Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 23

Thread: David Irving: Hitler and Churchill

  1. #11
    Senior Member Pictoria's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Last Online
    Thursday, July 28th, 2011 @ 12:22 PM
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    Scottish-British
    Ancestry
    Pictish
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Country
    Scotland Scotland
    Location
    Ayrshire
    Gender
    Age
    36
    Politics
    National Socialist
    Posts
    41
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Heinrich Harrer View Post
    Thanks for posting this video series.

    Of course it's banned in Germany, how surprising.

    I know how to circumvent it, but this censorship is still damn pathetic and annoying.
    Yet the Jew media has the cheek to insult China, Iran and others over their use of 'selective media channeling'!

    I have many of David Irving's books and they never fail to disappoint. My only criticism is in his occassionally over-dramatic phrasology. For example, in the Goering biography he referred to Triuph des Willens as 'chilling' - which of course it was not. In the DVD to Hitler's War he describes Hitler's 'leech treatment' (which may not even have any basis in reality) with a pure propagandist's aura.

    He IS great, but GERMAR RUDOLF is BETTER!

  2. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Last Online
    3 Hours Ago @ 06:02 PM
    Ethnicity
    Celto-Germanic
    Ancestry
    Irish, Scottish
    Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    Location
    North Ireland
    Gender
    Family
    Married
    Politics
    National Socialist
    Religion
    Ethnic Catholic
    Posts
    1,231
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,439
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,487
    Thanked in
    800 Posts

    History Never Happened, Who is David Irving?


    Who put the hit on Julius Caesar?

    November 2, 2010

    Editor’s note: Yes, the date is right, this article is 7 years old. Why then has it upset people today, and it has? Over the past few years, author and historian David Irving has slowed down a bit and moved into the shadows. At one time, the greatest WW2 researcher of all time, Irving was a pop star type celeb, first historian to ever get that far. Then he began destroying the fictional historical narratives that our dark overlords depend on so much. Watch the videos, and read my tired, nearly decade old prose. .. Gordon Duff.

    ________________________________________


    Editor’s Note Two: I had the pleasure of video taping four of Irving’s visits to Atlanta, one of them where C-Span was taping, which the AIPAC Lobby nixed the show by backing out, giving C-Span a way out of being tagged for censoring because they claim could not show just Irving’s part of the story without AIPAC’s.



    Of course they could have had a number of stand ins play the Israeli position role, but the goal was to not let Americans see what a solid lecturer that Irving was at the time. This is the same reason why VT has a corporate media blackout in the US, and is rarely publicly attacked. They do not want us to be able to respond and be heard.


    My footage is still sitting on the archive shelves waiting to be edited someday, while the David Irving story continues to be a moving one. What he has accomplished through his writing was a gift to us all, and any who have seen him lecture in person will never forget it. He is a walking billboard as to why historical truth is hated so much… Jim W. Dean ]




    Was it Osama bin Laden or the Mossad? Was it the Illuminati or the Council on Foreign Relations? Did they do it together? Where was Marc Anthony after 9/11 when we really needed him?


    A sad thing, perhaps beyond comprehension, is that we know more about Julius Caesar than we know about or own recent history. A few days ago someone sent me a link to a video by David Irving, the British author who professionally debunks everything.


    Irving, famous of late for taking on the holocaust, is the “go to guy” on World War II and Germany in particular. His research is, hands down, the best out there and he loves humiliating others for being duped by writing academic garbage based on secondary sources, too often proven, not just unreliable, but utter fiction.


    Irving takes on a lot of targets but his best debunking is Winston Churchill. Sitting through his book tour lecture from the 1980s, a grainy video, was surprisingly painless. With the rise of cable television, the new networks have made a cottage industry out of debunking our phony history, shows on military secrets, scandals and cover-ups run for hours each day. These are humiliating for historians who made their reputations writing “definitive” works based on what we now know to be forgeries, propaganda and disinformation.


    Irving’s case against Churchill is shocking and, worst of all, nobody has been able to debate him face to face. His sources are impeccable and his research beyond anything yet seen. This is a guy who will spend years reading letters, bank statements or travel around the world to get primary documents. Irving paints Churchill as a villain as great as Hitler, nearly as great as Stalin.


    Was World War II started by Churchill, a brilliant but immoral drunk, art forger and scoundrel who took payoffs from foreign intelligence services, banking cabals and anyone else willing to shove an envelope in his pocket?


    If so, then everything we know of World War II, of Hitler, of events of the 20th century is, not just a little bit wrong, but outrageously false.


    Most damning, to me at least, is learning that Churchill’s History of the Second World Warwas largely fabricated, ghost written by his American editors who made sure the truth never got out. Though Irving finds Churchill an easy target, it goes much further. Embarrassingly, the Goebbel’s wartime attacks on Churchill were far more fact and far less propaganda than our “history” teaches. A nasty thought, “What if Goebbels was simply telling the truth?”


    If the truth seems like outrageous propaganda, what have we allowed to happen to us? How can there be honest discussion on any subject, politics, religion or where to get decent Chinese food if all research is either “secondary source recycling” or, even worse, simply invented as we are now beginning to learn.


    Irving questions the nature of the holocaust, the gas chambers, the “soap and lampshade” stories and has made some major enemies in the process. What is particularly dangerous is his detailed analysis of Adolf Hitler as a masterful military strategist and pragmatic political leader. The immediate response is to stand up screaming, “What the hell is he talking about?”


    I can think of dozens of instances that absolutely prove Hitler was an incompetent, insane, brutal and . . . .
    Come to think of it, if I go on the internet, I can prove anything. I can even prove Hitler was Jewish. The accepted realities, our history as written in books, the history that defined Hitler, Irving implies, was as much history as today’s network news is, well, “fair and balanced.” What if every “fact” we use to refute Irving’s ideas came from Stalin?


    We know so much of what happened. I am reading the battle diaries from D-Day. I know there were landings, I know men died, but we don’t know why, only what we were told. Everything we believe is based on one known fact, that Germans are brutal and insane, a race of criminals, vicious monsters with an inbred need to destroy. 40% of Americans are of German ancestry, of course.


    It doesn’t take much research to learn that, in the 19th century, Germany became, not only powerful but the most advanced society on earth, science, philosophy, the arts, public welfare and education, Germany entered the 20th century as the leader of the world. German colonial policies, when compared to Britain, France, Spain, the Netherlands and Portugal, were typified by decency and humanitarian values. German citizens had more human rights, by a mile, than their British counterparts.


    A century later, Germany is a virtual mirror of mainstream “Midwest” America. Though politically castrated, Germany is what Americans wish their country was, in many ways at least. Germany has almost no military, almost no debt and relative freedom with one glaring exception. German’s have taken “political correctness” to a point that no American could imagine. Things heard on American television daily are crimes in Germany.


    If we aren’t willing to take the leap of faith that history demands, that Germans are monsters, then we are faced with something else. If Germans are who we know them to be, then we are a nation of liars and cowards, fools willing to follow any road, eat anything put on a plate in front of us. America could, very possibly, be a country scammed into war in Vietnam or Iraq or Afghanistan or, just maybe, into two wars with Germany.


    But again we leap to our feet, and scream. Many Americans are willing to consider that World War I was a “Vietnam” experience, phony atrocities and manipulation by a vast international conspiracy. That information has been “out there” for awhile and more and more are willing to consider it.


    However, the “sacred cow” of all time has been World War II. We aren’t talking Japan. No question, they attacked the United States. Germany, on the other hand, was that something else? We got used to lying to ourselves about the Civil War. Ask any American, we went to war to free the slaves. Problem is, the North only freed the slaves years later, when they were losing the war and only slaves in the South. The Civil War was over economics and bad government, “States Rights,” not slavery.


    How different is the truth about World War II? Should we have never gone to war with Germany and let them destroy Russia? How many Americans know that Hitler was willing to end the war in 1940 and withdraw his troops? How many Americans know that World War I could have ended in 1916 with an honorable peace but was pushed on by Balfour and Rothschild? Oh, you never heard that?


    World War II would never have happened, there would have never been communism, no Korea, no Vietnam, no Cold War, no potential for nuclear holocaust. Whose game are we playing then?


    Veterans Today

    Whose game are we playing then?

    Could it be the the jewish, globalist bankers who own and run the planet?

  3. #13
    Senior Member Ravenrune's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Last Online
    2 Weeks Ago @ 06:42 AM
    Ethnicity
    Anglo-Saxon-Celt
    Ancestry
    Irish, English, Scottish, German, French, Mi'kmaq
    Country
    Canada Canada
    Gender
    Zodiac Sign
    Scorpio
    Family
    Single adult
    Occupation
    maker of things
    Politics
    non-corruption for the people
    Religion
    Pantheism / Norse pagan / Taoism
    Posts
    536
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    76
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    587
    Thanked in
    295 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Hammish View Post
    Funny that he had not heard of the raid on Dresden until he went to Germany.

    I learned of it in an American High School in the early 70's, it wasn't hard to find information about it.

    Not to mention it was an important part of a best selling novel and movie (Slaughter House Five) from that time period
    (these below are quickly taken from Wikipedia and are just posted for the dates ... I wouldn't post anything important from there lol)

    ------------------------------------------
    ------------------------------------------

    he felt a “complete idiot” when a man from Leipzig told him about it (in 1960) and he had to confess that – even as a British historian - he'd never even heard of this raid up until then!
    "The Destruction of Dresden is a 1963 book by David Irving, "
    Slaughterhouse-Five, or The Children's Crusade: A Duty-Dance with Death (1969) is a science fiction-infused anti-war novel by Kurt Vonnegut
    On December 22, Vonnegut was captured with about 50 other American soldiers.[23] Vonnegut was taken by boxcar to a prison camp south of Dresden, in Saxony. During the journey, the Royal Air Force bombed the prisoner trains and killed about 150 men.[24] Vonnegut was sent to Dresden, the "first fancy city [he had] ever seen". He lived in a slaughterhouse when he got to the city, and worked in a factory that made malt syrup for pregnant women. Vonnegut recalled the sirens going off whenever another city was bombed. The Germans did not expect Dresden to get bombed, Vonnegut said. "There were very few air-raid shelters in town and no war industries, just cigarette factories, hospitals, clarinet factories
    ----------------------------------------

    It would appear that Irving had a book out in 1963 and Vonnegut's book was 6 years after (in which he based his figure for the estimate of the number of deaths on Irving's book ... of course wikipedia says this figure are a huge over-estimate ...sure!). So by the 1970's this information was no doubt more available due to Irving and Vonnegut's books.

  4. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Last Online
    3 Hours Ago @ 06:02 PM
    Ethnicity
    Celto-Germanic
    Ancestry
    Irish, Scottish
    Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    Location
    North Ireland
    Gender
    Family
    Married
    Politics
    National Socialist
    Religion
    Ethnic Catholic
    Posts
    1,231
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,439
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,487
    Thanked in
    800 Posts

    Churchill’s War

    Churchill’s War Vol 1 David Irving

    Chpt 9 THE GRAND ALLIANCE

    P 103

    Beaverbrook was aware of the rumours as to who was bankrolling the Bring Back Winston campaign. Upon his recent return from Miami, he had used infelicitous words about the people sabotaging rapprochement. “There are twenty thousand German Jews in England” he wrote “in the professions, pursuing research, in chemical operations, etcetera. These all work against such an accommodation.” (For what it’s worth, the Aga Khan would assure a diplomat in 1940 that Churchill had ”for years” been in the pay of the Jews and Lord Beaverbrook.)


    “The Jews have got a big position in the press here” this Press Lord rasped, in another. exasperated, ill considered letter. “One third of the circulation of the Daily Telegraph is Jewish. The Daily Mirror may be owned by Jews, the Daily Herald is owned by Jews and the News Chronicle should really be the Jew Chronicle . . . I am not sure about the Mail.” For years he continued, he had prophesied there would be no war. “But at last I am shaken. The Jews may drive us into war. I do not mean with any conscious purpose of doing so. They do not mean to do it. But unconsciously . . . their political influence is moving us in that direction.”


    The ending of the Standard contract might have been the coup de grace for Churchill. We can imagine with what bitterness he now asked The Times to advertise his beloved Chartwell for sale. The advert would appear on the second day of April, inviting offers of £20,000 (about £1 m in today’s value)


    A few days before that date, on March 28 he was saved.


    Bracken’s South African friend Sir Henry Strakosch, the Gold mining millionaire and chairman of Union Corporation Ltd., agreed to pay off Churchill’s debts. Strakosch was a Jew born in Moravia, Czechoslovakia. Chartwell was withdrawn from the market, and Churchill campaigned on.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to jagdmesser For This Useful Post:


  6. #15
    Senior Member SaxonPagan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Last Online
    1 Minute Ago @ 09:50 PM
    Ethnicity
    English
    Ancestry
    English, Anglo-Saxon
    Country
    England England
    Location
    South Coast
    Gender
    Zodiac Sign
    Aries
    Family
    Married
    Occupation
    Self Employed
    Politics
    Free Speech / Anti-EU
    Religion
    Pagan
    Posts
    5,004
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,548
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,531
    Thanked in
    1,361 Posts
    Interesting stuff, Jagd!

    However, this bit confuses me ...

    (For what it’s worth, the Aga Khan would assure a diplomat in 1940 that Churchill had ”for years” been in the pay of the Jews and Lord Beaverbrook.)
    ... because Lord Beaverbrook (the owner of the Daily Mail at that time) was pro-Mosley and there's a famous/notorious article he once published, entitled: "Hurrah for the Blackshirts!"


  7. The Following User Says Thank You to SaxonPagan For This Useful Post:


  8. #16
    Senior Member Herr Rentz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Last Online
    6 Minutes Ago @ 09:43 PM
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    German
    Ancestry
    Emmingen, Baden-Württemburg
    Subrace
    Don't know
    Country
    Germany Germany
    State
    Baden-Wuerttemberg Baden-Wuerttemberg
    Location
    US
    Gender
    Zodiac Sign
    Taurus
    Family
    Single adult
    Occupation
    Retail Sales Management
    Politics
    Nationalsozialist
    Religion
    Catholic
    Posts
    612
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    404
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    636
    Thanked in
    313 Posts
    That YouTube account was terminated so the videos are unavailable at that link.

    I am not so much interested in WWII per se, but more interested in the SS, Gestapo, and State Security of the Third Reich. Was there any in-depth coverage of the Sicherheitsdienst, Gestapo, or SS, in these videos?

    Is there another source for viewing them?
    American by birth, made of parts from Emmingen, Baden-Württemberg.

    Der Familie Rentz seit 1535 - Meine Ehre heißt Treue

    Das Leben ist zu kurz, um billiges Bier zu trinken!


  9. #17
    Senior Member SaxonPagan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Last Online
    1 Minute Ago @ 09:50 PM
    Ethnicity
    English
    Ancestry
    English, Anglo-Saxon
    Country
    England England
    Location
    South Coast
    Gender
    Zodiac Sign
    Aries
    Family
    Married
    Occupation
    Self Employed
    Politics
    Free Speech / Anti-EU
    Religion
    Pagan
    Posts
    5,004
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,548
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,531
    Thanked in
    1,361 Posts
    Was there any in-depth coverage of the Sicherheitsdienst, Gestapo, or SS, in these videos?
    To the best of my recollections (from 8 years ago) I don't think so.

    They may have got a few passing mentions but nothing more. I remember it mainly for Irving's total destruction of Winston Churchill.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to SaxonPagan For This Useful Post:


  11. #18
    Senior Member Herr Rentz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Last Online
    6 Minutes Ago @ 09:43 PM
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    German
    Ancestry
    Emmingen, Baden-Württemburg
    Subrace
    Don't know
    Country
    Germany Germany
    State
    Baden-Wuerttemberg Baden-Wuerttemberg
    Location
    US
    Gender
    Zodiac Sign
    Taurus
    Family
    Single adult
    Occupation
    Retail Sales Management
    Politics
    Nationalsozialist
    Religion
    Catholic
    Posts
    612
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    404
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    636
    Thanked in
    313 Posts
    Understood. I am more interested in the inner workings of the Third Reich dealing with security of the State rather than foreign affairs and the war.
    American by birth, made of parts from Emmingen, Baden-Württemberg.

    Der Familie Rentz seit 1535 - Meine Ehre heißt Treue

    Das Leben ist zu kurz, um billiges Bier zu trinken!


  12. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Last Online
    3 Hours Ago @ 06:02 PM
    Ethnicity
    Celto-Germanic
    Ancestry
    Irish, Scottish
    Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    Location
    North Ireland
    Gender
    Family
    Married
    Politics
    National Socialist
    Religion
    Ethnic Catholic
    Posts
    1,231
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,439
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,487
    Thanked in
    800 Posts

    Operation SEALION

    Churchill’s War


    Churchill’s War Vol 1 David Irving

    Chpt 30 THE EAGLE NEVER LANDED

    P 378 - 380



    FOR SIX WEEKS after the French collapse, Churchill would recall, the Americans treated Britain in that “rather distant and sympathetic manner” that one adopts towards an old friend dying of cancer.



    Hitler did not invade, however. He had other fish to fry. On June 20, 1940, the day when the Armistice took effect in France, his private secretary wrote: “I think it still hurts him to have to get tough with the British. He would obviously far prefer them to use their commonsense. If they only knew the Boss doesn’t want anything at all from them other than our former Colonies, they might be more approachable . . . “ This was the unfortunate truth that Mr Churchill would withhold from the British people. In fighting Hitler, Britain would quintuple her prewar debt, forfeit her world position, bring the Red Army to the Elbe, and collapse her Empire. But we now know from captured documents that despite all the sabre-rattling Hitler probably never intended to invade. Jolted by Soviet expansionism towards Romania, late in June 1940 he had reverted to his primary ambition, a German Empire in the east, trusting that the British would see reason. He refrained from inflicting real pain on them: they had rescued their army at Dunkirk; he had vetoed all air attacks on London.



    Only Hitler’s closest advisers were aware that he did not plan to invade Britain. General Hans Jeschonnek, chief of air staff, refusing to attend to lower echelons’ queries about invasion plans, explaining: “In my opinion the Führer does not have a Channel crossing in mind.” “Sea Lion,” he snapped to a staff officer, “won’t take place and I’ve no time to bother about it.” Significantly, Hitler’s high command (O.K.W.) had simultaneously issued a directive ordering its Intelligence agency to dupe Britain into expecting an invasion and, in collusion with Italy and Russia, an attack on the Middle East; the later was to provide cover for the steady eastward movement of the Eighteenth Army from France. The O.K.W. colonel who countersigned this directive had already begun mapping out a Russian campaign for Hitler.



    In the first week of July Hitler disclosed his decision to attack Russia to his chief adjutant (Schmundt) and his army’s commander-in-chief (von Brauchitsch), who in turn briefed the chief of general staff (Halder). Henceforth Hitler continued the dispositions for invasion only as a deception, codenamed Sealion. He had hornswoggled Churchill before, he believed he could do it again.



    A month later his staff issued a directive codenamed Aufbau Ost, Eastern Buildup; the O.K.W. war diary defined this on August 8 as “our order to camouflage the preparations against Russia.” By that time the army’s own Russian campaign plan, drafted by the Eighteenth Army’s chief of staff, was also ready.



    The deception would continue throughout the summer. Barges were converted into “assault craft;” stores were brought up, maps of England noisily procured, Hitler’s field commanders wondered why he vacillated; the more astute realized what he was up to. “The Führer wants the threat of invasion of Britain to persist” the German naval staff learned on August 14, “That is why the preparations, whatever the final decision, must continue.” Unhappy about the cost to the economy, the chief of naval operations suggested calling off Operation Sealion altogether – “In its place a special deception operation should be mounted to maintain the threat on the enemy.”



    A few days later Hitler expressed his frustrations to Major Vidkun Quisling. “I now find myself” he exclaimed, “forced against my will to fight this war against Britain. I find myself in the same position as Martin Luther, who had just as little desire to fight Rome, but was left with no alternative.” Two weeks after that , although Churchill’s bombers had just singed Berlin for the first time, Hitler sent his adjutant to scout a location for his headquarters against Russia.



    THIS TIME CHURCHILL was not outwitted. Thanks to his codebreakers at Bletchley, he now commanded a total, indeed Olympian , view which his subordinates were denied. Armed with immense wartime and political experience he interpreted the auguries more accurately than his soldiers. By the end of July he certainly recognized that Sealion was a bluff. Colonel Menzies, head of the secret service, believed however in the invasion: on the 29 for example he circulated a typical intercepted Luftwaffe signal reminding bomber crews not to damage certain South Coast ports.



    That seemed a bit too obvious even to the diplomats. They too, albeit slowly, grasped what Hitler was up to. Halifax referred in his diary of July 25 to evidence that Hitler was hesitating ; Sir Alec Cadogan also remarked on the “funny pause” across the Channel. “What are they doing” he mused on the 30th , “with these costly and half-hearted air-raids?” Both he and Halifax concluded by the end of July that Hitler was not going to invade. R.A. Butler, under secretary at the F.O., would brief a newspaperman on August 20 that the invasion was hooey – “There has never been,” he said, “sufficient concentrations of troops in Northern France.” Hitler's troops were going East, he said “They are going to attack Russia.”



    Churchill had deduced this too, but kept his comforting deduction to himself, because what he himself had privately termed the “invasion scare” was bringing him overwhelming support – Gallup now polled 88% backing him as prime minister, 20% more than Chamberlain at his most popular. Besides Roosevelt still had to be gulled into entering the war.



    In Grosvenor Square, Kennedy found the shift in Churchill’s stance from Cassandra to optimist, somewhat perplexing. Kennedy also fancied he heard rumbles of discontent from the munitions workers and poorer classes – they begun comparing the liberty which Churchill told them they enjoyed, with the security that Hitler gave his people.



    Churchill had a stranglehold on public opinion. The Socialists were now the dominating group in his Government, but those Englishmen with insight had begun to ask , he said “Where is all this going to end?”





    Hitler's "primary ambition, a German Empire" - just to right the great injustice of the Versailles Treaty.

  13. #20
    Anachronism "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member

    Huginn ok Muninn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ancestry
    Germany, Norway, England
    Subrace
    Nordeby
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    Texas Texas
    Gender
    Zodiac Sign
    Leo
    Family
    Single adult
    Politics
    Farther right than you.
    Posts
    3,034
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    599
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    738
    Thanked in
    350 Posts
    Hitler did not invade, however.
    Biggest mistake in the history of the world. It's astonishing to me that Hitler did not realize that he was not actually fighting the British, but the Rothschilds who controlled the British Empire like a puppet state. They controlled America as well. If only Hitler had fully understood this...
    Most people think as they are trained to think, and most people make a majority.

  14. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Huginn ok Muninn For This Useful Post:


Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. David Irving on Contemporary Views of Hitler and the Third Reich
    By Loyalist in forum Modern Age & Contemporary History
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Monday, August 15th, 2011, 08:19 PM
  2. Interview with David Irving in Norway
    By Hersir in forum Norway
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Thursday, May 28th, 2009, 12:00 AM
  3. David Irving: 'Hitler Appointed Me His Biographer'
    By BeornWulfWer in forum Articles & Current Affairs
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: Saturday, January 24th, 2009, 07:46 AM
  4. David Irving: Jews should ask themselves why they are hated
    By White_One in forum Articles & Current Affairs
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Tuesday, January 2nd, 2007, 05:57 PM
  5. Classify David Irving
    By Sigurd Volsung in forum Anthropological Taxonomy
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: Thursday, February 23rd, 2006, 02:14 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •