How Imminent is Civil War in America?

[Tripredacus]

The incident in the Capitol is going to be exploited for all it's worth by (anti-white) enemies of liberty as pretext to impose further violations of (white) Americans' constitutional rights. I don't need the gift of prophecy to forsee that much.

It is evident without any foresight, it is in plain sight. Seeing how The State still (mostly) uses the law to manage things (rather than just doing things because they feel like it)... the continual use of the term "terrorist" by elected officials and media is a big problem waiting to happen. In the eyes of the law, a person or group who is officially designated as a terrorist are able to be wholly effected by the Patriot Act and NDAA and other "war on terror" laws that exist. Basically will take a citizen and make him an enemy of the state, where no Constitutional protections are afforded. And The State typically uses things generally, so you can see how a simple official designation of up to a third of a country's citizenry to become enemies of the country would be a problem.

[Verðandi]

If anybody knows what circumstances herald the collapse of a superpower, it’s surely Mikhail Gorbachev. After all, the former Soviet president personally oversaw the downfall of the USSR, once America’s greatest global rival.

Now, the legendary statesman believes that this week’s storming of the Capitol in Washington is indicative of a threat to the US’ continued existence in its present form.

Speaking to Interfax, Gorbachev explained that the riots in Washington on January 6 “called into question the future fate of the United States as a state,” expressing confidence that the assault on the Capitol was planned in advance. He also believes it’s obvious who was responsible.

In 1991, Gorbachev himself was the target of a failed coup d’état, when disgruntled members of the Soviet Communist Party tried to overthrow the country’s Western-leaning leadership.

“The assault on the Capitol was evidently planned in advance, and it is clear by whom,” Gorbachev said, presumably referring to the leadership of the administration of President Donald Trump.

“It will take some time, but we will understand why this was really done,” he explained.

The home of the American legislature was stormed earlier this week during what was supposed to be a special session of Congress to approve the results of the 2020 presidential election. Pro-Trump supporters burst into the Capitol building, leaving at least five dead. It was the first time the Capitol had been overrun since the British Army took it over in 1814.

The former Soviet leader also spoke about the modern relationship between the US and Russia, including the future possibility of an arms race. In 1987, Gorbachev and then-US President Ronald Reagan signed the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF), one of many agreements which Washington ended during Trumps’ leadership. In his opinion, the “new generation” will reject the idea of an arms race, believing that there will be a “turn towards detente.”

“People who do not want war will unite, and their leaders will have to find a way out,” he said. “They will find new forms of treaties which take into account new types of weapons. We must not lose hope. I don’t lose hope in young people.”

Since Trump came to power in 2017, Washington has reduced its participation in international organizations. In 2018, the US withdrew from UNESCO and from the UN Human Rights Council (HRC). A year later, Trump pulled his country out of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF), and in 2020, it left the Open Skies Treaty. Furthermore, on February 5, a fortnight after Joe Biden is due to be sworn in as president, the US will depart from the New START nuclear arms reduction pact, unless the Kremlin and White House quickly come to an understanding.

RussiaToday

[Rodskarl Dubhgall]

The original 13 States plausibly could return to WASP ethnostate, with the Articles of Confederation borders as follows...

North: Canada
East: Atlantic
South: Florida
West: Mississippi

Negroids can have Liberia. Mongoloids can have Hawaii. Mexicans can have New Mexico, Arizona and California. Italians can have Florida, Louisiana and Texas. Germans can have Alaska. Irish can have Oregon.

Those ideas are based on available extant predominant bloods and soils.

If all the extraneous states and provinces were to be trimmed off or rolled back, they'd have an impossible time whittling us down further with any seemingly "legal" contrivances.

A lot of fake "States" made purely for Free vs Slave balance could vanish and old borders would expand again, but I think so long as the acquired entities were duly allocated fittingly, the remainder would be English as intended anyway. This means that we would lose only as many as nine states, with two in the Pacific Northwest being friendlier neighbours than the other seven, as they'd be related demographics on lands more salubrious for fellow North Europeans like us.

In Canada, they have a similar core basis in Ontario and Quebec called Upper West Canada and Lower East Canada, buttressed first by New Brunswick and Nova Scotia, before gaining the rest.

See here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_a...tates#Ancestry

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_a...-by-County.svg

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Territ..._United_States

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nation...sExpansion.png

[GroeneWolf]

The video has been removed for "Violating Youtube's Terms of Service". The left is going full throttle on censor ship

Basically a repeat of what happened after 2016. I wonder how many of those who have bought 1984 back then actually realised who where acting more like the ministry of truth. Of course they know that they for at least four years they do not need to fear any pro-political free speech legislation is going to aimed at them. At most some symbolic anti-trust cases that will ultimately be meaningless. For those who have not, it is more then time to start moving to actual alternative platforms.

[Theunissen]

Basically a repeat of what happened after 2016. I wonder how many of those who have bought 1984 back then actually realised who where acting more like the ministry of truth. Of course they know that they for at least four years they do not need to fear any pro-political free speech legislation is going to aimed at them. At most some symbolic anti-trust cases that will ultimately be meaningless. For those who have not, it is more then time to start moving to actual alternative platforms.

Sure, one can break up absolute market leaders. But meanwhile that industry is dominated by leftists, so your problem is that employees will also most likely be recruited from this milieu. On the other hand, their confidence also comes from the fact that they work for the big market leader, so breaking them up would at least take some wind out of their sails.

The thing with this kind of industry is also that increasing your turnover doesn't require too much further expenses. As long as people continue to use your service and make you the market leader. On the other hand: They can get away with it, because the vast majority allows it to be done with them, continues to stick to a market leader (given that there is a lack of suitable competitors).

[Huginn ok Muninn]

Lt. General Thomas McInerney | Pelosi's Laptop | COVID Biological attack | Italian interference

[Rodskarl Dubhgall]

It is evident without any foresight, it is in plain sight. Seeing how The State still (mostly) uses the law to manage things (rather than just doing things because they feel like it)... the continual use of the term "terrorist" by elected officials and media is a big problem waiting to happen. In the eyes of the law, a person or group who is officially designated as a terrorist are able to be wholly effected by the Patriot Act and NDAA and other "war on terror" laws that exist. Basically will take a citizen and make him an enemy of the state, where no Constitutional protections are afforded. And The State typically uses things generally, so you can see how a simple official designation of up to a third of a country's citizenry to become enemies of the country would be a problem.

After 9/11, all the leftist concern trolls were culture jamming real hard to see that domestic efforts were not going to be directed by Bush and Republicans at their favourite minority voting caucuses, but have had no compunction against using such arms of state against bonafide Americans since Obama and Democrats took office, to which Biden consented and had partaken withal. Obviously, there's no freedom for WASPs anymore, just for anti-WASPs.

[Æmeric]

What is going on is an organized coup by the left. They are using last weeks riot to justify setting up woke police state. The Joint Chiefs of Staff have gotten involved ( a major breach of military neutrality in US political affairs), siding with Biden. Senior officers have to be confirmed by the Senate so they are more likely to be woke, junior officers are likely pro-Trump or anti-woke.

Virginia and Maryland have both sent thousands of National Guard troops to Washington to defend the Capitol and Biden's inauguration. From the pics I've seen they appear to mostly White males, patriotic, who would seem to be mostly Trump supporters. If shooting starts which side would they be on?

[GroeneWolf]

The American left and co. calling a protest turned riot a coup attempt is to much of a hyperbole. Pretty much confirms how prone they are to psychotic behaviour themselves. And of course these virtue signalling sociopaths will use this as an excuse to increase the powers of the state over the American citizenry.

[Astragoth]

What is going on is an organized coup by the left. They are using last weeks riot to justify setting up woke police state. The Joint Chiefs of Staff have gotten involved ( a major breach of military neutrality in US political affairs), siding with Biden. Senior officers have to be confirmed by the Senate so they are more likely to be woke, junior officers are likely pro-Trump or anti-woke.

Virginia and Maryland have both sent thousands of National Guard troops to Washington to defend the Capitol and Biden's inauguration. From the pics I've seen they appear to mostly White males, patriotic, who would seem to be mostly Trump supporters. If shooting starts which side would they be on?

If the shooting starts half the troops will do as the leftist generals tell them too and half will revolt. At least at first. With more deserting as it becomes obvious who the left really is.