Page 12 of 14 FirstFirst ... 27891011121314 LastLast
Results 111 to 120 of 140

Thread: Present Day Japanese Culture Obsessed with the Nordic Race?

  1. #111
    Account Inactive

    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Last Online
    Monday, July 30th, 2012 @ 12:10 AM
    Ethnicity
    Angelisc
    Gender
    Posts
    68
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Sigyn View Post
    Apart from a society with emphasis on discipline and organization, exactly what do Japanese have in common with Germanics?

    I do not have anything personal against the Japanese as a people, I just do not see this metaphysical "spiritual bond" between us and them. Their ethnocentric values are a good example to follow, but those values are hardly unique to the Japanese.
    Nineteenth-century ethnographers and anthropologists, who were highly nationalist and racialist, wrote of the commonalities between the Germanic peoples and the Japanese people. As Feyn pointed out already, the similarities between our warrior ethea and our indigenous religions are but a few of these commonalities. Some of the most highly-regarded ethnocentric mythographers, perennial philosophers, and traditionalists, and heathen authors of the twentieth-century and beyond have highlighted the obvious similarities between the mythopoeia of observers of Shinto and Germanic heathenry. Like it or not, the weltanschauung of a Germanic heathen, our interpretation of nature, of laws, of ethics, of divinity, of community, probably has more in common with that of the average Japanese, given that practically every single Japanese still observes his or her indigenous religion, than with those of those observing either foreign religions - and conversions to Islam in the west are increasing day by day - or none among our own ethnic brethren. That's the sad truth.

    You're right. The collective unconscious of their people, their sense of honour, and of national and racial pride, their courage, their tribalism, their sense of community and of unity, of participation, is not unique to them. We also have and express these qualities, and, indeed, we do so as well as any Japanese, but the reality is that the bulk of our ethnic brethren no longer share or welcome these qualities, which are the norm among most Japanese. Why is stating this sad truth, and admiring how they've maintained national and racial cohesion among their people, which is what we want to achieve among our own, considered the same as saying one prefers the Japanese to the English, or anyone to anyone? That's like saying heathens, in general, prefer African primitives to the men and women of our cities, because of their critique of urbanisation and admiration for the smaller, decentralized, tribal communities of our ancestors.

  2. #112
    Go get him, Granraude.

    This post is really off-topic but what I consider the original Americans are the people who had the most to do with settling the land and building the country from nothing. This means the Anglo-Americans and some other groups which were culturally and racially able to assimilate into the dominant founding population. Race isn't the same thing as ethnicity, although ethnicity encompasses race. "Original American" differentiates me from a lot of other groups who have immigrated to this continent and call themselves "American." Just because they live here now or even appear on American TV doesn't mean I consider them my people.

    Not quite as funny as the way you think your attempts to insult me are anything but futile. Your apparently biological approach to race positions every worthless Original American as being as worthwhile as every worthwhile other... your approach is quite the opposite of elitism where every liberal every idiot every homosexual and every criminal is considered your racial brethren as long as he or she is an Original American.... and that complacency has played a part in holding us back... considering yourself "the same" as people who do not even believe in race believe in our collective histories and collective destinies simply because they "belong" is foolish and self-destructive. In contrast to the traitors in our midsts why are a people who share and welcome our ethnocentric vision such a threat?
    I do not believe all degenerates are equal, although I do not believe all are necessarily lost. I would need to consider the type of degeneracy and the individual situation. The Japanese are not a threat.

    I haven't lied about what you're written I've simply provided appropriate analogies to expose what you've written for the sheer folly that it is.
    A lot of what you have written has been composed of false assumptions which I refused to give the dignity to address, many of which false assumptions are derived from your impression of Americans while failing to realize that there is more than one type of American.

    A Question: How do you reconcile being "a viking," assuming your username is meant to reflect your social and cultural attitudes, with your complete disregard for the way our viking ancestors often viewed other people, and often exiled their own kith and kin who failed to live up to the expectations of their communities?
    I am not a viking and it's just a name. Once again you are telling me what I supposedly believe. I'm not an egalitarian.

    A question to you: Do you sympathize more with deracinated English or with ethnocentric Japanese?

  3. #113
    Account Inactive

    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Last Online
    Monday, July 30th, 2012 @ 12:10 AM
    Ethnicity
    Angelisc
    Gender
    Posts
    68
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Autosmal Viking View Post
    I am not a viking and it's just a name. Once again you are telling me what I supposedly believe.
    Please tell me you are not serious? My question said "...assuming your username meant..."... that's assuming... so no.... I wasn't telling you what you supposedly believe at all... once again you're evidencing a complete and utter failure to comprehend the fundamental difference between something that was written and what you're inferring from it so it's ironic that you accuse me of saying things I'm not saying because that's what you do time and time again.

    Seems a little odd that you'd choose the name of something with a different weltanschauung as yourself... go figure.

    You're distorting the truth and the English language to suggest it constituted "egalitarianism" for vikings to admire other cultures other people and outcast men and women of their own blood. It also shows that you lack the intellectual fortitude to consider these things beyond erroneous adolescent-level dichotomies: "you're egalitarian unless you refuse to admire other cultures other people and allow even the worst among your men and women to stay in your communities." Really? Really? So admiring different cultures admiring different people with a similar weltanschauung is "egalitarian" and ridding your community of filth is "egalitarian"... That's preposterous. Now before you accuse me of putting words in your mouth again there's no other logical explanation as to why you might say you're not an egalitarian in direct response to someone pointing out that vikings admired other cultures other people and outcast men and women of their own blood.

    egalitarianism
    Characterized by social equality and equal rights for all people.

    To admire a different people a different culture isn't synonymous with according all people the same status the same rights... these are things only to be accorded to those in the community who uphold the integrity and dignity of the community. Outcasting men and women who fail to uphold the integrity and dignity of the community is the very opposite of egalitarianism because it acknowledges and recognises that not all people in the community are equal either. Egalitarianism is blind to the reality that some people are different some are better some are stronger some are smarter some are more valuable than others to their community... leveling people by virtue of their race is as egalitarian as leveling people by virtue of their "shared humanity"... both are blind to the reality that only some of us are born to lead born to fight or born to serve and only some of us are of noble spirit while others are ignoble degenerates that don't belong no matter how bloody pure their blood.

    Vikings? Egalitarians? Just because they had the intellectual capacity to appreciate other cultures other people and the decency to rid their communities of filth? Good luck convincing every heathen on Skadi of your "brilliant analysis" of our ancestors...

    This discussion is going to go round and round in circles because you keep saying I'm saying things I'm not even implying and accusing me of saying you've said things you say you haven't even said though what I write are logical analogies to what you say and I'm done wasting time arguing with you. If two people were arguing and one said "all goats are or do this" and the other said "well... that's like saying all harts are or do that" which is a logical analogy you'd accuse him or her of putting words in the other person's mouth simply because there was no prior mention of "harts" or "that". If that person then said "all the trees in my garden are ash" you'd then accuse him or her of saying all trees are ash... that's the extent of your hysterical arguing... and it makes you look like a child. Polemics is clearly not your forte I'm sorry.

  4. #114
    Quote Originally Posted by vordringende View Post
    Please tell me you are not serious? My question said "...assuming your username meant..."... that's assuming... so no.... I wasn't telling you what you supposedly believe at all... once again you're evidencing a complete and utter failure to comprehend the fundamental difference between something that was written and what you're inferring from it so it's ironic that you accuse me of saying things I'm not saying because that's what you do time and time again.

    Seems a little odd that you'd choose the name of something with a different weltanschauung as yourself... go figure.

    You're distorting the truth and the English language to suggest it constituted "egalitarianism" for vikings to admire other cultures other people and outcast men and women of their own blood. It also shows that you lack the intellectual fortitude to consider these things beyond erroneous adolescent-level dichotomies: "you're egalitarian unless you refuse to admire other cultures other people and allow even the worst among your men and women to stay in your communities." Really? Really? So admiring different cultures admiring different people with a similar weltanschauung is "egalitarian" and ridding your community of filth is "egalitarian"... That's preposterous. Now before you accuse me of putting words in your mouth again there's no other logical explanation as to why you might say you're not an egalitarian in direct response to someone pointing out that vikings admired other cultures other people and outcast men and women of their own blood. Vikings? Egalitarians? Just because they had the intellectual capacity to appreciate other cultures other people and the decency to rid their communities of filth? Good luck convincing every heathen on Skadi of your "brilliant analysis" of our ancestors...

    This discussion is going to go round and round in circles because you keep saying I'm saying things I'm not even implying and accusing me of saying you've said things you say you haven't even said though what I provide are logical analogies to what you say and I'm done wasting time arguing with you. If two people were arguing and one said "all goats are or do this" and the other said "well... that's like saying all harts are or do that" which is a logical analogy you'd accuse him or her of putting words in the other person's mouth simply because there was no mention of harts or that. If that person then said "all the trees in my garden are ash" you'd then accuse him or her of saying all trees are ash... that's the extent of your hysterical arguing... and it makes you look like a child. Polemics is clearly not your forte I'm sorry.
    You just like to provoke. You picked one little thing that doesn't make a difference and wrote an autistic speech while avoiding the question that was addressed to you. I said I'm not an egalitarian because I'm not an egalitarian and I wanted that to be clear regarding your beloved degenerates topic. It's as simple as that.

    with your complete disregard for the way our viking ancestors often viewed other people, and often exiled their own kith and kin who failed to live up to the expectations of their communities?
    This is the part where you told me what I supposedly believe in a metaphor regarding the degenerates you like to talk about so much. The highlighted red is also more of you telling me what I believe out of nowhere with no basis.

  5. #115
    Account Inactive

    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Last Online
    Monday, July 30th, 2012 @ 12:10 AM
    Ethnicity
    Angelisc
    Gender
    Posts
    68
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Autosmal Viking View Post
    ...
    ... like I said... I'm not arguing with you any more. Now you're decontextualising what I said by taking a sample of a question that was originally framed in the already noted assumption that you chose the name because of some kind of social or cultural equation... the question isn't saying you're doing this or that it's saying that assuming you are then how can you reconcile those differences. You don't. And so it's a moot point so get over it and yourself. If you decontextualised such a question in a formal debate to try to suggest your adversary was saying something they're not you'd be disqualified. You stated you were not an egalitarian in the same paragraph in the same instance immediately following why you don't relate to vikings given their attitudes to others to other cultures and you honestly expect me or anyone to to believe there's no connection there... right. If indeed you're not questioning or insulting the weltanschauung of our viking ancestors then why have you wasted so much time and energy questioning and insulting mine questioning and insulting that of heathens who share their weltanschauung regarding other people other cultures and indeed their own? Go back and read the thread and you'll notice that those who have agreed with me agreed with my position tend to identify as heathens... "troll" must be a convenient insult to use when you're losing an argument particularly given that a lot a whole lot of your behaviour has resembled that of actual trolling like nit-picking about spelling and grammar and trying to provoke others by expressing doubt about their English-ness their loyalties their personhood et cetera. I have nothing more nothing at all to say to you sorry.

  6. #116
    Quote Originally Posted by vordringende View Post
    ... like I said... I'm not arguing with you any more. Now you're decontextualising what I said by taking a sample of a question that was originally framed in the already noted assumption that you chose the name because of some kind of social or cultural equation... the question isn't saying you're doing this or that it's saying that assuming you are then how can you reconcile those differences. You don't. And so it's a moot point so get over it and yourself. If you decontextualised such a question in a formal debate to try to suggest your adversary was saying something they're not you'd be disqualified. You stated you were an egalitarian in the same paragraph in the same instance immediately following why you don't relate to vikings given their attitudes to others to other cultures and you honestly expect me or anyone to to believe there's no connection there... right. If indeed you're not questioning or insulting the weltanschauung of our viking ancestors then why have you wasted so much time and energy questioning and insulting mine questioning and insulting that of heathens who share their weltanschauung regarding other people other cultures and indeed their own? Go back and read the thread and you'll notice that those who have agreed with me agreed with my position tend to identify as heathens... "troll" must be a convenient insult to use when you're losing an argument particularly given that a lot a whole lot of your behaviour has resembled that of actual trolling like nit-picking about spelling and grammar and trying to provoke others by expressing doubt about their English-ness their loyalties their personhood et cetera. I have nothing more nothing at all to say to you sorry.
    I addressed your words in the order they came, not the best logical flow. You were telling me how I viewed degenerates within our societies using a viking metaphor and I was telling you with an ultimatum that is not what I believe. Who are you to tell me what I meant/believe? Oh right, you've been doing that this whole time. Sorry, you've lost the debate.

    I made no mention of heathens and you are just provoking a response as you have been since you have nothing worthwhile left to say.

  7. #117
    Account Inactive

    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Last Online
    Monday, July 30th, 2012 @ 12:10 AM
    Ethnicity
    Angelisc
    Gender
    Posts
    68
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Autosmal Viking View Post
    Who are you to tell me what I meant/believe?
    Then say what you meant say what you believe. If it's true that you don't have a problem with the attitudes of our viking ancestors and other heathens toward other cultures toward other people and their propensity to look beyond blood and outcast members of their own race from their communities then why did you attack me in the first place by suggesting my attitude which reflects theirs which reflects that of our viking ancestors was wrong? If it's true that you do have a problem with it then why did you deny this earlier... even in your own post this "I am not a viking and it's just a name. Once again you are telling me what I supposedly believe. I'm not an egalitarian" is in direct response under the quotation of the question regarding vikings... how was this therefore not saying you disagree with their attitudes which is something you then denied saying as soon as I asked if this is what you were saying... there's an intellectual-dishonesty there's desperation there's cowardice in fact in the way you say one thing and then another... which is it... does it bother you that our viking ancestors traded with lived among and admired other cultures admired other people and although ethnocentric didn't hesitate to outcast men and women who failed to meet the expectations of their communities or doesn't it?

    Quote Originally Posted by Autosmal Viking View Post
    I made no mention of heathens...
    Why would you need to mention them... the point is that if my weltanschauung is the collective weltanschauung of others of other heathens and our heathen ancestors and that the expression of this collective weltanschauung as it relates to the admiration of others of other cultures of other people and the devaluing of those of our own race who fail to uphold the integrity and dignity of our own communities has made you get so hysterical and insult and attack me for expressing this then logic dictates that your view of the weltanschauung of other heathens including our heathen ancestors is anything but friendly. Unless of course you're a hypocrite and have simply been insulting and attacking me to provoke me which is trolling. "I made no mention of heathens..." is yet another example of your complete disconnect from the discussion... if Gavin rages hysterically against Barry for something he said but Jeff and two or three thousand people share Barry's opinion why does Gavin need to mention Jeff and these two or three thousand others for anyone to logically conclude that Gavin either likewise disagrees with them or that he's a hypocrite he's a fool who doesn't even believe what he's saying and he's simply antagonising for the sake of it? Is that so hard to understand? You say I "lost the debate"... what debate would that be exactly:

    Is it the one where someone said the Japanese were bastards for whaling and I and others reminded them that the Norwegians, the Icelanders, and the Faroe Islanders also whale?
    Or is it the one where you insisted on scientific racialism as opposed to metaphysical racialism to try to guilt-trip people into showing no admiration for the Japanese and the self-censorship of their warranted criticisms of problems among Australians and Americans even though the greatest of German minds of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries conceptualised race in metaphysical as well as in scientific terms, and didn't hesitate to voice their admiration for others, and lament, even hate, what was happening among our own people, for example, democratisation, liberalisation, et cetera? The one where my position is informed by the writings of Jünger, Moeller van den Bruck, Spengler, Schmitt, and Heidegger, and Nietzsche, and Evola, Devi, Serrano, even Rosenberg and Hitler, and your scientific racialism is informed by a form of egalitarianism of its own where you get stroppy if people say bad things about Australians and Americans and you get stroppy if people say good things about others?
    Perhaps it's the one where time and time again I've had to serve you your follies on a platter outlining the differences between constructing an analogy or framing a question in an assumption with saying you're saying exactly that word for word?
    Or is it the one where you erroneously accused me of hypocrisy because you think nit-picking about spelling and grammar because you have no argument compares to someone having to spell it out for you that you're saying they're saying things they're not because you can't even comprehend even the most basic fundamentals of polemical debate?

    The only thing you've won is the award for constructing the biggest logical fallacy of the century by suggesting that you can insult someone for their attitude toward the Japanese and toward the worst of our own and then imply that you'd have to actually mention others who share the same attitude for your insults to be an insult to them or their legacy: "Do you sympathize more with deracinated English or with ethnocentric Japanese?" I think you mean empathise... do you think our viking ancestors even remotely empathised with the men and women they threw out of their communities or executed for miserably failing to uphold the integrity and dignity of their communities? No. They did however empathise with other ethnocentric communities of other cultures of other races. So your point is pointless unless you think rather poorly of your viking ancestors as well as me. Your behaviour has epitomised the meaning of trolling because you've only sought to provoke me with your infantile and inane remarks about winning a debate you well and truly lost ages ago. I won't hold my breath for a considered response or particularly care either way.

  8. #118
    Senior Member
    The Aesthete's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Last Online
    Tuesday, March 10th, 2020 @ 03:07 PM
    Ethnicity
    Anglo-Australian
    Country
    Australia Australia
    Gender
    Politics
    Nordish Preservationist
    Posts
    2,203
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    305
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    162
    Thanked in
    105 Posts
    The Germans treated Australian prisoners of war infinitely better than the Japanese!

    According to the findings of the Tokyo Tribunal, the death rate of Western prisoners was 27.1%, seven times that of POWs under the Germans and Italians.

    Australian and American atrocities were never on the same scale as the Japanese!

    Japanese atrocities committed on POWs like; The Sandakan Death Marches which resulted in the deaths of more than 2,400 Allied prisoners of war; The Bataan Death March in which approximately 650 American prisoners of war died. The Banka Island massacre in which Japanese soldiers machine gunned 22 Australian military nurses. Incidents of cannibalism and human experimentation by the Japanese are less discussed as is their use of comfort women.

    The term "comfort women" describes women forced into sexual slavery by the Japanese military during World War II, many Dutch and some Australian women, mostly nurses, became comfort women.

    Over 23,000 Dutch citizens died in Japanese captivity, many of them children—over three times as many as those who died under the Nazi occupation of Holland

    Nearly 300 Dutch women were forced to become military sexual slaves for their captors, or as the Japanese government euphemistically called them, “comfort women.”

    http://www.jpri.org/publications/wor...pers/wp84.html

    I won’t even go into the atrocities they committed on other Asians like The Rape of Nanking.


    Watch this video about the contemporary abuse of young Western women in Japan:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aAzLVOMuJMI

    Joji Obara, filmed himself drugging and raping more than 150 girls. Worryingly, he's not the only rapist targeting foreign hostesses. "Sexual violation to a hostess would happen every night," alleges nightclub worker Rob Cox.




    The Japanese did bring the war to my country e.g. The Bombing of Darwin killing over 250 Australians and the attack on Sydney harbor killing 21 Australians etc.

    Further if New Guinea had fallen they may well have tried to invade (elements of the Imperial Japanese Navy had already proposed it!). During a meeting at Imperial Headquarters the Japanese formally agreed to a "Fundamental Outline of Recommendations for Future War Leadership" which relegated the option of invading Australia as a "future option" only if all other plans went well.

    Anyway I have spoken to old diggers who swear that it was a Japanese objective, having being told it by Japanese soldiers themselves whilst prisoners.






    My point is that Hentai is a very Japanese genre of perversion and there are plenty of others like Chikan Purei, bukkake etc

    It is estimated that 30-40% of manga contains sexual themes or content

    http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Front_Page/JB23Aa02.html

    According to John Carr, a United Kingdom government adviser on Internet safety policy for children, two-thirds of all pedophilic images on the Internet in the late 1990s may have originated in Japan.

    In 2008, Ethel Quayle, an expert on child pornography issues, made a report to the Third World Congress against Sexual Exploitation of Children and Adolescents highlighted that Japan was a major impetus behind child pornography worldwide.

    Japanese law permits the simple possession of child pornographic images if there is no intention of selling or distributing them.

    Japan is the 2nd largest per capita consumer of pornography after South Korea



    As for pornography in the West the answer is Jewish overrepresentation in pornography which is used to undermine Western culture.


    Today the world’s largest producer of pornography is owned by a Jew.

    A Jewish Professor of American History Nathan Abrams:

    There’s no getting away from the fact that secular Jews played (and still continue to play) a disproportionate role throughout the adult film industry in America. Jewish involvement in pornography has a long history in the United States, as Jews have helped transform a fringe subculture into what has become a primary constituent of Americana.


    Jewish involvement in porn … is the result of an atavistic hatred of Christian authority: they are trying to weaken the dominant culture in America by moral subversion.

    Al Goldstein, owner and publisher of the pornographic magazine "Screw" once said: "As you know 85% of men in porn films are Jewish."

    More:

    http://forums.skadi.net/showthread.php?t=136556

    Also there is a global demand for Western women as they are widely regarded as the most desirable.




    Buddhism (even Zen Buddhism originated in China) and Confucianism are not indigenous to Japan (remember the old saying about the Japanese; born Shinto, live Confucian, die Buddhist), the current Japanese writing system traces its history back to the 4th century, when Chinese characters (kanji) were introduced to Japan etc.

    Is baseball (The Nippon Professional Baseball league is Japan's largest professional sports league) and soccer apart of their tradition (it is the second favourite professional sport in Japan after baseball)?

    Also when in Tokyo I didn’t see any Japanese men in traditional dress rather in Western business suits.

    The Japanese are not that unique they are mostly descended from Korean immigrants who arrived with rice-paddy agriculture around 400 b.c.. Geneticists attempting to calculate the relative contributions of Korean-like Yayoi genes and Ainu-like Jomon genes to the modern Japanese gene pool have concluded that the Yayoi contribution was generally dominant.; 90% Yayoi / 10% Jomon haploid-group frequency of modern Japanese DNA.


    My Japanese friend actually told me this and even said that it is difficult to tell a Japanese and Korean apart except that the Japanese are generally hairier due to the Ainu influence.






    When I was in Japan I was appalled by how the Japanese coveted Western beauty and Westerners.

    Again:

    Darling (2004) conducted an experiment involving Japanese women, in particular, those with a strong sense of culture and who would strongly critique what they saw in the media. The experimenter sat and talked with each of the Japanese women while they looked at Japanese fashion magazines. Caucasian models were presented the most in these magazines and the women who looked at these images all said that Caucasians are simply more attractive than the Japanese. Also, when the women rated themselves, it was discovered that they compared themselves to the western ideal. Most of the women said they wish they were taller and had larger eyes, for example (Darling, 2004).

    It is well known more White models are used during Tokyo fashion week than Asian!

    https://plus.google.com/100906247084...ts/GMEz499dEBD

    60 percent of the women in Japan color their hair

    Japan is the largest purchaser of skin lighteners

    http://www.whiterskin.info/global-sk...llion-by-2015/

    Double-eyelid surgery is the most popular cosmetic surgical procedure in Japan, Japanese celebrity Ayumi Hamasaki has had it done. While other Japanese celebrities like Mika Nakashima go around wearing colored contact lenses etc.

    Remember colored eyes, light hairs etc are not natural among the Japanese unlike Westerners.

    Malaysia's 75-year-old prime minister, Mahathir bin Mohamad, traveled to Japan earlier in the year and heaped scorn on the country's young people
    "Japanese youths want to be blonds, work less and play more," he said. "The traditional Japanese and Eastern culture is being discarded”



    Trends show the East imitating the West (just as Japan did in the Meiji Period)

    South Korea just next door is now marjoritarily Christian and has the highest per capita rate of cosmetic surgery in the world (these procedures are mostly done so they look more Western).

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7GdNnBCaocI


    An example of Westernization: Meiji era, Japan, Prince Yorihito Higashifushimi in typical Western naval dress uniform with white gloves, epaulettes, medals and hat.


    Whales are majestic beasts (they are largest animals ever to live) coming back from the brink of extinction. It is wrong for any nation to do it!
    The way the Japanese do it is particularly appalling slaughtering claves and illegally killing whales in Australian waters (those waters belong to my nation and it is very expedient to nationalist notions)


    A mother and calf being loaded aboard the Nisshin Maru.

    Video footage of the cruelty:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtG1iW0ULVw



    I respect how the Japanese are protective of their citizenship and seem to value homogeneity, but large numbers of Japanese have immigrated to my country thereby not showing the same respect. As they have with many other Western countries like the US, Canada etc.

    To give you some idea according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics 52,111 of the Australian resident population were born in Japan, while according to the Australian Embassy, Tokyo, there are just more than 9,000 Australian citizens resident in Japan (most of whom return).

    In my country there are even whole suburbs which are mainly Japanese. And when I was in Japan I was constantly told by the Japanese how they would love to come and live in Australia.

    Not to mention the Japanese buying up Australian real estate and farmland, as well as iconic Australian companies like Dairy Farmers which is one of the largest and oldest dairy manufacturers in Australia and now Japanese owned.

    Yet if Australians try to buy Japanese farmland it is not so easy.



    I’m an Aussie and I can tell you (who probably has no bloody idea what Aussie culture is) that Australia’s cultural heritage is still strong; our head of state is still the queen, our flag still bears the union Jack, most Australians are still Anglo-Celtic. Asia is the real threat to our identity as Asians are flooding into my country.

    Btw the average Aussie is very ethnocentric, unfortunately we have many greedy elites that benefit from mass immigration (cheap labour, greater property prices etc) and traitorous politicians that are afraid to lose the ethnic vote.

    72 per cent of Australians polled favour an immigration cap

    More than half the respondents felt Australia had changed for the worse in the past 20 years.


    Read more: http://www.news.com.au/national/poll...#ixzz1kLpln5id

    A US Study Centre, Univ. Sydney poll in July 2010 asked ‘Right now, Australia is taking in too many immigrants’. 69 per cent of Australian respondents agree that Australia “is taking too many immigrants".


    Read more: http://ussc.edu.au/research/opinion-...s/past-surveys

    An Age/Nielsen poll in April 2010, asked respondents for views on the current immigration intake; 54% considered it to be ‘too high’


    Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/national/la...0418-smm4.html

    In 2005 Professor Andrew Fraser appeared on ‘A Current Affair’ on channel nine calling for a return of the white Australia policy. A phone poll (which had 35,000 callers) conducted by Channel 9's A Current Affair showed 85 per cent of the audience agreed with Professor Fraser's controversial stand.


    http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/...speech/3367108





    Anthropologists classify the Japanese as Mongoloid NOT Caucasoid!




    Do you intend to return and live amongst your own folk or are you going to stay with the Japanese indefinitely?

    Do I really have to point out the absurdity of lauding an Asian culture whilst disparaging Germanic cultures on a Germanic forum? Why don’t you go and join an Asian forum (I am sure you will find many other Jap lovers there)?



    I suggest you do some research as I will no longer waste my time elucidating you!!!!
    Our beauty is our power, our strength. We can’t allow them to change us, to lessen us. I will never grant them that satisfaction, and neither should you!

    White Oleander

  9. #119
    Senior Member
    The Aesthete's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Last Online
    Tuesday, March 10th, 2020 @ 03:07 PM
    Ethnicity
    Anglo-Australian
    Country
    Australia Australia
    Gender
    Politics
    Nordish Preservationist
    Posts
    2,203
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    305
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    162
    Thanked in
    105 Posts
    A tribute to your proud & honorable bloody Japs!


    JapaneseDolphin slaughter





    Japanese POWs








    Japan’s growing number of pillow lovers




    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/26/ma...=3&partner=rss

    Japanese product to give a more elevated Western nose



    Japanese product to create double eyelid



    Japanese skin whitening advertisement

    Our beauty is our power, our strength. We can’t allow them to change us, to lessen us. I will never grant them that satisfaction, and neither should you!

    White Oleander

  10. #120
    Senior Member
    The Aesthete's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Last Online
    Tuesday, March 10th, 2020 @ 03:07 PM
    Ethnicity
    Anglo-Australian
    Country
    Australia Australia
    Gender
    Politics
    Nordish Preservationist
    Posts
    2,203
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    305
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    162
    Thanked in
    105 Posts
    Do you have some Jap blood or a Jap lover (usually happens when Western blokes can’t get a Western one)?
    Our beauty is our power, our strength. We can’t allow them to change us, to lessen us. I will never grant them that satisfaction, and neither should you!

    White Oleander

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 10
    Last Post: Monday, April 4th, 2011, 11:26 PM
  2. The Purest Present-Day Alpinid Area in Europe?
    By Digitalseal in forum Alpinid
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: Monday, June 5th, 2006, 04:13 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •