Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Antisemitic 'Holocaust Denier' in Charge of WikiLeaks Russian Distribution

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Ediruc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Last Online
    Tuesday, June 1st, 2021 @ 06:43 PM
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    German-American
    Ancestry
    German-American and proud
    Subrace
    Alpinid-Nordid
    Country
    United States United States
    Gender
    Posts
    1,302
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    47
    Thanked in
    34 Posts

    Antisemitic 'Holocaust Denier' in Charge of WikiLeaks Russian Distribution

    http://www.thejc.com/news/world-news...n-distribution

    An antisemitic writer who has been described by anti-Fascist campaigners as a Holocaust denier is believed to be working as a Russian distributor for WikiLeaks.

    Israel Shamir, a Swedish resident who also uses the names Jöran Jermas and Adam Ermash, has been identified as the WikiLeaks staff member responsible for choosing which leaked documents are distributed in Russia.

    It is also claimed that his journalist son Johannes Wahlström, known to share some of Mr Shamir’s views and previously criticised for faking reports, works for WikiLeaks in Scandinavia.
    I really have no opinion on WikiLeaks.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Schattenjäger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Last Online
    Tuesday, November 22nd, 2011 @ 07:11 PM
    Ethnicity
    German
    Ancestry
    Schlesien
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Country
    Germany Germany
    State
    Silesia Silesia
    Location
    rural areas (for now)
    Gender
    Family
    Youth
    Occupation
    would-be historian
    Posts
    487
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    10
    Thanked in
    10 Posts
    How can you not have an opinion on Wikileaks, after they released info on thousands of BNP members, which enabled their persecution?

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    RoyBatty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Last Online
    2 Weeks Ago @ 03:22 PM
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    Paleface
    Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    Gender
    Occupation
    Arbeit Macht Frei
    Politics
    Rightwing / Socialist
    Posts
    2,442
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    31
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    60
    Thanked in
    49 Posts
    The article is pretty amusing. Let's look at a few aspects of it:

    #1 - JC = Jewish Chronicle, the article writer (Jennifer Lipman) is obviously Jewish so it's obviously not an impartial news source.

    #2 - Israel Shamir is accused of being an "anti-semite" but firstly, he himself is a Jew and secondly, the Semite group contains Jews, Arabs, other Middle Eastern people's etc. It's a meaningless accusation.

    #3 - Yulia Latynina, Shamir's accuser is as mad as a bat. According to her Putin recruited Bush (Dubya), Schroeder, Chirac, Berlusconi etc to "serve his objectives".... - Whatever

    To get a better idea of what Yulia is all about, perhaps a picture with her friends and associates could help clear things up.



    To cut a long story short, this woman is a waste of space and nutcase.

    #4 - The claim of how Shamir can supposedly control what Wikileaks documents "can be leaked and distributed in Russia" makes no sense whatsoever. Russia is a relatively free country, information is widely available via the Internet, printed media, TV etc. One can hardly "control" locally available information there. Some of the major TV channels are state controlled and obviously pander to the Kremlin but that's no different to say for example the UK's BBC.

    Shamir is then criticised further because he claimed that "Zionists controlled UK media and politics" etc etc. Since it's an accurate statement of fact I don't see the problem there either????


    As for Wikileaks, I have serious reservations about the organisation itself, its funding, its Dear Leader, its agenda etc. The kind of information they disseminate is somewhat tame, the preferred channels of distribution (the mainstream corporate media) isn't very guerrilla style, they have rather interesting ZOG Establishment friends etc etc etc. It all seems like a rather well contrived operation aimed at firstly establishing some "credentials" with the public so that it can later be used as a propaganda outlet to disseminate views and information its controllers want disseminated.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Heinrich Harrer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Last Online
    Tuesday, March 24th, 2020 @ 10:41 AM
    Ethnicity
    German
    Country
    Germany Germany
    Gender
    Religion
    none
    Posts
    785
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    156
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    22
    Thanked in
    13 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by RoyBatty View Post
    As for Wikileaks, I have serious reservations about the organisation itself, its funding, its Dear Leader, its agenda etc. The kind of information they disseminate is somewhat tame, the preferred channels of distribution (the mainstream corporate media) isn't very guerrilla style, they have rather interesting ZOG Establishment friends etc etc etc. It all seems like a rather well contrived operation aimed at firstly establishing some "credentials" with the public so that it can later be used as a propaganda outlet to disseminate views and information its controllers want disseminated.
    I've just read in the news that the maker of such acclaimed films as 'Schindlers List', 'Saving Private Ryan' and 'A Holocaust szemei' plans to make a movie about WikiLeaks:

    http://www.imdb.com/news/ni8221292/
    Steven Spielberg is reportedly working on a movie about the WikiLeaks scandal after buying the rights to a book detailing the inside workings of the whistle-blowing website and its director Julian Assange.

    The movie mogul's DreamWorks company has paid for the rights to new book WikiLeaks: Inside Julian Assange's War on Secrecy, according to Britain's The Guardian. The tome was published by Guardian Books last month.

    The book details the life of Assange, the creation of the site in 2006 and the leaks of classified documents.

    Alan Rusbridger, editor-in-chief of Guardian News & Media, says, "It's Woodward and Bernstein meets Stieg Larsson meets Jason Bourne. Plus the odd moment of sheer farce and, in Julian Assange, a compelling character who goes beyond what any Hollywood scriptwriter would dare to invent."
    Regarding your theory about wikileaks, who would be better suited than him to represent it in Hollywood? Just another little puzzle piece.

Similar Threads

  1. In Austria, A New Prison Sentence for 'Holocaust Denier' Fröhlich
    By Nachtengel in forum The German Countries
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: Saturday, October 16th, 2010, 06:03 PM
  2. Austrian University Recalls Diploma for Holocaust Gassing Denier
    By Nachtengel in forum Education & Schooling
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: Tuesday, February 9th, 2010, 04:13 PM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: Monday, August 23rd, 2004, 11:56 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •