
Originally Posted by
Ljót-fulfr
I have very dark brown hair -- almost black when I was younger. Yet, I have always been much fairer than many of the blonde / "Nordic" types. I notice many blondes tan much better than I do and typically tan a very bronze color. However, I have never been able to sustain or tan in a real sense at all -- I only freckle and turn red / or burn -- when the burn goes away I am whiter than most so-called "Nordic" whites I know. I am the whitest of the whites!
In many of the books I read on this subject their exist an assumption that "Nordic" blonde hair is the primary indicator of Nordic ancestry. I feel quite certain if I dyed my hair blonde and posted a picture I would automatically be labeled "Nordic." Yet it is my own personal conviction that one can be almost purely Nordic in physical and facial characteristics and yet have contrasting dark hair -- yet in this case I am most always identified as Med. or Alpine.
Is there a contradiction here?
Bookmarks