Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: Pope Benedict: Jewish People Not Guilty

  1. #11
    New Member

    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Last Online
    Tuesday, May 1st, 2012 @ 09:28 AM
    Teutonic Order Teutonic Order
    Roman Catholic
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Ediruc View Post
    It publicly humiliates itself time and time again
    Indeed and it drawing people away from the Church.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ediruc View Post
    ..and just shows what kind of nutcases and morons are running the show. I would really like to know who over there are the real brains behind the operation.
    Freemasonic infiltration of the Vatican.

    -Ecclesia Militans

  2. #12
    Senior Member
    Bearkinder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Last Online
    Wednesday, August 22nd, 2012 @ 06:21 AM
    United States United States
    Single adult
    Right-wing conspirator
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    Thanked in
    6 Posts
    Hmm, since they are supposed to be Christians (the Catholics), let's see what their book says about it:

    First, the Jews wanted to kill him for what they saw as blasphemy--
    Luke 22:70 Then they all said, “Are You then the Son of God?”

    So He said to them, “You rightly say that I am.”

    71 And they said, “What further testimony do we need? For we have heard it ourselves from His own mouth.”

    (Note how the jews call for his death just as muslims call for the death of people who mock mohammed).

    LET'S SEE WHO REALLY KILLED HIM (emphasis and comments mine):

    Luke 23:23 Then the whole multitude of them arose and led Him to Pilate. 2 And they began to accuse Him, saying, “We found this fellow perverting the[k] nation, and forbidding to pay taxes to Caesar, saying that He Himself is Christ, a King.” (Ahh yes, the jews LIED)

    3 Then Pilate asked Him, saying, “Are You the King of the Jews?”

    He answered him and said, “It is as you say.”

    4 So Pilate said to the chief priests and the crowd, “I find no fault in this Man.”

    5 But they were the more fierce, saying, “He stirs up the people, teaching throughout all Judea, beginning from Galilee to this place.” (In other words, he teaches something not in line with our bullshit)

    6 When Pilate heard of Galilee,[l] he asked if the Man were a Galilean. 7 And as soon as he knew that He belonged to Herod’s jurisdiction, he sent Him to Herod, who was also in Jerusalem at that time. 8 Now when Herod saw Jesus, he was exceedingly glad; for he had desired for a long time to see Him, because he had heard many things about Him, and he hoped to see some miracle done by Him. 9 Then he questioned Him with many words, but He answered him nothing. 10 And the chief priests and scribes stood and vehemently accused Him. 11 Then Herod, with his men of war, treated Him with contempt and mocked Him, arrayed Him in a gorgeous robe, and sent Him back to Pilate. 12 That very day Pilate and Herod became friends with each other, for previously they had been at enmity with each other.

    13 Then Pilate, when he had called together the chief priests, the rulers, and the people, 14 said to them, “You have brought this Man to me, as one who misleads the people. And indeed, having examined Him in your presence, I have found no fault in this Man concerning those things of which you accuse Him; 15 no, neither did Herod, for I sent you back to him;[m] and indeed nothing deserving of death has been done by Him. 16 I will therefore chastise Him and release Him” 17 (for it was necessary for him to release one to them at the feast).[n]

    18 And they all cried out at once, saying, “Away with this Man, and release to us Barabbas”— 19 who had been thrown into prison for a certain rebellion made in the city, and for murder. (Ahh, the jews. Doesn't matter if he's guilty. Disagreeing with us is enough for us to kill him)

    20 Pilate, therefore, wishing to release Jesus, again called out to them. 21 But they shouted, saying, “Crucify Him, crucify Him!”

    22 Then he said to them the third time, “Why, what evil has He done? I have found no reason for death in Him. I will therefore chastise Him and let Him go.”

    23 But they were insistent, demanding with loud voices that He be crucified. And the voices of these men and of the chief priests prevailed.[o] 24 So Pilate gave sentence that it should be as they requested. 25 And he released to them[p] the one they requested, who for rebellion and murder had been thrown into prison; but he delivered Jesus to their will.

    So, by the catholic's own holy book, it clearly says the JEWS are responsible. All of them. Neither Roman governor found anything to execute him over. But to the jew mind, disagreeing with what they want is worthy of death.

    Once again, though, Christianity bows to lick the feet of the jew. And they wonder why people are leaving the church in droves.

  3. #13
    Senior Member
    velvet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last Online
    Sunday, March 8th, 2020 @ 03:10 AM
    Northern Germany
    Germany Germany
    North Rhine-Westphalia North Rhine-Westphalia
    Zodiac Sign
    Pestilent Supremacy
    Blut und Boden
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    Thanked in
    652 Posts
    Wasnt Herod the king that sought to kill all newborn boys because of the prophecy about the messiah?


    Thus, the Gospel of Mark in the Sinai Bible carries the "first" story of Jesus Christ in history, one completely different to what is in modern Bibles. It starts with Jesus "at about the age of thirty" (Mark 1:9), and doesn't know of Mary, a virgin birth or mass murders of baby boys by Herod. Words describing Jesus Christ as "the son of God" do not appear in the opening narrative as they do in today's editions (Mark 1:1), and the modern-day family tree tracing a "messianic bloodline" back to King David is non-existent in all ancient Bibles (Sinaiticus, Alexandrinus, Syriacus etc), as are the now-called "messianic prophecies" (51 in total).

    The Sinai Bible carries a conflicting version of events surrounding the "raising of Lazarus", and reveals an extraordinary omission that later became the central doctrine of the Christian faith: the resurrection appearances of Jesus Christ and his ascension into Heaven. No supernatural appearance of a resurrected Jesus Christ is recorded in any ancient Gospels of Mark, but a description of over 500 words now appears in modern Bibles (Mark 16:9-20).


    Modern-day versions of the Gospel of Luke have a staggering 10,000 more words than the same Gospel in the Sinai Bible. Six of those words say of Jesus "and was carried up into heaven", but this narrative does not appear in any of the oldest Gospels of Luke available today ("Three Early Doctrinal Modifications of the Text of the Gospels", F. C. Conybeare, The Hibbert Journal, London, vol. 1, no. 1, Oct 1902, pp. 96-113). Ancient versions do not verify modern-day accounts of an ascension of Jesus Christ, and this falsification clearly indicates an intention to deceive.

    Today, the Gospel of Luke is the longest of the canonical Gospels because it now includes "The Great Insertion", an extraordinary 15th-century addition totaling around 8,500 words (Luke 9:51-18:14). The insertion of these forgeries into that Gospel bewilders modern Christian analysts, and of them the Church said:

    "The character of these passages makes it dangerous to draw inferences"

    (Catholic Encyclopedia, Pecci ed., vol. ii, p. 407).

    Just as remarkable, the oldest Gospels of Luke omit all verses from 6:45 to 8:26, known in priesthood circles as "The Great Omission", a total of 1,547 words. In today's versions, that hole has been "plugged up" with passages plagiarized from other Gospels. Dr Tischendorf found that three paragraphs in newer versions of the Gospel of Luke's version of the Last Supper appeared in the 15th century, but the Church still passes its Gospels off as the unadulterated "word of God" ("Are Our Gospels Genuine or Not?", op. cit.)

    It may be due to this that the Church withdraws the accusation, because it's most likely made up as well. As the rest of the story anyway. Historicity has long been disproven, but you can see "docu" after "docu" trying to give it historical validity.

    If the Vatican archieves ever are opened to historical research and the finds arent censored, their doctrine will fall apart like a card house.
    Ein Leben ist nichts, deine Sprosse sind alles
    Aller Sturm nimmt nichts, weil dein Wurzelgriff zu stark ist
    und endet meine Frist, weiss ich dass du noch da bist
    Gefürchtet von der Zeit, mein Baum, mein Stamm in Ewigkeit

    my signature

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Pope Blesses U.S. Bishops' Persecution of LGBT People
    By TheStormer in forum Articles & Current Affairs
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Wednesday, March 14th, 2012, 07:39 AM
  2. Pope Benedict Prefers Medieval Music for Mass!
    By Taras Bulba in forum Catholicism
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: Monday, November 10th, 2008, 05:23 AM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: Wednesday, September 20th, 2006, 07:26 AM
  4. Pope Benedict XVI on Europe
    By Taras Bulba in forum Catholicism
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: Monday, September 18th, 2006, 07:58 PM
  5. Replies: 3
    Last Post: Tuesday, April 19th, 2005, 06:26 PM


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts