Research Help Needed

[michael]

I have read several scolarly documents that postulate that the Australian Aboriginals are not the first people in Australia. Indeed it seems the arrived a long time ago and they themselves displaced and exterminated an earlier race of inhabitants.

Their used to be a bit of info that could be easily found on the internet but it seems that there is a systematic erasing of the facts to suit the present Aboriginal population and politically correct dogma.

I am sick & tired of these coons stating that the Europeans arrived and displaced them as the owners of this country. My opinion is "So sad too bad" cause you aren't really indigenous either.

If you get a spare minute or two please help me out in sending scholarly links that identify this fact.

Thanks,
Michael

[Mouse Shadow]

Do you mean the Lake Mungo People?

http://www-personal.une.edu.au/~pbrown3/ausindex.html

[velvet]

I am sick & tired of these coons stating that the Europeans arrived and displaced them as the owners of this country. My opinion is "So sad too bad" cause you aren't really indigenous either.

The problem is, to define what "indigenous" means, or, what time frame constitutes "indigenous".

Populations have always wandered. The Maori of NZ came around 750-800 years there only, but they were the people who lived there when the first Europeans came. Just as well as this is true for Australia, no matter whether the Aboriginies lived there 200 years or 5000. In America this were the Indians, in middle America the Maya. And all these people certainly have wiped off a people living previously there. This is just the course of evolution, a more progressive (in terms of tribe's organisation and structures) replaces a more primitive one. Should we give Europe back to the Neanderthals?

I dont think it is a good idea to try to refute the politically correct BS with more of the same nonsense, ie trying to prove that those, who are considered indigenous, are in truth not. The politically correct machinery would just jump on the wagon and start global wide relocations of "indigenous" people to their "indigenous" area. Honestly, I like Europe, I would prefer to further live here, and not in the Kurgan area or Siberia, India or Iran, where several thousand years ago some "indo-Aryan" people went through and left a bit of culture there and the base for the name "Iran". And I neither have interest to get this land back, where we, the IE people, where driven out.

However. I understand that this is a big problem for Australia, as well as the US, because this happened so recently, and unlike most other big replacements not in pre-historic (unwritten) times. But to refute BS with more BS won't bring us further, it would only cause chaos and give the politically correct freaks just more amunition to shoot on everyone, everywhere.

No matter what argument you would bring, the course of evolution, the course of time, it all would be abused. So the only way to argue against them is on an development level. Next time you run into a discussion with someone like this, let him play a mind-game. Ask him what would happen to the Aboriginies when the "invasions" would be reversed, the white people, who built the economy and infrastructure, leave and take everything with them, their economy, their businesses, their welfare state. In this case Australia would be wild area again, and instead of nice white Europeans, evil and brutal Muslims would come and cleanse the entire population off, or maybe Asians would come, China would be very happy about some square kilometers extra for their 1,3 billion people, right. In the end, even when the Aboriginies whine about the Europeans' presence, they also protect them against this kind of invasions. So they'd better be a bit more grateful, because when the Europeans leave, they would for sure be extinct, without any mercy.

And then, there would be noone to protect them, because "racism" is by (politically correct) definition only possible from whites on other races. So there would be noone to protect them from Asian "racism" or Muslim "racism". Noone would care. Just like noone cares about the mutual genocide between Hutsi and Tutsi (sp?), the mutual genocide between Congolese and the other blacks in that area, the publicly planned genocide on white South Africans (all contemporary, happens every day), or the 20th century genocide by bolshewik Jews on Russians (20mio). Ask them why they dont give a s**t about this racism, why they dont care about millions who get killed. Why they dont care about that Israel is the only real-existing nationalsocialist nation in the world, why they dont care about the ongoing genocide by supremacist Jews on Palestinasians.

Attack, not refute

[arcticdoctor]

The Time of Reason is over. The Time of Action is upon us.
Events, the destruction of our societies, the crumbling of our civilization
before our eyes, the invasion of our countries by the barbarian hordes
from the East and the South, these events are recruiting our people, our
kinsmen faster and more thoroughly than any of our previous attempts
at reason.
The issue is no longer 'how do we wake our people up', the issue now
is 'what do we do with the millions of frightened, disorganized recruits?'