Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Hungary: The Prehistory of the Region

  1. #1
    You are not wrong, who deem / That my days have been a dream
    Johannes de León's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Last Online
    Sunday, April 15th, 2012 @ 11:03 AM
    Terra Firma
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    Thanked in
    14 Posts

    Post Hungary: The Prehistory of the Region

    Hungary: A Brief History, by István Lázár
    Chapter 1

    The Prehistory of the Region

    Where were Árpád's Hungarians preparing to settle?

    Could it have been an uninhabited land? Unpopulated for hundreds of thousands of years, where only plants ran wild and animals roamed freely, unmolested by man? A heated debate about this question raged barely a century ago. It was mainly geologists who insisted that an ice-age, diluvial man never lived in the region of the Carpathian Basin. However, evidence from accidental finds could not long be denied; diggings that commenced crammed the prehistoric archaeological map of the region with symbols, whether we consider the ancient historical homeland or the territory of present-day Hungary shrunk to a fragment by the Versailles peace treaty (Trianon) in 1920. From among these symbols on the map we shall select only a few, without any connections among them.

    At Vértesszöllös, barely a stone's throw from the M-1 highway, running between Vienna and Budapest, is sheltered one of the oldest sites in Europe, with scattered tools, petrified footprints, and an exact copy of the nape of a prehistoric man. He gained the pet name "Samuel" from his excavators. He made crude tools from pebbles, he already used fire and had fed it with fatty pieces of bone. He came here about 350 to 400 thousand years ago for several hundred generations, taking pleasure in the thermal springs of that time, the mild microclimate of the spring basins; he belonged in the domain of "upright man", or homo erectus. His delineator named him homo sapiens palaeo-hungaricus on the basis of the estimated volume of his brain and his tools. Is he, perhaps, the very first who properly fits into the classification of sapiens?

    Over and above its age, the great value of the site is its completeness: it indicates an often interrupted but very lengthy residence. The spring-water limestone preserved the camp and hearth, heaps of tools, the bones of captured animals, and the imprints of plants, indicating the climate. Careful analysis of the legacy layer-by-layer clearly shows how the stockpile of tools became more advanced and better designed and formed. Here the rapidity of man's evolution seems mathematically measurable. All this is enormously interesting even if today much uncertainty still surrounds Samuel, who was unearthed in 1965. Uncertainty surrounds even the identity of the "owner" of the nape: is he the one who ate in the camp or the one who was actually devoured there?

    About 35 to 40 thousand years ago, the Carpathian Basin was populated by the Neanderthal man of prehistory, with his "specialized" hunting tribes, who cannot be included among our presumably extinct direct ancestors of a later time. At Érd, near Budapest, his hunting specialists pursued the cave bear (thus in name only, not in its habit), at Tata the young mammoth, likewise settling down beside hot springs, and in the Bükk mountains around the Subalyuk cave the ibex and the chamois.

    After the hardly comprehensible distance of 400 thousand and 40 thousand years, we place the time of our next segment at 4000 years before the Christian era, or 6000 years from today. For several reasons. On the basis of anthropological investigations, it can be stated about

    a small fragment of the original inhabitants in the Carpathian Basin assimilated by Árpád's conquerors that by that time they had been living in this very region for four to five thousand years, something rare in the history of a Europe diversified by many mass migrations. A very special historical occurrence also accounts for the choice of our third segment of time: the sudden and prolonged halt of neolithic development in our region. It was only recently that the knowledge of the raising of food, of animal husbandry and agriculture, coming from the Zagros mountain range and Mesopotamia, or more directly from Asia Minor and the region of the eastern Mediterranean, had reached the Carpathian Basin, taking hold in its soft underbelly, the southern part of the Alföld, or great Hungarian plain. However, for a while it came to a stop here and in a section of Transylvania.

    An amazing phenomenon prevailed at this time, one that had never occurred before and would never happen again: the civilization east of the Danube was superior to the one to its west. A part of the Alföld was the border area of the most developed center of civilization at the time, a place where the mother culture still emanated directly from the Mediterranean. We can say, "it was carried in by hand": in all probability, it can be linked to a migrating population. To the west and the north, however, only an indirect influence could be demonstrated later as well; indeed, even a counter-force appeared in these regions.

    No doubt, this line of demarcation marked by the advanced development and lasting for many generations was due to nature and the climate. The well-watered and immensely rich soil of the Alföld made permanent settlement and agriculture possible. Proof of this is provided by a spectacular form of settlement, whose name also points to the Near East: the artificial mound of settlement or tell. This is the outermost instance of this type of settlement in Europe. When, however, the knowledge of agriculture finally spread farther west, the clearing of forests for agricultural purposes began in Transdanubia, the later Pannonia, i.e. the western part of modern Hungary, with the appearance of different kinds of dwellings and villages and with frequent onward migration, because the soil was quickly exhausted there.

    Of course, the size and richness of the settlement mounds in the southern Alföld did not equal those of the ancestral tells in the Near East. Nevertheless, it is worth mentioning not only the numerous cultic and other material finds related to the centers of Mesopotamia and the Mediterranean but also the ruins of a two-story house from the Neolithic Age that recent excavations in Hungary have uncovered. This was already a neolithic "city" and not a "village".

    Finally, I mention that special feature which influenced the prehistory of our region from the Mesolithic Age to the Bronze Age with varying intensity. In addition to the Aegean and the Caucasus, that remarkably chippable volcanic glass, obsidian, turned up in Europe only in the Carpathian Basin, or more precisely in the region of the Eperjes-Tokaj mountain range which today partly falls in Slovakia and in Hungary. This rare, valuable mineral substance was, from time to time, the reason for sudden migrations or slow infiltrations and also for powerful conflicts; in its raw form or shaped into tools, it was the object of continual commercial exchange and brought into existence early and advanced modes of the division of labor. Since through their trace elements the Aegean, Caucasian, and Tokaj obsidian are today clearly separable, we can determine the connection of the Carpathian area and Tokaj with many distant archaeological sites in Central Europe. As is the case with amber, because of the presence of certain shells or, later, different kinds of money, the basic trade routes for obsidian can be traced, which were simultaneously paths for cultural expansion and exchange.

    The history of the Copper, Bronze, and Iron Ages in the Carpathian Basin does not lack for points of interest in finds whose significance extends beyond Hungary's own borders. As a consequence of a slightly drier climate, tribes of herdsmen replaced, or rather absorbed, the early agriculturists and keepers of animals. Long-time migration mainly from the southeast was time and again interrupted and replaced by the more southerly movement of peoples from the northeast and the Steppes, among them those of Iranian origin, but migrations from the west also took place and later on actually became determinative. During the Bronze and Iron Ages, a row of mountain centers, secured by powerful fortifications, developed in the western reaches, and their warlike lords of various ethnic origins brought the agriculturists in the neighboring, lower-lying areas under their control. Meanwhile, a fraction of a mysterious people who originated in Iberia and who made bell-shaped utensils arrived in the Carpathian Basin, bogged down in the Danube Bend, and were assimilated by the people living there. To the despair of anthropologists, the close tracking of the migrations and amalgamations was made difficult by the fact that beginning with the early Bronze Age, burial by cremation became more common. The Bronze Age also brought to the settlement hills agricultural tell-dwellers, who further increased the height of the abandoned, long uninhabited neolithic mounds, although they set up new ones as well. The Copper, Bronze, and Iron Ages were crammed with armed clashes, which sometimes disturbed the surface only slightly, sometimes produced a slow but far-reaching wave but sometimes brought about sudden, blood-soaked transformations that set back civilization for centuries.

    The prehistory of what we today call Europe closed with the Iron Age, not so much in a geographical as in a historical and cultural sense. This half continent first entered real history on fleet Greek legs and then with the supple strides of diverse, sandal-shod, moccasined peoples.

    So let us now take a good step into the future, all the way to the time when the location in the Neolithic Age of "civilized" and "barbarian" became reversed. From the dividing waters of the Danube to the east and on the mountain ridges to the north, the watch-fires of advanced guards burned: barbarian tribes looked covetously at rich Pannonia. During a pause in a grueling military campaign conducted against the barbarians, "on the land of the Quadi, on the bank of the [River] Garam", somewhere across from today's Esztergom, Marcus Aurelius, the philosophical Caesar, the last Stoic, who did not like to govern and even less to wage war, wrote his Meditations in the flickering lamplight in his camp.

    Those who gave their name to the province of Pannonia were other Pannonian tribes which lived more to the south and were of different origin; the Roman legions penetrating into the Carpathian Basin from the south and southwest had to subjugate mainly Celtic tribes and make peace with them. It is surprising that the tribes of this very dynamic ethnic group, long settled in the region and a branch of which had recently ravaged Rome, hardly resisted the Romans. They integrated much more peacefully than the Dacians who had moved up from the Balkans and whom the Roman legions tried to pacify in what is now Transylvania and on the eastern slopes of the Carpathian Mountains. Thus the history and fate of the two parts of the Carpathian Basin which became a part of the Roman Empire temporarily, today's Transdanubia and Transylvania, which now belongs to Rumania, diverged. Between them lay the Alföld -a wedged-in, barbarian strip where Sarmatian tribes of Iranian origin, the Iazyges and the Roxolani, faced the Romans sometimes in open hostility, sometimes in shaky alliance.

    Roman occupation of Pannonia lasted for four whole centuries, from the years after the birth of Christ to the beginning of the fifth century, during which, though disturbed by barbarian incursions and smaller turbulences, the development of the Danubian limes, the line of military defense, made excellent economic expansion possible. However, in Dacia, to which Transylvania belonged, Rome's supremacy was much shorter, lasting from A.D. 106 to 268 - 271, barely more than a century and a half, and severe uprisings also frequently disturbed this period. As a matter of fact, the occupation was never total, because individual Dacian tribes remained independent throughout in their earthen fortifications on high mountain tops. This view runs contrary to theories that proclaim the strong Romanization of the Dacians, the fusion of Dacian and Roman inhabitants, and then the unbroken survival of this alleged ethnic group; and henceforth, in the future history of Transylvania and Moldavia as well as the Wallachian plain, these theories see nothing more than the continual battle for independence of the pre-Rumanian and Rumanian population respectively. Actually, the evolution of the Rumanian ethnic group -its history and locality- as well as the history of the peopling of this region, of the successive appearance of the ethnic groups living intermingled here today, is much more complicated than that: the first Rumanian inhabitants settled down later and at various times in individual parts of the region over an extended period.

    It is very tempting to plunge deeper into this theme at this point. The sources available are numberless. In Hungarian archaeology, the Roman Age has always, and perhaps excessively, stood in the foreground. Pannonia is one of the provinces about which we know the most. And it is not merely pictures of local life that present themselves -their colors like those of a most resplendent mosaic- but also the piquant historical circumstance that during the later period of the caesars, Pannonia was the cradle of the caesars. After all, because of the limes, the concentration of military might was very great in the region. Stationed comparatively close to Rome, Pannonia's legions were swiftly deployable against the capital to overthrow and elevate rulers. So much so that-was "the tail wagging the dog" perhaps?-in the third century the expression "Pannonia's world domination" was coined. Yet it was precisely the numerous "putsches", garrison revolts, and changing "juntas" of the legions that formed one of the reasons why, in the end, the barbarian Germanic peoples soon did not look longingly at Pannonia and the Sarmatian Alföld and pounded directly on the gates of Rome, instead.

    The destruction that quickly followed Pannonia's period of false glory was severe but not devastating. Although it is shocking to see the archaeologist dig up wretched huts in the nooks of villas, palaces, and bath halls -the occasional abodes of vagrant shepherds and agriculturists clinging, like swallows' nests, to the broad stone walls- certain signs manifest the continuity of life. In some towns and encampments we can find the traces of Pannonian inhabitants who did not leave their localities during the period of the great migrations. Nor did urban life cease completely. On the edge of Budapest, the thick encrustation deposited on the aqueduct of former Aquincum proves such long utilization that we must conclude it was used for a long time even after Roman domination ended. Moreover, we know about Christian bishoprics that were active in Pannonia as late as A.D. 570-580. One of them was Sabaria (today's Szombathely), where Martin was born in 316 or 317 as a pagan but into a milieu becoming Christian. This is that Martin who, following his father's example, was first a soldier, a cavalry officer of the Guards in Italy, but later became the Bishop of Tours and then the patron saint of the whole of Gaul (his feast day is November 11).

    In the footsteps of the progressively withdrawn Roman legion, the Huns of savage reputation swarmed all over the region. What is more, their center was also located here at the peak of this nomadic empire's power -very warlike but disintegrating because it was based on a loose mixture of people- at the time of Attila, who was honored as the Scourge of God. This center was either in the southern Alföld near Szeged, in the border area between Hungary and Yugoslavia today, or, perhaps -collaterally as a winter and a summer encampment?- in modern Óbuda, which is identical with the Roman Aquincum mentioned above. This is that Sicambria which the Hun- Magyar cycle of legends describes as Attila's city. And -again a "French Connection "- some ancient legends of Gaul record it as the place where, in flight from a destroyed Troy and after centuries of wandering, the ancestors of the Gauls lived for a long time and where they moved on from to Western Europe.

    What more shall we say about the tumultuous time of the great migrations?

    We know the route of one of the Germanic peoples frequently turning up in Pannonia with an accuracy unusual for this period. The Langobards, cast out of the valley of the Elbe, arrived in fairly large numbers in 546, densely populating the northern and eastern perimeters of Pannonia along the Danube, areas not uninhabited of course. However, in 568, they moved on to the southwest beyond the Alps almost to the last person, something tremendously rare in this period. They founded Lombardy in Italy.

    The Avars advanced into their place from the east, a people warlike and of Turkish blood, who had grown stronger in the Eurasian steppes. A portion of them can still be found in the Soviet Caucasus, although some deny the continuity to the Avars living there today.

    Our Avar dilemma is entirely different. According to material finds and anthropological data, the bloody and uneven "Avar" domination of the Carpathian Basin for three centuries falls into two periods. The question has arisen as to whether, in contrast to hardly any relationship with the people of the early Avars, we are not or were not ourselves, the Hungarians, really identical to those whom anthropology calls the late Avars.


  2. #2
    Marius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Last Online
    Tuesday, March 8th, 2005 @ 03:45 PM
    European Union European Union
    Conservative Christian
    Uniate, Greek-Catholic
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Post Concerning the Hungarian denial of Romanian presence

    Taking into account the historic facts, Transylvania was the central region of the Dacian Kingdom (Dacians were an Indo-European people), which was later conquered by Romans, the region being influenced before and after the Roman retreat by the Latin culture. This is how the Romanian people formed.

    But, during time, many invasions took place, including th one of Visigoths which occupied for three generations the current land of Romania. Then there were Slavic waves, which changed the Christianism orientation in the region to a Slavonic, Orthodox one.

    In order to protect from these invasions, Romanians went and lived in the mountain regions. At some moment, their number increased so much, they were forced to go down. They settled there and some leaders and territories appeared. These leaders were Gelu, Glad and Menumorut. Unfortunately, they were not strong enough to resist long time to the Hungarian invasion, so the conquest arrived.

    Till the Christianisation of the Hungarians, imposed by St. Géllert (St. Gérard) and Stephen the Great, the Hungarians were a semi-nomadic people, eager for attacks in the Western Europe. In the meantime, some of the Transylvanian Romanians went in Wallachia and Moldavia, forming the Romanian Principates beyond the Carpathians.

    Unfortunately, following an uprisal of Romanians in Transylvania, on the Husit model, the Hungarian Kingdom of those times, using the fact they became Catholics in front of the Holy Seat, imposed a status of slaves or lower-rigths people to the conquered Romanians. The ones who wanted to escape from this, had to become Hungarians, like it was the case for many noble Romanian families like Corvin (later, Hunyadi, who gave Iancu de Hunedoara/Janos Hunyadi and Matei Corvin, Matthias Corvinus, the king), another name is the family of Banffy, I think.

    In the meantime, Germans from the Bishop of Cologne/Köln received lands in parts of Transylvania. They were named Saxons and this remainde their name till today. Some other Germans arrived in the Western parts if Transylvania, in Banat and in Crisana region, they were called Schwabs, I don't know whether iit has any connection with their original land (some sources say they are Austrians, in fact) . They created a vast culture in Transylvania, well-respected today. Unfortunately, not so well valored. They gave the name Siebenbürgen (Seven Fortresses) to Transylvania, because their organisation was based on 7 big cities.

    Well, many centuries passed like that, with Romanians holding in their Orthodoxy as a mean of National resistence in front of the conquest (even if the Slavonic was imposed by an earlier Bulgarian conquest!) till the creation of the Uniate (Greek-Catholic cult) for the Orthodoxs in the Habsburg Empire in order to obtain equal rights. Maria Theresia has an important role in this direction. So, many Romanians went in this direction, resuscitating in this way the Latinity who they started to forget. This is how the Romanian enlightment period started and expanded even beyon the Carpathians in the other Romanian Principates, Wallachia and Moldavia.

    Again, timed passed, World War I arrived and the Treaty of Trianon was signed which formed Romania again, on the whole ancient land of Romanians. World War II brought the dictate of Vienna, when the NE and NW Transylvania were given to Hungary and I can guarantee you that I know personally people who told me how the Hungarian army treated the Romanians in those times. I do not enter into details, they are not too "nice".

    Well, the wars passed and the communism was installed in Romania, unfortunately the distance to Russia was not too long and the influence and the brainwashing was much powerful than in the neighbouring Hungary or than in East Germany. So, we can see today the consequences, Romania still has many problems, in the meantime, East Germany become Germany and Hungary has just entered the EU.
    These current problems feed the revisionist attitudes of the Hungarian minority, which was not treated good during the National-Communist Ceausescu. Now, I can tell you that they have members in the Romanian Government, in the Parliament...

    Well, since Romania was influenced by three or even four orientations: German and Hungarian in Transylvania, Russian in Moldavia, Greek in Wallachia and Turkish in Dobrogea (extreme SE Romania, near the Black See), I personally think that a Federal country status should be followed. Because all these lands are and were always been inhabited by Romanians, but they developped under different influences and cultures. It is not quite possible, unfortunately, because Romania followed the French unity model, after 1918 (Trianon).

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 31
    Last Post: Thursday, May 18th, 2006, 01:28 PM
  2. Prehistory of the Peoples of Britain
    By cosmocreator in forum Ancient
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: Tuesday, October 5th, 2004, 09:04 PM
  3. Replies: 7
    Last Post: Monday, July 22nd, 2002, 11:34 AM


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts