilization."
    Pat Buchanan
    (from a 2004 speech given in Falls Church, VA)



    Since 1945 the British and European governments has been committing Genocide on our people via mass uncontrolled immigration that we never voted for.



    UN Definition of Genocide: Deliberately inflicting on an ethnic group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part. White Genocide must stop.



    We must
    STOP
    WHITE GENOCIDE. End ALL 3rd World Immigration and NATURE will take care of the 3rd World as it always did.

  16. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jagdmesser For This Useful Post:


  17. #29

    Youth Bulges, Violence, and the Fifth Village: “The Game is Over for Europe”


    Dr. Heinsohn elaborates on a theme that Mark Steyn has made familiar: the impending demographic collapse of the West, particularly Europe, and the accompanying threat from a surplus of angry young Muslim males.


    While the European populations are shrinking, and the best-qualified young people are leaving, we continue to allow mass-immigration of unqualified Muslims, who will soon make our welfare society collapse. Add to this the fact that the Muslim world has built up a surplus of youths, which according to experience will lead to mass-murder, and the effect cannot be helped by foreign aid. The originator of these bleak predictions is the German sociologist Gunnar Heinsohn, who believes that the game is over for Europe.



    By Lars Hedegaard


    BREMEN: If the leaders of the American-led “Coalition of the Willing”, had known Gunnar Heinsohn’s research, they most likely never would have left their troops in Iraq or Afghanistan. They would probably quickly abandon any thought of intervention in Sudan’s Darfur province. They would tell the Palestinian 10-children-families that the West no longer will pay for their unrestricted childbirth. Western opinion-makers and politicians would also abandon their pet theory that virtually any act of violence in a belt from Northern Africa to the Philippines in addition to miscellaneous acts of terror all over the world are caused by the unsolved Israeli-Palestinian conflict.



    And worst of all seen from the prevalent political consensus in Denmark and the rest of the West: Heinsohn does not believe, even for a second, that economic aid and hunger relief in countries plagued by large youth populations can prevent wars, social unrest, terror or killings. On the contrary he is convinced that the material aid in some cases can start the killings. This is because starving people do not fight, they just suffer. However, if you give a lot of young men enough to eat and a certain education, in a society where there are too many young men so that not all can get the recognition and position that they feel entitled to, it can lead to violence.



    About this the 63-year-old professor of sociology at the University of Bremen, in 2003 wrote in his sensational and quite politically incorrect book Söhne und Weltmacht: Terror im Aufstieg und Fall der Nationen [Sons and World Domination: Terror in the Rise and Fall of Nations]. The book became widely known and talked about, after the prominent German philosopher Peter Sloterdijk characterized the work as being as groundbreaking as Karl Marx’s Das Kapital. Sloterdijk thought that the book could pave the way for a new realism with in the field, one that could be called “Demographic Materialism”.



    Heinsohn is not concerned about the absolute size of populations, rather the share of teenagers and young men. If this share becomes too big compared to the total population, we’re facing a youth bulge. The problem starts when the individual family puts three, four, or more sons into the world. Then they start fighting for access to the positions in society that give power and prestige. Then you have a lot of boys and young men running around filled with aggression and uncontrollable hormones. Then we get the killings, until sufficiently many have been killed and their number matches society’s ability to provide positions for them.



    According to Heinsohn, 80% of world history is about young men in nations with a surplus of sons, creating trouble. This trouble can take many forms — a violent increase in domestic crime, coup d’état attempts, revolutions, riots, and civil wars. Occasionally the young commit genocide to assure themselves of the positions that belonged to those they killed. Finally, there is war to conquer new territory, killing the enemy population and replacing it with one’s own.



    But, as Heinsohn emphasizes again and again, the unrest and the violent acts that the youth bulge causes have nothing to do with famine or unemployment. In his book he described it in this way: The dynamic in a youth bulge — it cannot be emphasized too often — is not caused by the lack of food. A younger brother, who as a stable hand for the firstborn son can be well-fed and perhaps even fat, does not seek food, but position, one that can guarantee him recognition, influence and dignity. Not underweight, but rather potential losers or the déclassé are pushing forward. (p. 21)



    Unfortunately, the Western world in recent years is facing a gigantic youth bulge in large parts of the Muslim world. This bulge is created by a Muslim population explosion. In just five generations (1900-2000) the population in the Muslim countries has grown from 150 million to 1200 million — an increase of 800%. As a comparison the population of China has grown from 400 million to 1200 million (300%). The population of India has risen from 250 million to 1000 million (400%).



    Sappho has visited Gunnar Heinsohn at his office at the University of Bremen, where he was awarded a lifelong professorship, to ask him to elaborate on his sensational views.



    Youth Bulge and Violence


    What is the definition of a youth bulge?



    “There is no ordinarily accepted definition. The Frenchman who first used the notion in 1970 said that a youth bulge existed when 30% of the men in a population were between 20 to 24. I changed it to 30% between 15 and 29. This means that if you take 100 males from a country, then 30 of them will be between 15 and 29.



    “But remember that this 30% group of young men will not pose any danger if they are hungry or without education. To be dangerous they must be in good physical and mental shape.”



    Heinsohn emphasises that there are lots of wars and killings in history that don’t spring from a youth bulge. The Hitler movement and the Mussolini movement in the 1920s can be explained as youth bulge experiences. The early Nazis and Fascists had an average age a bit below 30. The Bolshevik movement in the period around the 1917 Revolution can be described in the same way. But by the time Hitler started WWII many German families were down to only one son. So Hitler’s attack in 1939 wasn’t a youth bulge phenomenon.



    Neither do the killings started by the later Marxist-Leninist regimes — that may have killed 100 million people — have anything to do with youth bulges. The Bolshevik revolution in 1917 was driven by millions and millions of farmers’ sons without land — that was a youth bulge; however Stalin’s gulag doesn’t fall into this category.



    What about Mao’s killings in China?



    “Again, in the 1930s Mao’s movement was carried by a youth bulge, but when he took power in 1949, and started his great purges by killing landowners, the youth bulge was already over.”



    So the predominant ideology of the West, namely that we can fight war and violence by fighting hunger and create jobs in the third world, is wrong?

    “Every year five German peace-research institutes publish an annual report, and every year it has the following conclusion: If we win the struggle against hunger, we have defeated war. On the contrary — the youth bulge research shows that if you’re successful in eliminating immediate material poverty and hunger in a country with a youth bulge, violence starts to escalate.



    “In Europe we have just celebrated the 50th anniversary of the Rome Treaty, and in all the newspapers we could read that this treaty ended war in Europe. This is absolutely wrong. If the Germans after 1945 had procreated as they did between 1900 and 1914, then we would have had a German nation with almost 500 million citizens, and we would have had about 80 million German men between 15 and 29. In reality we have 7 million. And then we can ask ourselves if these 80 million would have been as peaceful as the present 7 million, or if they instead would have been bombing Breslau or Danzig.”



    Demographic Capitulation
    - - - - - - - - - -


    “This brings me to something that I call ‘Demographic Capitulation’. It has a very simple definition: Take all the men aged 40-44 and compare them to the boys aged 0-4. Demographic capitulation is when you have 100 males aged 40-44 compared to less than 80 0-4 boys. In Germany the number is 100/50, in the Gaza-strip it is 100/464. I have compared some numbers for you, and these show that Denmark is on the verge of Demographic Capitulation. Your numbers are 100/80.”



    Heinsohn’s statistical overview shows that if Denmark had procreated at the same rate as in the Gaza Strip (from 240,000 to 1.4 million from 1950 to 2006), then we wouldn’t have had a population of 5.5 million (compared to 4.3 million in 1950), but 25 million, thus more than New Zealand and Australia combined. In that case the median age of Danes would be 15 (in reality it is 39), and there would be 3.6 million men in battle-ready age (15-29), while the real number is only 470,000. (Median age must not be confused with average age. The median age of 15 means that there are as many people below 15 as there are above 15).



    Compared to countries which, like Germany and Japan, have capitulated, are countries that are characterized by “Demographic Rearmament”. Apart from Gaza there are amongst others the three Muslim countries Afghanistan (100/403), Iraq (100/351) and Somalia (100/364). It is thus not random that they are marked by widespread and extreme acts of violence, and will be for several more years into the future. This also holds for Gaza and the Palestinian people in general.



    So you don’t believe that the so-called “Peace Process” between Israel and the Palestinians is realistic?



    “No, and the main reason is the big mistake that was made in Oslo in 1991, when the secret negotiations between Arafat and Yitzhak Rabin started. The error was that nobody took any notice of the Palestinian population explosion. The Palestinian population has grown almost 6 times as large within the last 50 years. We should have done two things: Israel should have stopped their settlements, and the world community should have said to the Palestinian people: Every child in Palestine will be fed by the world community as before, because by accepting that every Palestinian child is a refugee, the world community have a responsibility for the number of children born. But from January 1st 1992 you will have to pay for your own children, just as a woman does in Lebanon, in Tunisia, and in Algeria. That’s what they should have told the Palestinians. Why am I mentioning these three countries? Because in those societies a women has fewer than two children on the average. Had we done that 15 years ago, we would have seen a generation of young Palestinian men with few reasons to commit violence against each other or against the Jews. But we didn’t, and therefore I do not believe in the peace process, even if Hamas should decide to sign everything. Their youth will tear such agreements apart.”



    Heinsohn points out that it is the USA and EU, and particularly the Scandinavian countries, that pay for the enormous child production of the Palestinian people. We must cease this support, so that the Palestinians pay for the children they bring into the world after a certain point in time.



    Why can’t the Palestinians just work like everybody else and earn their own keep?

    “Palestine is a special matter. They never had any chance to develop, because they have always been on international support.”



    Poverty and Religion


    From your book one gets the notion that youth bulges creates poverty, while we in the West have seen the relation in the opposite way and seen youth bulges as a result of poverty?



    “If a youth bulge changes a state to a failed state, then one will see a breakdown of the market and the production, and it will lead to poverty. If we look at a case in which we now see an escalation of violence — Pakistan and Bangladesh — we can see that they both have a steady increase in the average income per citizen — and even a significant growth. Thus we have created the primary conditions for making the young men both well-fed and well-educated, which leads to them becoming unruly. If these young men successfully destroy the infrastructure of the country, it will result in poverty. I have followed this process closely in the West African state Cote d’Ivoire. Here they had a system with seven children for every woman, and at the same time the average income grew. When the killings started to rise, so did the average income.”



    How do you explain the fact that the Muslim Middle-East was deeply underdeveloped, before there was any sign of a youth bulge, even before the Europeans — who get the blame for most things — had set foot in the Middle-East? Isn’t it necessary to add religion to the explanation?



    “Let’s look at the small countries in Europe that were capable of conquering and colonising large parts of the world after around 1500, starting with Portugal and Spain. Our explanation is usually that there was a pressure on resources because of overpopulation. The opposite was the case. When Spain started their conquests in 1493 with Columbus’ second expedition, Spain had a population of six million, but in 1350 it had nine million citizens. Spain wasn’t overpopulated. On the contrary there was a sudden a growth in childbirths, because pope Innocent VIII in 1484 had decreed that birth-control was punishable by death, which caused an immediate explosion in births. In the Middle Ages the average number of children per family was 2-3; now it was suddenly 6-7. That caused the median age in the population of six million to be 15, while it in the nine-million population in 1350 had been 28-30. So there wasn’t a lack of land or food. However, there was a sudden scarcity of positions. Earlier one had raised one or two boys in the family. One could take over the farm and one could start a new one. Now they had three boys who had food, but no positions, and these boys started the conquests and the colonising. The Spaniards call these secundones, the “secondaries”.



    “Where does the religion enter the picture? These young men — 95% of them — were normal, good boys and saw it as a sin to kill or mistreat the conquered populations in the colonies. They knew the difference between themselves and a psychopath or a common murderer. So when they went into action, they had religion to tell them that they weren’t murderers, but people who with an honest heart killed infidels, sinners and unjust people. One executed orders from a higher power, since one wouldn’t want to be seen as disobedient.



    “Thus I don’t call these conquerors and colonisers — Spaniards, Englishmen and Danes — Christian, but Christianists. The same distinction as with a Muslim and an Islamist. These young Spaniards weren’t Christian, but Christianists, who needed this ideology to justify their terrible killings.”



    New Religions arise in no time


    Heinsohn is also hesitant in ascribing a core cause to which one can later refer acts and patterns of actions. As an example he mentions the movement of 1968, which he belonged to when young.



    “When the time comes, then new religious pamphlets and books will be written on the spot and in no time. One manipulates one’s religion in such a way that one takes from ones holy books — The Qur’an, The Bible, The Communist Manifesto — the sentences that fit with one’s purpose. One knows that one is going to use violence, but wants a justification. Because one is a just man. But when the youth bulge is spent, these books that were distributed in millions of copies will not even be sold in second hand shops. Everybody knows that they are full of rubbish. But while the movement is on the move, these young men are impervious to arguments. So the false ideas do not arise from holy scripture. The young originate them themselves. Because they need the wrong ideas to justify their actions. Thus one cannot stop them by explaining that their ideas are wrong. Thus it is not the wrong ideas that create the movement, it is the movement that creates the wrong ideas. Islam doesn’t create Islamism, the young Muslims do.”



    According to Heinsohn’s calculations there will be approx. 300 million young Muslim men in 2020, but not all of them will be angry. A growing number of Muslim nations — Algeria, Lebanon, Tunisia, Iran, Turkey, and the rich Emirates — have all fallen under the replacement production limit. Iran now has a fertility rate of 1.7. That is the same as in Denmark, but less than France. These countries still have a youth surplus from earlier, but in a few years they will no longer have a surplus that makes them pose any danger.



    Thus he doesn’t believe that the Iranian masses will put the whole region into flames. This scenario is a projection of the situation immediately before the Islamic revolution in 1979 and during the war between Iran and Iraq from 1980 to 1988, where Iran could send hundred of thousands of boys out into the minefields. These teenagers no longer exist.



    A class of losers


    Wouldn’t it be a solution to bring the superfluous sons to Europe?



    “What happens in Europe is that all the nations — there are no exceptions — are ageing nations which do not fully reproduce themselves. Thus they are entering into a process where they eat each other’s talent. Why aren’t they looking for the talent in Africa, where the population has grown from 100 million in 1900 to an estimated 2 billion in 2050? Why not in Islam, where we have a similar population explosion? Why is America looking for talent in Germany, why is Denmark looking for Polish people? Because the Third World countries don’t have the educational level that is needed in the developed countries, which can only maintain their position through innovation. For that purpose they need young people who have grown up in a high-tech society. It is not because Africans or Muslims aren’t as intelligent as others, they just aren’t socialized in a way that makes them useful in our societies.”

    In Demark we now have a number of highly-educated immigrants, and their descendents, from Muslim countries — doctors, lawyers, etc. But many are not as interested in our society as the large number of uneducated. Are they just as extreme and Islamistic as others?



    “I will leave the evaluation of Danish conditions to the Danes; however we have the same phenomenon in England. There we have a population within the population, namely the Pakistanis, who have the highest birthrate in the country, and who are most dependent on social system. In Western countries we have a social system which is hardly being used by the local population. In contrast to this we have in immigrant population whose women cannot compete in the local workforce. For them the social benefits that are too low for Danish and German women are particularly attractive. So what we see in England, France, Germany and the Netherlands are immigrant women who take some low-paid jobs, which they supplement with public benefits. It is not a fantastic income, but sufficient for them. And they are creating a career type, which is for women only, and which their daughters continue.



    “But the sons don’t have these possibilities. They grow up on the bottom of society, and don’t have the intellectual skills they need to improve their social position. It is these boys that burn Paris, that burn parts of Bremen. Some of them make it to university, and become leaders of the others — not poor, but young men with low status, who believe that they are suppressed because of their Islamic faith, but in reality it is the welfare-state itself that has created this class of losers.



    “If, on the other hand, one goes to Canada, where I have lived part of each year for the last 20 years, they have a completely different policy. They say: Our immigration policy has a simple base. Every newborn Canadian and every new Canadian who comes from abroad, has to be more intelligent than those who were here before. Because only through innovation can we keep our position in world competition. Therefore I want my son to be smarter than me. And believe it or not: Of 100 adult Canadian immigrants, 98 have work skills higher than the Canadian average. In Germany and France the corresponding number is 10%. So we went for quantity, and they went for quality.



    “And why? In Germany because everybody was afraid of being called racists, and it looks like all European nations suffer from the same fear of making choices.”



    The Fifth Village


    Might some of it also be explained by the left-wing importing their voter corps?


    “In France we have seen that Africans and Algerians have voted for Ségolène Royal. Add to that another phenomenon that we can watch in Germany, among other places. Here we have those whom we now have begun to call “ethno-Germans”, which comprise 85% of the German population, starting to emigrate. Annually about 150,000 Germans emigrate, most of them to the Anglo-Saxon world. Canada, Australia and New Zealand are ready to receive 1.5 million well-educated immigrants yearly, and they are doing everything to ease the way for them.



    “It is not strange that young, hard-working people in France and Germany choose to emigrate. It is not just that they have to support their own ageing population. If we take 100 20-year-olds, then the 70 Frenchmen and Germans also have to support 30 immigrants their own age and their offspring. This creates dejection in the local population, particularly in France, Germany, and the Netherlands. So they emigrate.



    “Europe just finalized their immigration principles in January 2007. And they are quite different from the Canadian ones. Our first criterion for letting people into the EU is whether the person has been victim of discrimination. Next principle: If the person already has family in EU, then he has privileged access. Third principle: People who are already illegally in Europe should be legalized. And finally, only as principle number four do we have the Anglo-Saxon principle that the immigrant should fit into our workforce.



    “The purpose is to make Europe look stronger than the Anglo-Saxons, when its about ‘soft force’.



    “I view the future very pessimistically. Europe’s situation reminds of the principle that is called ‘The Fifth Village’ in Brandenburg and Mecklenburg. They have experienced a thinning of the population, so four villages are being abandoned and the remaining population is moved to the fifth village; however, that doesn’t increase the population growth in the fifth village. And after some time the fifth village as well is populated by old people, and there are no young people in the vicinity to work for their pensions.



    “The same will happen to the approximately 40 nations between Brittany and Vladivostok. Some of them will become Fifth Villages and will have a new lease, others will just implode. I predict that all the Slavic nations will implode. Same thing with the three Baltic states and all of the Balkan states. The question is whether Germany and France will become Fifth Villages. I see Scandinavia as a Fifth Village. The same thing with the Iberian Peninsula. The same with Ireland and England. But I’m not sure the rest of the Continent will make it.”




    The Young Are Leaving


    But will we even deal with nations in the future? If Europe gets a Muslim majority, it isn’t certain that Danes, Germans, Frenchmen, etc. will bow to Sharia. Could the result be that the indigenous population withdraws to their own enclaves, from which they will try to defend themselves, as we have seen in Bosnia?



    “That is of course a possibility, but one must ask oneself, who is it that will stay and fight? It is possible, that I would, because I am more or less forced to stay here. But if I was a young 18-year-old ethnic German, done with high school, then I would do like most others are already doing. I would want to study in the Anglo-Saxon world, and then I would emigrate. I wouldn’t want to stay and fight. The Anglo-Saxon world needs 50 million well qualified immigrants within the next 30-40 years, so well qualified young people from Western Europe will have every incentive to go there instead of staying and fighting.

    “A possibility is to aim for Chinese immigration. If we in Germany had the same number of Chinese immigrants as they have in Canada, we would have had 3 million. But immigration from China has not even been considered in Europe.



    “China is the fastest-ageing nation in the world after Germany, Japan and South Korea. We usually view China as a sleeping giant. I on the other hand see China as a source, from where the Western nations can skim the best. And they will get them. Currently, rich Chinese are preoccupied with moving their riches to Switzerland, because with the few children being born in China, people in their 40s have no chance of ever getting a pension. China is down to a fertility rate of 1.6 children per woman. Already today China loses 500,000 of their best. The young see no hope of ever being able to build a pension plan in their home country. Therefore they settle in Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, Canada, etc.



    “In East Germany they have just decided to demolish an additional 400,000 apartments. There are no people for them, and the empty apartments ruin the banks by pressing the rents and the housing costs upwards. Also in West-Germany we are losing population. We have to stop taking the least-adapted immigrants. To attract young and competent people, we could give them a house. That was the way Brandenburg secured the French Huguenots in the 17th century. But I doubt it will work today.”



    Demographic Rearmament?


    Would it be possible to imagine that Europeans might suddenly start to procreate more as a moral obligation to maintain the people and the culture? It was what happened after the British had conquered the French Quebec. Then the priests pressed to get the families to put up to 15 children into the world, and this demographic effort was successful.



    Gunnar Heinsohn, doesn’t give much of a chance to such a strategy. It would require draconian measures, which the Europeans wouldn’t accept. Promises of money don’t work, except on those with a little education and status — which just makes the situation worse.




    “If you look at the Polish people,” says Heinsohn — who was born in 1943 in the city now known as Gdansk, but which he still calls Danzig, a son of a German submarine captain who lost his life near Newfoundland five months before his son was born — “here is a nation with proud traditions. Poland saved Europe from the Mongols, the Turks and the Bolsheviks and ended up bringing down Communism. And yet their birthrate is lower than the Germans. They are down to 1.2 children per woman. In addition they have already in the last 15 years lost 2 million of their best people. Perhaps they tell their parents that they’re coming back, but they won’t. That’s why I’m saying that countries such as Poland, Latvia and Lithuania are doomed. They have no attraction for immigrants. The same thing is happening with Russia. Who wants to move to Russia? And look at the newest members of the EU, Bulgaria and Romania. Romania is the first country in the world where there are more retirees than active workers, and we gave them access. The same with Bulgaria, which has the fastest-dwindling population. The young are moving out, and with a clean conscience, because they believe that tomorrow Brussels will pay for their parents. So the EU has accepted 27 million people, who wanted to get inside to secure their pension. And in the European center they are still overjoyed to have gotten millions more than the USA. That will make us strong, they believe.



    “So I see few possibilities. Though as I mention in my book the example of California, which experienced a turn-around around 1990, which meant that even the white population — excluding the Latinos who have a much higher birthrate — went from 1.3 to 1.8 child per woman. It is not full reproduction, but anyway a significant improvement. It was a huge surprise, because California is the world’s most advanced region. In the end of the 1980s the prognosis was for continued falling birthrates, but in the beginning of the 1990s new studies found that the women no longer were satisfied with just working, and shortly afterwards the birthrates went up.



    “In Europe it was dismissed with the explanation that Americans are so conservative, but that’s not true in California, which in many ways has been the pioneer of the West. However, I cannot see a similar change in Europe. Of course France has 2 children per woman, but out of five newborns, two are already Arabic or African. In Germany it is already true that 35% of all newborns come from a non-German background, and non-Germans commit 90% of violent crimes. As I’ve said — mothers get money to put children in the world, the daughters do the same, while the men lean towards crime.



    “Or take the Tunisian example. A woman in Tunisia has 1.7 children. In France she may have six, because the French government pays her for it. Naturally, it is not the intention that money should flow to the Tunisian women, but French women won’t touch this money, while the Tunisian wants to.”



    Then we need to discriminate?



    “That won’t work. It’s too late. In the moment you start, you will be dragged into each and every international court in existence. This is what the Anglo-Saxon world has escaped by discriminating at the border. Not based on race or ethnicity, but based on qualifications. They are discriminating against the unqualified. Yet they are friendly towards them, when rejecting them. When a person has been rejected in Ottawa or Canberra, they are being advised by the friendly authority to go to Germany. Because they have a different system there.”



    The end of the welfare state


    How do you see the political situation in Europe in twenty years? Is the welfare state gone, is democracy gone?



    “Concerning the European continent apart from Scandinavia, Ireland and England, I believe that the even the pessimistic population prognoses will turn out to be too optimistic. They assume that the young people will stay in Europe and bring up their own children, but it won’t turn out that way. A study in Germany from 2005 showed that 52% of the Germans between 18 and 32 wanted to leave. They might not mean it but they’re entertaining the thought. The really qualified are leaving. The only ones who are truly loyal towards France and Germany are those who are living off the welfare system. Because there is no other place in the world that offers to pay for them. America, Canada and Australia count on receiving our best-qualified youth, and they will get many of them. That will put an end to innovation and put a damper on economical growth in Europe. In Germany this is already so that we miss billions upon billions in revenue because we lack qualified people to take on the jobs. On one hand we have two million positions that we cannot fill, on the other a welfare-dependent population of six million, and there is no exchange between the two. The welfare group grows each year because of new babies, but the vacant job slots are not filled.



    “You can talk about two different states which are radically closed to each other. The welfare state cannot continue. We cannot hope to cover the demographic holes through immigration from China either, since the Chinese don’t want to immigrate to a welfare system, where they will have to pay for an ageing population’s pensions in addition to a welfare population of millions.



    “We have to say that there is only one category of people who can count on help from the government, and that is the mentally or physically handicapped. Nobody else should expect help. This sounds cold and cynical in the beginning, but our welfare states were founded the 19th century, when families had 10 children and when the father fell down a scaffold, somebody had to look after the family. This is not the situation we’re facing today.



    “If you go to Australia, you don’t get money to have children. You can get a slight tax-relief. On the other hand a citizen of Australia can keep 80 out of every 100 dollars he earns.”



    How could it go so wrong in a Europe, which otherwise had these grandiose plans about peace, cooperation, and prosperity, and in the beginning had unlimited trust in their own abilities?



    “It started to go wrong around 1980. But the great turn in Germany came as late as 1990. It was when we opened the gates for a mass immigration of roughly speaking unqualified people. In the period between 1990-2002 Germany allowed an immigration of 13 million. At almost the same time it started to go wrong in France. We can only stop this burden on the welfare state though the law. We have to pass a bill that declares that new children born after a certain date will have to be paid for by the parents. It will be a revolution. But it isn’t even being discussed here in Europe.”



    Clinton’s social reform


    “But let me point out what happened in the USA. During the election campaign in 1992 Bill Clinton promised with a famous pronouncement to end welfare as it had been previously known. In 1935 the USA had issued a bill by the name “Aid to Dependent Children” (from 1960 known as “Aid to Families with Dependent Children”, ed.), which guaranteed every mother with small children help from the public. There was again the question about the father who had fallen from the scaffold, and very few received support because of this bill. However in 1965 the morals had changed. Until then it would have been unthinkable to a mother — whether she was white or black — to be pregnant, hide the identity of the father and then let the public pay for her kids. Now she didn’t even have to push the father out of a tall building. This caused an explosion of the number of welfare-dependent American families. From 1965 to 1995 the share of these rose to 10% of all American families and 15% of the children. That was the reality that Clinton had to face.



    “Most of these welfare-dependents were blacks, and that made racists claim that the problem was in the black genes. But the Republicans and the Democrats worked together on a new law, “Temporary Assistance for Needy Families”, which was a smart law. It told American women: We will give you welfare up to five years. You decide whether it should be five years straight, or whether you want to divide the five years into shorter periods. The new law was passed in 1996 and took effect on January 1, 1997. It caused several top officials in the Clinton administration to walk out in protest, stating the law was a racist attack on the weakest — single mothers and their children. They had made a prediction for 1997-98, which showed that the number of children affected by this law would grow from 12 to 14 million. As it turned out, it was these well-meaning people who were the racists. The black girls were smart enough to go on the pill with the result that the welfare-dependent population shrank from 12 million to 4 million. It was the most successful social reform in history.



    “In Europe we haven’t even begun to discuss such a reform.”



    Leave the youth bulges alone


    Lately there has been a discussion about whether we in the West have anything to do in countries like Iraq and Afghanistan or with populations as the Palestinian. Thus a pessimistic message that, we have let them fight against each other, if they want, and it isn’t something that we should or ought to interfere in?



    “Among American strategists some are beginning to question whether the USA with its one-son families can send out troops to fight populations with many sons. That is the mistake we have committed in Iraq and Afghanistan. If you have to go in because you have been attacked, then you have to do it, but as soon as the danger has been defeated, it is necessary to withdraw. The Iraqis and the Afghans have to ensure the balance between the populations and positions in society themselves. And as far back in history we look, we can see that this balance has been created by young men who have killed each other. We have done it in Europe, and it has happened elsewhere. We cannot allow then to send their young men over the borders to kill others.



    “My personal view is, that when faced with a youth bulge, then the phenomenon must be allowed to play out with the consequences we know. We should stay away. If we interfere, we cannot avoid having to side with one party and then help kill that party’s opponents. And then you end up in a situation where you appear to the population as the ones who do the dirty work for one side in different conflicts. Instead one can arm the most sympathetic side, which was what the French did in Algeria, after the Islamists started their killings of the secularists in 1992. France then sent weapons aid to the secularists. Back then there was nobody who said that we had to send money and food for the families of the Islamists, as they do in Palestine.”




    Gates of Vienna: Youth Bulges, Violence, and the Fifth ...25 XII 2019.



    The most difficult thing is what is thought to be the simplest; to really see the things which are before your eyes. Johann Wolfgang Von Goethe.


    The problem is the tidal wave of immigrants and the destruction of the future of our people by moral collapse through promoting industrial scale abortion and homosexuality. The purpose of mass immigration is the destruction of nations, it isn't an accidental side effect but the whole reason it is happening.

  18. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jagdmesser For This Useful Post:


  19. #30
    Senior Member
    Winterland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Last Online
    1 Day Ago @ 04:24 PM
    Ethnicity
    German
    Ancestry
    German; Scot-Irish; Scandinavian
    Country
    United States United States
    Location
    Coastal region
    Gender
    Family
    Married
    Occupation
    Free Lance
    Politics
    Conservative
    Religion
    Christian
    Posts
    386
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    314
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    229
    Thanked in
    166 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by J.Yaxley View Post
    In both cases, Asian businessmen paid obscene amounts of money for houses abroad that they'd visit once a year. They knew what was coming and wanted to preserve as much of their savings as possible.
    I also wonder if these Chinese businessmen are attempting to unload their hard cash as more printed currencies become manipulated and worthless in the future. Real estate is a good investment when markets crash since the number of renters usually increases and produces good income.

    Rich people also tend to set up escapes from countries who have unsteady economies. China has an obvious population problem and suffers from highly polluted regions. The Chinese elite can also buy American citizenship with their extra cash to protect their families from difficult conditions. So, the millionaires buy up expensive real estate in both Canada and US along the Pacific Coast for easy business and travel access to mainland Asia. The rich always have their escapes.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Similar Threads

  1. Black Holes: The Deadliest Force in the Universe
    By HIM in forum Research & Technology
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: Thursday, November 28th, 2019, 11:54 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •