Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: What is the American Nation

  1. #1
    Funding Member
    „Friend of Germanics”
    Funding Membership Inactive
    Æmeric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Last Online
    16 Hours Ago @ 01:55 AM
    Britain, Ulster, Germany, America
    United States United States
    Indiana Indiana
    Conservative Protestantism
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    Thanked in
    516 Posts

    What is the American Nation

    An article "What is the American Nation" that is relevant to the discussion in this thread.

    Fundamental to White nationalism is the understanding that, historically, America was not a melting pot, but a settler nation: hence a European transplant. Its original settlers (all of whom were Protestant, but not exclusively Puritan or Calvinist) may have had an ambivalent attitude to the Europe they left behind, but they had no intention of shedding their European being for the sake of mixing with races and cultures unlike their own. Their identity as such was rooted in distinctly European life forms, which were opposed to those of the country’s aboriginals and to its imported Black slaves. Specifically, this identity was an Anglo-Protestant one adapted to the nativist environment of colonial America. At the time of the revolution, 80 percent of the population was of Anglo-Protestant descent. Of the remaining 20 percent, most were Dutch, German, and Swede, all of whom were Protestant and easily assimilated into the original core population. Only one percent of its people, mainly of French Canadian and Irish origin, was Catholic. The country’s institutions were accordingly reflective of the values and beliefs of its transplanted Anglo-Protestant settlers, just as the state’s republican ideology and the producerist ideology of its popular classes were in harmony with its specific ethnic disposition.
    This is the atmosphere that the Constitution was written & adopted in. It was a document for a particular group of people, Anglo-Americans (including those American settlers that were absorbed into Anglo-American society that had developed in North America), not a universal document for every ethnicity.

    At the time of revolution, the country’s national identity was still an embryonic one. The loyalties of the revolutionary generation were more to the individual colonies that had become states, such as Virginia and Massachusetts, than to the federal republic established in 1789. But despite the absence of a strong state, informed by tradition and aristocracy, the American polity was not simply the cultureless, economic enterprise that certain Nouvelles Droitistes make it out to be and it was certainly not the “nation of nations,” “the first universal nation,” or “the proposition nation” that our virtualist-minded anti-White elites insist on.
    This is what the ACLU believes & pursues, that what to be privelege for the descendents of those who founded the United States & their European kin who can assimilate, is instead universal rights for anyone who gets to the US. The goal of the ACLU is not civil liberties but the destruction of the American nation, via the granting of rights to those who have never, and could never be, part of the American nation.

    Even in this early period there existed an American national identity, buttressed by several hundred years of history; and by the development of specifically American institutions based on instincts of racial superiority and self-reliance; by conflicts with the British crown, which caused its people to see itself as a transplanted nation of Anglo-Protestant descent (though one imbued with freedoms Englishmen had allegedly lost during the Norman Conquest); but above all by an ethnic or biocultural identity rooted in the North European, specifically British (that is, Celt, Norse, and Saxon) stocks of the country’s settlers. America, thus, may have lacked Europe’s ancient genealogy, cultural legacy, rooted, territorial sense, and distinct ethnic consciousness, but its people spoke a European language, practiced a European religion, had a history informed by European symbols and themes, represented a fusion of European racial stocks, and felt their North European identity to be the defining part of their individual and collective identity. Until quite recently, as Jared Taylor argues, “America was a self consciously European, majority-white nation.”
    The ACLU fights for the rights of immibgrants, primarily non-Whites. But by helping to grant those Hispanic, Asian & Caribbean hords rights - including the right to stay in the US, regardless of how they got here - the ACLU is helping to deprive others (meaning Euro-Americans like myself) of something more precious then property. They are dispossessing us of our heritage, our right to collective identity (having one deprives non-Whites their civil rights) & our nation. The ACLU, along with other wellknown 'civil rights' organizations is helping to create a new electorate in America. The ACLU's actions, rather then its mission statement, is amore accurate reflection of what it really stands for.

    What Tocqueville called the “Anglo-Americans” had not the slightest intention of extending their liberties to Indians or negroes, nor even to those Whitemen whose (Catholic) religion and (Irish clannish) temperament seemed to disqualify them for republican government. America’s founding liberal principles were, in fact, little more than the ideological gloss of the country’s Anglo-Protestant life forms. Despite the Calvinist conceit of believing itself “chosen,” America’s political principles had universal import only in the most vacuous theoretical sense. For example, the Puritan vision of America was less a call to world reform than an affirmation of its uniqueness and superiority. And though the principles of American republicanism have since been re-interpreted to justify the present de-Europeanization, this was neither the intention of the Founders nor that of the country’s settlers, for their republic was preeminently a Herrenvolk democracy — germane not to humanity, but to the “historical humanity” that was White America. In this vein, the US Constitution, which contemporary liberals have re-interpreted for the sake of their multiracial utopia, defended the institution of slavery and posited that a Black’s worth was only 60 percent of a White. The first Congress (1790) voted that only Whites could be naturalized as citizens. And even after the Civil War, the granting of basic civil rights to former negro slaves, as Sam Francis points out, had “nothing to do with voting, holding political office, sitting on juries, intermarriage, getting a job or being promoted . . . which is what civil rights have come to mean today.”
    I had mentioned this before, the Constitution & the rights contained in it, were not extended to Negroes. So I do not believe that there were any intention of extending them to Mexicans or Asians.

    White immigrants were assimilated into the founding stock only after they (or their children) shed the cultural-linguistic identities that separated them from native Whites. As late as the Kennedy Administration (1960), the nationally conscious Irish, the first immigrant group, were still not fully assimilated. The so-called “melting pot” (a 20th-century concept invented by a cosmopolitan “Englishmen,” Israel Zangwill) was similarly selective, accepting only White immigrants as possible Americans (though it did mistakenly think that Jews from European countries were European). Moreover, this racially defined identity was the legacy of both the popular classes and the country’s ruling elites. For example, Thomas Jefferson, who in a fit of Enlightenment enthusiasm included the phase “all men are created equal” in the Declaration of Independence, never — not for a moment — thought of extending equal rights to negroes; Abraham Lincoln, the two faced Whig pioneer of the liberal leviathan, wanted to repatriate Blacks back to Africa; and the great liberal crusader, Woodrow Wilson, was an ardent segregationist who thought his cherished “democracy” inappropriate to all but Whites. Until the postwar period, White Americans of virtually every class and denomination saw themselves not as an amalgam of humanity, but as an American nativist variant of Europe’s white Christian nations. The racial vision of America which White nationalists today defend against the anti-European regimes in Washington, London, and Tel Aviv was actually the prevailing vision for most Americans for most of their history.
    The Constitution & the Bill of Rights has to be viewed from the era in which they were written - 1789 - and not in the more progressive, sensitive era of racial equality of 2010. It is the reinterpretation of what the Constitution means that is one of the greatest dangers to our personal liberties & the ACLU has been at the forefront of that movement.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Anselm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Last Online
    Wednesday, March 2nd, 2011 @ 05:44 AM
    Scotland, and England
    United States United States
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    Thanked in
    3 Posts
    We're quickly becoming fubar. Just try turning in an employer that hires illegals. Nothing will happen.

Similar Threads

  1. "Ethnic or Civic Nation: Theorizing the American Case"
    By Appalachian in forum The United States
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: Thursday, August 27th, 2020, 06:16 PM
  2. No American Nation
    By Elessar in forum The United States
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: Tuesday, September 21st, 2010, 06:24 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: Friday, April 24th, 2009, 05:00 AM
  4. Replies: 6
    Last Post: Saturday, December 6th, 2008, 10:09 PM
  5. American Patriots Battle to Save the Nation
    By Mac Seafraidh in forum The United States
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: Sunday, August 7th, 2005, 08:30 PM


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts