Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Facebook Bans Image of Jesus for ‘Excessively Violent Content’

  1. #1
    Senior Member Verðandi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Last Online
    Wednesday, September 12th, 2018 @ 03:42 PM
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Country
    Luxembourg Luxembourg
    Location
    Asgård
    Gender
    Age
    35
    Family
    Two sisters
    Occupation
    Wyrd-weaver
    Posts
    2,355
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    189
    Thanked in
    114 Posts

    Facebook Bans Image of Jesus for ‘Excessively Violent Content’

    On Good Friday, the Franciscan University of Steubenville tried to publish a series of Facebook advertisements for an online program in theology, catechetics, and evangelization. The copy for one of the ads included an image of the San Damiano cross, a medieval icon depicting Christ crucified, which is associated with the Franciscan order, which runs the college.



    According to the university’s web communications director, Tom Crowe, Facebook rejected the ad, stating: “Your image, video thumbnail or video can’t contain shocking, sensational, or excessively violent content.”

    The original 12th-century San Damiano cross, located at the Basilica of St. Clare in Assisi, Italy, is famous for its association with Saint Francis of Assisi and the order he founded. In the year 1206, Francis was praying before this image, which at the time was hanging in the church of San Damiano, when he is said to have received the commission from Jesus to “rebuild my Church.”



    In an email to The College Fix, Crowe said that Facebook had rejected the university’s ads before, but not because the content was too “violent.” The reason given was simply because they contained too much text: “Facebook only allows 20 percent of an image used in an ad to be covered with words and rejects images with more than that.”

    Crowe said this was “the first time an image of Christ crucified has been rejected” by Facebook when the university submitted a design like this.

    In his blog post, Crowe noted the irony of Facebook’s rejection of an image of Christ crucified on Good Friday, the day when Christians commemorate his crucifixion and death. Christ was “despised and rejected of man,” Crowe observed.

    The image is indeed “too shocking, too sensational” in a theological sense, which made the timing of Facebook’s rejection “so poignant,” he said.

    Facebook “couldn’t have fulfilled the Scriptures better if they tried, and that, more than anything else, is what I tried to convey in my quick blog post about it on Friday,” he said in his email. “It really isn’t a matter of religious bigotry, in my opinion, it’s one of the world, in its ignorance and self-importance, with its sense of how God ought to act, being shocked and disgusted by how God does, in fact, act.”

    One of the professors from Franciscan University, Benjamin Wiker, told The College Fix there was “no way” that this happened by accident. He did, however, thank Facebook rhetorically “for the free advertising” for the university by flagrantly rejecting an ad on religious grounds.

    Wiker said that the rejection of the ad was consistent with Facebook behavior, citing a blogger who runs the website Passion of Christ who had an ad rejected by Facebook because it contained images from Christ’s passion.
    http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...itbart+News%29

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Verðandi For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Last Online
    Wednesday, July 31st, 2019 @ 05:22 PM
    Ethnicity
    france-german-italian
    Ancestry
    france-german-italian
    Country
    Switzerland Switzerland
    State
    Ticino Ticino
    Location
    switzerland
    Gender
    Family
    married
    Occupation
    manager
    Politics
    conservative
    Religion
    Christian
    Posts
    40
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    21
    Thanked in
    13 Posts
    Obama will be happy....

  4. #3
    Funding Member
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member

    Siebenbürgerin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    German
    Ancestry
    Transylvanian Saxon
    Subrace
    Alpinid/Baltid
    State
    Transylvania Transylvania
    Location
    Hermannstadt
    Gender
    Age
    33
    Family
    Married
    Politics
    Ethno-Cultural
    Religion
    Lutheran
    Posts
    2,736
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    216
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    414
    Thanked in
    204 Posts
    This was the image of the University:



    It's an image of Christ on a cross and to be honest, I've seen more violent depictions than this one. In my view, it's ridiculous. First, because Christ on a cross is a big symbol for Christianity. While I don't believe in worshipping idols, symbolism has a powerful message and Christ dying on the cross to save humanity is a very powerful message, the essence of Christianity. So it's natural Christians will use depictions of the crucifixion more than anything else. Yes, Jesus suffered from violent trauma and death, but that's pointing a fact and not encouraging or condoning violence. It would be like accusing those who use powerful images to stop hunger or disease of condoning starvation and the like. The Passion of the Christ was criticised for same reasons...

  5. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Siebenbürgerin For This Useful Post:


  6. #4
    Account Inactive
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Last Online
    Wednesday, July 11th, 2018 @ 06:09 AM
    Ethnicity
    Ethnicity
    Ancestry
    Ancestry
    Gender
    Age
    37
    Posts
    2,127
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,488
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    130
    Thanked in
    108 Posts
    They would allow it if that were "pisschrist"...

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Rodskarl Dubhgall For This Useful Post:


Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •