Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Genetic Similarity Promotes Cooperation

  1. #1
    Hundhedensk "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member

    Hersir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Last Online
    @
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    Håløyg
    Ancestry
    Norway
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Y-DNA
    I2b1
    mtDNA
    J2a1a1b
    Country
    Norway Norway
    State
    South Trondelag South Trondelag
    Location
    Norway
    Gender
    Age
    32
    Zodiac Sign
    Pisces
    Family
    Single adult
    Politics
    Nationalist
    Posts
    6,032
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    945
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    691
    Thanked in
    313 Posts

    Genetic Similarity Promotes Cooperation

    In a dog-eat-dog world of ruthless competition and 'survival of the fittest,' new research from the University of Leicester reveals that individuals are genetically programmed to work together and cooperate with those who most resemble themselves.


    This shows the similarity discrimination effect in a hypothetical population of microorganisms, starting with a diverse population containing two similar pairs at the tops. The similar pairs cooperate with each other and thus leave more offspring in the following generation.


    A tendency for similar individuals to cooperate selectively with one another, even if they are not close relatives, can evolve spontaneously in simple organisms. This may help to explain why cooperation is so widespread in nature, the study suggests.

    Lead researcher Professor Andrew Colman, of the University's School of Psychology, said: "Cooperation has posed a major problem to evolutionary biologists since Darwin, because although cooperation and altruism abound in nature, Darwin's theory of natural selection is based on the "survival of the fittest". Our study has found a new mechanism of "similarity discrimination" that helps to solve this puzzle."

    Professor Colman, Dr Lindsay Browning, and Dr Briony Pulford carried out the study, due to appear in the Journal of Theoretical Biology. The research, funded by the Nuffield Foundation, can explain why organisms tend to discriminate in favour of others who resemble themselves.


    Using a combination of computer simulation and mathematical analysis, the researchers showed that similarity discrimination evolves quickly and powerfully in many types of social encounters. It evolves spontaneously in populations of organisms who are merely programmed to behave either cooperatively or selfishly, initially at random, and can recognize others who are genetically similar to themselves.


    This shows the average level of cooperation over 10,000 generations of evolution. The blue lines represent cooperation between similar pairs, and the red line cooperation between dissimilar pairs. Each of the six panels is a different strategic structure, starting with (a) Prisoner's Dilemma. Credit: University of Leicester

    Similarity discrimination is more powerful and efficient than the "greenbeard effect", first suggested by the British biologist Bill Hamilton in 1964 and discovered recently in several species of micro-organisms and insects. The greenbeard effect relies on individuals displaying fixed trait (hence the term "green beard" suggested by Richard Dawkins in 1976) and cooperating selectively with others who also display the trait. The similarity discrimination effect does not depend on any fixed trait: individuals cooperate selectively with others who are genetically similar to themselves, whatever traits they may display.



    Research has shown that the greenbeard effect can drive the evolution of cooperation, but only with difficulty and under restrictive conditions, including "viscous" populations of organisms that tend to stay in one place and mate locally with close relatives. The similarity discrimination effect evolves much more quickly and easily, even in freely mixing populations.

    Professor Colman said: "We have discovered a new mechanism that helps to explain why cooperation is so common in nature, even between non-relatives. It's tempting to think that it applies to forms of human discrimination such as in-group favouritism, racism, sexism and xenophobia, but it probably doesn't. The similarity discrimination effect relies on tight genetic linkage between genes encoding for behaviour and traits that others use to judge genetic similarity. Most human traits are encoded by multiple genes, and parents' genes are shuffled before being passed on to children, so a genetic linkage could not be maintained for long. I think the effect is much more likely to be observed in simple organisms with simpler genes."

    Provided by University of Leicester
    Source http://phys.org/news/2012-04-genetic...operation.html

    "It's tempting to think that it applies to forms of human discrimination such as in-group favouritism, racism, sexism and xenophobia, but it probably doesn't. "

    -"Yes, a careful career scientist of course has to state this, lest his name be associated with Politically Incorrect science."

  2. #2
    Senior Member hdcn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Last Online
    Sunday, April 29th, 2012 @ 04:41 AM
    Ethnicity
    Anglo-American
    Gender
    Politics
    Nordicist; Breed the Overman
    Religion
    Freethought; Heathen
    Posts
    45
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Many people in the scientific communities are annoyed by the fact that they can't openly express the implications of the evidence they gather, such as the reality of racialism. The fields of science are being constricted by people who think they know what life is about and force their ideals onto fields that just cannot agree with them. A new breed of religious intolerance hampering true scientific progress, or is it still the same organizations trying to slow true human progress?

  3. #3
    Moderator "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member

    GroeneWolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Dutch
    Subrace
    Don't know
    Country
    Netherlands Netherlands
    State
    Utrecht Utrecht
    Gender
    Age
    37
    Family
    Single adult
    Religion
    Germanic Heathendom
    Posts
    3,059
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    304
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    410
    Thanked in
    222 Posts
    It's tempting to think that it applies to forms of human discrimination such as in-group favouritism, racism, sexism and xenophobia, but it probably doesn't
    And everyone who are at least of average intelligence and is capable of critical thinking will realize that sentence does not make sense in relationship with the rest of the article. And most likely has only been made to keep these scientists research jobs secure. Or else they end up the same way as to so called London school of intelligence.
    The sense of honor is of so fine and delicate a nature that
    it is only to be met with in minds which are naturally noble or
    cultivated by good examples and a refined education.
    - Sir Richard Steele

Similar Threads

  1. J. P. Rushton: Right About Racial Differences, Wrong About Genetic Similarity Theory?
    By Nachtengel in forum Bio-Anthropology & Human Variation
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: Tuesday, March 31st, 2009, 09:41 AM
  2. Replies: 4
    Last Post: Saturday, November 18th, 2006, 08:55 PM
  3. J. P. Rushton: Ethnic Nationalism, Evolutionary Psychology and Genetic Similarity Theory
    By Ensittare in forum Bio-Anthropology & Human Variation
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Sunday, March 5th, 2006, 03:42 PM
  4. On the likely genetic similarity between Balts and Prussians
    By friedrich braun in forum Population Genetics
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: Friday, February 4th, 2005, 02:38 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •