Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Make Having Children Socially Desirable Again

  1. #1
    Moderator "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member

    Blod og Jord's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Danish
    Country
    Denmark Denmark
    Gender
    Age
    37
    Family
    Engaged parent
    Politics
    Nationalism
    Religion
    Odinism
    Posts
    743
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    75
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    228
    Thanked in
    126 Posts

    Make Having Children Socially Desirable Again

    White genocide is predicted by practically everyone based on the fact that Western women have essentially given up on having babies. Fertility rates in Europe are catastrophic, well below the 2.1 children per female needed to maintain the population. Germany, for example, is projected to drop in population from 80 million today to 68 million in 2060.

    However, while everyone agrees population collapse is in our future, no one agrees on what's causing the problem. Slate writer Jessica Grose quotes Wall Street Journal writer Manuela Mesco as suggesting the reason, in the case of Italian women, is that:

    they're spending more time getting educated, there aren't enough jobs to go around, there's a lack of day care options, and they are living with their parents well into adulthood.

    There's an assumption there that women need to get a university education, need to get a job, and need day care. Hold that thought.

    A study by two academics, Matthias Doepke, Professor of Economics at Northwestern University and Fabian Kindermann, Assistant Professor at the University of Bonn, suggests the childcare workload is the issue:

    We argue that disagreement (ed: over having children) is a consequence of an uneven distribution of the burden of childcare, coupled with a limited ability of spouses to make binding commitments. For example, if the woman anticipates that she would have to do most of the childrearing work, she will realize that this would impede her ability to pursue an independent career. As a consequence, if she had the child, her outside options would worsen and she would lose bargaining power within the marriage. The end result is that she may disagree with having a/another baby, even if the man would like to have one.
    Here we see the same assumptions cropping up. It's taken as given the woman is going to have a career; the issue for her is whether she will get help from her husband, or from a child care worker, in raising an additional child. There's no suggestion the woman could consider raising the child as a career. Let's have another look at Germany.

    Spiegel Online questioned Karsten Hank, a demographic expert and sociologist at the University of Mannheim:

    A well-known statistic that often gets bandied about in Germany is that 40-45 percent of women with university degrees are childless. I'm pretty sure most of these women planned to have children, but then didn't, either because of their career or their advanced age when they started trying to get pregnant, Hank said. As a rule, university cities and urban centers have lower fertility rates than rural areas without higher education options. The closest Hank can come to a miracle formula for fertility is: don't get an education, marry early and live on a farm. Hardly a tempting life plan.

    Well, hardly tempting for Spiegel Online, but obviously a satisfying option for rural women in Germany (and elsewhere).

    And so, here, we have three observers trying to solve a puzzle of why women are stressed and overworked when they try to manage two lifestyles who don't ask the obvious question, why try? Why, exactly, are women struggling through university, the business world, the corporate ladder, the rush hour; why are they trying so desperately to beat men instead of letting men do the struggling while they bring up baby? Where, exactly, did they get the idea the work world was fun?

    This brings me back to the Oxydol advertisement at the top of the post. Young people today, even adults, don't realize how ubiquitous soap commercials were on television, in magazines and newspapers back in the 1950's. Oxydol, Cheer, Duz, Tide, Fab, Lux and many other brands inundated viewers and readers daily. It is obvious now, looking back at the copywriting, that impressing your husband, and your neighbours, on the quality of your washing had a very high social value for women in 1955. And I think that's the key: social status.

    Women are more social than men. They network more and have more friends than men. And within those networks they, naturally, seek acceptance, even praise. We've seen this in social media a lot, but it exists in society outside modern communication networks as well. In any group setting, women will exchange talking points that help them climb the social acceptance ladder. In the 1950s keeping a tidy house, having a family and hanging out a sparkling white wash was the way the game was played. In the 2000s it's a university degree, a career and, bizarrely, getting tattoos.

    Or to put that more simply, women aren't having children because it no longer earns social brownie points in Western society to do so. Governments can hand out incentives, build day-care facilities, beg women to get pregnant; none of it will work. If it doesn't advance a woman's social standing, the wombs of the nation are going to stay empty.

    Of course, this suggests a solution, doesn't it?

    It suggests that high status individuals in government, business and the media should start having large families and should parade them through the tabloids like the beautiful people they are. Of course, this would require them to be nationalists and unfortunately, most of them are globalists. What to do?

    I would suggest we, the Alt-Right, should appeal to those prominent and wealthy conservatives on our side to start the ball rolling: have kids, make a great show of it, normalize large families. Where fashion leader lead, women will follow, whatever the cost. Status, after all, is everything.
    https://www.eurocanadian.ca/2018/02/...desirable.html

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Blod og Jord For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Account Inactive
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Last Online
    Wednesday, July 11th, 2018 @ 05:09 AM
    Ethnicity
    Ethnicity
    Ancestry
    Ancestry
    Gender
    Age
    36
    Posts
    2,140
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,489
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    121
    Thanked in
    101 Posts
    If only these fools could see that they're idiots because they can't keep the ones they're with and are failures for not having kids like normal folks. Those who have more sex with the same person wins over the loser who has less sex with one, but sex with everyone else who is just as much a loser. The object is to have a great time late in life and leave a great legacy, rather than burning out before you're 40 or less. These dummies embrace the midlife crisis as a way of life...but it's not really living! LOL

  4. #3
    Senior Member Aelfgar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Last Online
    23 Minutes Ago @ 10:58 PM
    Ethnicity
    English
    Ancestry
    8/16 English, 1/16 Scott. English, 3/16 Irish English, 4/16 Irish
    Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    Location
    England
    Gender
    Religion
    Agnostic
    Posts
    480
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    373
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    286
    Thanked in
    195 Posts
    It's a good analysis at the end. Once people are materially comfortable, earning and saving more money is mainly about status.

    How to increase the Germanic/white birth rate? How about banning women from certain jobs and professions?

    But I think the main goal is to decrease the non-white birth rate! I know a relatively humane way to do it, but I don't know how to generate the political will for it.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Aelfgar For This Useful Post:


  6. #4
    Account Inactive
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Last Online
    Wednesday, July 11th, 2018 @ 05:09 AM
    Ethnicity
    Ethnicity
    Ancestry
    Ancestry
    Gender
    Age
    36
    Posts
    2,140
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,489
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    121
    Thanked in
    101 Posts
    Just send them all back to Africa and don't subsidize them with famine relief.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 29
    Last Post: Saturday, March 3rd, 2012, 04:21 PM
  2. Replies: 6
    Last Post: Wednesday, June 29th, 2011, 03:32 PM
  3. Awareness of Racism Affects How Children Do Socially and Academically
    By Nachtengel in forum Psychology, Behavior, & Neuroscience
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Wednesday, November 18th, 2009, 05:25 PM
  4. Swiss Make Excuses for Foreigners Who Rape Children
    By Haldís in forum The German Countries
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: Saturday, November 25th, 2006, 02:34 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •