Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: The Hidden, Awkward Origins of WWII

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    SaxonPagan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Last Online
    2 Weeks Ago @ 03:49 AM
    Ethnicity
    English
    Ancestry
    English, Anglo-Saxon
    Country
    England England
    Location
    South Coast
    Gender
    Zodiac Sign
    Aries
    Family
    Married
    Occupation
    Self Employed
    Politics
    Free Speech / Anti-EU
    Religion
    Pagan
    Posts
    5,039
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,584
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2,672
    Thanked in
    1,438 Posts

    Exclamation The Hidden, Awkward Origins of WWII

    Dirty Little Secrets Of WWII

    By Jason Collett


    "We were not foolish enough to try to make a currency coverage of gold of which we had none, but for every mark that was issued we required the equivalent of a mark's worth of work done or goods produced... We laugh at the time our national financiers held the view that the value of a currency is regulated by the gold and securities lying in the vaults of a state bank."
    -- Adolf Hitler, 1937 (CC Veith, Citadels of Chaos, Meador, 1949.)


    The primary issue over which World War II was fought was to determine which money system was to survive. At bottom it was not a war between Germany and the so-called allies.


    At the end of the First World War, Germany was essentially tricked [see Paul Johnson A History of the Modern World (1983) p24 and H Nicholson Peacemaking 1919 (1933) pp13-16] into paying massive reparations to France and other economic competitors and former belligerent countries in terms of the so-called Treaty of Versailles, thanks to the liberal American President Woodrow Wilson. Germany was declared to be solely responsible for the war, in spite of the fact that ‘Germany did not plot a European war, did not want one, and made genuine efforts, though too belated, to avert
    one.’ (Professor Sydney B. Fay The Origins of the World War (vol. 2 p 552)).

    As a result of these massive enforced financial reparations, by 1923 the situation in Germany became desperate and inflation on an astronomical scale became the only way out for the government. Printing presses were engaged to print money around the clock. In 1921 the exchange rate was 75 marks to the dollar. By 1924 this had become about 5 trillion marks to the dollar. This virtually destroyed the German middle class (Koestler, The God that Failed, p 28), reducing any bank savings to a virtual zero.


    According to Sir Arthur Bryant the British historian (Unfinished Victory, (1940 pp. 136-144):
    • ‘It was the Jews with their international affiliations and their hereditary flair for finance who were best able to seize such opportunities.. They did so with such effect that, even in November 1938, after five years of anti-Semitic legislation and persecution, they still owned, according to the Times correspondent in Berlin, something like a third of the real property in the Reich. Most of it came into their hands during the inflation.. But to those who had
      lost their all this bewildering transfer seemed a monstrous injustice.After prolonged sufferings they had now been deprived of their last possessions. They saw them pass into the hands of strangers, many of whom had not shared their sacrifices and who cared little or nothing for their national standards and traditions..The Jews obtained a wonderful ascendancy in politics, business and the learned professions (in spite of constituting) less than one percent of the population..The banks, including the Reichsbank and the big private banks, were practically controlled by them. So were the publishing trade, the cinema, the theatres and a large part of the press – all the normal means, in fact, by which public opinion in a civilized country is formed..The largest newspaper combine in the country with a daily circulation of four millions was a Jewish monopoly.. Every year it became harder and harder for a gentile to gain or keep a foothold in any privileged occupation..At this time it was not the ‘Aryans’ who exercised racial discrimination. It was a discrimination that operated without violence. It was exercised by a minority against a majority. There was no persecution, only elimination..It was the contrast between the wealth enjoyed – and lavishly displayed – by aliens of cosmopolitan tastes, and the poverty and misery of native Germans, that has made anti-Semitism so dangerous and ugly a force in the new Europe. Beggars on horseback are seldom popular, least of all with those whom they have just thrown out of the saddle.’

    Tough stuff, Sir Arthur! What made you get out of the wrong side of the bed?

    Strangely enough, in a book unexpectedly published by Princeton University Press in 1984, Sarah Gordon (Hitler, Germans and the "Jewish Question") essentially confirms what Bryant says. According to her, ‘Jews were never a large percentage of the total German population; at no time did they exceed 1% of the population during the years 1871-1933.’ But she adds ‘Jews were overrepresented in business, commerce, and public and private service..

    They were especially visible in private banking in Berlin, which in 1923 had 150 private Jewish banks, as opposed to only 11 private non-Jewish banks.. They owned 41% of iron and scrap iron firms and 57% of other metal businesses..

    Jews were very active in the stock market, particularly in Berlin, where in 1928 they comprised 80% of the leading members of the stock exchange. By 1933, when the Nazis began eliminating Jews from prominent positions, 85% of the brokers on the Berlin Stock exchange were dismissed because of their "race"..

    At least a quarter of full professors and instructors (at German universities) had Jewish origins.. In 1905-6 Jewish students comprised 25% of the law and medical students.. In 1931, 50% of the 234 theatre directors in Germany were Jewish, and in Berlin the number was 80%.. In 1929 it was estimated that the per capita income of Jews in Berlin was twice that of other Berlin residents..’ etc etc.

    Arthur Koestler confirms the Jewish over-involvement in German publishing. ‘Ullstein’s was a kind of super-trust; the largest organization of its kind in Europe, and probably In the world. They published four daily papers in Berlin alone, among these the venerable Vossische Zeitung, founded in the eighteenth century, and the B.Z. am Mittag, an evening
    paper..

    Apart from these, Ullstein’s published more than a dozen weekly and monthly periodicals, ran their own news service, their own travel agency, etc., and were one of the leading book publishers. The firm was owned by the brothers Ullstein - they were five, like the original Rothschild brothers, and like them also, they were Jews.’ (The God that Failed (1950) ed.
    RHS Crossman, p 31).

    Edgar Mowrer, Berlin correspondent for the Chicago Daily News, wrote an anti-German tract called Germany Puts the Clock Back (published as a Penguin Special and reprinted five times between December 1937 and April 1938). He nevertheless notes ‘In the all-important administration of Prussia, any number of strategic positions came into the hands of Hebrews..

    A telephone conversation between three Jews in Ministerial offices could result in the suspension of any periodical or newspaper in the state.. The Jews came in Germany to play in politics and administration that same considerable part that they had previously won by open competition in business, trade, banking, the Press, the arts, the sciences and the
    intellectual and cultural life of the country. And thereby the impression was strengthened that Germany, a country with a mission of its own, had fallen into the hands of foreigners.’

    Mowrer says ‘No one who lived through the period from 1919 to 1926 is likely to forget the sexual promiscuity that prevailed.. Throughout a town like Berlin, hotels and pensions made vast fortunes by letting rooms by the hour or day to baggageless, unregistered guests. Hundreds of cabarets, pleasure resorts and the like served for purposes of getting acquainted and acquiring the proper mood..’ (pp. 153-4). Bryant describes throngs of child prostitutes outside the doors of the great Berlin hotels and restaurants. He adds ‘Most of them (the night clubs and vice-resorts) were owned and managed by Jews. And it was the Jews.. among the promoters of this trade who were remembered in after years.’ (pp. 144-5).

    Douglas Reed, Chief Central European correspondent before WWII for the London Times, was profoundly anti-German and anti-Hitler. But nevertheless he reported: ‘I watched the Brown Shirts going from shop to shop with paint pots and daubing on the window panes the word "Jew", in dripping red letters. The Kurfürstendamm was to me a revelation. I knew that Jews were prominent in business life, but I did not know that they almost monopolized important branches of it. Germany had one Jew to one hundred gentiles, said the statistics; but the fashionable Kurfürstendamm,
    according to the dripping red legends, had about one gentile shop to ninety-nine Jewish ones.’ (Reed, Insanity Fair, (1938) p. 152-3).

    In Reed’s book Disgrace Abounding of the following year he notes ‘In the Berlin (of pre-Hitler years) most of the theatres were Jewish-owned or Jewish-leased, most of the leading film and stage actors were Jews, the plays performed were often by German, Austrian or Hungarian Jews and were staged by Jewish film producers, applauded by Jewish dramatic critics in Jewish newspapers..

    The Jews are not cleverer than the Gentiles, if by clever you mean good at their jobs. They ruthlessly exploit the common feeling of Jews, first to get a foothold in a particular trade or calling, then to squeeze the non-Jews out of it.. It is not true that Jews are better journalists than Gentiles. They held all the posts on those Berlin papers because the proprietors and editors were Jewish’ (pp238-9).

    The Jewish writer Edwin Black notes ‘For example, in Berlin alone, about 75% of the attorneys and nearly as many of the doctors were Jewish.’ (Black, The Transfer Agreement, (1984) p58.

    To cap it all, Jews were perceived as dangerous enemies of Germany after Samuel Untermeyer, the leader of the World Jewish Economic Federation, declared war on Germany on August 6 1933. (Edwin Black, The Transfer
    Agreement: the Untold Story of the Secret Pact between the Third Reich and Palestine,
    (1984) pp272-277)

    According to Black, ‘The one man who most embodied the potential death blow to Germany was Samuel Untermeyer.’ (p 369). This was the culmination of a worldwide boycott of German goods led by international Jewish organizations. The London Daily Express on March 24, 1933 carried the headline "Judea Declares War on Germany." The boycott was
    particularly motivated by the German imposition of the Nuremberg Laws, which ironically were similar in intent and content to the Jewish cultural exclusivism practiced so visibly in present-day Israel (Hannah Arendt Eichmann in Jerusalem, p 7).



    The origins of World War 2:
    the views of four diplomats close to events

    • Joseph P. Kennedy, U.S. Ambassador to Britain during the years immediately preceding WW2 was the father of the famous American Kennedy dynasty. James Forrestal the first US Secretary of Defense (1947-1949) quotes him as saying "Chamberlain (the British Prime Minister) stated that America and the world Jews had forced
      England into the war". (The Forrestal Diaries, ed. Millis, Cassell 1952 p129).
    • Count Jerzy Potocki, the Polish Ambassador in Washington, in a report to the Polish Foreign Office in January 1939, is quoted approvingly by the highly respected British military historian Major-General JFC Fuller. Concerning public opinion in America he says "Above all, propaganda here is entirely in Jewish hands…when
      bearing public ignorance in mind, their propaganda is so effective that people have no real knowledge of the true state of affairs in Europe…
    • It is interesting to observe that in this carefully thought-out campaign… no reference at all is made to Soviet Russia. If that country is mentioned, it is referred to in a friendly manner and people are given the impression that Soviet Russia is part of the democratic group of countries…Jewry was able not only to establish a dangerous centre in the New World for the dissemination of hatred and enmity, but it also succeeded in dividing the world into two warlike camps…President Roosevelt has been given the power.. to create huge reserves in armaments for a future war which the Jews are deliberately heading for." (J.F.C. Fuller, The Decisive Battles of the Western World, vol 3 pp 372-374.)
    • Hugh Wilson, the American Ambassador in Berlin until 1938, the year before the war broke out, found anti-Semitism in Germany ‘understandable’. This was because before the advent of the Nazis, "the stage, the press, medicine and law [were] crowded with Jews… among the few with money to splurge, a high proportion [were]
      Jews… the leaders of the Bolshevist movement in Russia, a movement desperately feared in Germany, were Jews. One could feel the spreading resentment and hatred." (Hugh Wilson: Diplomat between the Wars, Longmans 1941, quoted in Leonard Mosley, Lindbergh, Hodder 1976).
    • Sir Nevile Henderson, British Ambassador in Berlin ‘said further that the hostile attitude in Great Britain was the work of Jews and enemies of the Nazis, which was what Hitler thought himself’ (A.J.P. Taylor, The Origins of the Second World War, Penguin 1965, 1987 etc p 324).
    Hitler wanted to destroy Communism, a fact that earned him the immense hatred and animosity of the Jewish organisations and the media and politicians of the west which they could influence. After all, according to the Jewish writer Chaim Bermant, although Jews formed less than five percent of Russia's population, they formed more than fifty percent of its revolutionaries.

    ‘It must be added that most of the leading revolutionaries who convulsed Europe in the final decades of the last century and the first decades of this one, stemmed from prosperous Jewish families.. They were perhaps typified by the father of revolution, Karl Marx.. Thus when, after the chaos of World War I, revolutions broke out all over Europe, Jews were everywhere at the helm; Trotsky, Sverdlov, Kamenev and Zinoviev in Russia, Bela Kun in Hungary, Kurt Eisner in Bavaria, and, most improbable of all, Rosa Luxemburg in Berlin.

    ‘To many outside observers, the Russian revolution looked like a Jewish conspiracy, especially when it was followed by Jewish-led revolutionary outbreaks in much of central Europe. The leadership of the Bolshevik Party had a preponderance of Jews.. Of the seven members of the Politburo, the inner cabinet of the country, four, Trotsky (Bronstein), Zinoviev (Radomsky), Kamenev (Rosenfeld) and Sverdlov, were Jews.’ (Bermant, The Jews, (1977), chapter 8.)

    Hitler came to power with two main aims, the rectification of the unjust provisions of the Versailles Treaty, and the destruction of the Soviet/ Communist threat to Germany. He had no plans or desire for a larger war of conquest, as Professor A.J.P. Taylor showed in his book, The Origins of the Second World War to the disappointment of the professional western political establishment.

    What occurred in Europe in 1939-41 was the result of unforeseen weaknesses and a tipping of the balance of power, and Hitler was an opportunist ‘who took advantages whenever they offered themselves’ (Taylor). Britain and France declared war on Germany, not the other way around. Hitler wanted peace with Britain, as the German generals admitted
    (Basil Liddell Hart, The Other Side of the Hill 1948, Pan Books 1983).

    With regard to the so-called Halt Order at Dunkirk, where Hitler had the opportunity to capture the entire British Army, but chose not to. Liddell Hart, one of Britain’s most respected military historians, quotes the German General von Blumentritt with regard to this Halt Order:

    "He (Hitler) then astonished us by speaking with admiration of the British Empire, of the necessity for its existence, and of the civilisation that Britain had brought into the world. He remarked, with a shrug of the shoulders, that the creation of its Empire had been achieved by means that were often harsh, but ‘where there is planing, there are shavings flying’. He
    compared the British Empire with the catholic Church – saying they were both essential elements of stability in the world.

    He said that all he wanted from Britain was that she should acknowledge Germany’s position on the Continent. The return of Germany’s colonies would be desirable but not essential, and he would even offer to support Britain with troops if she should be involved in difficulties anywhere.." (p 200).

    According to Liddell Hart, "At the time we believed that the repulse of the Luftwaffe in the ‘Battle over Britain’ had saved her. That is only part of the explanation, the last part of it. The original cause, which goes much deeper, is that Hitler did not want to conquer England. He took little interest in the invasion preparations, and for weeks did nothing to spur them on; then, after a brief impulse to invade, he veered around again and suspended the preparations. He was preparing, instead, to invade Russia" (p140).

    David Irving in the foreword to his book The Warpath (1978) refers to "the discovery.. that at no time did this man (Hitler) pose or intend a real threat to Britain or the Empire."

    This gives a completely different complexion, not only to the war, but to the successful suppression of this information during the war and afterwards. Historians today know only too well where the boundaries lie within which they can paint their pictures of the war and its aftermath, and the consequences of venturing beyond those boundaries, irrespective of
    the evidence. Unfortunately, only too few of them have been prepared to have the courage to break out of this dreadful straitjacket of official and unofficial censorship.


    The Economic Roots of WWII


    by Joachim Bochaca


    Background: In October of 1938 Walter Funk, Economic Minister of the Reich, had made a trip to the Balkans during which he concluded massive trade agreements with Yugoslavia, Turkey, and Bulgaria. Rumania was not willing to make such an agreement at that time because of the opposition of King Carol, whose girlfriend, Magda Elena Lupescu, was Jewish.

    On November 15, 1938 King Carol of Rumania arrived in London. The lover of the Jewess Lupescu was acclaimed by Anti-Hitlerites in Hyde Park. But no one imagined the monarch had come all the way to London just for the pleasure of lending his presence to a philo-Semitic demonstration.

    Carol represented the resistance to German economic expansion in Southeast Europe. Carol had come to London to meet with the bankers of the City of London to combat this expansion.

    The purpose of his voyage was indirectly revealed by R. S. Hudson, member of the Crown Council and undersecretary of Foreign Trade, in a speech given in the House of Commons November 30. It was a speech of capital importance, which constituted a virtual declaration of economic war against Germany. Economic war, which in our times always precedes total, political war.

    It was a speech that indicated that an important fraction of the English City had now evolved in the direction of Churchill's postulates. Here is a revealing fragment of Hudson’s speech:

    Germany engages in no treatment unfavorable to England’s markets in Germany; that we must recognize. But what we are complaining about is that with its methods Germany will ruin trade in the entire world.

    Our principle problem today is to know how it will be possible for us to confront the new form of German competition in the world. We are able to say that the reason for the economic influence of Germany resides in the
    fact that she pays the producer countries of Central and Southeast Europe much higher prices than those paid in the world market.

    We have examined all the procedures it would be possible for us to apply. The only means consists in organizing our industries in such a way that they would be in a position to oppose German industry and saying to Hitler and his people:

    "If you are not disposed to put an end to your present manner of proceeding and come to an agreement with us according to which you promise to sell your merchandise at a price that will ensure you a reasonable profit, we will combat you and vanquish you with your own methods."

    From a strictly financial point of view our country is infinitely stronger than any other country in the world; in any case stronger than Germany, and for that reason we enjoy great advantages that will result in our winning the
    battle.

    After this speech of Hudson’s, England revoked Germany's "most favored nation," status which, in its foreign trade treaties, it had maintained with Germany since 1927. The United States did the same, with a curious coincidence of dates.

    A brief comment: England and the United States, the champions of liberalism, politically as well as economically "the two are indissolubly linked" became indignant because Germany, by selling its products more cheaply, snatched from them markets that were traditionally theirs. This is outrageous. Where is the famous freedom of commerce?

    Hudson spoke of unfair commercial competition. Why unfair? Germany was able to sell its products more cheaply for one reason. One reason only. Because they did not depend on the gold standard, their products were not burdened at every stage of production with the heavy interest charges of the financiers and bankers. Here is the real motive for the 180-degree turn that was taking place in England. Organic Natural Economy, put into practice by National Socialist Germany defeated, for simple arithmetical reasons, the Classic Economy which reigned in England.

    But here is the other fact that brought to a pinnacle the irritation of the pleiade of bankers, dealers, ship-owners insurers, and captains of industry who swarmed around the Strand, the City, and Whitehall. On December 10, 1938, the government of Mexico signed an agreement with the Reich, in virtue of which, it would hand over to the latter, in the course of 1939, petroleum to the value of 17 million dollars. This petroleum came from oil wells that a nationalist government of Mexico City had expropriated from the Judeo-Yankees of Standard Oil of Manhattan.

    This was the straw that broke the camel's back. It was a barter agreement. The Reich would pay in irrigation apparatus, farm machines, office materials, typewriters and photographic equipment. Moreover, the agreement was concluded on the basis of an oil price much lower than the worldwide rates.

    The consequences of all this: Germany would obtain oil without having to put up with Royal Dutch, of the Judeo-British Samuel Deterding, nor with Standard Oil, of the Judeo-American Rockefeller. The transaction would take place without the City touching one miserable shilling through credit operations, financing, guarantees, warrants, freight charges, or insurance premiums. It would be a simple barter, guaranteed by the German government itself, and the transports would be effected in German boats. For the big shots of the City this was plain dismaying. Never mind that Hitler used such procedures in the Balkans or in Turkey; never mind that Central Europe would acclimate to them, but to extend them to
    Central America condemned London to a certain and inevitable decline.

    What’s more, it became manifest that Minister Funk was preparing a trip to Buenos Aires, Montevideo, and Santiago de Chile. All this was, for the City, the beginning of the end. As a consequence of this, new and important segments of the English plutocracy, racially Anglo-Saxon, joined Churchill’s camp.

    Funk’s trip to Southeast Europe; the taking of Canton and Hankeu [by Japan]; the German-Mexican accord; the announcement of Funk's trip to South America; the progressive weakening of the position of King Carol of Rumania; loss of the Chinese market [by Japan's occupation of Hong Kong, Canton, and Hankeu]; the occupation of Albania by Italy; each one of these events provoked the desertion of another part of the pacifist forces on which Chamberlain had based his politics of conciliation in September [the Munich Agreement]. When these forces acted openly to the benefit of
    Beck [Polish Foreign Minister], Stalin could relax. The progress toward the East, the Drang nach Osten, that progress which, at the same time it gave land to German plows would eliminate Communism as a potential danger for Europe and the World, would have to stop.

    In truth, there still remained, at the beginning of December, 1938, some English businessmen who formed the City’s last stronghold that still opposed the war. But their resistance would soon be swept away by an offensive of New York Zionism, embodied in the “Brain Trust” of President Roosevelt.


    Source: http://www.rense.com/general92/dirty.htm

  2. #2
    Account Inactive

    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    German
    Ancestry
    Germanic
    State
    Teutonic Order Teutonic Order
    Gender
    Politics
    GPWW
    Posts
    1,630
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4
    Thanked in
    4 Posts
    Sir Nevile Henderson, British Ambassador in Berlin 'said further that the hostile attitude in Great Britain was the work of Jews and enemies of the Nazis, which was what Hitler thought himself' (Taylor, AJP: The Origins of the Second World War Penguin 1965, 1987 etc p 324).
    Hitler repeatedly called ambassador Henderson into the Reich Chancellery to complain about the British press and the "warmongering style", as well as the personal attacks and insults thrown at him. At one time the Daily Mirror claimed that "German troops invaded Morocco" (fake news), another time an outlet launched the "Blitzschlag" hysteria in early 1939. In it was claimed that Hitler supposedly planned to bomb London without DoW in a sudden strike with 1.000 planes. In July 1939 (again Daily Mirror) claimed that "Hitler has only one egg". It is now known that Sefton Delmer (SOE-British Intel -Psychological Warfare department) fabricated the story and published it under pseudonym in the Daily Mirror. Later it was circulated in the US too.

    Hitler, who did read the British Press ( which was known in London), was of course regularly upset what was written about him and the Germans in general. Henderson then apologized as above cited, said "we have a free press" and that neither the PM Sir Neville Chamberlain nor he himself could do anything about that. Which of course indicates that countries/nations of the Free-masonic Orbit with a so called "Free Press" can spread any lie, slander, deception, disinformation or fabrication against hapless and defenseless foreign leaders at good will without anyone in government position can be hold accountable for this.

Similar Threads

  1. Do You Have Any Hidden Talents?
    By Mrs. Lyfing in forum The Hearth
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: Wednesday, March 12th, 2008, 09:07 PM
  2. Hidden Symbols: Origins of European Crosses
    By Bioblitzkrieg in forum Runes & Sinnbildkunde
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Monday, January 16th, 2006, 12:49 AM
  3. Genetic testing reveals awkward truth about Xinjiang’s famous mummies
    By morfrain_encilgar in forum Population Genetics
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Friday, May 27th, 2005, 09:32 AM
  4. Awkward Angles (Keith Nurse)
    By morfrain_encilgar in forum England
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Wednesday, January 19th, 2005, 05:40 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •