Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 38 of 38

Thread: Scarlett Johansson Has New Thor's Hammer Tattoo

  1. #31
    Providence Planter
    „Friend of Germanics”
    Skadi Funding Member


    Rodskarl Dubhgall's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Last Online
    @
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    American
    Ancestry
    Anglo
    Subrace
    Nordic
    Y-DNA
    R1A-BY30613
    mtDNA
    U8B-K2A5A1
    Country
    Other Other
    State
    Rhode Island Rhode Island
    Location
    Kentucky
    Gender
    Age
    38
    Zodiac Sign
    Leo
    Family
    Married parent
    Occupation
    Blacksmith
    Politics
    Anti-Federalist
    Religion
    Posts
    3,694
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    8,038
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    399
    Thanked in
    346 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by KYAnglo View Post
    I agree. "I Love NY" on this holy symbol?! Worse than the "metal" kids that wear it as a "metal" fashion statement knowing little or nothing of its significance.
    She did no honor to her half-Dane roots there.
    Apart from her Jewish mother poisoning the well and thereby distorting a plausibly more pleasant appearance, voice and demeanour (cf. Kristanna Loken), the combination of the phrase and the symbol work for one with Danish (previously Swedish) heritage, seeing how the old York was Viking capital and so, somebody living in the newer York should be representing those roots. If this girl has understood these things despite being Jewish, I'd say she's not that bad, for at least it's not an Israeli flag tattooed on her body--if she is to make a choice between her parents and residence. What kind of imagery would we prefer to see in NY? It seems she made the best of it. Then again, she's "friends" with Woody Allen--how gross. I'm not a fan of hers, but have been roundly annoyed by those who are, the same type of blokes who froth at the mouth over Angelina Jolie. Sorry, just totally not my type. Between her and Gwyneth Paltrow, the latter of those Marvel Cinematic Universe Jewesses is probably less ugly. I make this case because Gwyneth's mother isn't a Jew, but perhaps Scarlett's brother might look more Danish due to gender differences and their influence in phenotype expression; just a thought.

    Too many obsess about the ignominy of Jewry and forget the actual basis of NY being not based so much on the Dutch either, because King Charles II refused to acknowledge any competing title to land claimed by Queen Elizabeth and that the entirety of coasts between Danish Greenland and Spanish Florida was meant for England since 1497, when Cabot sailed for the first Tudor Rose. Feudal patroonships were supplanted by the Duke of York's colony named Yorkshire, originally divided into ridings and the county town: West Riding, Staten Island. East Riding, Long Island. York, Manhattan Island. North Riding, Mainland. After Maine and New Hampshire were sequestered by the Puritans, New York remained the only Anglican colony in New England and a Tory one at that. My curiosity is to what degree Jacobitism influenced affairs there or Nova Scotia. Like the Duke of York, Yorkshire still had Papist sympathies at the time, whereas Nova Scotia was still legally only part of Scotland, until the Union. Somehow or other, these factors were what led to the Quebec Act, with the Earl of Bute in the ear of King George III--who was first Lord of Mann, something most are unaware of. Toronto reused the name of York for the Loyalist capital there, after the evacuation of 1783.

    Of course, it's so totally interesting how the future King James II, as Lord High Admiral, took this land from his nephew and successor, Prince William III of Orange, who returned the favour by taking his throne and daughter, Queen Mary II in a cousin-marriage. An echo dynamic behind this played out amongst the Swedes in what became Philadelphia, as Queen Anne had a Danish husband in the Duke of Cumberland likewise replacing the former attempt at colonisation by the Vasa realm, that was soon to be ruled by the Hessian dynasty and Hessians under the Hanoverians joined in settling this region once ruled by the Count of Nassau. This, after the Hanoverians inherited the throne by way of the Palatinate in charge of Bohemia, so it was no wonder Palatines and Moravians were so well-represented. Funny how things turned out, with dynastic developments running parallel to folk movements. It's hard to justify anti-monarchist hysteria in such conditions, but who can blame the idiots for acting out when no public education examines the blood and soil links between governors and the governed?

    All of this is in the basic Mid-Atlantic social fabric, no matter what other types of 'diversity worship' fostered by 'rootless' (ruthless) cosmopolitans of today, anxious to deprive us of our history and hence, our current existence as if no more. Although Holland and Muenster only colour the Englishness of this region as they do in my family tree, all of it has a primacy of place that non-Germanic others shouldn't be allowed to trump. I wish the Amish would be seen as ideal Anglos and anti-Germanics for the saboteurs they are. Odd how the Amish could stick their noses up at Anglos and end up being the best Anglos would have to offer in a sea of unwashed masses, at least for the region in question. Of course, the Mafia is all too eager to work with Jewry in tearing down any respectability that the Quakers, Livingstons and Astors brought to the area. I will continue to direct my attention span to the unsung heroes of Anglo-America in the shadows of the filth infesting the Hudson. The Statue of Liberty is an idol of perversity. Long live the farms of Lancaster and York counties in Amish Country. This apparently seamless feature of identies in naming, reveals just how integral the Amish are in relation to otherwise Plantagenet fiefs in England. If only more could look at this how I do and not simply crown Jewry instead. Being that my grandfather was of Bradford, infamous 're-application' of the York name rubs me totally the wrong way.

    Clifford's Tower in 1190 was a nice ending for some in the old York, but why come to the new one and foul it up all over again? Could Occupy Wall Street be a replay of that?

  2. #32
    Senior Member
    Theunissen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Last Online
    18 Hours Ago @ 12:23 AM
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ancestry
    North Western Europe
    Country
    South Africa South Africa
    State
    Transvaal Transvaal
    Location
    South Africa
    Gender
    Posts
    951
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    367
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    597
    Thanked in
    365 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Todesritter View Post
    Is 'Jewish' a racial/ethnic attribute (affecting or affected by blood heritage) or a religious/cultural one?
    It's definitely ethnic, although that gets often confused.

  3. #33
    Providence Planter
    „Friend of Germanics”
    Skadi Funding Member


    Rodskarl Dubhgall's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Last Online
    @
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    American
    Ancestry
    Anglo
    Subrace
    Nordic
    Y-DNA
    R1A-BY30613
    mtDNA
    U8B-K2A5A1
    Country
    Other Other
    State
    Rhode Island Rhode Island
    Location
    Kentucky
    Gender
    Age
    38
    Zodiac Sign
    Leo
    Family
    Married parent
    Occupation
    Blacksmith
    Politics
    Anti-Federalist
    Religion
    Posts
    3,694
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    8,038
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    399
    Thanked in
    346 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Theunissen View Post
    It's definitely ethnic, although that gets often confused.
    Why is it that only Jews are allowed an opt-out from Christianity? All other ethnic religions of the Roman world had to be wiped out, but Jews are exempt. Same thing with how Islam insisted Aryans reject themselves for putting Arab culture on their pedestal, destroying Persia in the process. It's clear that Christianity and Islam are not universal religions, unless you believe in Hebrew and Arab supremacy as neutral, normal and natural. The Vatican is just the oldest Jew Ghetto in Europe, poised to strike from the old imperial capital by imploding the infrastructure and replacing it with the Papal States, because Rome becomes untenable when filtered by the Bible's POV. Nothing but Christianity, supposedly universal, took down Rome and by working against it from the inside. Each priest is like Grima Wormtongue in the ears of our leaders, so Constantine would've been Theoden and shaking off Wormtongue was like the Julian restoration.

    Multiculturalism in the Indo-Germanic sense is dirty, evil to the purposes of Abrahamic Brotherhood, but multiculturalism by their place in our midst is a-ok for them. They can't even handle other versions of Semitic heritage, like Egyptian, Assyrian, or Babylonian and insisted on fratri-genocidal obliteration of their own kind, yet it's us Indo-Germanics that are vilified and never them despite justifying their own hates in the name of their ethnic religions. Our chief error is offering them this latitude, because that's the typical state in which our world operates. We are not born fanatics and fantasists like them, so why bother being treated like boiled frogs? How could abandoning our own ethnic religions serve us in any way, if Jewry rightly keep theirs and witness with amusement how we prostrate ourselves before theirs? Why yes, let's waste our future on this bad investment called 'cultural appropriation' and stick both middle fingers up at our ancestors, who didn't know what they were missing when honouring their own patriarchs and matriarchs.

    Oh yes, let's all be Israelites by adoption and let the real Israelites take us for a ride, by letting them be classed as entitled to Aryan status, even though they'll never accept us groveling before them to somehow be co-heirs of Abraham. So very smart a strategy, but S/P-aul had his pyramid scheme to keep the Nazarene sect going past Masada and Bar Kokhba. Why should any of us care to play a game of telephone with translations of their ethnic religions somehow repurposed for our consumption, propping it up to simulate the appearance or misnomer of universality? Where can you find objective truth? I'd wager it's more genuine in Tibet rather than Sinai. Why's that? Selfishness is not NPOV, so the very basis of Judaism for Gentiles is disingenuous on the face of it. If we are to have an ethnic religion again, churches must be purged of Bibles and Jew iconography, while temples must be restored from their ruins instead of treated like touristic curiosities in devil worship. I would much rather see a temple to Zeus in our world than any church that bases its existence on Semitic mythology.

    Then again, to play the disinterested role of devil's advocate, why not focus on finding some value in humanising other Semitic cultures that were once prolific, like Manichaeism or Mandaeism instead of the Bible and Koran? Why Israel and not Phœnicia, or Jerusalem and not Tyre, or Byblos, by whose name the Bible got its own? Apparently, there are supposedly still remnants of Samaritans and the Zionists treat them the same now as the Exilarchs treated them when Cyrus let them leave Susa, connected somehow with the Esther and Mordechai story and Purim. A gay Jew like Emmerich is going to love the Stargate concept that turned pharaohs into avatars for supervillainous space aliens, but the Ptolemaic dynasty wouldn't have fallen for it and neither should we.

    Back on the original topic:

    Are mischlings like Scarlett Johansson and Gwyneth Paltrow accepted as Germanic enough to be members of the Asatru family? Say they want to make a conscious choice of one side and it's not like they're Negroes. I'm thinking that this question would be better not having to be asked, like if Mr. Johansson and Miss Danner had a great looking daughter, but Mr. Paltrow and Miss Schlamberg likewise were unknowns and not our concern. It's just a sad fact of life that those half-breeds have no real home, but one foot in each camp. If both sets of parents were comfortable in their own skin and observed their ethnic religions, those children of theirs would have much better lives.

  4. #34
    Senior Member
    Theunissen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Last Online
    18 Hours Ago @ 12:23 AM
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ancestry
    North Western Europe
    Country
    South Africa South Africa
    State
    Transvaal Transvaal
    Location
    South Africa
    Gender
    Posts
    951
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    367
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    597
    Thanked in
    365 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Rodskarl Dubhgall View Post
    Why is it that only Jews are allowed an opt-out from Christianity? All other ethnic religions of the Roman world had to be wiped out, but Jews are exempt. Same thing with how Islam insisted Aryans reject themselves for putting Arab culture on their pedestal, destroying Persia in the process. It's clear that Christianity and Islam are not universal religions, unless you believe in Hebrew and Arab supremacy as neutral, normal and natural. The Vatican is just the oldest Jew Ghetto in Europe, poised to strike from the old imperial capital by imploding the infrastructure and replacing it with the Papal States, because Rome becomes untenable when filtered by the Bible's POV. Nothing but Christianity, supposedly universal, took down Rome and by working against it from the inside. Each priest is like Grima Wormtongue in the ears of our leaders, so Constantine would've been Theoden and shaking off Wormtongue was like the Julian restoration.
    ....
    Nowadays, anybody can.
    It's interesting that the Jews were allowed a special role during the Middle Ages. But they already had their own community with its own structures of teachers, leaders, organisers in place. For the European people it was different, when their kings and feudal lords became Christian of some kind, so would their vassals and subjects. Those that did not, lost their status, simply investigate where e.g. the word "Pagan" does stem from.

    Christianity is NOT universal, and actually Jesus said that his kingdom is NOT FROM THIS world. Universalism is humanist POV read into scripture and teachings. Essentially this was done with some sophistry taking it from the point of where the gospel is to be offered to all nations. Traditional Christianity also had the teaching of the two realms: The kingdom of Adam, which is the worldly or earthly affairs and the kingdom of Christ, which is the heavenly affairs. Most churches/Christian groups seem to have dropped/forgotten this teaching or blurred its borders and hence are now prone to be swallowed by secular ideologies like Humanism, Universalism, etc. That some of the church leaders have been recruited into freemasonry will have been conducive to this. "Brotherhood of man" is a goal of the masons. If you control the training institutions for preachers and theologians, you can of course slowly change their perceptions, dogmas, teachings, attitudes, etc. over time. There is some traditionalist churches kicking against this, but they are mostly crumbling themselves. So the message does get changed over time. It's the unregenerate teaching the unregenerate with first the Holy Ghost getting expelled and than one scripturally grounding teaching after the other. That's why you get churches nowadays preaching pacifism, obedience to tyranny, multiculturalism, tolerance (another freemasonic motto), even 'same-sex marriage'. You get theologians arguing for this kind of stuff, they will be very sophisticated in their kind of argument they draw. And this even gets into conservative churches over time. There are quite some examples in South Africa for this. It started with the English churches and then slowly into the Afrikaans churches. There is reaction to this, with similar developments as in other Western Countries now. "All are Welcome" now, but more and more people give it a skip, with overall Church membership declining, which however means a shift in locus of source on values and attitudes as well. Not that this meant too much for too many in the past anyway, but it isn't an improvement neither.

    As a matter of interest a lot of the "change" was done via the churches in South Africa during the 80s. They were specifically targeted to change their teachings that they would be conducive to drop "separate development" and "condemn racism", something other churches (of the Reformed persuasion) had already done. An "Anti-Apartheid-Activist" by the name of Allan Boesak became the President of the World Alliance of Reformed Churches, which I guess was partially due to a swing to the left among the Reformed Churches and partially due to some conniving in the background. Marxist having already transformed that kind of organisations for a while now to set the agendas there. It should be noted that Calvinists were seen as being conducive towards freedom, nationhood, property, family etc. in the past. So the screws were removed and changed over time there.

  5. #35
    Senior Member
    Emma of Normandy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Last Online
    4 Days Ago @ 07:55 AM
    Ethnicity
    Anglo-American
    Ancestry
    England, Germany
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    North Carolina North Carolina
    Location
    Piedmont
    Gender
    Family
    Married parent
    Occupation
    Librarian
    Politics
    Conservative, nationalist
    Religion
    Anglican Church in North America
    Posts
    106
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    82
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    116
    Thanked in
    67 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Theunissen View Post
    Nowadays, anybody can.
    It's interesting that the Jews were allowed a special role during the Middle Ages. But they already had their own community with its own structures of teachers, leaders, organisers in place. For the European people it was different, when their kings and feudal lords became Christian of some kind, so would their vassals and subjects. Those that did not, lost their status, simply investigate where e.g. the word "Pagan" does stem from.

    Christianity is NOT universal, and actually Jesus said that his kingdom is NOT FROM THIS world. Universalism is humanist POV read into scripture and teachings. Essentially this was done with some sophistry taking it from the point of where the gospel is to be offered to all nations. Traditional Christianity also had the teaching of the two realms: The kingdom of Adam, which is the worldly or earthly affairs and the kingdom of Christ, which is the heavenly affairs. Most churches/Christian groups seem to have dropped/forgotten this teaching or blurred its borders and hence are now prone to be swallowed by secular ideologies like Humanism, Universalism, etc. That some of the church leaders have been recruited into freemasonry will have been conducive to this. "Brotherhood of man" is a goal of the masons. If you control the training institutions for preachers and theologians, you can of course slowly change their perceptions, dogmas, teachings, attitudes, etc. over time. There is some traditionalist churches kicking against this, but they are mostly crumbling themselves. So the message does get changed over time. It's the unregenerate teaching the unregenerate with first the Holy Ghost getting expelled and than one scripturally grounding teaching after the other. That's why you get churches nowadays preaching pacifism, obedience to tyranny, multiculturalism, tolerance (another freemasonic motto), even 'same-sex marriage'. You get theologians arguing for this kind of stuff, they will be very sophisticated in their kind of argument they draw. And this even gets into conservative churches over time. There are quite some examples in South Africa for this. It started with the English churches and then slowly into the Afrikaans churches. There is reaction to this, with similar developments as in other Western Countries now. "All are Welcome" now, but more and more people give it a skip, with overall Church membership declining, which however means a shift in locus of source on values and attitudes as well. Not that this meant too much for too many in the past anyway, but it isn't an improvement neither.

    As a matter of interest a lot of the "change" was done via the churches in South Africa during the 80s. They were specifically targeted to change their teachings that they would be conducive to drop "separate development" and "condemn racism", something other churches (of the Reformed persuasion) had already done. An "Anti-Apartheid-Activist" by the name of Allan Boesak became the President of the World Alliance of Reformed Churches, which I guess was partially due to a swing to the left among the Reformed Churches and partially due to some conniving in the background. Marxist having already transformed that kind of organisations for a while now to set the agendas there. It should be noted that Calvinists were seen as being conducive towards freedom, nationhood, property, family etc. in the past. So the screws were removed and changed over time there.
    The partial tolerance of Jews during the Middle Ages had two reasons, as I understand it.

    1)The Jews were a warning, a living reminder of how God had abandoned them for their stubborness and pride.

    2) The Jews had to be kept alive because a certain number were fated to convert in a particular time and place according to prophecy.

    There was none of this dual covenant nonsense.

    As for Johansson, a Jewess is a Jewess. I find her with a Thor's Hammer tatoo as appropriate as a Negro Heimdall.

  6. #36
    Senior Member
    Theunissen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Last Online
    18 Hours Ago @ 12:23 AM
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ancestry
    North Western Europe
    Country
    South Africa South Africa
    State
    Transvaal Transvaal
    Location
    South Africa
    Gender
    Posts
    951
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    367
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    597
    Thanked in
    365 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Emma of Normandy View Post
    The partial tolerance of Jews during the Middle Ages had two reasons, as I understand it.

    1)The Jews were a warning, a living reminder of how God had abandoned them for their stubborness and pride.

    2) The Jews had to be kept alive because a certain number were fated to convert in a particular time and place according to prophecy.

    There was none of this dual covenant nonsense.
    ....
    That may indeed have been the theological justification. Some of the princess allowed them to sojourn as aliens in their land, though for pragmatic reasons (in modern terms they were bribed and became tax collectors).

    I can't decide what people put on their bodies, but it is a bit strange I admit. A Negro Heimdall is another plot twist indeed (how is Heimdall described in poetry?). Still surprised a main line actor would do that, since that type of symbolism associated with the Norse and Germanic is considered politically incorrect.

  7. #37
    Providence Planter
    „Friend of Germanics”
    Skadi Funding Member


    Rodskarl Dubhgall's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Last Online
    @
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    American
    Ancestry
    Anglo
    Subrace
    Nordic
    Y-DNA
    R1A-BY30613
    mtDNA
    U8B-K2A5A1
    Country
    Other Other
    State
    Rhode Island Rhode Island
    Location
    Kentucky
    Gender
    Age
    38
    Zodiac Sign
    Leo
    Family
    Married parent
    Occupation
    Blacksmith
    Politics
    Anti-Federalist
    Religion
    Posts
    3,694
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    8,038
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    399
    Thanked in
    346 Posts
    Theunissen,

    Pagan Romanticism is looked at with scorn and derision if felt more seriously than sword and sandal treatments on the silver screen. You see Scarlett Johansson and so many other Jews who are 'celebrities', but would any Gentiles give our modern Pagan fellows the same interest rather than revulsion and ridicule like George Harrison? Sure, Indo-Germanics can and do conduct themselves in reckless abandon, with or without Christianity involved, but this is waved aside by thinking about them as being of little consequence. There's no case of outright Pagans in our world with any positive attention by Christians, compared to how Jews receive theirs. Similarly, I'm quite certain that Shi'ite Persians would rather spit on their Zoroastrian brethren to satisfy their Sunni Arab opponents than let their hearts be touched by the diehard Zarathustra adherents among them. That's the kind of attitude I'm referring to.

    All of us are expected to fall in line to the Semitic conspiracy theory of Abrahamic religion, but whereas Romans would be Christians to satisfy the Jews and Persians would be Shi'ites to satisfy the Sunnis, Hebrews wouldn't want to be Christians and Arabs wouldn't want to be Shi'ites, nevermind being Pagan or Zoroastrian. It's clear that Abrahamic supremacism emanates from the Semites and their Aryan Gentile servants fool themselves into thinking of out-Jewing and out-Musliming the Hebrews and Arabs at their own game.


    Emma of Normandy,

    That takes me to your points:

    1) Jews have the right to determine the direction of their own culture, as do Gentiles. It's not for Gentiles to become 'more Jewish than the Jews themselves' and dishonour our own father and mother in the process, all in the misguided attempt to bring them to heel, any more than we should be hazed and psychologically broken by brainwashing into a subject race with the dogma of Whiteness being the cancer of human history. You see, all of this melodrama revolves around the Jew and not us, for it's not them being expected to host Zeus in their Temple of Jerusalem like under Antiochus Epiphanes, causing the Book of Maccabees to be written as a testament of our evil for daring to expect the Chosen to conform to Pagan ways. I'm sure the Arabs and Persians have the exact same type of Mafia don and 'made man' relationship, with the 'made man' playing by the rules set by their Mafia don and still trying to best him, rather than the once proud Aryan supremacy of Achæmenes bringing order to their Semitic subjects.

    2) These cat and mouse games prolong the inevitability of our world imploding by subordination beneath a foreign will and their party platform as the blueprints of failure. If they're so inferior, being led by the nose to the same dooms as them for a fool's errand brings no 'salvation' to anyone, both sides convinced of out-doing the other in Abrahamocentrism as the key to ultimate purpose in life. This gives Semites a natural advantage and wiggle room, since it's their culture by which all of us are judged, so 'playing for time' allows us no quarter to compare with theirs.

    A 'dual covenant' of Indo-Germanics and Hamito-Semitics each observing our own cults of devotion and not bothering with the other, is exactly what is called for here. Let Rome be Pagan and Israel be Jewish, etc. Who cares? Julian had the proper perspective of accepting Jews as entitled as Pagans to their own cultures, not the Christian artifice in place of either.

    Unlike the matter of Negro miscegenation, I find the matter of Eurasian mischlings not cut and dried. In Aryan law, a child is born to his father's status and in Semitic law, it's according to the mother's. Those born to both sides have 'dual covenant' and may be most confused, but it's only to our detriment if they are not allowed to accept and cherish our mutual Pagan heritage, just Jew and/or Christian duopoly. Therefore, I accept the love Scarlett Johansson has shown her patrimony, even as she will not relinquish her Jewishness. If some half-Jewess is going to value her Pagan roots more than some Christian, who purports to be a Gentile with 'Amazing Grace' at finding Nazarene Judaism more than simply tolerable or palatable, there's little moral high ground in the latter.

    This Biblical hysteria is sheer nonsense, because both sides of the argument are rather flawed in their constitutional sense. Still, I prefer Jews who were ashamed of their circumcision and would try to fake their foreskins, all for a chance to compete in the Olympics, over fellow Indo-Germanics who want to play as Israelites and think that they can split hairs to delude themselves of any actual difference from Israelis they do or don't worship. Why not have foreigners submit to our terms, instead of we, theirs? There's no power or leverage in sight for us to imitate them; it only worked when Cyrus played the Messiah for the Jews and the Ptolemys played pharaohs to the Egyptians, etc. If I'm to be 'born-again' in Semitic society, it oughtn't be anything less than ruling over them at my feet instead, but I'd just as soon be apart from them in a true ritual purification that can only be achieved by burning every Bible 'justifying' any relationship at all.


    If only the Library of Alexandria had taken the Orthodox Septuagint along with it, there wouldn't be any lunacy about making it less Hellenistic to put the Masoretic text in its place and thenceforth decide it's safer to sully ourselves, as this meant the Vulgate and its Protestant followers all diminished the Gentile contribution to the Bible as originally compiled. How can any proud Gentile assent to insisting upon such debasement, all in the quest to subdue Pagan spirit to the most Hebraic of interpretations of their culture? Why should it matter that we view their society in their own eyes and hold ourselves in contempt by looking at us in the 'Jew gaze'? In their mission of cosmopolitanism and belief that objective truth requires neutrality, this led to being played for suckers, once the Hellenists incorporated the original Old Testament into their corpus of literature, the same as done over other cultures with all Alexandrias named for the most famous Macedonian, throughout their Persian dominions.

    There's no special reason why the Bible should have any more import assigned to it than any other manifestations of Semitic cultural trappings. Might as well build ziggurats (Towers of Babel) for Marduk, because otherwise, undue weight is given Abraham quitting the Chaldean city of Ur and his example being used for all others to likewise practise self-immolation going so far as infanticide in Gehenna and treating sons like sacrificial lambs. Yes, let's have wanton self-destruction be our religion all on account of the Bible, so no wonder we see the writing on the wall. Blame agnostics and atheists for the Jew bedrock of Christianity spreading sickness everywhere in the image of the Crucifixion. Let's all be Christlike and nailed to crosses because of Jew mythology about Isaac; let's constantly rehearse and ritualise self-induced sufferings in order to identify as the Jew we're schizophrenically obsessed with.

  8. #38
    Senior Member
    Winterland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Last Online
    14 Hours Ago @ 03:50 AM
    Ethnicity
    German
    Ancestry
    German; Scot-Irish; Scandinavian
    Country
    United States United States
    Location
    Coastal region
    Gender
    Family
    Married
    Occupation
    Free Lance
    Politics
    Conservative
    Religion
    Christian
    Posts
    392
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    317
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    233
    Thanked in
    169 Posts
    Many successful Jews in Hollywood today don't have harsh Semitic features. Many actors and actresses are half Jewish with one German or Irish descent parent. Most whites in America don't have any Jewish backgrounds; most Christians would not marry Jews and had consequences if they had practiced mixed religions from either stance. This is another typical approach to "water down" our culture and make it mainstream as mixed marriages promoted in the media or mixed religions, which is actually rarer.

    Really, anyone can get a tattoo. Scarlett Johansson is one of the highest paid female actresses in Hollywood after the popular Avenger's series movies. It can be another "jewelry" piece without the authentic meaning. I agree with being more of a fashion statement with shallow expression and more of a promotion of her successful acting character. Bikers have their share of Viking tattoos and heavy metal symbols without participating in Odinism.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Similar Threads

  1. Classify Jewess Scarlett Johansson
    By Edward SC in forum Anthropological Taxonomy
    Replies: 95
    Last Post: Tuesday, November 3rd, 2020, 04:36 AM
  2. What is wrong with this picture? (on Scarlett Johansson)
    By Death and the Sun in forum Immigration & Multiculturalism
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: Monday, January 9th, 2006, 02:39 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •