Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: NZ Party Leader Asks, Why No 'Minister for Men'?

  1. #1
    Funding Member
    „Friend of Germanics”
    Funding Membership Inactive
    Nachtengel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last Online
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    Thanked in
    629 Posts

    NZ Party Leader Asks, Why No 'Minister for Men'?

    We've got a Minister for Women, so why not a Minister for Men?

    That's what ACT Party leader David Seymour wants to know - or better still, he wants all of what he calls "demographic ministers" to be scrapped.

    "I think it's wrong to have ministers exist purely for a particular type of person. I actually think that all ministers should be working for all New Zealanders," he says.

    It comes off the back of huge criticism of the Minister for Women, Louise Upston, for not directly addressing the Chiefs stripper scandal.

    "Men are doing worse than women in just about every imaginable social statistic," Mr Seymour says.

    "If you believe it's worth having a minister for a particular type of social issue, then it's far more important in 2016 that it's a Minister for Gender rather than merely women."

    Mr Seymour says it seems like the Government is "trying to appoint a minister for every conceivable sub-group of people".

    Mr Seymour says there are a range of men's issues that need to be brought to the table too, and if "demographic ministers" need to stick around then men should be represented.

    "If you're seriously saying that being higher in suicide statistics, higher in imprisonment rates, higher in mental health statistics and lower in educational attainment for men are not worth addressing, but income differential for women is worth addressing, then I don't think you're part of a 21st century debate about gender."

    If the Minister for Women must stay, Mr Seymour thinks the role should be changed to a 'Minister for Gender'.

    "If we're going to be serious about gender issues and take it as a 21st century issue rather than a 1970s issue, then we should be looking at issues such as equal pay across a whole range of issues for both genders, rather than this old fashioned view that it's entirely about women's liberation," he says.

    But it's not just the gender minister he's targeting - he also thinks the Ministers for Māori Development, Ethnic Communities and Pacific Peoples should go and be represented by one body.

    "Asian New Zealanders now make up nearly 10 percent of the population, why shouldn't there be a Minister for Asians, and then where does it end?" he says.

    "If we're going to have a minister for a certain group of people, then it should be simply a Minister for Ethnic Affairs."

    And it doesn't even end there - he wants the Ministers for Youth and Seniors to be scrapped too.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Catterick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Last Online
    Thursday, September 7th, 2017 @ 12:29 AM
    Mixed Germanic and Celtic
    British Isles & Scandinavia
    Borreby x Nordic
    Other Other
    Single adult
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    Thanked in
    28 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Out of Germania View Post
    Typical: "they are the real sexists". Statements like those were once great trolling, but by now they legitimise the narrative of difference denial. Remember: apparent gaps between genders in employment and income are the result of biology - yes this works both ways.

Similar Threads

  1. Classify Finnish party leader
    By Mannerheim in forum Anthropological Taxonomy
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: Tuesday, May 2nd, 2006, 07:30 PM
  2. Dutch Socialist Leader in Fear of Moslem Party Members
    By Blutwölfin in forum Netherlands & Flanders
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: Tuesday, March 21st, 2006, 01:55 PM


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts