Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: Guillaume Faye: 'Pre-War: Account of an Impending Cataclysm'

  1. #1
    Funding Member
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member

    Nordhammer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Last Online
    Monday, February 6th, 2006 @ 07:08 PM
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Gender
    Politics
    Nordicist
    Posts
    3,153
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    6
    Thanked in
    6 Posts

    Exclamation Guillaume Faye: 'Pre-War: Account of an Impending Cataclysm'

    Pre-War: Account of an Impending Cataclysm

    Guillaume Faye - Paris: L’ Æncre, 2002 (24 Euros) 382 pp.

    Reviewed by Michael O’Meara


    Readers of The Occidental Quarterly are probably unfamiliar with the work of Guillaume Faye, but his ideas are increasingly those of Europe’s nationalist vanguard. An early associate of Alain de Benoist and one of the architects of the European New Right, the young Faye left politics in the late 1980s to pursue a career in media. In 1998 he returned, instantly re-establishing himself as the intellectual force on the nationalist right.

    He has since published five books, each of which has had a major impact on the struggle against multiculturalism, Third World immigration, and globalization.1 Unlike Benoist and other New Right theoreticians, whose defense of the European ethnos is waged almost exclusively on the cultural terrain, and unlike Le Pen's National Front, which favors the assimilation rather than the forced repatriation of non-Europeans, Faye claims that race is not only primary to cultural identity, but that race and culture are, at root, inseparable. For this reason he argues that the struggle to preserve Europe's cultural patrimony is no less a struggle to defend its genetic heritage and the ethnic integrity of its Lebensraum.2

    His latest work—Avant-Guerre: Chronique d’un cataclysme annoncé (Pre-War: Account of an Impending Cataclysm)—is reminiscent of Spengler’s Hour of Decision. Like Spengler, Faye looks at the storm clouds on the horizon and predicts that within ten years a coming era of world-altering tempests will descend on the white race, determining if it is to have a future or not.

    In his view, these cataclysms will be neither ideological nor economic in character, but (à la Huntington) racial and civilizational, involving clashing continental blocs and warring ethno-racial groups. They are thus likely to engender unprecedented violence and destruction, forcibly shaking white people from the stupor that is leading them toward extinction. Although presently unprepared to fight such wars and alienated from all that is distinct to their race and heritage, the struggles of the twenty-first century, he believes, will give Europeans on both sides of the Atlantic a final chance to throw off the forces that have denatured and debilitated then over the last half century.

    Europe and America

    Like most "nationalists" who fight in Europe’s name, Faye is extremely critical of the American government and the role it has played in repressing the worldwide forces of white solidarity. But unlike many on the anti-American right, Faye does not believe the U.S. is Europe’s principal enemy, even if its Judeo-liberal New Class has been responsible for eroding European autonomy and demonizing its culture. An enemy, he contends, does more than corrupt and intimidate, it threatens one’s biological existence. Taking his cue from Carl Schmidt, he thinks it is more accurate to characterize the U.S. as Europe’s "adversary"—an adversary that needs to be opposed if Europeans are ever to re-assert the Faustian project distinct to their ethos—but nevertheless one with whom a life-and-death struggle is not at all inevitable.

    The real enemy threatening the white homelands comes, he claims, from the Third World. Accordingly, the terror attack of "9/11" suggests one form his predicted cataclysm will take. But while Islam is Europe’s principal enemy, it is not, paradoxically, America’s. Based on the work of General Gallois, Alexandre Del Valle, and a new generation of European geopoliticists, Faye argues that Islam has long served the U.S. in furthering the hegemonic ambitions of its global village, specifically in dividing Europe and weakening Russia. That its recruitment and arming of Islamic fanatics to fight in Afghanistan and Chechnya and in Bosnia and Kosovo at last boomeranged ought not to detract from the fact that for a quarter century the U.S. systematically incited Islamic insurgencies for the sake of its strategic aims.

    In Faye’s view, America’s principal Third World enemy, and thus the power it will face in World War III, comes not from the Middle East (even if militant Islam continues to target it), but from a rapidly developing and technologically armed China bent on contesting its dominance in the Pacific. In this potential Sino-American conflict, Faye believes the future lies entirely on the Chinese side. Unlike the Middle Kingdom, the U.S.’s disparate mix of race and cultures has left it without a coherent heritage and thus a destining project worth dying for. This makes it not a nation in the European sense, but simply une symbiose étatico-entrepreneuriale. Because such an entity is likely to fly apart if challenged by a determined enemy, in the great cataclysms to come it will be Europe (and Russia), not the U.S., that will stand at the center of the struggle to defend the white West from a hostile non-white world.

    Islam

    While America’s future holds out the prospect of an interstate war with China, Faye believes Europe faces an intrastate war with the forces of an insurgent Islam—a war, to repeat, that will resemble 9/11 more than the conventional military engagement the U.S. can expect in the Pacific.

    In the four decades since 1962, when Africa broached Europe’s southern frontier, the continent, especially France and Belgium, has been inundated by successive waves of Third World immigrants. The amplitude of this immigration, involving masses not individuals, is such that not a few demographers contend that it is more accurately described as "colonization." Due to disproportional birthrates, the unrelenting influx of non-white, unassimilable, and largely Muslim immigrants has already begun to "de-Europeanize" Europe. For example, virtually everywhere they have settled in France they have succeeded in "ethnically cleansing" former neighborhoods, establishing not ghettos, but conquered territories, from which future conquests are being prepared. With their seven to eight million inhabitants, these territories have become, in effect, hostile African/Middle Eastern encampments within an increasingly besieged France.3

    This immigration is creating an extremely volatile situation, for Europe lacks the massive police apparatus and vast geographical expanses that have kept ethnoracial tensions ‘manageable’ in the U.S. Typically, in urban areas where neighborhoods have been lost to Islamic civilization, Europeans have come to experience not only escalating levels of violence and insecurity, but the loss of their laws and institutions. There are now more than 1400 zones de non-droit in France (including eleven towns), and in nearly a hundred of these, republican jurisdiction has been supplanted by the shari`a (Islamic law).4

    Within such zones, whose deteriorating conditions politically correct public officials persist in describing in socioeconomic rather than biocultural terms, it is nearly impossible for a Frenchman to reside in the public housing estates (HLM) built for the French working class, to find a café serving wine or ham, or for his wife to dress or behave in public as do European women. In contrast to the Little Italies and Germantowns arising in many American cities in the last century, these non-European enclaves have not the slightest intention of assimilating into the dar-al-Harb (the "impious" non-Islamic world, which Muslims view as the "world of war"), and have, in fact, begun to assert their autonomy vis-à-vis it. In recent years, hardly a week passes without a newspaper report of a riot or bloody incident provoked by clashes between police and Muslim gangs.

    Since 1990, urban violence has grown five percent annually—since 2000, by ten percent—as the anomie, violence, and disintegration associated with America’s inner cities becomes an increasingly familiar European reality. In fact, in 2000, for the first time in history, French criminality, whose ethnoracial character is overwhelmingly non-European, surpassed that of the U.S. crime rate; and Paris, once the City of Lights, became the least safe of the major European cities.

    In the face of these threats to the continent’s demographic, cultural, and institutional foundations, the media, the academy, and the established "anti-racist" organizations (mostly controlled by Zionists) attempt to silence whoever criticizes such changes, all the while making the term "multiculturalism" emblematic of the mobile postmodern society of optional values and fashionable identities that comes with globalization. Instead, then, of mobilizing the Christian West against such threats, these New Class forces preach cowardice, resignation, escapism, and a self-destructive humanitarianism.

    An ethno-masochistic response of this kind has naturally emboldened the more militant members of France’s Muslim community, who now call for jihad against the "white cheese." Public authorities, though, persist in distinguishing between violent fundamentalists (who number perhaps 40,000) and the "peace-loving" Muslim community, unable or unwilling to acknowledge Islam’s inherent hostility to Europe’s secular society. Between orthodox and fundamentalist Islam, Faye, though, claims there is solely a difference in temperament. And even this is increasingly compromised by fundamentalist aggressions. Years before the 9-11 attack on the symbols of U.S. hegemony, this "monstrous offshoot of Judaism" had already begun its third great offensive against the dar-al-Harb, targeting Europe as a future Muslim homeland.5 Buoyed up by U.S.-protected strongholds in Southeast Europe (Albania, Bosnia, Kosovo), U.S. pressure to admit Muslim Turkey to the EU, and large stockpiles of sophisticated arms, Islamists have already begun organizing for a new conquest.

    It is not surprising, then, that Faye interprets the growth of European Islam as the opening salvo in a larger struggle for the continent’s future.6 Faye’s militant opposition to Islam does not, however, bear a resemblance to that of President Bush’s handlers. The struggle against Islam, he insists, is a struggle to free Europe from a dire threat to existence—not a justification for further Zionist aggression.

    What War Will Bring

    In the coming cataclysms—likely to involve street battles between rival racial communities, guerrilla skirmishes, mega-terrorism, perhaps even small-scale nuclear exchanges with "dirty bombs," along with conventional-style invasions from neighboring Islamic armies—Faye believes Europe will either perish or experience a rebirth. In any case, the confrontations ahead will create a situation in which the present politically correct delusions are impossible to sustain.

    For like every great struggle affecting human’s natural selection, war privileges the elemental and the vital. With it, the subtleties and distractions that sophists and simulators have used to misdirect Europeans cannot but cease to count, as will those minor differences that have historically divided them. Then, as "money and pleasure" cede to the imperatives of "blood and soil," only the traditions, the way of life, and the genetic principles defining them as a people will matter.

    The situation the white race finds itself in today may therefore be unconditionally bleak, but in that hour when everything risks being lost, Faye believes a final opportunity for renaissance will present itself.

    In this vein, he predicts that the dominant musical theme of the twenty-first century will be neither an orchestral ode to joy nor the doggerel of an urban savage, but rather a solemn military march based on ancient hymns. Europeans on both sides of the Atlantic, he advises, would do well to keep step with its strong, marked rhythm.

    Michael O’Meara is a scholar who resides and teaches on the West Coast of the United States. He is the author of numerous articles and book reviews.

    End Notes

    1. L’archéofuturisme (1998); Nouveau discours à la nation européenne, 2nd ed. (1999); La colonisation de l’Europe (2000); Pourquoi nous combattons (2001). All these works have been published by L’Æncre and can be purchased at the Librairie Nationale, 12 rue de la Sourdière, 75001 Paris, or on the Internet at www.librairienationale.com/</SPAN>.

    2. See Michael Torigian, New Right, New Culture: Anti-Liberalism in Postmodern Europe (Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 2003).

    3. The number of non-Europeans in France is not officially known. The cited figure is the estimate of one of the country’s leading demographers. See “L’avenir démographique: Entretien avec Jacques Dupâquier,” in Krisis 20-21 (November 1997). Another academic (J. P. Gourevich) claims it is closer to 9 million. Some put the figure as high as 14 million, while the media usually refer to 4, 5, or 6 million. But more alarming than these figures is the fact that one-third of the population under 30 is now of non-European origins and has a birth rate four or five times higher than the European one.

    4. Jeremy Rennher, “L’Occident ligoté par l’imposture antiraciste,” in Écrit de Paris 640 (February 2002). Even the politically correct editor of Violences en France (Paris: Seuil, 1999), Michael Wieviorka, acknowledges that the explosion of violence and criminality since 1990 is an outgrowth of Islamic power. Because the French government keeps most data on immigrant crime and racial terror securely under wraps, the little that is known has been surreptiously leaked by frustrated officials. The publication with the best access to these leaks is the monthly J’ai tout compris! Lettre de désintoxification, edited, not coincidentally, by Guillaume Faye.

    5. The first, Arab wave of the seventh century brought the Muslims to Poitiers, and the second, Turkish wave of the twelth through the seventeenth centuries led to the destruction of Christian Byzantium and the seige of Vienna. The third wave, in the form of the present colonization, is stealthy in character, but potentially even more catastrophic.

    6. Accordingly, the more militant Europeanists now invoke the need for a new reconquista. This is especially evident in Philippe Randa’s novel Poitiers demain (Paris: Denoël, 2000) and the album Reconquista by the group Fraction (Heretik Records).

  2. #2
    American Couch Potato
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member

    AngryPotato's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Anglo-American
    Subrace
    Norðvestrid/NW. Nordid
    Country
    United States United States
    Location
    Amidst the brown horde
    Gender
    Occupation
    Ball Breaker
    Politics
    Hunting the Enemy
    Religion
    Children of Tyr
    Posts
    589
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8
    Thanked in
    8 Posts

    Post Re: Preparing for World War III

    I have to say that I thought this was going to be about a race war in America and was going to bring up the problem with China. A war with China truly frightens me as an American and most people do not see it as a possibility. With the Chinese increasing their military spending in double digit percentages every year, they are gearing up for something big. I for one do not want to fight for Taiwan. I would be one for the defense of NZ/Australia & Japan. Japan would not survive such a conflict with China. I don't think the land is worth the resulting war, but they're good allies with a solid culture that doesn't promote racemixing. At a certain point WNs must decide if they're for full scale genocide of all races or if they're for separation of races. I for one am OK with the Japanese existing in the world, on their island. I've said it before and I will continue to say that I do not see an invading force destroying America and occupying it without the use of some sort of WMDs. We may only be 1/4 the citizenry of China, but we are armed to the teeth citizens. Such a war would end up with the destruction of our coastal cities. I don't know if Russia and Canada would side with us or not. They will need to protect their interests. I don't see the EU nor NATO coming to our assistance. Perhaps a handful of nations, but no universal commitment and almost no troops if any at all. The US would end up using Mexican conscripts as fodder. The jew will just scamper to South America.

    The article also brings up something that doesn't affect my daily life. Muslims in Europe. We do not have such a widespread problem here in the US. I will need to keep this in mind when discussing the Muslim question in the future. We do need such a subforum on Skadi.

    In this vein, he predicts that the dominant musical theme of the twenty-first century will be neither an orchestral ode to joy nor the doggerel of an urban savage, but rather a solemn military march based on ancient hymns. Europeans on both sides of the Atlantic, he advises, would do well to keep step with its strong, marked rhythm.
    I would welcome this.

  3. #3
    Member xakep's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Last Online
    Saturday, January 28th, 2006 @ 11:47 AM
    Subrace
    Other
    Country
    United States United States
    Location
    Earth
    Gender
    Politics
    None
    Posts
    181
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Post Re: Preparing for World War III

    If war happens it will most likely involve the use nuclear weapons which would target West coast. I should consider moving to Central States soon, just in case.

  4. #4
    New Member ThisMeansWar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Last Online
    Sunday, November 21st, 2004 @ 01:31 PM
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Gender
    Age
    32
    Politics
    Socialdarwinism
    Posts
    12
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Post Re: Preparing for World War III [G. Faye]

    A interesting text I might say, although nothing new for me as an European citizen. The author of the text specify on two (not so)different things and combines them to one. In short: The next world war if the west and its norms still exists will be all about USA against China and Europe against Islam and the bond across the Pacific ocean bethween the whites.

    As I see it the world war will come even if Europe and the white race will perish and we, the white race just as the two wars before will play the key part in all of it. But as a proud european i bet my life in that if the west fails to "rebirth" and falls we will not give up without draging the muslims with us.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Last Online
    Tuesday, July 26th, 2005 @ 03:22 AM
    Gender
    Posts
    766
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4
    Thanked in
    4 Posts

    Post Re: Preparing for World War III [G. Faye]

    The article raises so many good points that it would take a long time to comment on all of them. But, one point in particular stands out:

    unlike many on the anti-American right, Faye does not believe the U.S. is Europe’s principal enemy, even if its Judeo-liberal New Class has been responsible for eroding European autonomy and demonizing its culture. An enemy, he contends, does more than corrupt and intimidate, it threatens one’s biological existence. Taking his cue from Carl Schmidt, he thinks it is more accurate to characterize the U.S. as Europe’s "adversary"—an adversary that needs to be opposed if Europeans are ever to re-assert the Faustian project distinct to their ethos—but nevertheless one with whom a life-and-death struggle is not at all inevitable.

    The real enemy threatening the white homelands comes, he claims, from the Third World.
    In my view, this is absolutely correct. The US suffers from incompetent (or worse) leadership, but that does not make it the enemy of Europe, let alone its principal enemy. It is perhaps an adversary or rival, but that might not be so if the current multiculturalist clique were not in charge of it.

    The Islamic threat is indeed the real threat to Europe's future, on a racial and cultural level. They are nearby, aggressive, and invading the continent with breathtaking speed. It is as if they determined to redress their defeat by Charles Martel in 692 AD. Europeans need to hand these barbarians a second defeat if they are to survive in their own homeland.

    I would also agree that China is a very serious rival and threat to the US. As China continues to grow more powerful, pushing its sphere of influence outward until it touches on Japan and Australia, while a declining US seeks to hold on to what it has, a trans-Pacific clash between these countries seems inevitable. I am not so sure which country is likely to win, because the nature of modern weaponry (if it came to the use of WMDs) makes this unknowable in advance - it is quite possible neither country would survive such a war in any recognizable form. But, that is purely speculative.

    A crucial question that the article didn't really touch on, though, is the role of Russia in all of this. Russia can play a crucial role for good or ill. If it sides with Europe against Islam, then the preservation of Europe is assured. However, one does come across those who advocate some sort of Russo-Chinese-Islamic alliance against the US (perceived as the world's principal enemy), with Europe as a sort of junior partner in such an alliance. That, in my view, would be a disaster that would tear the white race apart, largely for the benefit of Muslims and Chinese - it surely could not be to Europe's benefit, as it would leave the forces of Islam stronger than ever.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Jove's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Last Online
    Friday, January 20th, 2006 @ 12:36 PM
    Subrace
    Borreby
    Country
    England England
    Location
    Europa
    Gender
    Age
    41
    Politics
    Folkish Libertarianism
    Posts
    36
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Post Re: Preparing for World War III [G. Faye]

    The article is certainly interesting, but I’m still to be convinced that an (imminent) Islamic rebellion in Europe would have any real motor on it. First of all, no country is likely to invade or otherwise direct an assault (in the conventional sense) on any European country because in our nuclear age it’s simply unrealistic as it would constitute a nationwide suicide to any country that would attempt it.

    Moreover, given the slow but sure Americanization, democratization and globalization of (west-central) Asia, there would be no nations with dictatorial regimes left in the entire region that would be in the position to simply ‘attack’ Europe, because they would be economically dependant on the American occupied nearby nations like Iraq, and soon perhaps Iran and Syria (i.e. although this is a long shot, I don’t believe America has invaded Iraq to “institute democracy and free the people;” Iraq is but a stronghold to further US expansion in the region). With US economic monopoly of the region, oil transfers would become increasingly controlled by the States, and, although I cannot support this claim by any ‘empirical’ evidence as such, I do believe that the main reason behind US expansion into the Middle East is for reasons of establishing a throttlehold on any future military actions undertaken by countries in the ME, and later countries outside the ME because significant military action in any one country consumes ca. 10 times more minerals than everyday social transfers in any continent as a whole. Thus Europe and intra-European Islam will clash as separate political entities, with religious ties to the outside world at best.

    This scenario would undeniably leave Russia a significant role to play in European struggle against intra-continental Islam, as Russia possesses a comparatively extravagant mineral and oil reserves in its enormous territory. However, I strongly doubt that Russia’s role will be that of the ‘knight in shining armour’ because this notion is simply too idealistic / simplistic. It’s not unlikely that tribulations within NATO will arise because of the Russo-Latvian civil conflict that will simply be, well… a pain in the arse (for lack of better a term) for the western European coalition within NATO. Hence Russia’s role is far from determined in this continental drama.

    Islam will unquestionably continue to rise in Europe to an ultimately extremely volatile state, and there will be lots of casualties (mainly of European nationals) as far as I can tell. But the rise in Muslim identity in European political and social arenas will produce a state of affairs that will coerce ethnic Europeans to flock in collective opposition to the Islamic threat, and, as this will unfold, all the current distinctions between ‘Muslim terrorists’ and ‘Muslim peace-lovers’ will be abolished and the road for military action against Muslims will be paved clean (in all probability there will be massive concentration areas / ghettoes before en masse repatriation).

    Unfortunately, the abovementioned scenario is but one of a few I have in mind, and this one is the least consequential I could personally come up with. Faye is undoubtedly correct about one thing; the dominant European musical theme will no longer conflict with its sociopolitical reality.

  7. #7
    Member Strengthandhonour's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    Thursday, February 10th, 2005 @ 09:15 PM
    Subrace
    Galician/Lombardian/Genoese
    Country
    European Union European Union
    Location
    my secret base
    Gender
    Age
    31
    Occupation
    Student
    Politics
    what does Politics mean?
    Religion
    Religion of Romans
    Posts
    320
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post

    Post Re: Preparing for World War III [G. Faye]

    I always wonder about what Europe's role would be in a new world war. As many of us have noticed, Europe isn't as powerful as it once was, and the only way of Europe challenging any type of massive army such as China or the USA would be for Europe to unite as a whole under an union. China's army is beyond big, and it's all male as well which gives them an advantage.
    I think that warfare is so advanced that it would kind of go back. See, countering missiles over and over again would end up in soldiers having to fight in battlegrounds once again.
    The US army as of now, I would consider it the best worldwide, as they have so many bases throughout the world giving them a huge tactical advantage.
    Just close your eyes...can you remember
    The generations not so long ago
    I feel the shameless urge that we must restore
    Our former king to his rightful throne
    And with me lords and maidens
    We wait for the chosen son's return

    I come alive
    It's a time for celebration
    Our will to restore
    Make our past become the futre once more

    Still he lives! 2000 years have passed
    And still we're yearning for his return
    We fulfill a wishful prohecy
    And so the chanting begins
    Hail Caesar...Hail Caesar...we render unto you
    What is still yours

  8. #8
    Adolar II
    Guest

    Post Re: Preparing for World War III [G. Faye]

    Another review which might be of interest is the review of "L'archeofuturisme" by Guillaume Faye, which appeared in issue 21 of The Scorpion magazine:



    http://thescorp.multics.org/21faye.html



    I believe it was Faye who coined the terms "xenophilia" and "ethno-masochism" to describe the Zionist-liberal induced self-hate which infects much of the West today.



    A. II













    [QUOTE=Nordhammer]
    Preparing for World War III








    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Avant-Guerre: Chronique d’un cataclysme annoncé
    (Pre-War: Account of an Impending Cataclysm)

    Guillaume Faye
    Paris: L’ Æncre, 2002
    24 Euros

    382 pp.


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Reviewed by Michael O’Meara

    [Source]

    Readers of The Occidental Quarterly are probably unfamiliar with the work of Guillaume Faye, but his ideas are increasingly those of Europe’s nationalist vanguard.

    An early associate of Alain de Benoist and one of the architects of the European New Right, the young Faye left politics in the late 1980s to pursue a career in media. In 1998 he returned, instantly re-establishing himself as the intellectual force on the nationalist right.

    He has since published five books, each of which has had a major impact on the struggle against multiculturalism, Third World immigration, and globalization.1 Unlike Benoist and other New Right theoreticians, whose defense of the European ethnos is waged almost exclusively on the cultural terrain, and unlike Le Pen's National Front, which favors the assimilation rather than the forced repatriation of non-Europeans, Faye claims that race is not only primary to cultural identity, but that race and culture are, at root, inseparable. For this reason he argues that the struggle to preserve Europe's cultural patrimony is no less a struggle to defend its genetic heritage and the ethnic integrity of its Lebensraum.2

    - snip -

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Last Online
    Wednesday, September 27th, 2006 @ 09:26 PM
    Location
    Eorthe {For Now}
    Gender
    Occupation
    Bringer of Truth - Balance
    Religion
    ~Truth~
    Posts
    69
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Post Re: Preparing for World War III [G. Faye]

    There is no WWIII coming it is the continuation of WWII, and the end of it and many other things....
    "For the gate is narrow and the way leads to life, and those whom find it are few"

  10. #10
    Senior Member ogenoct's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Last Online
    Monday, April 23rd, 2012 @ 06:58 AM
    Ethnicity
    German
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Location
    Moscow
    Gender
    Age
    43
    Politics
    National Futurism
    Religion
    Atheism
    Posts
    751
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Post Re: Preparing for World War III [G. Faye]

    Another anti-Islamic piece of garbage, deflecting away from the real enemy.

    Constantin

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. What Was, Must Be: Guillaume Faye's Archeofuturism
    By Olavssønn in forum Strategic Intelligence
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: Sunday, August 19th, 2012, 05:13 PM
  2. Guillaume Faye och Nord-Sydkonflikten
    By Oskorei in forum Sweden
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Monday, February 6th, 2006, 06:26 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •