Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Canada's Negative Identity

  1. #1
    Funding Member
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member

    Nachtengel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    German
    Gender
    Posts
    5,916
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    94
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    765
    Thanked in
    420 Posts

    Canada's Negative Identity

    There can be no discussion of Canadian identity without acknowledging the importance of geography, specifically its proximity to the United States. Historically, this relationship has involved an element of polarity according to two definitions of the word; both in terms of attraction and diametrical opposition. The former definition, what George Grant would call the "continental pull," is perhaps an inevitable result of setting up camp next to a hegemon. This first polarity is reflected by the irresistible attraction of Canadians towards American consumerism and culture — if indeed we are to consider both of those as separate. The second polarity, or diametrical opposition, could be misconstrued as a knee-jerk reaction to the first if it were not, in some ways, prior to it. This opposition is illustrated by the common saying that Canadian identity can be defined as simply "not being American."

    The foundation of Lower and Upper Canada, from 1791 onward, was based on an affirmation; namely that their respective traditions were something worth protecting, thus limiting personal freedom in the name of collective good was justified. This is hardly a revelation.

    What is interesting — and troubling — is the way in which a positive identity characterized by the importance placed on institutions in preserving a central ethno-cultural tradition as opposed to the American principles of unrestrained individualism has eroded, leaving only that vestigial opposition

    Indeed, the central fact of 20th century Canadian history is the reversal from a positive to a negative identity. We could go as far as to say that its History is, in fact, a History of negation: the rejection of the American ideal, followed by a double deracination; the emancipation from — or negation of — the European motherland, coupled with the rejection of the very idea of a core European identity by Pierre Trudeau and his successors.

    Negative identity, according to developmental psychology, is closely associated with adolescence and consists in defining oneself by what one was not, as opposed to what one is. To quote the actor Mike Myers: "Canada is the essence of not being. Not English, not American, it is the mathematic of not being." We have clearly entered into the vaporous realm of pure ontology.

    Of course, the meaning of non-being or negation has preoccupied a great many thinkers over the years in a wide variety of disciplines; from philosophy to proposition logic to linguistics and psycho-linguistics. In The Sophist, for example, Plato inferred that "When we say not-being, we speak...not of something which is the opposite of being, but only of something different."1

    It follows, then, that the negative proposition "A is not B" (Canada is not America) presupposes the existence of the variable C (an undefined Canadian identity) which is incompatible with, or other than, B. A number of questions arise from this apparently simple observation. Who is in charge of defining B — the America that Canada is supposedly not — and, consequently, to whom does it devolve to define C?

    Arguably, the antipodal inversion from a positive to a negative identity has articulated itself around a central pivot; namely the structuralizing virtue of institutions. From the belief that institutions served to preserve a positive identity, Canada has now come to view the institutions themselves as constitutive of identity.

    In a 2011 study, the Institute for Research on Public Policy (IRPP) points to a number of surveys as proof that "Multiculturalism has become part of the Canadian identity" with respondents ranking it, along with health care and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, among the most important national symbols.2 Another poll commissioned by the Association of Canadian Studies claims that 94% of respondents viewed health care as an "important source of collective pride." Interestingly, the editor of the IRPP study, Jeffrey G. Reitz, speculates that "Canadian pride in multiculturalism may be to some extent reinforced by its role in defining Canadian identity vis-à-vis the United States."

    As an intellectual exercise, let us assume these findings are actually representative of broad public opinion. The belief that multiculturalism, healthcare, and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms are central to national pride is indicative of Canadians viewing their identity as a de-personalized externality. To reiterate, this implies that A (Canada) is not B (America) because C (institutions exist that are in opposition to B). We are left with a perversion of the original ideal, concerning the structuralizing importance of institutions as a mechanism of differentiation; of course in this case the institutions serve to preserve a negative, as opposed to a positive, identity. This conflation of institutions and identity, indeed, this identification with the very institutions that seek to suppress them is, for Whites, a form of Stockholm syndrome in the strictest sense.

    All the above also applies, in a similar vein, to Quebec; the dynamic between it, the Rest of Canada and the United States could be described, then, as a trilinear polarity, once again both in terms of attraction and opposition. Once the affirmation of a central ethno-cultural (and thus exclusive) identity became (or was made to become) unacceptable, nationalist discourse shifted towards the French language as an inclusive constitutive element: language being, of course, yet another institution. A national identity based solely on a shared language is necessarily a negation of both race and culture; it is then an only slightly more stringent form of multiculturalism.

    The way in which Canadian identity, today, is constructed via institutional mediation; that is, as an internalization of externalities, suggests that, in the void left by the erosion of White racial consciousness, we have conceded to institutions, to paraphrase Shakespeare, the duty to "give to airy nothing a local habitation and a name."3

    This hunkering down — on multiculturalist policies or on the French language — can be interpreted not only in terms of polarity but also ontologically; as attempts to ward off the specter of non-being. According to the Aristotelian Law of Contradictions, the propositions A is B (Canada is America) and A is not B (Canada is not America) cannot simultaneously be true; whether or not classical logic is applicable to questions of collective identity, it certainly holds that the existence of such a paradox is far from conducive to any lasting sense of national unity. For Hegel as for many philosophers, "an unresolved contradiction is a sign of error;" contradictory opposites, if left unchecked, lead to a sort of phase cancellation, borrowing a phenomenon from acoustics, and the ensuing silence of non-being.4 Therefore, the hegemony of multiculturalist doctrine — and its unilingual variant in Quebec — is a synthetic solution, in Hegelian dialectical terms, derived from the conflict between a thesis and its antithesis. Obviously it was but one possible synthesis among many.

    National identity, in a sense, is a zero sum game. As Spinoza famously said, Omnis determinatio est negatio — every determination is a negation. Ethnic pluralism is the affirmation of the Many through the negation of the One. Undoubtedly, the ideological subversion of a nation-concept is most effective when it is formulated in familiar terms — if it is articulated around a central pivot, origin myth or institution which creates the illusion of continuity. In all European nations as well as its former colonies, it is increasingly clear that egalitarianism has been an ideological dead end and a testament to finite minds and the inherent fallibility of Man. May this negation be a temporary setback on the path towards our ultimate affirmation.
    http://www.eurocanadian.ca/2017/07/c...-identity.html

  2. #2
    Account Inactive
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Last Online
    Wednesday, July 11th, 2018 @ 06:09 AM
    Ethnicity
    Ethnicity
    Ancestry
    Ancestry
    Gender
    Age
    37
    Posts
    2,127
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,488
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    130
    Thanked in
    108 Posts
    Canada's allegiance is to Stewart Britain, rather than Cromwellian England. The Revolution was another English Civil War and the War of 1812 a continuation thereof, but America and Canada are not showing any clear winner in a triumphalist worldview narrative, because of their coexistence. America upholds Tudor Englishness in exile from the Auld Alliance victory that put the Scotch puppets of the French onto the Throne. The Geneva Bible is America's, whilst the KJV is for Britain and the Commonwealth, with the Douay-Rheims for Ireland.

    Canada is to America what Ireland is to Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Each would rather commit suicide than acknowledge commonalities...

  3. #3
    Senior Member ravenseyes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Last Online
    Tuesday, August 13th, 2019 @ 05:51 PM
    Ethnicity
    In Order- Celtic/Nordic-Germanic
    Ancestry
    Paternal-Irish/Icelandic Maternal- Welsh/German
    Country
    United States United States
    Location
    NW US Rocky Mountains
    Gender
    Zodiac Sign
    Taurus
    Family
    In a steady relationship
    Occupation
    Youth in Crisis
    Religion
    Order of Water&Woodland Fairies
    Posts
    69
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    275
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    79
    Thanked in
    39 Posts
    Aside from what history says, I live almost on the border of Canada and have friends up there. One can determine by how they act when they are in America, from what province they traveled from. Examples would be, if they're from Alberta, they drive very very fast and cause or come close to causing wrecks darn near 100% of the time. Saskatchewan folk seem quiet when visiting, BC overall the same with a wee bit of arrogance. I don't see many from Manitoba but my friend who does business with them says they're very enjoyable. Ontario visitors are almost always of mixed race. Perhaps they're from Toronto?

    When I grew up just below Quebec, when one didn't need a passport to cross the border, we always had a lot of fun and I found it to be my favourite. Perhaps I am biased.
    My friends from Canada tell us the health care system is frightening although made to be some sort of perfect model. One had to wait 6 months to get appendix surgery and by the time he went in, it was burst, and the other has terrible back injury and he suffers just thinking about making his next appointment. Is this the norm? They say it is for them and they live there.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to ravenseyes For This Useful Post:


  5. #4
    Account Inactive
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Last Online
    Wednesday, July 11th, 2018 @ 06:09 AM
    Ethnicity
    Ethnicity
    Ancestry
    Ancestry
    Gender
    Age
    37
    Posts
    2,127
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,488
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    130
    Thanked in
    108 Posts
    For more than 26 years of my life, I have lived with only one state between myself and Canada--originally, it was Quebec and now, Ontario. My granduncle and grandaunt live across the border from Quebec. I've only ever been to New Brunswick when on summer vacation in Maine. Almost took Amtrak through Vermont to see an Expos game. My great-grandfather was named for his uncle who lived in Welland, ON. My grandfather's cousin used to live in Minoa, upstate NY. I've only ever been as far as the Catskills for camping.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 110
    Last Post: 3 Weeks Ago, 01:48 AM
  2. Are You RH-Negative or RH-Positive?
    By Thorburn in forum Bio-Anthropology & Human Variation
    Replies: 104
    Last Post: Sunday, July 8th, 2018, 02:20 PM
  3. Is Hel A Negative Place?
    By DanseMacabre in forum Cosmology & Mythology
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: Monday, November 22nd, 2010, 11:02 AM
  4. Are Negative Points Authorized?
    By Combatent in forum Help & Suggestions
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Saturday, September 4th, 2004, 01:51 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •