More Federal Tyranny: U.S. "Judge" Overturns Cal. Gay "Marriage" Ban

[KYAnglo]

Yet another example of the U.S. government's tyranny and total disregard for the will of Americans and sovereignty of the States:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/08/04/federal-judge-overturns-californias-sex-marriage-ban/

A federal judge on Wednesday overturned a California ban on same-sex marriage, ruling that the Proposition 8 ballot initiative was unconstitutional.
The ruling by U.S. District Judge Vaugh Walker, one of three openly gay federal [COLOR=blue !important][COLOR=blue !important]judges[/color][/color] in the country, gave opponents of the controversial Proposition 8 ballot a major victory.
Gay couples waving rainbow and American flags outside the courthouse cheered, hugged and kissed as word of the ruling spread.

As a blogger I read put it:

This is just the latest case of an imperial Federal government subverting the will of the people and imposing its own agenda despite popular opposition. Think: ObamaCare, SB 1070, and now this.

It's enough to make you think the Federal government is our enemy.

Note also that this unelected tyrant-in-robes aka federal "judge" that made this ruling is openly a sodomite deviant, and yet did not recuse himself from hearing this case though he must have a clear and personal bias in the case, a clear violation of his office and judicial ethics.
The United States federal government in all its manifestations is the worst enemy of all Americans who would be free and preserve the existence of their people and cultures.

[SpearBrave]

The real issue here is that it is against the will of the people.

Why should everyone bow to a few leftist? Why do we not turn out this illegal federal government? The people of the late great state of California voted against this then it should be law!

Another violation of states rights when will it end?

[VitkiValkyrie]

I agree with Spearbrave. No matter what the issue, laws affecting the populace shouldn't be made or overruled without public consensus.

[Ediruc]

"Our courts are supposed to protect our Constitutional rights," lead plaintiff Kris Perry

It is ironic this homo said that. The rights of the people who were opposed to this abomination have been infringed upon too.

[SpearBrave]

I agree with Spearbrave. No matter what the issue, laws affecting the populace shouldn't be made or overruled without public consensus.

This is the Amerika we now live in, for a long time the citizens relied on courts to uphold the Constitution( the Law). Now those courts use political correctness by dealing with emotion not fact or law.

The recent acts by the lower federal courts is nothing less then treason. They swore oaths to uphold the law and have now broken those oaths. These acts are too far gone and wide spread to just say " oh that judge is liberal " , no these judges are leftist. They want to destroy America and replace it with Amerika. Wake up America the federal government is out to destroy you and your rights.!

[Æmeric]

Obongo is trying to play both sides of the fence:Obama:I'm Against Gay Marriage & Prop 8

What he means is he doesn't want to do anything that will rile up the oposition to gay marriage. And yet he just nominated lesbian Elena Kagan to the Supreme Court. Notice how most politicians have sidestepped the issue of Kagan's sexuality, which will be an issue when she votes to uphold this ruling.

[SpearBrave]

Obongo is trying to play both sides of the fence

If you think back, this has long been suspected with his college dorm mate.
(no proof of course)

It has been said that clinton was the first black president and that obongo is the first 'gay' president.

[Æmeric]

If you think back, this has long been suspected with his college dorm mate.
(no proof of course)

It has been said that clinton was the first black president and that obongo is the first 'gay' president.

Maybe that is why Michelle is vacationing in Spain, leaving Barack to celibrate his 49th birthday with friends in Chicago.

[SpearBrave]

^

Ok back on topic. IMHO opinion this is not so much about prop. 8 as it is about States rights to pass their own laws and govern themselves.

The United States of America was never supposed to be a demoratic federal state. This case should have never even went to any federal court.

[KYAnglo]

^

Ok back on topic. IMHO opinion this is not so much about prop. 8 as it is about States rights to pass their own laws and govern themselves.

The United States of America was never supposed to be a demoratic federal state. This case should have never even went to any federal court.

The U.S. government has no business trying to tell a State how to define marriage within its borders. Such has always been a State power and perogative.
The citizens of Massachusetts, for example, have apparently wished to recognize the bizaare and absurd notion that homosexuals can "marry" and that's their right as a State.
Here in Kentucky, the people overwhelmingly amended our state constitution six years ago, to define marriage as only recognized between a man and woman. That's our right as a sovereign Commonwealth.
The prop. 8 case in California is a clear demonstration that a branch of the federal government, the federal courts, is never going to be a rein or check on expansion of federal powers, hence these appalling acts of arrogant tyranny by the federal "judges".
They are criminals squatting on the bench, s---ing all over the rule of law .
The States MUST begin to stand firm and nullify intolerable, illegal acts like this by the federals, or we will eventually all be slaves and subjects to them.
The latest attacks and violations in Arizona and California on the clearly expressed and sovereign will of the people of these States by the federal regime should show any American what we need to know about our true enemy.
It is not the non-existent, imaginary 'rights' of some illegal wetback in Arizona, or sodomite in California that has been grossly violated by these latest acts of the United States government.