Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20

Thread: Is There a "Racial Identity Crisis" in France?

  1. #1
    Senior Member Lothringen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Last Online
    Friday, February 10th, 2012 @ 04:57 PM
    Ethnicity
    Frank (Cherusci)
    Ancestry
    Lothringen/Prussia/Galicia(ex part of Austrian Empire)
    Country
    Holy Roman Empire Holy Roman Empire
    State
    Alsace-Lorraine Alsace-Lorraine
    Location
    Austrasia
    Gender
    Family
    Married parent
    Occupation
    employee
    Politics
    Habsburg-Lothringen für Herzog !
    Religion
    Catholic & germanic evhemerism
    Posts
    165
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post

    Is There a "Racial Identity Crisis" in France?

    First was the nearly politically incorrect debat on the "National Identity" that according to a survey is
    1) French langage (80 %)
    2) Republic (64 %)
    3) blue/white/red flag (63 %)
    4) "laïcité" (61 %) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La%C3%AFcit%C3%A9
    5) public services (60%)
    6) national anthem "La Marseillaise" (50 %)
    http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Identit...tionale#France


    Note that no reference to franckish culture nor christianity appear in this list.
    Did the "French" forget that "France" (*) started with Chlodovech/Clovis/Chlodwig conversion the Christianism ?
    That the maximum expansion of "France" (except colonial Empire) was at the "Frank-Reich" of Karl der Gross and for most of muslims "Crusaders" and "Francks" had the same meaning. Note also that in Versailles gallery the Entrance of Crusaders in Jerusalem show Gottfried von Bouillon as main character. Gottried was born in Boulogne but Bouillon is in now Belgium and Gottfried was promoted Duke of Niederlothringen (Nothern or Low Lorraine) by the Kaiser of the Holy Empire, not by the King of France.


    (*) actually Chlodovech was born in Tournai (now in Belgium), had his sister marrying Theodoric the Great (mythologized as Dietrich von Bern) and himself married christian burgundian princess Clothild

    Secondly there was in France (and Belgium) the Niqab/Burqa problem: make it illegal or not. I must admit that I get lost and don't know the final decision...

    Thirdly French officials of high rank have now "bad words" and get prosecuted
    - a Minister was found guilty of racial insult and fined 750 euros with an order to donate 2000 euros to an anti-racism group
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brice_H...osse.2C_France
    - a prefect with Baron (from Napoleonic Empire) title from the famous
    Girot de Langlade family, knight of "Legion d'Honneur" (Honnor Legio) and Commander of "Ordre National du Merite" (National Order of Merit)
    http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Girot_d...#Vie_familiale
    find himself forced to retirement and now gets prosecuted
    http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Gi...e_(pr%C3%A9fet)
    because he said
    "on se croirait en Afrique ici" (we feel has if we were in Africa here) to airport security employee who understood this as a racist insult.

    It is not clear whether he said "there are only Blacks here" or not
    Which would not be logic as in fact "Africa" is not only "Black Africa" (sub Saharian) as Kabils, Berberes, Afrikaners, etc.. are geographically "Africans" but not "Black")

    http://fr.news.yahoo.com/73/20100629...c-0e31ec3.html
    http://www.lepost.fr/article/2009/08...uel-valls.html

  2. #2
    Waffenbrüder und Blut
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member

    Rassenhygieniker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Homo europæus
    Ancestry
    Iutum (Jutes), Agendicum (Sénons)
    Subrace
    Atlantid
    Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    Location
    Scotland
    Gender
    Family
    Single adult
    Politics
    NS-Eugeniker
    Religion
    Highland Catholic
    Posts
    729
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    The problem was that France was a society that fonctioned under Germanic rule for centuries, when the most numerous non-germanics racial elements from the south chased back the Germanics (which was orchestrated by jews), France started to degrade to a typical multiethnic and multiracial society. With the mediterranean mongrels in the south (who are really just Spaniards and Moors) and the remnants of Germanic racials in the North.

    It was Germanics who made France great and it was Germanics who made Spain great, when those Germanics racial elements disapparead the Germanic culture who shaped France standards both of those countries sunk down to their natural worthlessness. France won't live for long, because like Belgium France is nothing more than an artificial country, who is not really Germanic, not really latinic, not really celtic and so on...

    To be German is to be Germanic, to be Scandinavian is to be Germanic, this is clear but when such thing starts to become foggy (such in the case as France and to some lesser extent the US) it starts to degrade unto a unfathomable mess of multi-racialism and multi-ethnicism.

  3. #3
    Waffenbrüder und Blut
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member

    Rassenhygieniker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Homo europæus
    Ancestry
    Iutum (Jutes), Agendicum (Sénons)
    Subrace
    Atlantid
    Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    Location
    Scotland
    Gender
    Family
    Single adult
    Politics
    NS-Eugeniker
    Religion
    Highland Catholic
    Posts
    729
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Lothringen View Post
    6) national anthem "La Marseillaise" (50 %)
    • "I think that Marseille is incurable for all eternity, unless all of it's inhabitants are deported and replaced with men from the north." - Fréron, (1793)


    The fact that the national anthem of France is named after such a region, shows how much Latin France is and added with that there is also they way they sing this anthem which is very... southerly vulgar if you know what I mean. Just to say, it is definitly not a Germanic based anthem...


    Quote Originally Posted by Lothringen View Post
    Note that no reference to franckish culture nor christianity appear in this list.
    Did the "French" forget that "France" (*) started with Chlodovech/Clovis/Chlodwig conversion the Christianism ?
    That the maximum expansion of "France" (except colonial Empire) was at the "Frank-Reich" of Karl der Gross and for most of muslims "Crusaders" and "Francks" had the same meaning. Note also that in Versailles gallery the Entrance of Crusaders in Jerusalem show Gottfried von Bouillon as main character. Gottried was born in Boulogne but Bouillon is in now Belgium and Gottfried was promoted Duke of Niederlothringen (Nothern or Low Lorraine) by the Kaiser of the Holy Empire, not by the King of France.
    Yes all of this is carefully forgotten because afterall it doesn't even reflect on this french population as a whole, what those Germanics accomplished and did is the way Germanics do things. If it wasn't for the Germanics, the whole of France and Iberia would have already been part of Arabia quite some time ago.


    Quote Originally Posted by Lothringen View Post
    "on se croirait en Afrique ici" (we feel has if we were in Africa here) to airport security employee who understood this as a racist insult.

    It is not clear whether he said "there are only Blacks here" or not
    Which would not be logic as in fact "Africa" is not only "Black Africa" (sub Saharian) as Kabils, Berberes, Afrikaners, etc.. are geographically "Africans" but not "Black")
    When they say Africa they mean black:



    Otherwise they tend to say Maghreb, instead of Africa.

    But either way it doesn't really matter, because they all come from Africa are by the millions in France already, this is why they call them as awhole Afro-Maghrebins.

    Yeah and the existence of Afrikaners is unknown to at least 98% of the french and even if he was referreing to the Afrikaneers (which he obviously wasn't) he would not have worded it that way.

    He worded it the way someone would word something if they wanted to infer the obvious about the French National Soccer team...

  4. #4
    Senior Member Lothringen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Last Online
    Friday, February 10th, 2012 @ 04:57 PM
    Ethnicity
    Frank (Cherusci)
    Ancestry
    Lothringen/Prussia/Galicia(ex part of Austrian Empire)
    Country
    Holy Roman Empire Holy Roman Empire
    State
    Alsace-Lorraine Alsace-Lorraine
    Location
    Austrasia
    Gender
    Family
    Married parent
    Occupation
    employee
    Politics
    Habsburg-Lothringen für Herzog !
    Religion
    Catholic & germanic evhemerism
    Posts
    165
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post
    Because of the loss of several its "colonies" (*) what was previously the
    French Union has now been reduce to the French Republic which is mainly assimilated as France.

    Before "France" was mainly a synonym of Metropole and the other "lands" had their own identity
    http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Union_francaise
    Just like there was Rome and the Roman Empire or later
    German Empire and the German colonial empire
    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...n_colonial.PNG

    At the opposite of the German case whom colony were taken by "democratic" superpowers after WWI, the french ones gained independance.
    In german case, the "Indigen" did not move to the remain of the Empire.
    In the french case, despite they where now fully free in the land of their ancestors, a large part of them strangely move to the ex-colonizer.
    Quite surprising if you consider all the accusations of torture, slaughter,... that was on the french army.

    French Republic may be seen a compression of all the French Union on France.
    Just like if as Alexander the Great Empire collapsed Greece received refugies from Egypt, Babylon, Persia, Indian west border,...
    Or if 1918 Germany received those from Kamerun, Togoland, Samoa, New Guinea,...

    What would have been the impact on Greek culture/identity if pyramids & hieroglyph had started to appear in Greece ?

    What would have happen in Scandinavia if when retreating from Vinland, vikings had been followed by several native american tribes ?

    William the Conqueror would have used mounted archers as elite, and wear a feather crown instead of steell helmet at Hasting ?

    (looks like the "french" Mameluks on Austerlitz frozen battlefield...)

    Concerning the "Banania" picture, it is commercial poster, the official one you should refer is this

    THREE COLORS, ONE FLAG, AN EMPIRE

    Note that today french legislation forbids any statistic based on ethny, race, genotype or whatever you call skin/hair/eyes colors analyse





    (*) Oversea Territories Department (Oran/Alger/Constantine), "associated" states (Indochina)

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Last Online
    Thursday, January 4th, 2018 @ 04:54 PM
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    English
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    New York New York
    Gender
    Family
    Single adult
    Occupation
    Anthropology major.
    Religion
    Presbyterianism
    Posts
    111
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Rassenhygieniker View Post
    The problem was that France was a society that fonctioned under Germanic rule for centuries, when the most numerous non-germanics racial elements from the south chased back the Germanics (which was orchestrated by jews), France started to degrade to a typical multiethnic and multiracial society. With the mediterranean mongrels in the south (who are really just Spaniards and Moors) and the remnants of Germanic racials in the North.
    I really hope you aren't serious.

  6. #6
    Moderator "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member

    Sigurd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Last Online
    Friday, August 16th, 2019 @ 06:42 PM
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    German
    Ancestry
    Bavarii, Saxones, Suebi, Alamanni
    Subrace
    Borreby + Atlantonordoid
    Country
    Germany Germany
    Location
    Einöde in den Alpen
    Gender
    Age
    31
    Zodiac Sign
    Libra
    Family
    Engaged
    Politics
    Tradition & Homeland
    Religion
    Odinist
    Posts
    9,080
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    50
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    186
    Thanked in
    107 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Bradford View Post
    I really hope you aren't serious.
    Ruling houses of Germanic background continued to be relatively common in France for a while, so we aren't talking solely about the early medieval, but even longer.

    This is not a major point though, not a matter of doing away with Germanic rule, but rather them "emancipating" fairly early when compared to many other countries, they became fairly instrumental in many conflicts spreading from France in the past 300 years.

    They became quite obnoxious starting with the special protection by Louis XIV. in 1675, had numerous of people asking for "Jewish emancipation" in the 18th century (Moses Mendelsohn for one), and they were leading instigators and major beneficiaries of the Revolution of 1789.

    (Here, as an injunction -> notice how upon aquisition of Elsaß-Lothringen, French rulers were particularly happy to send Jews into this region. Attempt to water down the German population there?)

    Later, the hassle made around the Dreyfus affair, etc. etc. pp. --- and in the 20th century, I don't think I'll have to talk about Daniel Cohn-Bendit's involvement in kicking off the 1968 student protests, which led to the victory of the Frankfurt school and led us to the misery of the type of political indoctrination in schools and universities that we have to this day.

    As far as today's politics in France are concerned, I don't think I'll even have to start. Dominique Strauss-Kahn and Nicholas Sarkozy are partial-Jewish high-profile politicians to begin with, these are just the two most notable and notorious from a huge network of infiltrators.
    -In kalte Schatten versunken... /Germaniens Volk erstarrt / Gefroren von Lügen / In denen die Welt verharrt-
    -Die alte Seele trauernd und verlassen / Verblassend in einer erklärbaren Welt / Schwebend in einem Dunst der Wehmut / Ein Schrei der nur unmerklich gellt-
    -Auch ich verspüre Demut / Vor dem alten Geiste der Ahnen / Wird es mir vergönnt sein / Gen Walhalla aufzufahren?-

    (Heimdalls Wacht, In kalte Schatten versunken, stanzas 4-6)

  7. #7
    Waffenbrüder und Blut
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member

    Rassenhygieniker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Homo europæus
    Ancestry
    Iutum (Jutes), Agendicum (Sénons)
    Subrace
    Atlantid
    Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    Location
    Scotland
    Gender
    Family
    Single adult
    Politics
    NS-Eugeniker
    Religion
    Highland Catholic
    Posts
    729
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Lothringen View Post
    Concerning the "Banania" picture, it is commercial poster, the official one you should refer is this

    THREE COLORS, ONE FLAG, AN EMPIRE
    • "We were the first to cry among the masses of the people the words 'Liberty, Equality, Fraternity.' The stupid Gentile poll parrots flew down from all sides on to these baits, and with them carried away the well-being of the world."



    Quote Originally Posted by Bradford View Post
    I really hope you aren't serious.
    The French Revolution
    By Archibald Maule Ramsay


    The Nameless War

    The French Revolution of 1789 was the most startling event in the history of Europe since the fall of Rome. A new phenomenon then appeared before the world. Never before had a mob apparently organized successful revolution against all other classes in the state, under high sounding, but quite nonsensical slogans, and with methods bearing not a trace of the principles enshrined in those slogans.

    Never before had any one section of any nation conquered all other sections; and still less swept away every feature of the national life and tradition, from King, religion, nobles, clergy, constitution, flag, calendar, and place names, to coinage.

    Such a phenomenon merits the closest attention; especially in view of the fact that it has been followed by identical outbreaks in many countries. The main discovery that such an examination will reveal is this fact: the revolution was not the work of Frenchmen to improve France. It was the work of aliens, whose object was to destroy everything, which had been France.

    This conclusion is borne out by the references to "foreigners" in high places in the Revolutionary Councils, not only by Sir Walter Scott, but by Robes Pierre himself.

    We have the names of several of them, and it is clear that they were not British, or Germans, or Italians, or any other nationals; they were, of course, Jews.

    Let us see what the Jews themselves have to say about it :

    "Remember the French Revolution to which it was we who gave the name of 'Great.' The secrets of its preparation are well known to us for it was wholly the work of our hands." Protocols of Zion No. 7.

    "We were the first to cry among the masses of the people the words 'Liberty, Equality, Fraternity.' The stupid Gentile poll parrots flew down from all sides on to these baits, and with them carried away the well-being of the world. The would-be-wise men of the Gentiles were so stupid that they could not see that in nature there is no equality, and there cannot be freedom (meaning, of course, freedom as understood by Socialists and Communists, freedom to wreck your own country)." Protocols of Zion-No.1.

    With this knowledge in our possession we shall find we possess a master key to the intricate happenings of the French Revolution. The somewhat confused picture of characters and events moving across the screen, which our history books have shown us, will suddenly become a concerted and connected human drama.

    When we begin to draw parallels between France of 1789, Britain of 1640, Russia of 1917, Germany and Hungary of 1918-19, and Spain of 1936, we shall feel that drama grip us with a new and personal sense of reality. "Revolution is a blow struck at a paralytic."

    Even so, however, it must be obvious that immense organization, and vast resources, as well as cunning and secrecy far above the ordinary are necessary for its successful preparation.

    It is amazing indeed that people should suppose that "mobs" or "the people" ever have, or ever could, undertake such a complicated and costly operation. No mistake more-over could be more dangerous; for it will result in total inability to recognize the true significance of events, or the source and focus of a revolutionary movement.

    The process or organizing revolution is seen to be firstly the infliction of paralysis; and secondly, the striking of the blow or blows.

    It is for the first process, the production of paralysis, that the secrecy is essential. Its outward signs are debt, loss of publicity control, and the existence of alien-influenced secret organizations in the doomed state.

    Debt, particularly international debt, is the first and over-mastering grip. Through it men in high places are suborned, and alien powers and influences are introduced into the body politic. When the debt grip has been firmly established, control of every form of publicity and political activity soon follows, together with a full grip on industrialists.

    The stage for the revolutionary blow is then set. The grip of the right hand of finance established the paralysis; while it is the revolutionary left that holds the dagger and deals the fatal blow. Moral corruption facilitates the whole process.

    By 1780 financial paralysis was making its appearance in France. The world's big financiers were firmly established. "They possessed so large a share of the world's gold and silver stocks, that they had most of Europe in their debt, certainly France."

    So writes Mr McNair Wilson in his Life of Napoleon, and continues on page 38: "A change of a fundamental kind had taken place in the economic structure of Europe whereby the old basis had ceased to be wealth and had become debt. In the old Europe wealth had been measured in lands, crops, herds and minerals; but a new standard had now been introduced, namely, a form of money to which the title 'credit' had been given."

    The debts of the French Kingdom though substantial were by no means insurmountable, except in terms of gold: and had the King's advisers decided to issue money on the security of the lands and real wealth of France, the position could have been fairly easily righted. As it was the situation was firmly gripped by one financier after another, who either could not or would not break with the system imposed by the international usurers.

    Under such weakness, or villainy, the bonds of usury could only grow heavier and more terrible, for debts were in terms of gold or silver, neither of which France produced.

    And who were the potentates of the new debt machine; these manipulators of gold and silver, who had succeeded in turning upside down the finances of Europe, and replacing real wealth by millions upon millions of usurious loans?

    The late Lady Queensborough, in her important work Occult Theocracy gives us certain outstanding names, taking her facts from L'Anti-Semitisme by the Jew Bernard Lazare, 1894.

    In London she gives the names of Benjamin Goldsmid and his brother Abraham Goldsmid, Moses Mocatta their partner, and his nephew Sir Moses Montifiore, as being directly concerned in financing the French Revolution, along with Daniel Itsig of Berlin and his son-in-law David Friedlander, and Herz Cerfbeer of Alsace. These names recall the Protocols of Zion, and turning up Number 20 we read: "The gold standard has been the ruin of States which adopted it, for it has not been able to satisfy the demands for money, the more so as we have removed gold from circulation as far as possible."

    And Again: "Loans hang like a Sword of Damocles over the heads of rulers who . . . come begging with outstretched palm."

    No words could describe more aptly what was overtaking France. Sir Walter Scott in his Life of Napoleon, Vol. 1, thus describes the situation: "These financiers used the government as bankrupt prodigals are treated by usurious moneylenders, who feeding their extravagance with the one hand, with the other wring out of their ruined fortunes the most unreasonable recompenses for their advances.

    By a long succession of these ruinous loans, and the various rights granted to guarantee them, the whole finances of France were brought to total confusion."

    King Louis' chief finance minister during these last years of growing confusion was Necker, "a Swiss" of German extraction, son of a German professor of whom McNair Wilson writes: "Necker had forced his way into the King's Treasury as a representative of the debt system owning allegiance to that system."

    We can easily imagine what policy that allegiance inspired in Necker; and when we add to this the fact that his previous record was that of a daring and unscrupulous speculator, we can understand why the national finances of France under his baneful aegis rapidly worsened, so that after four years of his manipulations, the unfortunate King's government had contracted an additional and far more serious debt of 170,000,000 pounds.

    By 1730 Freemasonry had been introduced into France from England. By 1771 the movement had attained such proportions that Phillipe Duc de Chartres afterwards d'Orleans became Grand Master. This type of freemasonry was largely innocent, both in policy and personnel in its early days; but as events proved, the real moving spirits were ruthless and unscrupulous men of blood.

    The Duc d'Orleans was not one of these latter. Though a man of little principle, and an extravagant, vain and ambitious libertine, he had no motives beyond the ousting of the King, and the establishing of a democratic monarchy with himself as that monarch. Having in addition but little intelligence, he made the ideal stalking horse for the first and most moderate stage of revolution, and a willing tool of men whom he probably scarcely knew; and who sent him to the guillotine soon after his base and ignominious role had been played.

    The Marquis de Mirabeau who succeeded him as the leading figure of the Revolution was cast in much the same role. He was a much abler man than d'Orleans, but so foul a libertine that he was shunned by all his own class, and imprisoned more than once at the instance of his own father.

    He is known to have been financed by Moses Mendelssohn, head of the Jewish Illuminati, and to have been more in the company of the Jewess Mrs. Herz than was her husband. He was not only an early figurehead in French Freemasonry in the respectable years, but introduced Illuminism into France.

    [Note: Moses Mendelssohn is the 'learned Jew' who is quoted as saying that: "Judaism is not a religion. It is a law religionized".

    To my mind, that is the same as saying that "Judaism is a political program (for World Dominion) wrapped in a cloak of religion". - jackie]

    This Illuminism was a secret revolutionary society behind freemasonry. The Illuminati penetrated into all the lodges of Grand Orient Freemasonry, and were backed and organized by cabalistic Jews.

    It is interesting to note that the Duc D'Orleans and Talleyrand were both initiated into Illuminism by Mirabeau shortly after the latter had introduced it into France, from Frankfurt, where its headquarters had been established in 1782 under Adam Weishaupt.

    In 1785 there happened a strange event, which makes it seem as though the heavenly powers themselves made a last moment attempt to warn France and Europe against these massing powers of evil:

    Lightning struck dead a messenger of the Illuminati at Ratisbon.

    The police found on the body papers dealing with plans for world revolution.

    Thereupon the Bavarian Government had the headquarters of the Illuminati searched, and much further evidence was discovered.

    French authorities were informed, but the process of paralysis was too far advanced, and no action resulted.

    By 1789 there were more than two thousand Lodges in France affiliated to the Grand Orient, the direct tool of international revolution; and their adepts numbered over 100,000.

    Thus we get Jewish Illuminism under Moses Mendelssohn and Masonic Illuminism under Weishaupt established as the inner controls of a strong secret organization covering the whole of France.

    Under the Illuminati worked Grand Orient Freemasonry, and under that again the Blue, or National, Masonry had operated until it was converted over-night into Grand Orient Masonry by Phillipe d'Orleans in 1773. Little did Egalite suspect the satanic powers that he was invoking, when he took that action, and satanic they certainly were. The name Lucifer means "Light Bearer"; and Illuminati those who were lit by that light.

    By the time the Estates General met at Versailles on 5th May, 1789, the paralysis of the executive authority by the secret organizations was complete.

    Paralysis by control of public opinion and publicity was well advanced by then also.

    This was the manner of its accomplishment.

    By 1780 d'Orleans' entire income of 800,000 livres, thanks to his reckless gambling and extravagance, was mortgaged to the moneylenders.

    In 1781, in return for accommodation, he signed papers handing over his palace, estates, and house the Palais Royal, to his creditors, with powers to form there a centre of politics, printing, pamphleteering, gambling, lectures, brothels, wine-shops, theatres, art galleries, athletics, and any other uses, which subsequently took the form of every variety of public debauchery.

    In fact, Egalite's financial masters used his name and property to install a colossal organism for publicity and corruption, which appealed to every lowest instinct in human nature; and deluged the enormous crowds so gathered with the filthy, defamatory and revolutionary output of its printing presses and debating clubs.

    As Scudder writes in A Prince of the Blood: "It gave the police more to do than all the other parts of the city."

    It is interesting to note that the general manager installed by the creditors at the Palais royal was one de Laclos, a political adventurer of alien origin, author of Liaisons Dangereuses, and other pornographic works, who was said "to study the politics of love because of his love for politics."

    This steady stream of corruption and destructive propaganda was linked with a series of systematic personal attacks of the vilest and most unscrupulous nature upon any public characters whom the Jacobins thought likely to stand in their way. This process was known as "L'infamie."

    Marie Antoinette herself was one of the chief targets for this typically Jewish form of attack. No lie or abuse was too vile to level at her. More intelligent, alert, and vigorous than the weak and indolent Louis, Marie Antoinette presented a considerable obstacle to the revolution. She had, more-over, received many warnings regarding freemasonry from her sister in Austria; and no doubt was by this time more awake to its significance than when she had written to her sister some years previously:

    "I believe that as far as France is concerned, you worry too much about freemasonry. Here it is far from having the significance that it may have elsewhere in Europe. Here everything is open and one knows all. Then where could the danger be?

    One might well be worried if it were a question of a political secret society. But on the contrary the government lets it spread, and it is only that which it seems, an association the objects of which are union and charity.

    One dines, one sings, one talks, which has given the King occasion to say that people who drink and sing are not suspect of organizing plots. Nor is it a society of atheists, for we are told God is on the lips of all. They are very charitable. They bring up the children of their poor and dead members. They endow their daughters. What harm is there in all that?"

    What harm indeed if these blameless pretensions masked no darker designs? Doubtless the agents of Weishaupt and Mendelssohn reported on to them the contents of the Queen's letter; and we can imagine them shaking with laughter, and rubbing their hands in satisfaction; hands that were itching to destroy the very life of France and her Queen; and which at the appropriate hour would give the signal that would convert secret conspiracy into the "massacres of September" and the blood baths of the guillotine.

    In order to further the campaign of calumny against the Queen, an elaborate hoax was arranged at the time, when the financiers and grain speculators were deliberately creating conditions of poverty and hunger in Paris.

    A diamond necklace valued at nearly a quarter of a million was ordered at the Court jewellers in the Queen's name by an agent of the Jacobins. The unfortunate Queen knew nothing of this affair until the necklace was brought round to her for acceptance, when she naturally disclaimed anything to do with the matter, pointing out that she would consider it wrong to order such a thing when France was in so bad a financial way.

    The printing presses of the Palais Royal, however, turned full blast on to the subject; and every kind of criticism leveled at the Queen.

    A further scandal was then engineered for the presses. Some prostitute from the Palais Royal was engaged to disguise herself as the Queen; and by the forged letter the Cardinal Prince de Rohan was induced to meet the supposed Queen about midnight at the Palais Royal supposing he was being asked for advice and help by the Queen on the subject of the necklace.

    This event, needless to say, was immediately reported to the printing presses and pamphleteers, who started a further campaign containing the foulest innuendoes that could be imagined concerning the whole affair. The moving spirit behind the scene was Cagliostro, alias Joseph Balsamo, a Jew from Palermo, a doctor of the cabalistic art, and a member of the Illuminati, into which he was initiated at Frankfurt by Weishaupt in 1774.

    When the necklace had finally served its purpose, it was sent over to London, where most of the stones were retained by the Jew Eliason. Attacks of a similar nature were directed against many other decent people, who resisted the influence of the Jacobin clubs. After eight years of this work the process of paralysis by mastery of publicity was complete.

    In every respect therefore by 1789, when the financiers forced the King to summon the Estates General, the first portion of their plans for revolution (i.e. paralysis) were accomplished. It now only remained to strike the blow or series of blows, which were to rob France of her throne, her church, her constitution, her nobles, her clergy, her gentry, her bourgeoisie, her traditions, and her culture; leaving in their place, when the guillotine's work was done, citizen hewers of wood and drawers of water under an alien financial dictatorship.

    From 1789 onwards a succession of revolutionary acts were set in motion; each more violent than the one preceding it; each unmasking fresh demands and more violent and revolutionary leaders. In their turn each of these leaders, a puppet only of the real powers behind the revolution, is set aside; and his head rolls into the basket to join those of his victims of yesterday.

    Phillipe Egalite, Duc d'Orleans, was used to prepare the ground for the revolution; to protect with his name and influence the infancy of the revolutionary club; to popularize freemasonry and the Palais Royal; and to sponsor such acts as the march of the women to Versailles.

    The "women" on this occasion were mostly men in disguise. d'Orleans was under the impression that the King and Queen would be assassinated by this mob, and himself proclaimed a democratic King. The real planners of the march, however, had other schemes in view.

    One main objective was to secure the removal of the royal family to Paris, where they would be clear of protection from the army, and under the power of the Commune or Paris County Council in which the Jacobins were supreme.

    They continued to make use of Egalite right up to the time of the vote on the King's life, when he crowned his sordid career by leading the open vote in voting for the death of his cousin. His masters thereafter had no further use for his services; and he very shortly followed his cousin to the guillotine amidst the execrations of all classes.

    Mirabeau played a similar role to that of Egalite. He had intended that the revolution should cease with the setting up of Louis as a democratic monarch with himself as chief adviser. He had no desire to see violence done to the King. On the contrary, in the last days before he died mysteriously by poison, he exerted all his efforts to get the King removed from Paris, and placed in charge of loyal generals still commanding his army.

    He was the last of the moderates and monarchists to dominate the Jacobin club of Paris; that bloodthirsty focus of revolution, which had materialized out of the secret clubs of the Orient Masons and Illuminati. It was Mirabeau's voice, loud and resonant, that kept in check the growing rage of the murderous fanatics who swarmed therein.

    There is no doubt that he perceived at last the true nature and strength of the beast, which he had worked so long and so industriously to unchain. In his last attempt to save the royal family by getting them out of Paris, he actually succeeded in shouting down all opposition in the Jacobin club. That evening he died by a sudden and violent illness; and, as the author of The Diamond Necklace writes: "Louis was not ignorant that Mirabeau had been poisoned."

    Thus, like Phillipe Egalite, and later Danton and Robes Pierre, Mirabeau too was removed from the stage when his role had been played. We are reminded of the passage in Number 15 of the Protocols of Zion: "We execute masons in such wise that none save the brotherhood can ever have a suspicion of it."

    And again: "In this way we shall proceed with those goy masons who know too much."

    As Mr E. Scudder writes in his Life of Mirabeau: "He died at a moment when the revolution might still have been checked."

    The figure of Lafayette occupies the stage on several important occasions during these first revolutionary stages. He was one of those simple freemasons, who are borne they know not wither, in a ship they have not fully explored, and by currents concerning which they are totally ignorant.

    While a popular figure with the revolutionary crowds, he very severely handled several incipient outbreaks of revolutionary violence, notably in the march of the women to Versailles, during the attack on the Tuilleries, and at the Champs de Mars. He, too, desired the establishment of a democratic monarchy, and would countenance no threat to the King even from Phillipe Egalite, whom he treated with the utmost hostility during and after the march of the women to Versailles, believing on that occasion that Egalite intended the assassination of the King, and the usurpation of the Crown.

    He evidently became an obstacle to the powers behind the revolution, and was packed off to a war against Austria, which the Assembly forced Louis to declare. Once he did dash back to Paris in an effort to save the King; but he was packed off again to the war. Mirabeau's death followed, and Louis' fate was sealed.

    The wild figures of Danton, Marat, Robes Pierre, and the fanatics of the Jacobin club now dominated the scene.

    In September of 1792 were perpetrated the terrible "September massacres"; 8,000 persons being murdered in the prisons of Paris alone, and many more over the country.

    It should be noted here, that these victims were arrested and held till the time of the massacre in the prisons by one Manuel, Procurer of the Commune. Sir Walter Scott evidently understood much concerning the influences which were at work behind the scenes. In his Life of Napoleon, Vol. 2, he writes on page 30: "The demand of the Communaute de Paris,* now the Sanhedrin of the Jacobins, was, of course, for blood." [*The Paris County Council, equivalent to the L.C.C. in London.]

    Again, on page 56 he writes: "The power of the Jacobins was irresistible in Paris, where Robes Pierre, Danton and Marat shared the high places in the synagogue."

    Writing of the Commune, Sir Walter Scott states in the same work: "The principal leaders of the Commune seem to have been foreigners."

    Some of the names of these "foreigners" are worthy of note:

    There was Chlodero de Laclos, manager of the Palais Royal, said to be of Spanish origin.

    There was Manuel, the Procurer of the Commune, already mentioned. He it was who started the attack upon royalty in the Convention, which culminated with the execution of Louis and Marie Antoinette.

    There was David the painter, a leading member of the Committee of Public Security, which "tried" the victims. His voice was always raised calling for death. Sir Walter Scott writes that this fiend used to preface his "bloody work of the day with the professional phrase, 'let us grind enough of the Red'." David it was who inaugurated the Cult of the Supreme being; and organized "the conducting of this heathen mummery, which was substituted for every external sign of rational devotion." (Sir Walter Scott, Life of Napoleon, Vol. 2.)

    There were Reubel and Gohir, two of the five "Directors," who with a Council of Elders became the government after the fall of Robes Pierre, being known as the Directoire.

    The terms "Directors" and "Elders" are, of course, characteristically Jewish.

    One other observation should be made here; it is that this important work by Sir Walter Scott in 9 volumes, revealing so much of the real truth, is practically unknown, is never reprinted with his other works, and is almost unobtainable.

    Those familiar with Jewish technique will appreciate the full significance of this fact; and the added importance it lends to Sir Walter Scott's evidence regarding the powers behind the French Revolution.

    To return to the scene in Paris. Robes Pierre now remains alone, and apparently master of the scenes; but this again was only appearance. Let us turn to the Life of Robes Pierre, by one G. Renier, who writes as though Jewish secrets were at his disposal. He writes:

    "From April to July 1794 (the fall of Robes Pierre) the terror was at its height. It was never the dictatorship of a single man, least of all Robes Pierre. Some 20 men (the Committees of Public Safety and of General Security) shared the power."

    To quote Mr. Renier again: "On the 28th July, 1794," "Robes Pierre made a long speech before the Convention . . . a philippic against ultra-terrorists... uttering vague general accusations.

    'I dare not name them at this moment and in this place. I cannot bring myself entirely to tear asunder the veil that covers this profound mystery of iniquity. But I can affirm most positively that among the authors of this plot are the agents of that system of corruption and extravagance, the most powerful of all the means invented by foreigners for the undoing of the Republic; I mean the impure apostles of atheism, and the immorality that is at its base'."

    Mr Renier continues with all a Jew's satisfaction: "Had he not spoken these words he might still have triumphed!"

    In this smug sentence Mr Renier unwittingly dots the i's and crosses the t's, which Robes Pierre had left uncompleted. Robes Pierre's allusion to the "corrupting and secret foreigners" was getting altogether too near the mark; a little more and the full truth would be out.

    At 2 a.m. that night Robes Pierre was shot in the jaw and early on the following day dragged to the guillotine.

    Again let us recall Protocol 15: "In this way we shall proceed with goy masons who know too much."

    Note: In a somewhat similar manner Abraham Lincoln was shot and killed by the Jew Booth on the evening of his pronouncement to his cabinet that he intended in future to finance U.S. loans on a debt free basis similar to the debt free money known as "Greenbacks," with which he had financed the Civil War.

    Archibald Maule Ramsay wrote the true history of events leading up to the Second World War. For this, he was imprisoned for several years.

    Quote Originally Posted by Sigurd View Post
    Ruling houses of Germanic background continued to be relatively common in France for a while, so we aren't talking solely about the early medieval, but even longer.
    • After the French Revolution, citizenship was finally granted to the Jews of France.


    The final nail to the coffin of France.

  8. #8
    Senior Member DominionsWolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Online
    Thursday, September 23rd, 2010 @ 06:33 AM
    Ethnicity
    German-Canadian
    Ancestry
    German,English, Norweigan, Spanish/Portuguese
    Country
    Dominion of Canada Dominion of Canada
    State
    British Columbia British Columbia
    Gender
    Occupation
    Student
    Politics
    Folkish Libertarian
    Religion
    Philospher
    Posts
    61
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    How many French people actually think about whether their heritage is Celtic or Germanic. All the French people I have met consider themselves French, not celtic or Germanic. When referring to ancestry, they talk about the Gauls and Franks, but this doesn't seem to define French ethnicity today.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Teutonic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Last Online
    Sunday, April 15th, 2012 @ 10:42 PM
    Ethnicity
    German
    Ancestry
    Bayern, Baden, Schwaben, Württemberg
    Country
    German Empire German Empire
    State
    Bavaria Bavaria
    Location
    Oberbayern
    Gender
    Family
    In a steady relationship
    Religion
    Deutsch
    Posts
    320
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Thusnelda View Post
    Well, I hope there´s a racial identity crisis in France. Because otherwise they´re lost for sure. If I see their football national team and the lack of protest against it then there´s no sign for optimism regarding France. Their system of civic nationalism is wrong.
    I think France is a lost cause, the girls I meet from France are complete traitors to their people and culture. Most of them worship American culture, and love black American Athletes..The France Football team is a bunch of Aliens..

    But when watching the National German team, I am starting to think the same, I mean, how many foreigners are on this team? When Ballack got hurt I was like, ah im not watching but I like Müller,Schweinsteiger,Lahm.. But no one protests here in Germany about Özil,Sami Khedira,Cacau,Boateng,Tasci,Aogo.. When you look at the list of players none of them have our names, most of them seem Alien.. And the game against Ghana sometimes I was like where is the German team? Cacau and Boateng look to me the same as those on the Ghana team..

    And then my girlfriend made a comment about the German news saying how cool it was that Özils German girlfriend converted to a muslim.. And when watching the game in a Bar, It seems most of our people care about partying and dont see the big picture or even care about it. Plus I see them treating the German Fahne with such disrespect, one girl crumpled hers up like it was a piece of garbage and shoved it into her purse.Did she ever think about the men, women that died to protect everything that those colors represent?? It strikes me as fake patriotsim and makes me sad and then pissed off.
    "Sei, was Du willst, aber was Du bist, habe den Mut ganz zu sein."
    (Albert Leo Schlageter)

    "Deutsche Einigkeit, meine Stärke - meine Stärke, Deutschlands Macht" (Hermann)

  10. #10
    Senior Member Lothringen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Last Online
    Friday, February 10th, 2012 @ 04:57 PM
    Ethnicity
    Frank (Cherusci)
    Ancestry
    Lothringen/Prussia/Galicia(ex part of Austrian Empire)
    Country
    Holy Roman Empire Holy Roman Empire
    State
    Alsace-Lorraine Alsace-Lorraine
    Location
    Austrasia
    Gender
    Family
    Married parent
    Occupation
    employee
    Politics
    Habsburg-Lothringen für Herzog !
    Religion
    Catholic & germanic evhemerism
    Posts
    165
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post
    Quote Originally Posted by DominionsWolf View Post
    How many French people actually think about whether their heritage is Celtic or Germanic. All the French people I have met consider themselves French, not celtic or Germanic. When referring to ancestry, they talk about the Gauls and Franks, but this doesn't seem to define French ethnicity today.
    Well, Celtic (even gallo-roman) or Germanic heritage cannot really applied even to pure native "French" from oversee.
    If by "french" you mean "citizen of the French Republic" native people of Guyana or French Guinea are french since 1503 and cannot be consider as immigrant nor "imported slave"
    Same for several people of "La Réunion", french since 1638.

    This is quite similar than the case of Denmark & Groenland from 1500 to 1814 or even from 986.
    None will deny Inuits the right to feel and claim to be danish, but they cannot be considered as let say "Vikings"

    Similarly native from French oversee department (even lost like Harkis) or territories cannot be deny the right to feel and claim to be french (or citizen of the French Republic if you prefer) but they cannot be considered as Francks.

    Personnally I have myself difficulties to admit the celtic/druidic part of my culture or maybe blood. Between Brennos & Vercingetorix or Hermann(Arminius) & Chlodovech (Clovis) I have made my choice for reference.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Italy is Set to Join Belgium and France in Banning the "Burkha" in Public
    By celticviking in forum Articles & Current Affairs
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: Wednesday, August 3rd, 2011, 09:47 PM
  2. Replies: 2
    Last Post: Monday, February 28th, 2011, 05:57 AM
  3. France's "National Pride" Campaign
    By Ocko in forum Immigration & Multiculturalism
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: Friday, December 4th, 2009, 12:15 AM
  4. France, "Eldest Daughter of the Catholic Church" - and the First to go Moslem
    By friedrich braun in forum Immigration & Multiculturalism
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: Tuesday, April 19th, 2005, 09:08 PM
  5. "Racial Origin and earliest Racial History of the Hebrews", by Eugen Fischer
    By Frans_Jozef in forum Anthropogeny & Ethnogenesis
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: Friday, October 22nd, 2004, 06:57 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •