Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: Ru 486 ABortion Pill

  1. #1
    Johnson
    Guest

    Post Ru 486 ABortion Pill

    RU-486, also known as the abortion pill, is a medication that causes the termination of an early pregnancy.

    RU-486 involves the use of two different pills. The first pill contains a medication called mifepristone. When taken, this medication blocks the action of the hormone progesterone that is needed to maintain a healthy pregnancy. Without progesterone, the pregnancy will die, and a miscarriage will occur.

    Two days after taking mifepristone, a second pill must be taken that contains a medication called misoprostol. This second medication makes the uterus contract and push out the pregnancy tissue. This is similar to what happens in a natural miscarriage.

    Taking RU-486 is very different from having a surgical abortion. A surgical abortion must be performed in a hospital or clinic by a doctor. Local anesthesia and sedation is used during the procedure. The actual abortion takes approximately 10 minutes and the process is complete as soon as the procedure is over.

    In comparison, a medical abortion with RU-486 requires a few visits to the doctor to take the medications. There is no surgery. The person goes home and waits for the pregnancy tissue to be expelled within several days. However, the person using RU-486 may experience side effects, such as strong cramping and heavy bleeding.

    Approximately 92% of the time, RU-486 leads to the complete termination of a pregnancy. That means that 8% of the women or girls who take RU-486 will end up needing a surgical abortion procedure to remove pregnancy tissue that did not come out on its own.

    RU-486 can only be used in the first seven weeks of pregnancy.

  2. #2
    Lupu Fenris
    Legio_Melita's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Last Online
    Thursday, January 8th, 2004 @ 03:22 PM
    Location
    Aryan Malta
    Gender
    Age
    33
    Occupation
    Student and part-time Waiter
    Politics
    National Socialist/Fascist
    Posts
    102
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Post

    It is a niggerly act to have fuck anyone in sight and impregnate without care, and it is a sicker act to kill a baby (unless he's a fucking mongrel/spic/jew, you get the point).

  3. #3
    Johnson
    Guest

    Post

    What if having the baby endanger's the mother's health?

  4. #4
    Senior Member Ederico's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Last Online
    Tuesday, September 4th, 2007 @ 10:37 PM
    Gender
    Age
    37
    Posts
    1,269
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post

    Post

    Abortion from the Racialist perspective is something to be abhorred when both parents are Aryan in all cases except physical danger for the mother. Perhaps there are other cases, but I cannot think of others at the moment.

  5. #5
    Johnson
    Guest

    Post

    What if the mother has a disease that will be passed on to the child when she births it?

    AIDS, (other STD's)...

    What of Down's Syndrome, Mental Retardation, Disfigured child...

    Bear in mind that all these questions are from an athiest point of view.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Ederico's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Last Online
    Tuesday, September 4th, 2007 @ 10:37 PM
    Gender
    Age
    37
    Posts
    1,269
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post

    Post

    Originally posted by Johnson
    What if the mother has a disease that will be passed on to the child when she births it?

    AIDS, (other STD's)...

    What of Down's Syndrome, Mental Retardation, Disfigured child...

    Bear in mind that all these questions are from an athiest point of view.
    From a Rational perspective I support Abortion in all of the cases you mentioned and I actually believe it could be in correlation with an Eugenics program. The Abortion I support is State-induced but considering other factors I would consider allowing the parents to decide whether to Abort or not, obviously with no Social Benefits given to the child and its parents if the Abortion does not happen.

  7. #7
    Senior Member Ominous Lord Spoonblade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Last Online
    Tuesday, September 26th, 2006 @ 12:55 AM
    Subrace
    shape-shifter
    Country
    Canada Canada
    Location
    Castle Fort Frightengaard
    Gender
    Age
    34
    Politics
    pride and power
    Religion
    I built the pyramids
    Posts
    1,296
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    7
    Thanked in
    7 Posts

    Post

    I think that abortion is definately a good choice when the child is going to have a severe disability or disease. I don't see the point in having that child. We have a much too compassionate society. Healthy babies on the other hand should not be aborted unless the mother's health is at risk. I don't have a moral issue with choosing one life over the other in that case.

    Many anti-abortionists though, will bring up such a thing like the "abortion pill"...and many people will call themselves "pro-life", but they don't have any objections to birth control pills, etc. One pregnancy preventative mechanism that the birth control causes is not allowing the uterine lining to develop so that in the case of fertilization the ovum cannot implant itself. This happens in the instance of breakthrough ovulation, which occurs surprisingly often (the first mechanism of bc is to stop ovulation). So, do you think that birth control is a form of abortion when it relys on that final mechanism?

  8. #8
    Johnson
    Guest

    Post

    Birth control is not a form of abortion, abortion stops a life, whereas BC prevents a new human from growing.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Last Online
    Saturday, December 11th, 2004 @ 10:23 AM
    Location
    The Land of Cowboys
    Gender
    Politics
    Right side up
    Posts
    166
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Post

    Vanessa has a point. The line between BC and abortion can be unclear. An intra-uterine device does not prevent conception, but implantation of the fertilized egg. An otherwise viable embyo is flushed from the system.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Last Online
    Wednesday, July 23rd, 2003 @ 11:31 PM
    Location
    Portsmouth Newhampshire USA
    Gender
    Age
    34
    Politics
    White Nationalist
    Posts
    129
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Post

    I am against abortion unless it is mongreled, endangers mothers life, rape victom mothers, or if the baby will have serious health problems.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Another Pill That Could Cause a Revolution
    By Hersir in forum Health, Fitness & Nutrition
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: Tuesday, August 3rd, 2010, 04:10 PM
  2. Breast Cancer: Its Link to Abortion and the Birth Control Pill
    By CharlesDexterWard in forum Health, Fitness & Nutrition
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: Thursday, April 24th, 2008, 02:54 PM
  3. Heart Pill Intended Only for Blacks Sparks Debate
    By Vanir in forum Articles & Current Affairs
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: Tuesday, July 19th, 2005, 07:44 AM
  4. Read this before you get a flu shot or take another pill
    By Nordhammer in forum Articles & Current Affairs
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: Monday, December 29th, 2003, 02:41 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •