Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: How ‘Science’ Is Used To Deceive The Public

  1. #1
    Funding Member
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member

    Nachtengel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    German
    Gender
    Posts
    5,604
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    49
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    366
    Thanked in
    230 Posts

    How ‘Science’ Is Used To Deceive The Public

    Did you know that there was a shocking study published in the Public Library of Science Journal, that found “up to 72%” of scientists admitted their colleagues were engaged in “questionable research practices,” and that just over 14% of them were engaged in outright “falsification”?[1]

    If that’s not bad enough, between 1977 and 1990 the FDA found scientific flaws in 10–20% of all the studies they audited.[2]

    But it gets even worse; scientists at the Thousand Oaks biotech firm Amgen, set out to double-check the results of 53 landmark published studies in their fields of cancer research and blood biology. What they found was shocking; only 6 of the 53 studies could be proven valid. That means almost 90% were flawed, yet passed off to the public as fact. [3]

    In other words, there’s a lot of scientific bullshit floating around my friends.



    This becomes especially concerning when we consider how “science” seems to have replaced organized religion as the new authority that should blindly be obeyed in many ways. People speak of it as if it is infallible, and anyone who questions the high priests of science are generally attacked, degraded, and dismissed as modern day heretics.

    But science, just like any religion, is not a god that only speaks unadulterated Truth. It is far from being infallible and is constantly in need of being updated, upgraded, challenged, revised, and changed, for the simple fact that science is subject to the narrow confines of mankind’s tiny flawed human perception; which is forever growing and expanding — and easily skewed by things like prejudice, pride, and corruption.

    In and of itself, science is obviously inanimate and can do neither good nor bad because it has no mind of its own. It is not a person, so we need to stop talking about science like it is a super hero. It is simply a vehicle that requires a driver, and the destination obviously differs from one driver to the next.



    While some may have the earnest pursuit of objective Truth in mind, most can be corrupted by the pursuit of money (such as Iowa State University professor Dong-Pyou Han who is now sitting in jail for his AIDS vaccine fraud), the want of fame, or simply personal prejudice and egotistical pride. And to help remind people why they should not blindly trust “science” — or any other body of purported knowledge for that matter — I decided to write this short article on how scientific bullshit has been used throughout history to manipulate our perceptions and beliefs.

    BIG TOBACCO & THE SUGAR INDUSTRY

    More than half a century ago, big tobacco used science as a weapon to convince the naive and gullible about the safety of their cigarettes.



    Notice the key phrase, “Scientific Evidence”/Image credit: Adpast.com

    A number of different medical organizations and journals, including the New England Journal of Medicine and the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), were indeed on the payrole of Big Tobaccoand helped to promote their agenda through the promotion of flawed “science”.



    Image credit: Tobacco Exhibits

    Notice the key persuading phrase in the above advertisement; “…the final results, published in authoritative medical journals, proved conclusively that when smokers changed to Philip Morris, every case of irritation cleared completely or definitely improved.”

    Similarly, the sugar industry hired a group of Harvard scientists to hide the link between sugar and heart disease in the 1960s, and the International Sugar Research Foundation (ISRF) suppressed a study that showed sugar could potentially increase the risk of bladder cancer.

    This is something we all need to understand my friends; our global society is run as a business, not as a non profit organization that values human life. And this means that any line of profession can easily be corrupted by money. Unfortunately our problems are systemic and have their roots in this painfully flawed paradigm.

    THE MANIPULATION OF SCIENCE STILL CONTINUES TODAY

    In more recent history, the Bush Administration got caught manipulating science to conform to their agenda. Big oil has likewise bribed scientists to parrot their narrative. Similarly, biotech giant Monsanto and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have also been caught engaging in this unethical practice together. This is not the first time Monsanto has been caught acting in this manner either. In Canada, a group of scientists testified that the GMO giant offered them a bribe of $1-2 million, and in Indonesia they were fined for engaging in bribery of a government official as well. Another biotech giant, Syngenta, hired scientists to discredit professor Tyrone Hayes, who conducted research that found out their herbicide Atrazine posed health risks to the population. Merck was taken to court by two scientists that claimed the Big Pharma giant manipulated tests concerning their mumps vaccine’s efficacy.

    Coca Cola was also caught paying scientists (to the tune of $132.8 million) to downplay the severity of consuming their sugary drinks, and other unhealthy products. In fact, corporations do this all the time. A perfect example, is a study conducted by the University of Colorado that claimed that diet soda was better at promoting healthy weight loss than water. Unsurprisingly, this study was funded by the soda industry.



    Another study claimed that children who ate candy weigh less than children who don’t, and are less likely to be obese. This, unsurprisingly again, was funded by a trade association representing candy giants Butterfingers, Hershey and Skittles.


    CONCLUSION

    Today, a number of questionable practices in the name of science continue. Sadly, the manipulation (or incompetence) of science is something that most likely will never be truly eliminated from society because it is rooted in human fallibility and corruption. This is not to say that the concept of science does not serve an important purpose, because it certainly does; I personally use scientific methods and principles daily in my life, and even relied on scientific research to highlight corruption within the scientific community in this blog. But this was written specifically to remind us all that “science” can be used to deceive us — has been used to deceive us — and should always be questioned as a result. Scientists obviously need money to conduct their research, and corporations who place material profit above human life have plenty of it. The hand that gives usually controls the hand that takes.

    Until we design a system that promotes unadulterated education, more than it does propaganda and ignorance; and rewards integrity more than the willingness to do anything for “money,” this type of pathetic human behavior will persist for obvious reasons.

    ALWAYS QUESTION EVERYTHING.

    Bibliography:

    1] Daniele Fanelli, Public Library of Science Journal, How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data, May 29, 2009
    2] J. Leslie Glick, Scientific data audit—A key management tool, Pages 153-168 | Published online: 11 Jun 2008
    3] C. Glenn Begley & Lee M. Ellis, Nature 483, 531–533, Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research, 29 March 2012
    http://www.renegadetribune.com/how-s...ve-the-public/

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Nachtengel For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Senior Member Godwinson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Last Online
    Thursday, September 27th, 2018 @ 03:29 AM
    Ethnicity
    English
    Ancestry
    English, Anglo-Saxon
    Country
    England England
    Location
    South Coast
    Gender
    Family
    Married
    Occupation
    Self Employed
    Politics
    Fascist
    Religion
    Pagan
    Posts
    3,288
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    249
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    586
    Thanked in
    281 Posts
    I no longer believe anything I'm told by 'scientists'.

    I used to be very interested in such things as the Universe and quantum physics etc.. but after I while I realised they were just making half of this stuff up

    My interest then shifted to looking into funding for those involved in these particular fields, and sure enough it transpires that you have to follow certain lines of research or you don't get any money to pursue your work.

    It's the same with climate change - there's any amount of cash available for those following the approved path but the heretics receive next to nothing and just about all 'scientific research' today works on this basis.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Godwinson For This Useful Post:


  5. #3
    Senior Member Theunissen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Last Online
    35 Minutes Ago @ 02:51 AM
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ancestry
    North Western Europe
    Country
    South Africa South Africa
    State
    Transvaal Transvaal
    Location
    South Africa
    Gender
    Posts
    377
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    68
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    110
    Thanked in
    71 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Godwinson View Post
    I no longer believe anything I'm told by 'scientists'.
    I used to be very interested in such things as the Universe and quantum physics etc.. but after I while I realised they were just making half of this stuff up
    My interest then shifted to looking into funding for those involved in these particular fields, and sure enough it transpires that you have to follow certain lines of research or you don't get any money to pursue your work.

    It's the same with climate change - there's any amount of cash available for those following the approved path but the heretics receive next to nothing and just about all 'scientific research' today works on this basis.
    There is good reason to be skeptical. Believing something just because "Scientists said" is a logical fallacy and ad hominem or appeal to authority, if you want.
    Any (scientific) statement must
    a) make sense.
    b) be backed up by what can actually be observed.

    Anything else is just so stories.

    Bear in mind that scientists went to long studies, where they essentially were indoctrinated by senior scientists and their beliefs. It helps with your marks, if you "become friends" and agree with them. After their studies they'll have to find a job within a rather limited field and again, it helps not to deviate to far from the consensus line there.

    There is something like paradigma's in science (or academia) and they are tied to dogmas of dominant belief systems. In that way academia is like religious groups that have their own dogma, rules, power structure, etc.

    As a general rule: Conformism with the dogmas will be rewarded, challenging the dogmas or interpretation models will be punished. You commonly won't make it past peer review there. Something, which some people believe is sort of the gold standard for scientific truth.

Similar Threads

  1. Is Science Racist? Liberals Want to Drop Science Classes
    By Nachtengel in forum Immigration & Multiculturalism
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Wednesday, January 27th, 2010, 03:40 PM
  2. Science and Philosophy
    By socratus in forum Philosophy
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Wednesday, September 1st, 2004, 01:46 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •