That's all well and good to enlarge the overton window in our favour but not really an answer as to what they actually advocate or what societal/moral policy they'd like to implement then.
Clearly not all of "White Sharia" can be meant as mere satire and a lot of what was stated in that article and beyond is obviously taken at face value by its proponents.
And the day they sold us out, Our hearts grew cold
'Cause we were never asked, No brother, we were told!
What do they know of Europe, Who only Europe know?
Ancient DNA: List of All Studies analyzing DNA of Ancient Tribes and Ethnicities(post-2010)
They advocate a patriarchal society. Working out the details now would be mental masturbation. Calling it "White Sharia" is purely for irony. It's really about having the society our forefathers did for most of European history (among literate nations, not the barbarians the article talks about).
The Right of whatever sort has advocated a rather patriarchal system/return to tradition since ever, that’s nothing new. But obviously that can mean vastly different things to different people.
So if they want their White Sharia to have any influence and not merely remain a meme among adolescent internet warriors, they have to at least outline what they mean by it, what its benefits are and how they want to achieve it. I’m not asking for some detailed master plan, merely a very rough outlining.
And the day they sold us out, Our hearts grew cold
'Cause we were never asked, No brother, we were told!
What do they know of Europe, Who only Europe know?
Ancient DNA: List of All Studies analyzing DNA of Ancient Tribes and Ethnicities(post-2010)
I'm not sure if all the pushers of the White Sharia meme have identical ideas about what it would really mean either. But it definitely means women would not have equal political influence, to say the least. Surely the benefits of that don't need much explanation, for non-liberals like us.
White sharia is a meme and a joke, except to the post-neomasculinility sphere, the circle around the Iranian V. Roosh and his website Return of Kings (its participants were part of #neomasculinity until it split into a traditionalist part and a Men's Rights Activist part) + also the dreaded Andrew Anglin's Daily Stormer website. And those who take offense to it. In the case of Anglin (who on the basis of his nutzi larpyness is considered to be a covert Jewish shill by many respectable nationalists) and Roosh V. they're quite right to take offense, though. There have been plenty alt-right articles written on this subject, nearly all rejecting "white sharia" out of hand for a myriad of reasons. This struggle for the direction the alt-right will take was written in the stars: the manosphere wants the alt-right to be primarly about anti-feminism and women and their messed up idea of traditionalism, the edgy "racism" is just a bonus. For the nationalists in the alt-right it's different. And the alt-right was a nationalist "movement" all along.
1:05 marker: furious white talib, yells about throwing fags in the ovens. It sounds quite trollish, but he and his buddies also sort of mean it. Luckily, these guys are pretty irrelevant. They're probably the worst people one can encounter amongst the far right, the Hollywood stereotypes.
04:31 marker: "Oh yeah baby, oh dude, the thots will have their clits removed and they wil be beaten! You think sandnigger sharia is bad? It's gonna be patriarchy 2.0 without chivalry. There will be administrative, maintenance beatings. It's about putting our women in check." They also discuss the possibility of white rape gangs for girls without good fathers.
"If we were going to stand in darkness, best we stand in a darkness we had made ourselves.” ― Douglas Coupland, Shampoo Planet
Originally Posted by North Vinlander
They advocate a patriarchal society. Working out the details now would be mental masturbation. Calling it "White Sharia" is purely for irony. It's really about having the society our forefathers did for most of European history (among literate nations, not the barbarians the article talks about
I DESPISE them calling a traditional, patriarchal European society "White Sharia." Anyone who thinks this is funny should have their head examined. First, Sharia does not really have a good image among whites, and second, it sounds like we are adopting this evil culture because we have none of our own.
Most people think as they are trained to think, and most people make a majority.
Roman society is not really european society. Romans are some guys in toga who showed up one day from the east and for them white sharia is kind of applicable. All the covering of faces and crap came from the middle east not from islam or white people.
Don't worry, I did. They said there was nothing in there.
But really, you say it's not funny as if you get that it's a joke, then you argue against it as if it's serious.
Bad jokes can be very serious indeed. For examples, see most Quentin Tarantino films and look at the anti-white hatred and general cultural rot his "dark comedies" have produced.Don't worry, I did. They said there was nothing in there.
But really, you say it's not funny as if you get that it's a joke, then you argue against it as if it's serious.
Most people think as they are trained to think, and most people make a majority.
What are you actually afraid White Sharia would result in, except more politically incorrect thoughts on the sexes?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks