Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Did Jews Fake Hitler's "Master Race" Phrase To Create War & World Domination?

  1. #1
    Anachronism "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member

    Huginn ok Muninn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ancestry
    Germany, Norway, England
    Subrace
    Nordeby
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    Texas Texas
    Gender
    Zodiac Sign
    Leo
    Family
    Single adult
    Politics
    Farther right than you.
    Posts
    3,045
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    623
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    753
    Thanked in
    359 Posts

    Did Jews Fake Hitler's "Master Race" Phrase To Create War & World Domination?

    Did Jews Fake Hitler’s “Master Race” Phrase To Create War & World Domination?

    August 27, 2017 renegade 13 Comments
    Is it a myth that Germany claimed to be the “Master Race”?

    By John Wear of Wear’s War

    Although not a crime, it is a fact that Adolf Hitler made numerous disparaging remarks about Jews throughout his political career. Typical is this passage from Mein Kampf:

    The life which the Jew lives as a parasite thriving on the substance of other nations and States has resulted in developing the specific character which Schopenhauer once described when he spoke of the Jews as ‘The Great Master of Lies.’ The kind of existence which he leads forces the Jew to the systematic use of falsehood, just as naturally as the inhabitants of northern climates are forced to wear warm clothes.[1]



    Jewish organizations were greatly offended by such statements and wasted no time in attempting to undermine Hitler’s National Socialist regime. In March 1933 they called for a worldwide boycott of unlimited duration of German-manufactured goods. The German government countered on April 1, 1933, with a half-day boycott of Jewish stores inside Germany. It was the latter act that made headlines all over the world as proof of “Nazi brutality,” while the far more extensive and harmful Jewish boycott of German goods that lasted for years was hardly ever mentioned.[2]

    Hitler, who blamed Jews for causing many of Germany’s economic problems, took over a nation that had been totally impoverished through war and inflation. Hitler was determined to end the adverse Jewish influence on the German economy. In April 1933 Hitler passed a new law preventing Jews from holding jobs as civil servants. This law caused well over a thousand Jews in academic posts to begin looking for positions abroad.[3] Other laws discriminating against Jews were later passed, and before long Jews had vanished from government offices, schools, higher education and other public domains. These National Socialist policies helped the German economy to flourish, and by the beginning of 1938 Germany had by far the best economy in the world.

    German economic success was a major reason why Jewish leaders used Winston Churchill to agitate for war against Germany. Churchill was financially supported by the anti-German group The Focus, whose membership included mostly wealthy British and American Jews.[4] Gen. Robert E. Wood stated at a Senate committee that Churchill had said to him in November 1936,

    Germany is getting too strong, and we must smash her.

    Churchill also stated in the year 1936,

    We will force Hitler into war, whether he wants it or not.[5]

    Churchill was an exceptional orator and writer, and he was an effective agent in stirring up British public opinion against Germany.

    Hitler also believed that Jewish leaders controlled U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt and the Soviet Union. Hitler mentions the Jewish control of Roosevelt and the Soviet Union in his speech on December 11, 1941, declaring war on the United States:

    The circle of Jews around Roosevelt encouraged him [to divert attention to foreign policy]. With Old Testament vindictiveness they regarded the United States as the instrument which they and he could use to prepare a second Purim against the nations of Europe, which were increasingly anti-Jewish. So it was that the Jews, in all of their satanic baseness, gathered around this man, and he relied on them….

    We know the power behind Roosevelt. It is the same eternal Jew that believes that his hour has come to impose the same fate on us that we have all seen and experienced with horror in Soviet Russia. We have gotten to know the Jewish paradise on earth first hand. Millions of German soldiers have personally seen the land where this international Jewry has destroyed and annihilated people and property. Perhaps the President of the United States does not understand this. If so, that only speaks for his intellectual narrow-mindedness.[6]

    Hitler is correct that Roosevelt was surrounded by Jewish advisors. Jewish historian Lucy Dawidowicz noted,

    Roosevelt himself brought into his immediate circle more Jews than any other President before or after him.

    A partial list of Jews surrounding Roosevelt include: Bernard Baruch, Felix Frankfurter, David E. Lilienthal, David Niles, Louis Brandeis, Samuel I. Rosenman, Henry Morgenthau, Jr., Benjamin V. Cohen, Rabbi Stephen Wise, Francis Perkins, Sidney Hillman, Herbert H. Lehman, Jesse I. Straus, Harold J. Laski, Charles E. Wyzanski, Samuel Untermyer, Edward Filene, David Dubinsky, Mordecai Ezekiel, Abe Fortas, Isador Lubin, Harry Dexter White (Weiss), David Weintraub, Nathan G. Silvermaster, Harold Glasser, Irving Kaplan, Solomon Adler, Benjamin Cardozo, Anna Rosenberg, and numerous others, almost to the exclusion of Gentile advisers. As a consequence, Roosevelt was surrounded by a milieu of Jewish hate and hostility toward Germany.[7]

    Hitler is also correct that Jews had taken control of the Soviet Union. Capt. Montgomery Schuyler, a U.S. Army intelligence officer in Russia during its revolutionary period, stated in a report dated June 9, 1919:

    A table made up in 1918, by Robert Wilton, correspondent of the London Times in Russia, shows at that time there were 384 commissars including 2 Negroes, 13 Russians, 15 Chinamen, 22 Armenians and more than 300 Jews. Of the latter number 264 had come from the United States since the downfall of the Imperial Government.

    Thus, the “Russian Revolution” had only 13 ethnic Russians and more than 300 Jews in its top governing body of 384 members.[8]

    British Intelligence reports also confirm that Jews controlled the Communist revolution in the Soviet Union. The first sentence in a lengthy British Intelligence report dated July 16, 1919, states:

    There is now definite evidence that Bolshevism is an international movement controlled by Jews.

    Even Winston Churchill, in an article appearing in the Illustrated Sunday Herald on Feb. 8, 1920, wrote:

    There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews….[9]

    Hitler’s Final Solution to the Jewish problem was to force every Jew to leave Germany. Such a policy was highly discriminatory and unfair to the majority of Germany’s Jews. However, since Jews were the driving force behind Communism, Hitler felt that Jews had to be driven out to eliminate their subversive influence on Germany. Also, Hitler and many commentators believed that Germany’s economic program could not have succeeded by leaving intact the Jewish power structure in Germany.[10]

    Forced population transfers have been codified as a crime against humanity in the statute of the International Criminal Court.[11] Hitler’s forced expulsion of Jews from Germany would thus constitute a crime under current international law. It should be noted, however, that more than 20 times as many ethnic Germans were expelled from their homelands after World War II as there were Jews in Germany when Hitler became Chancellor of Germany. These ethnic Germans also lost essentially all of their possessions and were exported under brutal conditions in which millions of them died. The fate of the German expellees constitutes a far greater crime under current international law than Hitler’s attempted forced expulsion of Jews from Germany.

    While National Socialist Germany did practice racial discrimination, it is a myth that Germany claimed to be the “Master Race.” Hitler never made any such claim or used any term remotely resembling “Master Race.” Instead, Hitler used the term “Aryan” to represent all the Germanic peoples of Europe, including the British, Dutch, Swedes, Norwegians, Fins, Swiss, and all other European people of Germanic origin.[12] The term “Master Race,” so dearly beloved by anti-Germans, was never even used in SS training.[13]

    The Western press also made every effort to invent racial controversies in Germany when none existed. At the 1936 Berlin Olympics, numerous newspapers wrote that Hitler had snubbed Jesse Owens after Owens had won an Olympic gold medal. When Owens was asked how it felt to be snubbed by the Führer, Owens said:

    …When I passed near the Chancellor he arose, waved his hand at me and I waved back at him. I think the writers showed bad taste in criticizing the man of the hour in Germany.[14]

    Jesse Owens felt that he had been treated well by everyone at the 1936 Berlin Olympics.

    Other nations involved in World War II also practiced discrimination against their minorities.

    Poland passed a large number of additional anti-Jewish laws on March 29, 1938, the extremity of which was a good indication of Polish hatred of the Jews. The Poles sought to encourage the emigration of the greatest possible number of Jews from Poland at the least possible cost.[15] The United States also practiced racial discrimination against black people, with Jim Crow laws in the Deep South of the United States being especially discriminatory.

    British leaders also made extremely racist public statements. Lord Halifax, the chief British architect of war against Germany, said in his first speech to the House of Commons that the British people were a “superior race” within an Empire which comprised more than a quarter of the world’s population. There is no record that Halifax ever recanted or made public apologies concerning his maiden speech to the British Parliament.[16] Winston Churchill stated to U.S. Vice-President Henry Wallace in May 1943 that America and Great Britain should not be apologetic about Anglo-Saxon superiority because Anglo-Saxons are superior.[17]

    Finally, legal sterilization and eugenics were performed in other nations besides Germany. Approximately 36,000 legal sterilizations had been performed in the United States by 1941, and Denmark, Norway, and other countries had laws allowing sterilization.[18] Thus, the United States, Great Britain, Poland and other European nations had no legitimate basis to act as if Germany’s racial and eugenic discrimination was unique in the world.

    Read more in Chapter 10 of Germany’s War

    ENDNOTES
    [1] Hitler, Adolf, Mein Kampf, translated by James Murphy, London: Hurst and Blackett Ltd., 1942, p. 173.
    [2] Schmidt, Hans, Hitler Boys in America: Re-Education Exposed, Pensacola, FL: Hans Schmidt Publications, 2003, p. 14.
    [3] Powers, Thomas, Heisenberg’s War: The Secret History of the German Bomb, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1993, p. 185.
    [4] Bradberry, Benton L., The Myth of German Villainy, Bloomington, IN: AuthorHouse, 2012, p. 322. The Focus was originally called the Anti-Nazi Council. The name of the group was later changed in July 1936 to The Focus based on Winston Churchill’s wishes for a less negative title. See Irving, David, Churchill’s War (Vol. One), New York: Avon Books, 1987, pp. 54, 59. Churchill’s help in the launching and operation of The Focus is discussed in Gilbert, Martin, Churchill and the Jews: A Lifelong Friendship, New York: Henry Holt and Company, LLC, 2007, p. 136.
    [5] Walendy, Udo, Truth for Germany: The Guilt Question of the Second World War, Washington, D.C.: The Barnes Review, 2013, pp. 275-276. See also Hughes, Emry, Winston Churchill: His Career in War and Peace, 1955, p. 145.
    [6] Weber, Mark, “The Reichstag Speech of 11 December 1941: Hitler’s Declaration of War Against the United States,” The Journal of Historical Review, Vol. 8, No. 4, Winter 1988-1989, pp. 406, 411.
    [7] Bradberry, Benton L., The Myth of German Villainy, Bloomington, IN: AuthorHouse, 2012, pp. 321, 339.
    [8] Duke, David, Jewish Supremacism: My Awakening to the Jewish Question, 2ndedition, Mandeville, LA: Free Speech Press, 2007, pp. 47-48.
    [9] Ibid., pp. 45-46, 48.
    [10] Schmidt, Hans, Hitler Boys in America: Re-Education Exposed, Pensacola, FL: Hans Schmidt Publications, 2003, p. 58.
    [11] De Zayas, Alfred-Maurice, A Terrible Revenge: The Ethnic Cleansing of the East European Germans, 2nd edition, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006, p. 154.
    [12] Bradberry, Benton L., The Myth of German Villainy, Bloomington, IN: AuthorHouse, 2012, pp. 268-269.
    [13] Schmidt, Hans, SS Panzergrenadier: A true story of World War II, Pensacola, FL: Hans Schmidt Publications, 2001, p. 52.
    [14] Schaap, Jeremy, Triumph: The Untold Story of Jesse Owens and Hitler’s Olympics, New York: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2007, p. 193.
    [15] Hoggan, David L., The Forced War: When Peaceful Revision Failed, Costa Mesa, CA: Institute for Historical Review, 1989, pp. 151-152.
    [16] Ibid., pp. 96, 187.
    [17] Toye, Richard, Churchill’s Empire: The World That Made Him and the World He Made, New York: Henry Holt and Company, 2010, pp. 240-241.
    [18] Nicholas, Lynn H., Cruel World: The Children of Europe in the Nazi Web, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2005, pp. 15-16.

    http://www.renegadetribune.com/jews-fake-hitlers-master-race-phrase-create-war-world-domination/
    Most people think as they are trained to think, and most people make a majority.

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Huginn ok Muninn For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Senior Member Theunissen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Last Online
    2 Hours Ago @ 05:01 PM
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ancestry
    North Western Europe
    Country
    South Africa South Africa
    State
    Transvaal Transvaal
    Location
    South Africa
    Gender
    Posts
    536
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    192
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    290
    Thanked in
    158 Posts
    From interrogations of leading National Socialists during the Nuremberg show trials:
    M. HERZOG: Defendant Sauckel, I was asking you yesterday whether you considered that Germany's foreign policy was based on the Hitlerian theories concerning living space and the master race.

    SAUCKEL: May I ask you to repeat the question? I did not quite understand it in German.

    M. HERZOG: I was asking you yesterday if you considered that the foreign policy of Germany was based on the two Hitlerian theories, Lebensraum and the master race.

    SAUCKEL: I have understood-whether German foreign policy was based on the principles of Lebensraum and the master race.

    M. HERZOG: Yes, I am asking you to answer whether, in your opinion, it was so.

    SAUCKEL: Not on the principle of a master race. I should like to be permitted to give an explanation of this.

    I personally have never approved of the statements made by some of the National Socialist speakers about a superior race and a master race. I have never advocated that. As a young man I traveled about the world. I traveled in Australia and in America, and I met families who belong to the happiest memories of my life. But I loved my own people and sought, I admit, equality of rights for them; and I have always stood for that. I have never believed in the superiority of one particular race, but I always held that equality of rights was necessary.
    http://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/05-30-46.asp
    And it goes further:
    GENERAL R. A. RUDENKO (Chief Prosecutor for the U.S.S.R.): I should like to begin the cross-examination in determining the role which German propaganda played in the criminal activity of the Hitler Government. Tell me, do you admit that German propaganda disseminated racial theories and introduced into the minds of the German people the ideas of the superiority of the German race- that means, the idea of the "master race"? Do you admit that?

    FRITZSCHE: The question touches upon two problems. May I reply to both of them? I admit that German propaganda spread the racial theory, but I deny that German propaganda spread the theory of the "master race."

    GEN. RUDENKO: You do not admit it?

    FRITZSCHE: No.

    GEN. RUDENKO: Very well. You admit that the German propaganda incited in the German people racial hatred toward the Jews and propagated the necessity of their extermination?

    FRITZSCHE: Once again two problems are contained in this question. May I answer to both?

    GEN. RUDENKO: I beg your pardon, you do not have to emphasize this. Just answer the question; if there are two, answer two.

    FRITZSCHE: I admit, as I have done in my answer to your first question, that German propaganda spread the racial theory but I deny most emphatically that German propaganda, had made preparations for, or had called for, the mass murder of Jews.
    http://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/06-28-46.asp
    Further:
    DR. FRITZ: You are accused, furthermore, of having spread the doctrine of the "master race." The Prosecution makes this charge indirectly against you. How about that?

    FRITZSCHE: I never set up or voiced the theory of the "master race." I even avoided this term. I expressly prohibited this term being used by the German press and the German radio when I was in charge of one or the other. I believe that the term "master race" played a greater role in the anti-National Socialist propaganda than in Germany proper. I do not know who invented this term. To my knowledge it was publicly mentioned only by men like Dr. Ley, for example, men-and I must explain this frankly and expressly- who were not taken seriously by anyone in this connection. It is true, however, that this term played a great role, without being expressed openly, among the SS because of its racial exclusiveness; but people of intelligence, tact and insight, and with some knowledge of the world, very carefully avoided the use of this word.

    DR. FRITZ: Mr. President, at this opportunity, I should like to offer an affidavit to the Tribunal by Dr. Scharping of 17 May 1946. Dr. Scharping was Government Counsellor in the Propaganda Ministry up to the end. From this affidavit I shall now quote only one sentence from Page 13. I quote:

    "In this connection it can be explained that Fritzsche always Opposed the term 'the master race.' He even expressly prohibited the use of this word on the radio."

    [Turning to the defendant.] But the Prosecution has quoted a passage from one of your radio speeches to prove this assertion.

    FRITZSCHE: The quotation is correct, but I ask you just to read it carefully. The term "master race" is rejected in this quotation for the Jewish and for the German people. The quotation cannot be misunderstood.
    http://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/06-27-46.asp

  4. #3
    Senior Member Ravenrune's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Last Online
    1 Hour Ago @ 05:11 PM
    Ethnicity
    Anglo-Saxon-Celt
    Ancestry
    Irish, English, Scottish, German, French, Mi'kmaq
    Country
    Canada Canada
    Gender
    Zodiac Sign
    Scorpio
    Family
    Single adult
    Occupation
    maker of things
    Politics
    non-corruption for the people
    Religion
    Pantheism / Norse pagan / Taoism
    Posts
    540
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    78
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    591
    Thanked in
    297 Posts
    The vast majority of people will never read this kind of information. They only consume TV shows, movies and easy information. Barely anyone will wade through all of this kind of information (especially when doing so is projected by society as a sign of being a Nazi or Nazi apologist).

    Then there are the more academic types who study "history" but they too are mostly ignoring details such as this (mostly due to the imposed pressure that has been embedded into society about the alleged story of WWII ... or if they are within the University system, fear of saying politically incorrect things). I often wonder if an unbiased legal expert (lawyer, judge, etc) would just look quickly at the stipulations of the Nuremberg trials, would they find it legally questionable.

    http://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/imtconst.asp

    Article 3.

    Neither the Tribunal, its members nor their alternates can be challenged by the prosecution, or by the Defendants or their Counsel. Each Signatory may replace its members of the Tribunal or his alternate for reasons of health or for other good reasons, except that no replacement may take place during a Trial, other than by an alternate.
    I'm no legal expert but this kind of doesn't feel quite right LOL ;-)

    Article 21.

    The Tribunal shall not require proof of facts of common knowledge but shall take judicial notice thereof. It shall also take judicial notice of official governmental documents and reports of the United Nations, including the acts and documents of the committees set up in the various allied countries for the investigation of war crimes, and of records and findings of military or other Tribunals of any of the United Nations.
    The problem here is that there was no legal decision about 'common knowledge' or proving what was factual or not factual about this 'common knowledge' shows that this was a totally unfair tribunal from the start. This should be easy to see.


    Even glancing over the opening rules of this tribunal to punish "zee evil Nazis" should give any unbiased legal expert some problems in my opinion. In other words, the whole thing was set up from the start with the goal of finding them guilty and punishing them (so not real justice ... "victor's justice").

    And that's all recorded at an official legal school at Yale LOL.... the whole system just supports it's self and doesn't question it's self any more than the judges and prosecutors in centuries past who claimed "witches" had sexual intercourse with Satan questioned themselves.


    ------------------


    The best I can see about how huge societal opinions and information changes over time is that it takes many decades (and likely after anyone was alive at the time is deceased). Most of this picking away at the official story is done by persistent and brave unbiased individuals (heretics, or "holocaust" questioners .... who see illogical claims and look into them ... and who will be attacked).


    I hope to some day see all of this biased BS called out in every day press. Perhaps in some future time we will see a great epic movie of what the World Wars and the time in between really was (hopefully Hollywood will either be gone or at least will have more *diversity* at that time ;-) ) .

  5. #4
    Senior Member Ravenrune's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Last Online
    1 Hour Ago @ 05:11 PM
    Ethnicity
    Anglo-Saxon-Celt
    Ancestry
    Irish, English, Scottish, German, French, Mi'kmaq
    Country
    Canada Canada
    Gender
    Zodiac Sign
    Scorpio
    Family
    Single adult
    Occupation
    maker of things
    Politics
    non-corruption for the people
    Religion
    Pantheism / Norse pagan / Taoism
    Posts
    540
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    78
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    591
    Thanked in
    297 Posts
    Forced population transfers have been codified as a crime against humanity in the statute of the International Criminal Court.[11] Hitler’s forced expulsion of Jews from Germany would thus constitute a crime under current international law. It should be noted, however, that more than 20 times as many ethnic Germans were expelled from their homelands after World War II as there were Jews in Germany when Hitler became Chancellor of Germany. These ethnic Germans also lost essentially all of their possessions and were exported under brutal conditions in which millions of them died. The fate of the German expellees constitutes a far greater crime under current international law than Hitler’s attempted forced expulsion of Jews from Germany.

    This is the kind of thing that has been quietly swept under the rug of "official history". I never even heard of this until digging into all of this myself on the internet. Even if your average "History Channel" viewer was told about this, I can imagine many people still just brushing it off with "well the Germans deserved it after what they did".

    The forced confinement of Japanese, some German and some Italian people in Canada and the USA during World War II is likewise mostly ignored.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Ravenrune For This Useful Post:


  7. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Last Online
    1 Hour Ago @ 05:52 PM
    Ethnicity
    Anglo-American
    Gender
    Religion
    Hitlerism
    Posts
    339
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    70
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    104
    Thanked in
    75 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Ravenrune View Post
    The vast majority of people will never read this kind of information. They only consume TV shows, movies and easy information. Barely anyone will wade through all of this kind of information (especially when doing so is projected by society as a sign of being a Nazi or Nazi apologist).
    I think the animated film The Dark Knight Returns Pt. 2 could be weaponized against Jewry, but it'd have to be done by people who know what they're doing, not by Alt-Right degenerates and our shameful "nationalistic" intelligentsia.

    45 minutes into the film, a nuclear detonation causes a nationwide blackout. Chaos and anarchy are on the streets. Batman rallies both people and criminals to help each other (as well as Gordon, who is also crucial to maintaining order in the series), embarrassing the US government (the president is practically caricatured in his facial appearance and speeches, and they also show him hiding in an unknown fallout shelter like a coward. Incidentally, the film mentions President FDR's decision to rally America against Pearl Harbor bombings) with his transformation of Gotham into an orderly city, the only stable city in the US thus far.
    How did the government respond? They sent Superman to put him in his place. We didn't get to see how the other American cities responded, but it'd have probably been similar to Germany's neighbors, what with the democratic equality complex that has gripped the masses. Batman in this film was literally Hitler, doing his own thing, answering to no one but himself, and not letting anyone get in the way of his operations. He enjoyed complete freedom while Superman played the lackey of the US president (we also see Superman draining the life out of surrounding plants and trees in the aftermath of intercepting the nuke, perhaps symbolizing how far he had fallen).

    In the end, via a grand finale he had prepared with the aid of Green Arrow and his new Robin (previously he had staged a public match with the Mutant Leader in order to humiliate him in front of his followers. He did not win all of them over, but the decent ones among their ranks began identifying themselves as "the Sons of Batman" in his honor), he regained Superman's respect for him, but also humbled him. At the end of the film, despite his "death" and his intentional destruction of Wayne Manor, he secured an enduring legacy, proving H. S. Chamberlain's statement that true heroism is centred in the inner motive, not in the outward success. Every truly great portrayal of Batman ends with his legacy being renewed in the end.

    The significance of a political philosopher does not depend on the practical success of the plans he lays down but rather on their absolute truth and the influence they exert on the progress of mankind.

Similar Threads

  1. "If We Hadn't Fought World War 2, Would We Still Have a British Empire?"
    By Nachtengel in forum Modern Age & Contemporary History
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: Wednesday, March 21st, 2012, 04:30 AM
  2. Replies: 3
    Last Post: Sunday, April 18th, 2010, 08:21 PM
  3. "Churchill, Hitler and the Unnecessary War" [Pat Buchanan]
    By Leo in forum Modern Age & Contemporary History
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: Friday, August 15th, 2008, 09:22 PM
  4. "Expansion and World Mission of the Anglo-Saxon Master Race in America"
    By FadeTheButcher in forum Questions About Germanics
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: Monday, December 27th, 2004, 03:22 PM
  5. "Philosemitism: Admiration and Support in the English–Speaking World for Jews"
    By friedrich braun in forum Literature & Book Reviews
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: Friday, November 19th, 2004, 03:57 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •