Jewish-Catholic Alliance: Catholics Promoting Immigration, Multiculturalism & Race Mixing
Jewish-Catholic Alliance: Catholics Promoting Third World Immigration, Multiculturalism & Race Mixing
The Big Unanswered Question
The Big Unanswered Question is why the Jewish-Catholic alliance to change our immigration laws in 1965.
Ted Kennedy & Philip Hart were both Roman Catholics, and as responsible as the Jews for that law.
The final vote in the Senate was 76-18.
With the 18 against, as far as I know, being Southern & Western Protestants.
Were any Roman Catholic politicians opposed to the 1965 Hart Celler Act in the Senate???
How about in the House where it passed 326-69—any Roman Catholics against it???
This is a question that can only be answered if ethnic differences are taken into account.
As Samuel Huntington and others have pointed out, the U.S. has a British Protestant cultural core. These groups consisted of colonists rather than immigrants.
Many of the immigrants who came later were Catholic. These groups and their descendants frequently don't approve of the native culture, even if they enjoy the good things it produces.
Granted, there are many fine Americans who are descended from immigrants. But overall they do tend to be more leftist than founding stock Americans, especially when they heavily congregate in an area.
Here are several examples: Austin is the most leftist part of Texas because it is culturally German rather than Southern. The northern Midwest tends to be more leftist than the lower Midwest because these northern areas were settled by white ethnics.
With this in mind I can answer your questions:
The Catholic Church has profited greatly from immigration. Just look at the number of Catholics in the Third World. The Church sees its future in these people and looks after their interests accordingly.
But it's more than just the Catholic Church.
Since the Southerners got thrown out in the late sixties, the Democrat Party has been a party largely composed of non-whites of all types, Jews, and immigrants and many of their descendants.
As a result, the Democratic Party has become largely hostile to the founding stock Americans and those who identify with them. And Jews serve as ringleaders.
The Democratic Party is fundamentally a Jewish party in the sense that Jews are absolutely necessary to funding and organizing the Democrats.
http://forums.skadi.net/showthread.php?t=134588&page=3
http://forums.skadi.net/showthread.p...47#post1021547
American Jews are committed to cultural tolerance because of their belief—one firmly rooted in history—that Jews are safe only in a society acceptant of a wide range of attitudes and behaviors, as well as a diversity of religious and ethnic groups. It is this belief, for example, not approval of homosexuality, that leads an overwhelming majority of U.S. Jews to endorse gay rights and to take a liberal stance on most other so-called social issues.
Moreover, a deep concern that an ethnically and culturally homogeneous America would compromise Jewish interests can be seen in Silberman's (1985, 347–348) comments on the attraction of Jews to "the Democratic party . . . with its traditional hospitality to non-WASP ethnic groups. . . . A distinguished economist who strongly disagreed with Mondale’s economic policies voted for him nonetheless. ‘I watched the conventions on television,' he explained, 'and the Republicans did not look like my kind of people.’ That same reaction led many Jews to vote for Carter in 1980 despite their dislike of him; 'I'd rather live in a country governed by the faces I saw at the Democratic convention than by those I saw at the Republican convention’ a well-known author told me."
http://theoccidentalobserver.net/tooblog/?p=768
Judaism has always had a fairly tight congruence between their evolutionary interests and their explicit ideology. On the other hand, Christian sects are communities with a variety of explicit ideologies that are at best only tangentially related to their ethnic interests.
Indeed, it might be argued that Christianity often works well as an ideology for a more or less homogeneous white society. But, at least without some big changes from the current varieties, it is abysmally inadequate as an ideology of ethnic defense. This is especially so in a culture dominated by an intellectual and cultural elite that is hostile to all forms of Christianity and ridicules everything they believe in.
This contrast between Judaism and Christianity persists today: Ethnic particularism and biological descent continue to be robust trends within Judaism. On the other hand, a great many Christian denominations, including some evangelical groups, are strong supporters of multi-racial immigration and quite a few Christian groups avidly seek converts from all races and ethnicities.
http://forums.skadi.net/showthread.php?t=134972
Since the end of World War II a strange alliance of Communists, Christian churches, ethnic lobbies and other pressure groups working through the corporate sector and within the centralised apparatus of state power has set out deliberately to flood the White homelands with a polyglot mass of Third World immigrants.
http://forums.skadi.net/showthread.php?t=134749
http://forums.skadi.net/showthread.php?t=134766
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by Battle
: (at last count, my family history includes English, French, Scottish-that-was-English-but-got-kicked-out-of-England, Irish, Austrian, Ukrainian, Polish, Aboriginal...)
Bookmarks