Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Ontario Liberal Tax Credit for 'foreign Workers' Slammed

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Last Online
    Thursday, May 10th, 2012 @ 12:35 AM
    Ethnicity
    Anglo-Canadian
    Ancestry
    German
    Country
    Canada Canada
    Gender
    Posts
    1,051
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2
    Thanked in
    2 Posts

    Ontario Liberal Tax Credit for 'foreign Workers' Slammed

    Seriously Dalton, you're already going to lose the election...

    An Ontario Liberal pledge to provide a tax credit to businesses of up to $10,000 for hiring new immigrants to their first jobs is coming under fire by the province's Progressive Conservatives for favouring "foreign workers."

    The Tories have been quick to criticize the tax credit pledge which was officially unveiled Monday along with the rest of the Liberal campaign platform just over a month before the Oct. 6 election.

    With just a day to go until the official election campaign begins, Hudak slammed the new promise aimed at helping skilled immigrants as an "affirmative action" program.

    "Basically Dalton McGuinty wants to pay companies $10,000 to hire foreign workers while we have half a million people in Ontario today who are looking for jobs," he said Tuesday at a campaign event at the home of a Scarborough family.

    "He is going to pay companies $10,000 to hire anybody but you. I think that's wrong and it shows a premier who is just out of touch."
    http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ontari...igrant546.html

  2. #2
    Datter av Norge
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member

    Ælfrun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Last Online
    @
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    Norwegian-Canadian
    Gender
    Posts
    1,054
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    6
    Thanked in
    6 Posts
    "The fact is that we live in a very diverse province and that [for] government, there is a responsibility to ensure that opportunities exist for everyone," she said.

    Man man man, well at least the NDP does not want to put immigrants before Canadians. She has a point when she said that jobs need to be for everyone. The way it is now, the immigrants are coming and taking most of our jobs!

    We do not need to waste anymore of our tax money on them. it seems like the government hands them cheques as soon as the get off of the boat here.
    All things must come to the soul from it's roots, from where it is planted. The that is beside the running water is fresher, and gives more fruit.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Loyalist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Last Online
    Saturday, August 4th, 2018 @ 03:49 PM
    Ethnicity
    Anglo-Canadian
    Ancestry
    British Isles
    Subrace
    Keltic-Nordid/Atlantid
    Country
    Dominion of Canada Dominion of Canada
    Gender
    Age
    29
    Family
    Married
    Politics
    Traditionalist
    Religion
    Christian
    Posts
    1,165
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8
    Thanked in
    8 Posts
    The Liberal Party uses the same tactics pioneered by the Democrats in the US when the Irish started flooding in: pander to immigrants and create a whole pool of future Liberal voters. The NDP are communist trash, pure and simple, but do tend to be the party of the white working class, which, as Ælfrun mentioned, does not take kindly to foreigners turning up and taking our jobs. The Conservatives/PCs tend to be the best of the worst, but federally and provincially, do nothing to stop the flood. We need a BNP-style alternative in Canada, something which not even our colonial counterparts in Australia and New Zealand lack.

  4. #4
    Senior Member OnePercent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Last Online
    Monday, August 13th, 2012 @ 07:01 AM
    Ethnicity
    Germanic-American
    Ancestry
    Swiss/Irish
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Country
    Vinland Vinland
    State
    Arizona Arizona
    Location
    Valley of the Sun
    Gender
    Age
    43
    Occupation
    Tech Support
    Politics
    Independent
    Religion
    Asatru
    Posts
    471
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post
    WTF? I guess if you are Canadian this is proof that your government cares a whole lot more about immigrants than it does about you. Not only will this law prevent citizens from getting jobs, citizens are going to be paying the taxes that these businesses are not. Basically, the Canadian taxpayer will be paying an immigrant to take a job away from him. You know the world has gone insane when you start seeing things like this become reality.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Last Online
    Thursday, May 10th, 2012 @ 12:35 AM
    Ethnicity
    Anglo-Canadian
    Ancestry
    German
    Country
    Canada Canada
    Gender
    Posts
    1,051
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2
    Thanked in
    2 Posts
    We have, and it didn't work out all that well. There have been other true right-wing parties such as the SoCreds, Confederation of Regions Party, Reform Party, Christian Heritage Party. The Reform Party of course evolved into the current Conservative Party, and in so doing has become more moderate in order to achieve a broader base of support. Provincially there aren't that many conservative alternatives; it's either the Family Coalition Party or the Libertarian Party, if you consider the latter to be "conservative" (I don't). Oh, and there's the Freedom Party, which has some sort of connection I believe to the pro-Zionist wackjobs at freedominion.

    Quote Originally Posted by Loyalist View Post
    The Liberal Party uses the same tactics pioneered by the Democrats in the US when the Irish started flooding in: pander to immigrants and create a whole pool of future Liberal voters. The NDP are communist trash, pure and simple, but do tend to be the party of the white working class, which, as Ælfrun mentioned, does not take kindly to foreigners turning up and taking our jobs. The Conservatives/PCs tend to be the best of the worst, but federally and provincially, do nothing to stop the flood. We need a BNP-style alternative in Canada, something which not even our colonial counterparts in Australia and New Zealand lack.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Loyalist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Last Online
    Saturday, August 4th, 2018 @ 03:49 PM
    Ethnicity
    Anglo-Canadian
    Ancestry
    British Isles
    Subrace
    Keltic-Nordid/Atlantid
    Country
    Dominion of Canada Dominion of Canada
    Gender
    Age
    29
    Family
    Married
    Politics
    Traditionalist
    Religion
    Christian
    Posts
    1,165
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8
    Thanked in
    8 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Gardisten View Post
    We have, and it didn't work out all that well. There have been other true right-wing parties such as the SoCreds, Confederation of Regions Party, Reform Party, Christian Heritage Party. The Reform Party of course evolved into the current Conservative Party, and in so doing has become more moderate in order to achieve a broader base of support. Provincially there aren't that many conservative alternatives; it's either the Family Coalition Party or the Libertarian Party, if you consider the latter to be "conservative" (I don't). Oh, and there's the Freedom Party, which has some sort of connection I believe to the pro-Zionist wackjobs at freedominion.
    The Reform Party was as good as it gets, but being our "Tea Party" it never had any hope of success outside of the West. Reform figures have been a positive influence on the Conservatives, but their voices have been drowned out by the establishment to appeal to the widest possible portion of the electorate. As for the Christian Heritage Party, I have had a good deal of contact with them, given that their core supporters are the Dutch Reformed Christians dotted around the Niagara region. While socially conservative, the party strongly emphasizes Judeo-Christianity, blind support for Israel, etc. The Family Coalition Party is the same. I do not care for Libertarians. None of the aforementioned really ever came out against immigration or multiculturalism anyway; it is simply too taboo in an environment of state-enforced political correctness.

  7. #7
    Datter av Norge
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member

    Ælfrun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Last Online
    @
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    Norwegian-Canadian
    Gender
    Posts
    1,054
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    6
    Thanked in
    6 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by OnePercent View Post
    WTF? Basically, the Canadian taxpayer will be paying an immigrant to take a job away from him. You know the world has gone insane when you start seeing things like this become reality.
    Yes, that is basically it Sucks to be Canadian "The land of the free"
    All things must come to the soul from it's roots, from where it is planted. The that is beside the running water is fresher, and gives more fruit.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Last Online
    Thursday, May 10th, 2012 @ 12:35 AM
    Ethnicity
    Anglo-Canadian
    Ancestry
    German
    Country
    Canada Canada
    Gender
    Posts
    1,051
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2
    Thanked in
    2 Posts
    I'm not sure CHP's "support" for Israel constitutes a love of Jews, rather has to do with biblical prophecy etc. A Jew in the end is a non-believer, and therefore a...

    Anyway, in terms of CHP's policy on immigration and multiculturalism, no it's not ideal, but at the same time I think one needs to read behind the lines. Yes, they are open to anyone from almost anywhere coming here, but when they say "protect those aspects of our culture that have made us one of the most desirable places on earth to live"--what does that really mean? To me it says white European heritage, English Law, etc.

    I believe they are the only party that openly expresses their opposition to Islam in their platform:

    Immigration – Citizenship and Loyalty

    Canada has always been a land of hope and opportunity for people from around the world precisely because of our Judeo-Christian heritage which ensures everyone is treated equally before the law.

    Adherence to the rule of law must be protected or Canada risks becoming like other countries, which due to inadequately developed immigration laws, are now dealing with strident cultural groups which insist that their new host country accept the tenets of the country they have left behind as the means by which to establish cultural norms and settle disputes and conflicts.

    In this area, Sharia law with its demands for cultural and legal accommodation in places such as the UK, the Netherlands, and other Western nations, must receive special attention. Sharia law, which endorses such things as the denial of equal rights for women under the law, female genital mutilation, honour killings, polygamy, violence against homosexuals, jihad, dhimmitude and the death of infidels will be strenuously opposed under a CHP immigration programme.

    Such demands are a violation of the principle of loyalty to the new country and are far in excess of our common understanding of multiculturalism. The CHP rejects cultural relativism, and asserts that not all cultures are equal or equally good. Canada, as part of the British Commonwealth, owes its distinct cultural heritage to the Judeo-Christian worldview and norms. Our laws, customs, and freedoms can be traced directly to this heritage. Thus, Canadian immigration will balance respect and appreciation for the diversity of people of different ethnic backgrounds with respect for Canada’s Christian heritage, while not diminishing the latter. Whatever the country of origin, we must build a primary sense of being “Canadian” and forcefully reject any attempt contrary to this vision.

    This means that new immigrants must acknowledge and respect that Canada’s cultural heritage is rooted in a Judeo-Christian worldview which is the foundation of our national identity and laws. The decision to choose to live in Canada must be accompanied by patriotism and loyalty to Canada and our democratic values and morals. Previously held traditions and legal systems incompatible with Canada’s culture and law must be abandoned.

    The very core of the Canadian citizenship oath is the declaration of loyalty to the Queen of Canada, and the pledge to “faithfully observe the laws of Canada and fulfil my duties as a Canadian citizen.” Therefore, to enjoy the privilege of living in Canada, immigrants—although proud of their own cultural heritage—must pledge their allegiance to the new land which they have chosen to call their home.

    Therefore, as a prerequisite to entry into Canada, immigrants, as part of their application process, must sign a formally binding pledge whereby they:

    1. Agree to abide by Canadian law.
    2. Agree to forego or abandon practices and traditions that are contrary to Canadian law and tradition such as:
    1. Sharia Law and/or Islamic Culture – which includes but is not limited to “honour” killings, polygamy, and the wearing of the burqa or niqab face covering in public
    2. Gang Violence
    3. Terrorism – which includes promoting and supporting subversive terrorist groups (the most numerous are those involving Muslim extremists, but there are others such as Tamil and Sikh organizations) in their country of origin and worldwide

    All such practices that constitute a violation of the signed pledge will be considered serious enough to warrant deportation back to the country of origin.

    Note: This is not to say that refugees and immigrants cannot be involved in peaceful efforts, which are not in contravention of Canadian law, to draw attention to the plight of their former countrymen in order to help bring about change.

    Immigrants who are admitted will be expected to adopt Canada’s cultural norms, to educate their children to be proud of their new country and make a contribution to its betterment. The CHP will ensure that entry into Canada is only granted to those wishing to truly integrate into Canadian society.

    Immigration — Economy

    CHP Canada acknowledges that as a nation, we have a rich history of immigration, and we will continue to welcome immigrants to our shores. The Canadian economy cannot grow successfully without the skilled labour necessary to do so and carefully selected immigrants with skills that are in short supply can help meet temporary labour needs.

    We therefore support Canada’s immigration point system which ensures that economic migrants add to the national skill set.

    At the same time, this aspect of Canadian immigration policy is amongst the many that are fraught with problems. For instance, under our current immigration programme a mere 17% of the principle applicants are selected through the points system…the remainder are relatives, humanitarian and refugee cases who are not required to meet any economic selection criteria. Additionally, there is no monitoring of the correlation between the job skills presented by potential immigrants and those demanded by labour market forces. These represent serious deficiencies in Canada’s immigration policy and are contributing factors to the many immigrants who have not been able to find satisfactory employment.

    The CHP will therefore closely monitor labour market needs and match those needs with immigration applicants. This will help the new immigrant to readily establish themselves as contributing members of Canadian society, and prevent a drain on the social services for immigrants who cannot find employment.

    Another aspect of Canadian immigration policy which needs to be re-evaluated is the use of immigration to try to reduce the ever increasing unfunded liabilities created by the growing numbers of those entitled to collect Canada’s CPP and OAS. Immigration has been touted as the necessary offset to the growing burden of retiring workers, but research from the Fraser Institute shows that this is unachievable and unsustainable.

    Often new immigrants are middle-aged and will be retiring themselves in a short number of years. CHP Canada would place greater long-term emphasis on strengthening the family, and increasing the national birth rate, coupled with short-term immigration of skilled and qualified immigrants.
    Immigration — Terrorism and Screening

    Whereas;

    * Canada currently identifies over 50 terrorist organisations active in Canada;
    * Terrorism is a global threat and a threat to Canada’s national security;
    * Canada is currently at war with an enemy that espouses a particularly dangerous and pernicious ideology, radical Islam, which seeks the subjugation of the entire world to its ideology;
    * Canada has the world’s highest immigration rate, between 1990 and 2009 our population increased by 3.9 million. In the nine years between 1996 and 2005 well over 200,000 of those immigrants came to Canada from Muslim countries with high numbers of radical Islamists. These immigrants have received insufficient screening simply because the sheer size of the infrastructure required to screen such high numbers of immigrants does not exist in our Department of Immigration. Today, very few immigrants are even interviewed by a Canadian visa officer. The sheer weight of numbers means the vast majority of applicants are processed on paper only. With these kinds of numbers arriving within our borders there is also insufficient time to integrate these newcomers into the broader fabric of Canadian society.

    Therefore, CHP Canada will immediately overhaul Canada’s current unsustainable policy of mass immigration to:

    * Recognize that immigration is being used as a form of jihad designed to undermine Canada’s Judeo-Christian culture and law to replace it with Sharia law; CHP Canada would immediately implement a moratorium on immigration from any Muslim nation.
    * Deny immigration to any person who holds an ideology known to pose a threat to Canadians and Canadian society.
    * Increase the resources available for screening and reduce the levels of immigration and refugee claims to levels which can be adequately screened for security and criminal risks.
    * Increase the use of detention for individuals whose identity is questionable, who pose a potential
    * security threat, and those who have been ordered to leave;
    * Continue to use the immigration security certificate which is a useful instrument for detaining and removing foreign terrorists;
    * Track, stop, arrest, and if needed, deport individuals engaged in fundraising for the purpose of aiding and abetting terrorism.

    To sum up, the Canadian refugee and immigration system is inadequate to secure the nation from the threats posed by terrorism. The above steps are a beginning; CHP Canada will work on a comprehensive and complete review and overhaul of Canada’s current systems for the purpose of making Canada more secure from the threat of terrorism.

    Immigration — Population

    Canada’s current birthrate of 1.6 children per female is below the 2.1 minimum needed to maintain viability as a nation. Governments have only lately begun to pay attention to the disastrous implications of this trend. In the past we have lived under the false security that any shortfall could be made up by increased immigration. It cannot.

    Furthermore, in our secular quest for securing rights over responsibilities we have permitted the loss, since 1969, of over 3.3 million citizens through abortion. CHP Canada has championed a reversal of this trend by strengthening the family and advocating ‘Adoption over Abortion’ and has proposed practical solutions to this tragedy.

    Studies conducted by the C.D. Howe Institute and the Fraser Institute confirm that there are greater financial, economic and social benefits to be gained by shifting the priority in population management away from immigration and toward domestic growth.

    Immigration — Refugees

    The foundation of a just refugee policy must reflect the core of our nation’s Judeo-Christian heritage; love for one’s neighbour, and hospitality and compassion for victims of oppression, persecution and natural disasters.

    For humanitarian and compassionate reasons Canada does not hold refugees to the same standards that would normally apply to admitting new immigrants. We agree with this position with the exception that a CHP government would require a refugee to take an oath of loyalty. Many refugees are unskilled and need extensive training in order to cope and adapt to our culture and find their place in Canada’s economy. They do however fill an ongoing need for a minimum wage labour pool. The ability to raise their standard of living will improve as refugees acquire language, education, and job related skills.

    To assure that help for refugees is channelled properly and their needs are best met, CHP remains a strong advocate of involving faith based groups in a sponsorship and training program.

    In order to protect the process for legitimate refugees seeking refuge in Canada, we would track, stop, arrest, and if needed, deport individuals engaged in human smuggling.

    Immigration — Multiculturalism

    The CHP welcomes and respects the cultural enhancements brought to Canada by people from every corner of the globe. We have a mosaic that has enriched Canada immensely in the form of:

    * The arts, crafts, music, theatre, sports, and dance
    * Cuisine
    * Specialised labour skills
    * Science, technology and medicine

    However, it is important that Canada protect those aspects of our culture that have made us one of the most desirable places on earth to live.


    Quote Originally Posted by Loyalist View Post
    As for the Christian Heritage Party, I have had a good deal of contact with them, given that their core supporters are the Dutch Reformed Christians dotted around the Niagara region. While socially conservative, the party strongly emphasizes Judeo-Christianity, blind support for Israel, etc. The Family Coalition Party is the same. I do not care for Libertarians. None of the aforementioned really ever came out against immigration or multiculturalism anyway; it is simply too taboo in an environment of state-enforced political correctness.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 5
    Last Post: Wednesday, November 23rd, 2011, 12:13 AM
  2. Replies: 1
    Last Post: Sunday, September 4th, 2011, 07:39 PM
  3. Nearly One-Sixth of All American Workers Are Foreign-Born
    By Nachtengel in forum The United States
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Thursday, December 10th, 2009, 06:35 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •