Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Females Are Outperforming Males On Every Educational Level, And That Has Staggering Implications For The Future Of Our Society

  1. #1
    Funding Member
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member

    Nachtengel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    German
    Gender
    Posts
    5,916
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    94
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    763
    Thanked in
    420 Posts

    Females Are Outperforming Males On Every Educational Level, And That Has Staggering Implications For The Future Of Our Society

    It is an uncomfortable truth that most educators simply do not want to talk about.

    Females are dramatically outperforming males on every educational level, and many are wondering what this means for our future. If men do not feel a strong sense of purpose and meaning, they can get into trouble really quickly. As I write this article, the vast majority of those that abuse drugs are men, the vast majority of those that commit violent crimes are men, and the vast majority of those that we put into prison are men. I began researching this article by looking into the fact that the labor participation rate for men has been declining for decades, but our problems run much deeper than that. Today, so many men feel lost. Millions of them don’t have a sense of direction, millions of them don’t have anything that really drives or motivates them, and millions of them are deeply depressed and greatly dissatisfied with life.

    For a lot of them, it started very early. As Dr. Michael Thompson told CBS News, all across America girls are outperforming boys at every educational level…

    “Girls outperform boys in elementary school, middle school, high school, and college, and graduate school,” says Dr. Michael Thompson, a school psychologist who writes about the academic problems of boys in his book, “Raising Cain.” He says that after decades of special attention, girls are soaring, while boys are stagnating.

    “Girls are being told, ‘Go for it, you can do it. Go for it, you can do it.’ They are getting an immense amount of support,” he says. “Boys hear that the way to shine is athletically. And boys get a lot of mixed messages about what it means to be masculine and what it means to be a student. Does being a good student make you a real man? I don’t think so… It is not cool.”

    Perhaps one of the big reasons why young males are so drawn to sports is because it allows them to do the sorts of things the come naturally to males. Sporting events allow young males to engage in battle, to hunt and to conquer. Yes, it is a simulated environment, but sporting events really do bring out something primal in young boys.

    According to a recent study from University of New Brunswick in Canada, girls have been outperforming boys consistently through the years. It is a popular belief that boys perform better in subjects like Math and Science; however, a review of 308 studies involving more than 1.1 million children across the globe has challenged this stereotype. The study looked at data from 1914 to 2011 and the findings suggest that girls do better in school than boys in the classroom regardless of the material.

    So it isn’t just in the United States that this is happening.

    And it is a trend that does not seem to diminish with age.

    Young women are dominating in high schools all over the nation, and at one high school in Massachusetts girls make up 70 to 80 percent of the students in advanced placement classes…

    At graduation ceremonies last June at Hanover High School in Massachusetts, it was the ninth year in a row that a girl was on the podium as school valedictorian. Girls also took home nearly all the honors, including the science prize, says principal Peter Badalament.

    “[Girls] tend to dominate the landscape academically right now,” he says, even in math and science.

    The school’s advanced placement classes, which admit only the most qualified students, are often 70 percent to 80 percent girls. This includes calculus. And in AP biology, there was not a single boy.

    I suppose the silver lining for young men is that if they really want to meet more girls they should just work really, really hard to get into those AP classes.

    But the truth is that this is no joking matter. At this point, higher education in the United States is totally dominated by women. Just check out these numbers…

    Women earned approximately 57 percent of the bachelor’s degrees awarded by U.S. institutions of higher education in the 2016-2017 academic year, according to data released this week by the National Center for Education Statistics, which is part of the U.S. Department of Education.

    That, according to NCES data, makes 2016-2017 the eighteenth straight academic year in which women have earned approximately 57 percent of the bachelor’s degrees awarded by U.S. colleges and universities.

    Did you understand what that excerpt was saying?

    Women have received about 57 percent of all bachelor’s degrees in this country for 18 years in a row.

    Our future doctors, lawyers, politicians and societal leaders come from our pool of college graduates, and the numbers tell us that women are going to be dominating those fields for the foreseeable future.

    So what will men be doing?

    Well, in recent years more of them have been dropping out of the labor force than ever before. The following comes from the New York Times…

    Among women, the share out of the labor force has fallen from 66 percent in 1950 to 43 percent today. That is not surprising in light of changing social norms and the greater career opportunities now open to women.

    Men, however, exhibit the opposite long-term trend. In 1950, 14 percent of men were out of the labor force. Today, that figure stands at 31 percent.

    For those of you that prefer graphics, here is a chart from the Federal Reserve that shows this staggering decline over the last several decades. Please note that we are currently at a much lower level than we were at during the last major recession…


    If men aren’t working, how are they supporting themselves?

    For many, the social safety net provided by the government is an easy answer. Here is more from the New York Times…

    One might wonder how these less educated, prime-age men support themselves after leaving the labor force. The social safety net plays a role. In a study for the Mercatus Center of George Mason University, Scott Winship reports that “75 percent of inactive prime-age men are in a household that received some form of government transfer payment.” Mr. Winship believes that government disability benefits in particular are one reason for the lack of interest in work.

    For others, living with Mom and Dad for as long as possible is the solution. Today, a staggering 38.4 percent of all Millennials live with their parents, and that number seems to keep going up with each passing year.

    We live during an era of dramatic societal change, and many are concerned about where all of this change is taking us.
    More: https://www.infowars.com/females-are...f-our-society/

  2. #2
    Senior Member Theunissen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Last Online
    50 Minutes Ago @ 09:26 PM
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ancestry
    North Western Europe
    Country
    South Africa South Africa
    State
    Transvaal Transvaal
    Location
    South Africa
    Gender
    Posts
    539
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    194
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    293
    Thanked in
    160 Posts
    Did you understand what that excerpt was saying?
    Women have received about 57 percent of all bachelor’s degrees in this country for 18 years in a row.
    It depends on the type of bachelor degrees as well though. I still see far more man in technical fields like engineering and hard sciences or management.

    Also, educational performance isn't congruent with real life professional performance, where other traits come into play.

  3. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Theunissen For This Useful Post:


  4. #3
    Funding Member
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member

    Finnish Swede's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Finnish Swede
    Ancestry
    Father: Swedish, Mother Finnish Swede
    Subrace
    Sub-Nordid - Nordid - Baltid mix
    Country
    Other Other
    State
    Finland Swede Community Finland Swede Community
    Location
    Ostrobothnia
    Gender
    Age
    21
    Zodiac Sign
    Pisces
    Occupation
    Student
    Politics
    No specific ideology
    Religion
    Lutheran
    Posts
    1,867
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    386
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,506
    Thanked in
    1,373 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Theunissen View Post
    It depends on the type of bachelor degrees as well though. I still see far more man in technical fields like engineering and hard sciences or management.

    Also, educational performance isn't congruent with real life professional performance, where other traits come into play.
    True, but at least in Scandinavia even in those areas (like technical fields) women % is growing all the time. Slowly? Yes, but still growing. Over all nations should be more worried about that development (education levels: Girls vs Boys). It's not girls fault, but how to motivate boys more?

    ''Profession performance'' is interesting term. That includes lots of matters. One of the most important one (career wise) are personal characteristics like motivation, passion, ambition, unscrupulousness, narcissism, inflexibility ... those (= testosterone ones) will keep men in CEOs of big companies. Plus the fact as women are making babies today and tomorrow. Still today we can see even more women CEOs than ever before (but basically only in smaller companies).

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Finnish Swede For This Useful Post:


  6. #4
    Account Inactive
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Last Online
    Wednesday, July 11th, 2018 @ 06:09 AM
    Ethnicity
    Ethnicity
    Ancestry
    Ancestry
    Gender
    Age
    37
    Posts
    2,127
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,488
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    130
    Thanked in
    108 Posts
    This stupid battle of the sexes is leaving families (i.e. children) behind and opening the way for more rapefugees. Be faithful to one another. Think of the dishonor you bring your grandparents. Men, get off your arses and work for the "nookie", for real.

    Nookie


    Women, be yourselves instead of having Freudian penis envy. Both of you care about the kids as if they are you (because they are) and remember what it was like when your own parents didn't care about you. You can and do, change the world, one baby at a time, so care.

  7. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Rodskarl Dubhgall For This Useful Post:


  8. #5
    Funding Member
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member

    Finnish Swede's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Finnish Swede
    Ancestry
    Father: Swedish, Mother Finnish Swede
    Subrace
    Sub-Nordid - Nordid - Baltid mix
    Country
    Other Other
    State
    Finland Swede Community Finland Swede Community
    Location
    Ostrobothnia
    Gender
    Age
    21
    Zodiac Sign
    Pisces
    Occupation
    Student
    Politics
    No specific ideology
    Religion
    Lutheran
    Posts
    1,867
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    386
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,506
    Thanked in
    1,373 Posts
    I don't think that most of women who works (or studies at Universities etc.) someway feels that they battle with men.
    They do it as they...
    1.) want that (develop themselves and for safety reasons)
    2.) can do it (guys studying results & school reports are often worse).
    Some hard core feminists might be exceptions ....


    What is more important? Nation or its citizens? Which is existing for another?



    Can people change their society or can society change people?



    In democratic countries nobody (incl. nation) can ''force'' anybody to make children. Children needs to be wanted.



    Today: If more than 1 - 2 babies would be wanted/per family (and in larger scale) .... for sure men alone can not specify that kind of family model and/or parents roles on it. That simply won't work, like we see today ... no matter how hard somebodies would just want to go back at time.


    I see here two major issues:
    The ''safety'' above. I know that in the past .... in Nordic countries there were talks about public salaries paid to housewifes by nation. Those never came real, sum was very small (both monthly salary => earned pension later age) and today ... thanks to immigrants ...that would make things only worse.
    I also doubt that many working man would be ready that their salary would be automatically paid for example half to their (house)wifes...

    And another matter is that many cases .... both parents really need to work as husbands' salaries are too small. Not to talking about if there would be lots of kids and not a normal 1 or 2.

    Now somebody can say that lets live like Amish etc. (simply via home farming). I'm a country side girl .... I think, I could even do that someway opposite to city people (for example I have milked cow, not to talking about many other things ... I wonder how many here has ever done the same?) ... plus we have fields around of our house. Maybe people could live like that (= stay alive) and if needed something....changing things directly with their neighbours. But white people (incl. germanics) have always wanted to be most advanced and live most advanced countries. I doubt big majority will ever be ready to change that (give up on that).

    Summer houses are good example here. Today's summerhouses are not any more ''summer houses''. They are like 2. homes (showers, huge kitchens, normal toilets etc.). Incl. all the luxuries as people have their homes. If I go to summer house, I prefer old type (ascetic one) ... as that differs from my everyday life. Lot's of people don't.

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Finnish Swede For This Useful Post:


  10. #6
    Account Inactive
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Last Online
    Wednesday, July 11th, 2018 @ 06:09 AM
    Ethnicity
    Ethnicity
    Ancestry
    Ancestry
    Gender
    Age
    37
    Posts
    2,127
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,488
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    130
    Thanked in
    108 Posts
    The welfare state is failing hard. If folks don't want to adjust to austerity, they will be destroyed in the same fashion as Rome. Only caring about mindless self indulgence is not a trait of the civilized mind. Hedonism begets barbarism, inviting barbarians to come demand their part of the spoils. Stoicism can shake off the enemy at the gates, without the bait luring them in the first place. Insulation from reality is not doing these folks any big favors--they must deal with it. If only welfare states didn't spawn spoiled brats, who don't know how to feed themselves and worry about "First World problems".

    They must look outside the borders, at what's being brought inside the borders, to see how life isn't so peachy. Death is coming to those who make Heaven on Earth. Take it away from yourselves willingly, or have it forcefully ripped out of your dead hands. Not everyone can have everything and not everyone can be everything. There are skills and traits that ought not be obsolete, because survival depends on them. Wearing pants, cutting hair and refusing motherhood is hardly preparing women to be happy with themselves and living a fulfilling life without regrets. Men who don't lift a finger to feed, fix and fight for women and children are likewise without purpose, as the resources are depleted and nobody has anything anymore, which whining won't change.

    Transhumanism is just post-Western race suicide made universal. All the post-White countries are transracial, intentionally dying out by handing over the torch and keys to the city, surrendering chastity of the native wombs to all invaders, using the same propaganda of self-loathing that inspired eco-crazies to declare it their mission to surrender to the Great Ape Project, or artificial life and let them both take over, to make a Planet of the Apes and Terminator or Borg scenario. This is White Guilt and it's worst in secular socialist societies, having belief in nothing but base materialism. Socialism doesn't care about its practitioners, who find love for true community, the ostensible point of Communism, detestable. Individuals are being destroyed by Cultural Marxism every second, as globalism is the only goal.

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Rodskarl Dubhgall For This Useful Post:


  12. #7
    Senior Member Theunissen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Last Online
    50 Minutes Ago @ 09:26 PM
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ancestry
    North Western Europe
    Country
    South Africa South Africa
    State
    Transvaal Transvaal
    Location
    South Africa
    Gender
    Posts
    539
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    194
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    293
    Thanked in
    160 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Finnish Swede View Post
    True, but at least in Scandinavia even in those areas (like technical fields) women % is growing all the time. Slowly? Yes, but still growing. Over all nations should be more worried about that development (education levels: Girls vs Boys). It's not girls fault, but how to motivate boys more?
    There is a push for girls getting into positions previously considered "male role". As if they had to prove something to the world that they are "as good as man". Those fields are usually highly specialized, while the traditional role of woman was a far broader one. Their services didn't have as high price tags on them and mothers and house wife's didn't get salaries or wages for their subsequently undervalued services. But people respond to incentives over time.

    The class room exercise and bureaucratized forms for education like they are still practiced aren't really something for boys whose temper works different then the one for girls. That also explains part of the difference.

    Quote Originally Posted by Finnish Swede View Post
    ''Profession performance'' is interesting term. That includes lots of matters. One of the most important one (career wise) are personal characteristics like motivation, passion, ambition, unscrupulousness, narcissism, inflexibility ... those (= testosterone ones) will keep men in CEOs of big companies. Plus the fact as women are making babies today and tomorrow. Still today we can see even more women CEOs than ever before (but basically only in smaller companies).
    My guess it that 80% of what one needs in professional life isn't based on school bank education, but must come from other sources. That includes social skills (which are crippled in public schools), initiative, creativity, intuition, decisiveness etc. Sure there is women that run small companies, there always has been. Most successful small businesses are run by husbands and wives that are partners. I know several in the form of farmers, real estate agencies, PR-services, etc.
    Higher management positions filled by women mostly are part of the state and state sponsored civil society sector. Seen that barely in companies with a tough, stressful environment. The employees also like more a man in that positions, because women in those positions tend to be mean to them or don't cope.

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to Theunissen For This Useful Post:


  14. #8
    Sees all, knows all Chlodovech's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    6 Days Ago @ 07:14 AM
    Ethnicity
    Flemish
    Ancestry
    Frankish
    Country
    Holy Roman Empire Holy Roman Empire
    Gender
    Politics
    Völkisch traditionalist
    Religion
    Catholic
    Posts
    3,167
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,477
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,552
    Thanked in
    1,109 Posts
    There are several reasons for this unsustainable situation. The problem was never the boys, it's the adults.

    * The "mixed classrooms" we find in our educational systems are geared towards girls - just like any other mixed gender area in society. When women enter a field of society they were previously not or hardly active in, that field alters itself to accomodate women - from football stadiums to the work place. Society is gynocentric in that regard. One examply of this would be the mandatory book reading - boys prefer hard, technical non-fiction, girls prefer novels, yet both are obliged to read novels.
    * Another issue with the mixed classrooms is that they're way too distracting for boys whose hormones just begin raging through their bodies - and the source of the distraction are the girls. Instead of being able to focus on knowledge, they have to deal with their first crush - it doesn't contribute positively to their grades.
    * Studies have shown that female teachers give better grades to girls than to boys for doing the exact same work - it's an unconscious bias, mostly. It's the grade gap!
    * Young boys are less suited for sitting still in a classroom all day, yet our schools force them to do exactly that all day long - it's demotivating.
    * Modern day Feminist teachers in the U.S. make boys feel bad about themselves with their feminist claptrap - they're treated as a problem - this demotivates them even more.
    * A lack of male teachers/role models in the class room.

    Boys need a somewhat different educational approach from girls, different motivational techniques too - and they need more male teachers and role models - and I do mean manly men. For example: men who are fathers (and hence have a natural way of dealing with kids - paternal types) and who are ex-military/reserve personnel, or who were or are still in some function cops, athletes, firefighters or nurses who intervene at scenes of an accident and distribute first aid. Preferably great story tellers too. Being a good teacher is a challenge, not everyone has it in them to become one - more screening needs to be done, the bar must be set higher, the standard must be raised - it's such an important job after all, one of the most important ones in society.

    The sad thing is that our pro-feminist governments don't care for the boys, they don't do anything to change this disastrous situation. After all, they want more women to succeed in life and that happens at the expense of men.
    "If we were going to stand in darkness, best we stand in a darkness we had made ourselves.” ― Douglas Coupland, Shampoo Planet

  15. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Chlodovech For This Useful Post:


  16. #9
    Moderator "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member

    Sigurd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Last Online
    3 Days Ago @ 11:16 PM
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    German
    Ancestry
    Bavarii, Saxones, Suebi, Alamanni
    Subrace
    Borreby + Atlantonordoid
    Country
    Germany Germany
    Location
    Einöde in den Alpen
    Gender
    Age
    31
    Zodiac Sign
    Libra
    Family
    Engaged
    Politics
    Tradition & Homeland
    Religion
    Odinist
    Posts
    9,107
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    73
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    217
    Thanked in
    127 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Chlodovech View Post
    One examply of this would be the mandatory book reading - boys prefer hard, technical non-fiction, girls prefer novels, yet both are obliged to read novels.
    I would beg to disagree. Boys also like to read novels, but they generally need to either have one of the following ingredients: suspense and intrigue, political scheming, milieu studies, technical facts, philosophy or the likes. Both the more philosophical reading like Ernst Jünger novels and the Fantasy/Sci-Fi field tend as well as historical novels & biographies tend to be more sought after by males than females.

    Like within society, women oft have a more 'social' approach to reading, even within "patriotic novelists" men tend to prefer Jünger, whilst women tend to prefer Stifter, with Rosegger appealing to both audiences. Hamsun is likewise, in German-speaking countries, predominantly "male reading".

    Studies have shown that female teachers give better grades to girls than to boys for doing the exact same work - it's an unconscious bias, mostly. It's the grade gap!
    This is a romantic view that would have been the case perhaps 15-20 years ago. At university we were confronted with some rabid feminist teachers who would decidedly give women better grades. The extreme case was one group task performed by one male and one female student. The girl received a "gut" (second highest grade) whilst the guy received a "genügend" (second lowest grade) - for the same piece of groupwork!

    Young boys are less suited for sitting still in a classroom all day, yet our schools force them to do exactly that all day long - it's demotivating.
    No child is suited for sitting still in a classroom all day. What IMHO schools do wrong is that they put sporting classes in the afternoon. A lot of behavioural and academic problems would be tackled by starting the day with a PE class. Morning sports aren't considered to be particularly healthy for nothing.

    A lack of male teachers/role models in the class room.
    In Central Europe this is a fairly interesting observation: Whilst the teaching staff body in secondary schools still tends to be predominantly male, this has been completely different for primary school teachers for ages. In fact, in most of the schools my father -a primary school teacher - has taught, he ended up being the only (!) male teacher in that school. Curiously enough, all of kids, parents and colleagues generally regard him as one of the best, naturally because of the (possibly partially biologically so?) different approach from his peers.
    -In kalte Schatten versunken... /Germaniens Volk erstarrt / Gefroren von Lügen / In denen die Welt verharrt-
    -Die alte Seele trauernd und verlassen / Verblassend in einer erklärbaren Welt / Schwebend in einem Dunst der Wehmut / Ein Schrei der nur unmerklich gellt-
    -Auch ich verspüre Demut / Vor dem alten Geiste der Ahnen / Wird es mir vergönnt sein / Gen Walhalla aufzufahren?-

    (Heimdalls Wacht, In kalte Schatten versunken, stanzas 4-6)

Similar Threads

  1. Why Do Females Seem More Blond Than Males?
    By fareast in forum Nordid
    Replies: 57
    Last Post: Saturday, December 15th, 2018, 02:35 AM
  2. Replies: 18
    Last Post: Friday, August 6th, 2010, 07:35 AM
  3. Why Females Prefer Immigrant Males
    By Loki in forum Men, Women, & Relationships
    Replies: 88
    Last Post: Wednesday, January 3rd, 2007, 05:17 PM
  4. Why are thin males/females most popular?
    By Gagnraad in forum Bio-Anthropology & Human Variation
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: Tuesday, August 22nd, 2006, 03:46 AM
  5. Armenians =non IE racially / Caucasians = NE males + IE females
    By Euclides in forum Population Genetics
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: Friday, February 6th, 2004, 04:42 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •