Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Overpopulation in Context

  1. #1
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Last Online
    Friday, May 11th, 2012 @ 09:24 PM
    Ethnicity
    Anglo-Teutonic
    Ancestry
    Germany, England, Scotland
    Country
    United States United States
    Gender
    Politics
    Natural Law
    Posts
    152
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post

    Overpopulation in Context

    Overpopulation in Context
    by Andrew Hamilton


    Globally, two massive population trends are occurring simultaneously.

    Overall, world population is growing at an alarming pace, a rate so high that it will ultimately exceed the carrying capacity of the planet.

    Of course, the term ''carrying capacity'' is subject to ideological abuse. Estimates of the Earth’s carrying capacity range from less than 1 billion people, which seems ridiculous in light of the fact that it currently carries 7 billion and has carried more than 1 billion since 1800, all the way to 1 trillion, which seems just as far-fetched. Reportedly, two-thirds of estimates fall in the 4 billion to 16 billion range, with a median of 10 billion.

    A counter-trend is also present. Within the overall population growth, the European populations are shrinking fast, so rapidly that biological and cultural extinction looms.

    Now, if your primary concern is the environment, or overall human sustainability without regard to the fate of subgroups, then white population's decline can be viewed as positive. (This flies in the face of moralistic talk about extinction, but governments and elites are indifferent to this phenomenon as long as politically incorrect out-groups are targeted.)

    In fact, this is the position of the establishment, government, and most European people. The Population Reference Bureau’s researchers last year expressed gratification that First World fertility (which means white fertility, since non-white immigrants are reproducing rapidly), and Japanese and East Asian fertility, are below the replacement level, because otherwise overall population growth would have been higher. The analysts were not concerned about the fate of these declining populations because such shrinkage pulled down overall numbers.

    Contrast this with a position opposed to European extinction. The latter view entails de facto support for increasing white fertility to at least replacement level, if not more, within the context of a still-expanding global population.

    An alternative, of course, would be to foster an asymmetric population change precisely the opposite of the establishment's: lowering the fertility among the world's ''poor'' nations while increasing fertility among the world's ''rich.''

    Since this is politically incorrect on both racial and Marxist grounds, it is unlikely to win favor within any dominant institutional structures.


    Growth In World Population

    The Population Reference Bureau (PRB) is a Washington-based private organization founded in 1929 to provide population data to policymakers, bureaucrats, journalists, academics, and interested laymen. It analyzes all demographic data and research to present up-to-date population information in easily understood formats.

    According to the PRB, it took all of human history for world population to reach the 1 billion mark in 1800. Growth in increments of 1 billion people since then has been as follows:

    1800: 1 billion

    1930: 2 billion

    1974: 4 billion

    2011: 7 billion




    Currently, the world is in the midst of its largest population growth in history, at the current pace.

    We are presently in a critical period in which most populations living on the Earth have recently decreased their mortality rates, but only those that did so much earlier have learned to decrease their fertility rates. Virtually all population growth today is in the Third World, or among massive immigrant populations imported into formerly white countries.



    Dhaka, Bangladesh: ''Staying the night in the hotel room from which this photo is taken doesn't give you sleep. Instead it teaches you what cacophony really means: it means hearing any possible human sound you can think of, all at the same time. You'll hear what you think of — and you don’t stop thinking. Actual sounds — including (in the middle of the night) marriage parties, loud riots, sirens, drums, market screams, passengers and rickshaw drivers, buses, claxoning, and who knows what kind of anguish — all combine into a terrible not-yet-known rhythm.'' — Ahron de Leeuw


    Sub-Replacement Fertility

    As noted, the worldwide growth has been less than it otherwise would have been, thanks to sub-replacement birth rates in Europe, North America, Australia, New Zealand, China, Japan, Taiwan and Korea. The nations of the First World, by failing to reproduce, are vanishing.

    Huge families are still the norm in the Third World, as well as among non-whites imported into First World countries to replace the native inhabitants. Therefore, many African and South Asian populations continue to expand at a rapid rate. Their death rates have been slashed by foreign aid, housing, medical care, transfer payments, and other Western generosity, while their fertility rates remain as high as always.

    Replacement fertility — where each generation exactly replaces the one before it (i.e., equilibrium, or zero population growth) — is currently 2.1 children per couple in the First World and 2.4 in poorer countries.

    Because some men and women in each generation do not reproduce, couples who do so must give birth to a few more than 2.1 children to sustain the overall population. Actual birth rates are currently below the replacement level (signifying population implosion) — despite factoring in miscegenation, which is now substantial, and the higher birth rates that are attributable to immigrants.

    Key is ever-changing dynamism, motion, and flux. Races can expand and contract rapidly, both absolutely and relative to other races. They can grow, shrink, collapse, and become extinct.

    As with any endangered species or subspecies, white fertility must return to above replacement level as soon as possible — an admittedly arduous task. A race characterized by sub-replacement fertility does not have a future. It will suffer a tragic loss of population, culminating in race suicide or extinction.

    Whites must see the dawn of a new demographic spring, have more children, more life, more resources. Unless this is done, they will cease to exist.
    http://www.counter-currents.com/2012...on-in-context/

  2. #2
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Last Online
    Monday, August 13th, 2012 @ 11:07 PM
    Status
    Brief Absence
    Ethnicity
    Anglo-American
    Ancestry
    UK/NL/Bavaria
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    Ohio Ohio
    Gender
    Age
    38
    Family
    Single adult
    Politics
    None/Unimportant
    Religion
    Agnostic
    Posts
    180
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    I'm convinced it's actually mobility that causes all this. If every single mode of transportation vanished overnight the population would be back down to 1000 A.D. levels within 5-10 years.

    Also- Like he stated in the article if you wish to add more to the population then you need 3+ children with each partner....obviously when you and your significant other pass away with 1 child. You'll just leave 1 after losing 2.

    This is true as well and I'm glad he used proper wording in the article.
    Quote Originally Posted by article
    despite factoring in miscegenation, which is now substantial, and the higher birth rates that are attributable to immigrants.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Sigyn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Last Online
    Friday, August 24th, 2012 @ 05:34 PM
    Ethnicity
    Swedish
    Country
    Sweden Sweden
    Gender
    Family
    Single adult
    Politics
    Nationalist
    Posts
    550
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    7
    Thanked in
    5 Posts
    This article does point out something important - the only people who care about overpopulation, and make the effort to cut down their birthrates, are precisely the ones who aren't overpopulating the planet in the first place.

    I basically agree with what the article says. We should get up our birthrate to a replacement level at least, and then stop sending aid to the Third World. Their massive birthrate will go down by itself, if they're just left alone without any outside help.

  4. #4
    Whamen Respekter
    „Friend of Germanics”
    Skadi Funding Member
    Žoreišar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Online
    2 Hours Ago @ 03:29 AM
    Ethnicity
    Scandinavian
    Ancestry
    East Norwegian + distant Finnish
    Subrace
    Nordid + reduced CM
    Y-DNA
    I1a1
    Country
    Norway Norway
    Location
    Sweden
    Gender
    Age
    30
    Occupation
    Traditional Craftsman
    Politics
    Family, Nation & Nature
    Religion
    Heathen Worldview
    Posts
    2,642
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,693
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,687
    Thanked in
    846 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Slivers View Post
    I'm convinced it's actually mobility that causes all this.
    That certainly is a major factor, but also mechanization of food production and centralization of living space are also contributing greatly in driving up the population limits. None of this can [currently] be achieved without fossil fuel, though, which is what we can trace the global population explosion back to.

    Quote Originally Posted by Sigyn View Post
    [...] stop sending aid to the Third World. Their massive birthrate will go down by itself, if they're just left alone without any outside help.
    That may cover most of Africa and a few other countries, but we would still be left with China and India, the two leading contributors to global overpopulation, which fertility rates' are largely (if not completely?) independent on Western foreign aid.
    A nation is an organic thing, historically defined.
    A wave of passionate energy which unites past, present and future generations

Similar Threads

  1. Overpopulation & Hyperimmigration
    By Nachtengel in forum Immigration & Multiculturalism
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Monday, October 2nd, 2017, 12:46 PM
  2. Replies: 4
    Last Post: Friday, February 10th, 2012, 02:10 AM
  3. Replies: 18
    Last Post: Saturday, November 12th, 2011, 06:08 PM
  4. Replies: 4
    Last Post: Thursday, December 10th, 2009, 05:44 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •