"History of The White Race", by A. Kemp

[SS Charlemagne]

http://www.stormfront.org/whitehistory/

Very great informations and articles.

[Awar]

I disagree. Kemp writes nonsense supported with photoshop-altered images, mis-quotes and false translations. Only the fact that he lies a lot makes his effort worthless, not to mention the fact that his work defies all logic.

I've read that sometimes Kemp edits the book when he's caught outright lying. I'm not sure if that happens, because I read it once, and my brain still hurts from the 1.000.000.000+ inconsistencies, lies and plain stupidity.

Kemp is one of those illiterates who thinks that the races of the world consist of
nordics, blacks and mongols, and everything else is a mixture between these.
Truth is, as always much more complex, so, Kemp's explanations are just aiming for those who like reading simple things.

[Johannes de León]

http://www.stormfront.org/whitehistory/

Very great informations and articles.

http://www.geocities.com/refuting_kemp/
http://www.geocities.com/dienekesp/kemp.html

Just to have some ideas on how he tries to distort history.

Also a guy how writes a book about history, and dares to talk about Portugal and Spain and says that Hidalgo (or the Portuguese equivalent, Fidalgo) means "son of a goth"... for God's sake... Hidalgo means "Hijo de Algo" it translates to Son of Something, something here is the same as someone of importance, NOT necessarily a goth.

[Dienekes_Pontikos]

... Kemp writes nonsense supported with photoshop-altered images...

Speaking of which... Try and guess which pic of the "Nordic" Napoleon made it into "March of the Titans".

[Awar]

Heh... it was fun reading how the Napoleonic wars diminished the number of whites in France. So, he also uses dual meanings... clever.

Look at this:

" However, his greatest legacy to France was a severe depopulation and reduction in the numbers of Whites in that country due to the losses inflicted during the wars."

So, a Frenchman, or someone who likes France can easily understand Kemp's words as lamenting about the fact that France lost so many brave men.

But, someone who dislikes France can understand "reduction in the numbers of Whites", as if France became significantly more non-white.

Especially someone who has no clue about what the world was like in the 19th century can think that France was some sort of multi-racial state ( like most modern developed countries ), and draw a conclusion that Frenchmen are not fully white ( not as white as Kemp's favourites, the people of Germanic/Celtic stock ).

[Stríbog]

LOL. That Napoleon was Alpine-Mediterranid is evident to anyone not wearing insanely Nordicist spectacles. Kemp makes a few plausible assertions, then proceeds to discredit them by associating them with nonsense like "Ancient Egypt was Nordic."

[SS Charlemagne]

I can agree that some articles are fasle or with many lie but not all articles.

Heh... it was fun reading how the Napoleonic wars diminished the number of whites in France. So, he also uses dual meanings... clever.

Look at this:
Quote:
" However, his greatest legacy to France was a severe depopulation and reduction in the numbers of Whites in that country due to the losses inflicted during the wars."

So, a Frenchman, or someone who likes France can easily understand Kemp's words as lamenting about the fact that France lost so many brave men.

But, someone who dislikes France can understand "reduction in the numbers of Whites", as if France became significantly more non-white.

Especially someone who has no clue about what the world was like in the 19th century can think that France was some sort of multi-racial state ( like most modern developed countries ), and draw a conclusion that Frenchmen are not fully white ( not as white as Kemp's favourites, the people of Germanic/Celtic stock ).

Agree with you , this is really stupid to say that Napoleonic war had reduce the White population in France;
It will be the same that if he will say that WWI or WWII had reduce white in germany.
Nonsense

And for Napoleon it's right ,he was not nordic , he is born in Corsica , he was mediteranean.

Kemp makes a few plausible assertions, then proceeds to discredit them by associating them with nonsense like "Ancient Egypt was Nordic

Ancient egypt was not nordic but was white, Egypt was colonized by greek

[Johannes de León]

I can agree that some articles are fasle or with many lie but not all articles.

One or two, i doubt there are much more if one researches well.

Ancient egypt was not nordic but was white, Egypt was colonized by greek

Was??? I thought the Egyptian civilization was the first great civilization of the world.

This is one of my favourtie pictures. take a look:


EDIT: attached here.

[SS Charlemagne]

[Was??? I thought the Egyptian civilization was the first great civilization of the world.

the Queen Cleopatra was greek and also The ptolemy dynasty.
It's why egytians civilizatiion was so great , it'sbecause the majority of the Pharaon was greeks descendants.

http://waltm.net/cleohis2.htm

now look the face of the Ptolemy and compare it with actual egytians :
http://members.verizon.net/vze3xycv/...ptolemyPic.htm

She look more a european woman than a arab woman

[Awar]

But, Egypt's greatest achievments were from an age thousands of years BEFORE Greeks became the nobility in the 4th century BC.