Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: The Social Darwinism Fraud

  1. #1
    Senior Member SaxonPagan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Last Online
    24 Minutes Ago @ 03:08 AM
    Ethnicity
    English
    Ancestry
    English, Anglo-Saxon
    Country
    England England
    Location
    South Coast
    Gender
    Zodiac Sign
    Aries
    Family
    Married
    Occupation
    Self Employed
    Politics
    Free Speech / Anti-EU
    Religion
    Pagan
    Posts
    5,024
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,558
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,540
    Thanked in
    1,365 Posts

    The Social Darwinism Fraud

    The Social Darwinism Fraud

    It is important to understand the historical transition of the methodology employed by the Illuminati in their never-ending quest to control the people and resources of planet earth.

    Paramount is the shift from open confrontation with and violent suppression of liberation movements, to more subtle forms of psychological warfare-waged control and distortion of information through the mass media. Perception management is the name of the game.

    This battle for our minds takes many forms, but begins by inserting key philosophical premises into the public consensus. One of the most insidious of these is social Darwinism, which preaches “survival of the fittest” and reinforces the top-down dominance paradigm. This fraudulent Luciferian world view – reinforced by corporate-funded “scientific” research – needs to be deconstructed and discredited if we are to progress as a species.

    Charles Darwin’s expedition was funded by European nobility. He was himself a Freemason. Despite this elite pedigree, Darwin’s research led him to one very important conclusion, and it was not the “survival of the fittest” mantra that the global elite have since employed to justify everything from colonialism and slavery to private central banking and monopoly capitalism. Rather, Darwin’s central thesis was that the survival of a species was dependent on a high degree of cooperation within that species.

    I grew up on a 2,000 acre ranch and have lived in the country almost my entire life. I have hunted, trapped, fished, raised livestock and had pets. I have hiked countless miles of back country Montana trails where I’ve encountered grizzly bears, mountain goats, moose and wolverine. My wife and I recently went on a safari in South Africa’s Kruger National Park.

    Through all of these experiences I have never seen two wild animals locked in mortal combat. What I have seen is cooperation at many levels, not only within species, but between species. Yet if you watch any Royal Geographic Society-funded documentary on wildlife, the theme of conflict is omnipresent.

    Take a walk in the woods and you will hear songbirds warning the fox that you are headed her way. Observe a herd of deer and you will see the fit, healthy individuals watching out and waiting for the young, injured or sick members. Visit Kruger and you will see warthogs sticking close to the zebras. The zebras can see above the bushveld and watch for lions, while the smaller warthogs, with their razor-sharp tusks, can give a lion problems for long enough to allow a zebra to escape an ambush.

    I had two dogs for nearly fifteen years. Buck, the larger dog, deferred to Milo, the smaller but older dog, his entire life. They never once had a physical confrontation. Though Buck was easily the stronger of the two, he saw no need to be the “big dog”. Buck knew that cooperation was a much easier path. In turn Milo never abused his respected position of “elder”.

    I later adopted a family of three male cats. When Bob caught a mouse, he would often give it to Loris. When Loris caught one he would give it to Harvey. We used to wait in anticipation to see if they would fight over it, but they never did. Often they would triangulate and hunt together, while also keeping a lookout for bigger predators.

    Of course confrontation occurs in the animal community, mostly during the rut and when food is scarce. Boys will be boys. And all living beings must eat. But why does the Tavistock perception management media focus so much on these rare incidents and so little on the much more prevalent cooperation within the natural community? Because doing so would shatter the myth that monopoly capitalism is a natural economic system.

    Greed is not natural. Cooperation is. We are inherently loving.

    The global elite have utilized this same phony version of neo-Darwinism in their portrayal of indigenous people. We are told, usually when justifying some oil war for Exxon Mobil or Citibank, that “Indians were constantly at war (blah, blah, blah),too.” Yet any cultural anthropologist worth their salt will tell you that Native Americans rarely waged inter-tribal war during the 100,000+ years before European contact.

    Pre-contact tribes also didn’t have one “alpha” chief. They had tribal councils, consisting of elderly men and women whose life experiences were valued. Young physically strong hunters were always expected to show deference to these elders. Among the Lakota, the hunter who made the kill always ate last, reinforcing the virtue of humility and discouraging arrogance. Might was not right in tribal society. The very concept of “chief” was foisted upon native people by the Crown colonizers.

    The Luciferian European nobility saw this socialist tribal model as a threat to their growing industrial capitalist empire. So their hired guns led by Albert Pike – founder of both Scottish-Rite Freemasonry in the US and the Ku Klux Klan – launched the Indian Wars.

    These mercenaries also taught Indians to collect scalps, paying them a bounty before sending the scalps back to the Euro-inbreds who did God knows what with them. The Crown Agent Skull & Bones Society reportedly keeps Geronimo’s skull in its Yale University house of horrors.

    Pike’s troops then hand-picked tribal “chiefs” of low character that were easily bought – usually with whiskey. These “chiefs” replaced the traditional tribal councils, signed treaties giving away tribal land, and were bribed into attacking other tribes to create the disunity necessary for the Illuminati to destroy the Native American nature-based model of living with the earth instead of pilfering it.

    Pike was a 33rd degree Mason and Crown Agent. He brought Freemasonry to America at Charleston, SC in the 1870’s. His book Morals and Dogma serves as a bible for US Freemasons today. In the book Pike proclaims the Satanic bent of Freemasonry espousing, “The Masonic Religion should be by all of us initiates in the High Degrees maintained in the purity of the Luciferic Doctrine”.

    Neo-Darwinism is a diabolical, fear-laden Luciferian way of thinking about the world. It is a reality at odds with nature. The dominance paradigm it justifies is a Western industrial human construct conjured up as a rationale for past, present and future subjugation of the planet and its people by the Illuminati bloodline elite.

    One last thought: If control over the global economy really is as simple as “survival of the fittest” and “alpha male dominance”, shouldn’t Evander Holyfield own Bank of America, while Goldman Sachs’ scrawny CEO Lloyd Blankfein rents a cockroach-infested shack in Harlem?


  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to SaxonPagan For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Funding Member
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member


    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Gender
    Posts
    837
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    67
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    100
    Thanked in
    39 Posts
    The notion of social-darwinism is not a fraud. The problem is rather that it has had multiple meanings and it is very difficult to speak of a single social-darwinism in the historical sense. This happens to a lot of categories in the history of ideas and also depends on whether the term is used by proponents of the idea or by opponents who use it in a deregatory way (compare 'populism'). The way it is understood in the text above (and which is also the most common understanding of it) is actually one of the most confusing understandings of 'social-darwinism' since it predates Darwin. It's rather social-spencerism: Herbert Spencer, inspired by the thesis of Malthus, developed a social theory of struggle in the most liberal capitalist (and thus individualist) sense. He was also the one who coined the phrase 'survival of the fittest', which Darwin borrowed from Spencer. Only later when he discovered Darwin's work, he tried to reconcile Darwin's theory of natural selection with his own ideas. The term 'social-darwinism' might be apt to the extent there is a central position for competition in Spencer's social theory. But of course primarily these ideas were his own, not Darwin's. But this is a problem with all forms of social-darwinism (even feminist types exist). Since Darwin was a biologist and not a social scientist, any application of his findings in the social domain become 'tainted' by new perspectives and ideas. But this is no fraud. Some knowledge of the origins of these ideas and a basic understanding of how ideas develop in history can take away the need to frame it as a conspiracy.

  4. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Bernhard For This Useful Post:


  5. #3
    Senior Member Theunissen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Last Online
    59 Minutes Ago @ 02:33 AM
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ancestry
    North Western Europe
    Country
    South Africa South Africa
    State
    Transvaal Transvaal
    Location
    South Africa
    Gender
    Posts
    482
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    152
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    240
    Thanked in
    130 Posts
    The text puts words into the mouth of historical figures. You need to give proper citation for each and every such quote or claim.

    I don't call it social darwinism, but there is definitely a competition over resources between individuals and groups.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Theunissen For This Useful Post:


  7. #4
    Senior Member SaxonPagan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Last Online
    24 Minutes Ago @ 03:08 AM
    Ethnicity
    English
    Ancestry
    English, Anglo-Saxon
    Country
    England England
    Location
    South Coast
    Gender
    Zodiac Sign
    Aries
    Family
    Married
    Occupation
    Self Employed
    Politics
    Free Speech / Anti-EU
    Religion
    Pagan
    Posts
    5,024
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,558
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,540
    Thanked in
    1,365 Posts
    Yes, there are a lot of selective examples given to illustrate what the author considers to be the predominance of cooperation over competition.

    His angle (that I agree with to a large extent) is that the global élites advocate the “survival of the fittest” because they are the ones currently on top and this is the only means by which they can justify their unscrupulous methods.

    Such things as predatory capitalism with all its greed and selfishness are more readily acceptable to the masses when presented as basic laws of nature.

  8. #5
    Senior Member Herr Rentz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Last Online
    1 Hour Ago @ 01:44 AM
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    German
    Ancestry
    Emmingen, Baden-Württemburg
    Subrace
    Don't know
    Country
    Germany Germany
    State
    Baden-Wuerttemberg Baden-Wuerttemberg
    Location
    US
    Gender
    Zodiac Sign
    Taurus
    Family
    Single adult
    Occupation
    Retail Sales Management
    Politics
    Nationalsozialist
    Religion
    Catholic
    Posts
    618
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    405
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    644
    Thanked in
    318 Posts
    What the article contains about animals is a crock of crap. He apparently didn't spend enough time in the wild or wasn't paying attention.
    American by birth, made of parts from Emmingen, Baden-Württemberg.

    Der Familie Rentz seit 1535 - Meine Ehre heißt Treue

    Das Leben ist zu kurz, um billiges Bier zu trinken!


  9. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Last Online
    4 Days Ago @ 07:07 PM
    Ethnicity
    Anglo-American
    Gender
    Religion
    Hitlerism
    Posts
    327
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    65
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    99
    Thanked in
    70 Posts
    It is important to understand the historical transition of the methodology employed by the Illuminati in their never-ending quest to control the people and resources of planet earth.
    The modern agenda has nothing to do with the Bavarian Illuminati. The Illuminati makes a convenient scapegoat to stockpile more hatred for Germans. It really must be asked why so little of Adam Weishaupt's writings have been translated. We actually owe it to individual Masons for taking up the translation work in recent times, which sufficiently demonstrate that Weishaupt was leagues ahead of his time and was steadfast in the highest idealism. He also did not try to substitute Christianity with a natural religion.

    This fraudulent Luciferian world view – reinforced by corporate-funded “scientific” research – needs to be deconstructed and discredited if we are to progress as a species.
    Lucifer is tantamount to Prometheus. Like the descendants of Cain, the angels of Enoch, and the serpent of Eden, Prometheus was wrongly punished for contributing to mankind (the gift of fire was necessary for the North). Obviously all these myths have come down distorted to posterity, probably by Jews.

    [Darwin] was himself a Freemason.
    Largely a baseless claim, although apparently Albert Mackey claimed Darwin as a Mason in his dictionary. But one should keep in mind that like Jews and Christians, Masons have a tendency of claiming men for their cause; they trace their ideas to antiquity, which furnishes them with some credibility.

    I have hunted, trapped, fished, raised livestock and had pets.
    So the guy is basically a degenerate peasant. Hardly a man who coexists with nature but rather tries to rule over it. The cultivation of animals for food is a symptom of decay.

    Through all of these experiences I have never seen two wild animals locked in mortal combat. What I have seen is cooperation at many levels, not only within species, but between species. Yet if you watch any Royal Geographic Society-funded documentary on wildlife, the theme of conflict is omnipresent.
    It's worth pointing out that the documentaries on wildlife often cover extreme regions, in contrast to the docile places this man has claimed to live in.

    Greed is not natural. Cooperation is. We are inherently loving.
    There's a curious entry in Hitler's table talks where he relates an account of a brawl in a local tavern. From this he concludes that "The idea of human solidarity was imposed on men by force, and can be maintained only by the same means."

    The global elite have utilized this same phony version of neo-Darwinism in their portrayal of indigenous people. We are told, usually when justifying some oil war for Exxon Mobil or Citibank, that “Indians were constantly at war (blah, blah, blah),too.” Yet any cultural anthropologist worth their salt will tell you that Native Americans rarely waged inter-tribal war during the 100,000+ years before European contact.

    Pre-contact tribes also didn’t have one “alpha” chief. They had tribal councils, consisting of elderly men and women whose life experiences were valued. Young physically strong hunters were always expected to show deference to these elders. Among the Lakota, the hunter who made the kill always ate last, reinforcing the virtue of humility and discouraging arrogance. Might was not right in tribal society. The very concept of “chief” was foisted upon native people by the Crown colonizers.

    The Luciferian European nobility saw this socialist tribal model as a threat to their growing industrial capitalist empire.
    You can clearly tell this guy has liberal/communistic/social democratic leanings, this is another attack on white people and blaming them, and not Jews and direct Jewish sects (Puritanism, Calvinism), for their poor dealings with savages. He also revises the history and conduct of the indigenous peoples on a quip.

    So their hired guns led by Albert Pike – founder of both Scottish-Rite Freemasonry in the US and the Ku Klux Klan – launched the Indian Wars.
    Another unfounded statement.

    Pike was a 33rd degree Mason and Crown Agent. He brought Freemasonry to America at Charleston, SC in the 1870’s.
    Pike was a humanist who valued the necessity of work, was familiar with the weaknesses of democracy/republic and the direction America was headed, and he called out the press for being a neo-Inquisition.

    His book Morals and Dogma serves as a bible for US Freemasons today.
    Pretty much every Freemason would debate that. I have read Pike's book extensively and when I tried to convey the ideas to an individual Mason, he cautioned me not to take it that far, even dismissing Pike as an authority.

    In the book Pike proclaims the Satanic bent of Freemasonry espousing, “The Masonic Religion should be by all of us initiates in the High Degrees maintained in the purity of the Luciferic Doctrine”.
    Only two fatal mistakes from Freemasonry: acceptance of Jews into their lodges and the belief that Jews had a share in the mysteries like their neighbors. The Jewish Essenes was merely an imitation, borrowing ideas and literature from other cultures. The Freemasons are a step ahead of Theosophists by maintaining their secrets. Indeed, there is no complete membership list for Freemasonry and as much rubbish people will concoct about it, they will never be able to fully ascertain the fraternity's hierarchy and goals.

Similar Threads

  1. Anti-Social Darwinism
    By KingOvGermania in forum Philosophy
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: Monday, July 16th, 2012, 01:56 AM
  2. Is Marxism the Logical Consequence of Darwinism?
    By Bernhard in forum Political Theory
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: Tuesday, February 14th, 2012, 04:17 AM
  3. The Annihilation of White People; Simple Darwinism.
    By Sågverksarbetaren in forum Immigration & Multiculturalism
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: Wednesday, January 25th, 2012, 10:15 PM
  4. How applicable is Social Darwinism?
    By Imperator X in forum Philosophy
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: Wednesday, October 10th, 2007, 11:09 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •