David Duke Speaks to the Tea Party

[Diarmuid]

This is a good video, Duke is spot on!

http://www.youtube.com/user/drdduke#p/u/6/yDeNBsD8iRc

[Mouse Shadow]

Great!!! Excellent attitude! About time a politician aimed the guns at the evil anti-human jews!

[Mouse Shadow]

http://www.youtube.com/user/drdduke#p/u/5/Z43PcBR_El0

I found some more on David Duke, regarding the genocide of Europeans! He's making people wake up! COOL!!!

[Loyalist]

David Duke is a discredited clown, and his involvement in any aspect of the Tea Party will only prove injurious to the latter. Keep in mind that the mainstream media is tripping over itself to paint the Tea Party as racist, and a former KKK leader endorsing or addressing the movement only gives them ammunition to further that notion. While I doubt that the fact that the Tea Party is an essentially white organization presents a problem to most here, we must consider the larger picture.

[SaxonPagan]

Well the larger picture to which you refer is that the media is controlled by Jews who would demonize White movements ANYWAY so you might just as well invite David Duke along and do things in style

Sorry, but I don't ever remember David Duke becoming a "discredited clown". Can you remind me when this happened? Or was it the Jewish-controlled media that "discredited" him?

[Loyalist]

Well the larger picture to which you refer is that the media is controlled by Jews who would demonize White movements ANYWAY so you might just as well invite David Duke along and do things in style

That does not make any sense. As I said, it gives them more ammunition with which to discredit the Tea Party as a racist movement when the organization might otherwise have a chance of distancing itself from accusations of white supremacy. Of course the Jew-dominated media will slam the Tea Party either way, but their tactics of race-baiting are all the more effective when one of the most prominent racists in the land comes out and endorses the target.

Sorry, but I don't ever remember David Duke becoming a "discredited clown". Can you remind me when this happened? Or was it the Jewish-controlled media that "discredited" him?

David Duke is a degenerate gambler and tax evader who has no problem associating with non-Europeans when it is ideologically expedient for him. I am still dismayed at the hypocrisy of his appearances alongside Iranians and Syrians for the purpose of furthering his incoherent anti-Semitic agenda. His multiracial fetish is not limited to that, however; he tainted the Ku Klux Klan by removing the ban on Catholics, thus allowing hordes of Latins and Slavs to flood into an organization that was once mandated with defending the American WASP community.

[SaxonPagan]

As I said, it gives them more ammunition with which to discredit the Tea Party as a racist movement when the organization might otherwise have a chance of distancing itself from accusations of white supremacy. Of course the Jew-dominated media will slam the Tea Party either way, but their tactics of race-baiting are all the more effective when one of the most prominent racists in the land comes out and endorses the target.

The Tea Party movement is already condemned to being perceived as "racist" and that's a nailed-on FACT!! Now, you can either protest your innocence in abject fashion and or you can learn how to deal with this and find counter-arguments (such as the fact 99% of Blacks voted Obama) that only the likes of David Duke seem capable of mentioning.

I must have spent the last 35 years of my (adult) life listening to patriots using the “don't give them any ammunition to call us racists” line. For this reason, 90% of their arguments never actually get heard or are presented in some watered-down form that becomes meaningless. It's strange but I'm unaware of Blacks, Jews or Muslims ever shying away on these grounds.

Too many Whites are beaten before they even begin because they're on the defensive, ruling out their most passionate representatives because of some public image issue. It's only when we stop worrying about what our enemies think that we'll have any degree of success, and as for fellow Whites who might find David Duke too much for their weak constitutions – we don't need them with us anyway!

I'm sorry, Loyalist, but David Duke said more in those 10 minutes than most “safe” White politicians would say in 10 months and it's about time somebody came along to radicalize the White population instead of serving them platitudes that are acceptable to everyone but inspire no-one!

As for Duke's private life, I don't give a **** !!

[Loyalist]

The Tea Party movement is already condemned to being perceived as "racist" and that's a nailed-on FACT!! Now, you can either protest your innocence in abject fashion and or you can learn how to deal with this and find counter-arguments (such as the fact 99% of Blacks voted Obama) that only the likes of David Duke seem capable of mentioning.

The only individuals labeling the Tea Party as racist are fringe liberals at NBC, such as Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow, and a few mouthpiece celebrities whose opinions no one actually cares about.

As for the percentage of the black vote captured by Obama, there is no one afraid to point that out, by virtue of the fact that it is statistically-accurate. The people who do highlight the 95% of the black vote enjoyed by Democrats on a regular basis, and who do help our cause, are individuals like Pat Buchanan.

I must have spent the last 35 years of my (adult) life listening to patriots using the “don't give them any ammunition to call us racists” line. For this reason, 90% of their arguments never actually get heard or are presented in some watered-down form that becomes meaningless. It's strange but I'm unaware of Blacks, Jews or Muslims ever shying away on these grounds.

I am speaking in the context of the Tea Party, which is not a racialist movement. It is, at least on paper, a non-partisan, grassroots effort to defeat the socialistic aims of the Obama administration. By including white nationalists, neo-Nazis, or whatever ideology Duke subscribes to today, the left's claim of racist sentiment in the Tea Party gains greater legitimacy.

Too many Whites are beaten before they even begin because they're on the defensive, ruling out their most passionate representatives because of some public image issue. It's only when we stop worrying about what our enemies think that we'll have any degree of success, and as for fellow Whites who might find David Duke too much for their weak constitutions – we don't need them with us anyway!

In an ideal world, but in the present environment David Duke's support is not beneficial to a mainstream political movement in America.

I'm sorry, Loyalist, but David Duke said more in those 10 minutes than most “safe” White politicians would say in 10 months and it's about time somebody came along to radicalize the White population instead of serving them platitudes that are acceptable to everyone but inspire no-one!

Putting a respectable face on a conservative, predominantly white American movement is the key to success; failing to move beyond the KKK/skinhead nonsense of the past does nothing to further the cause.

As for Duke's private life, I don't give a **** !!

Do you take the same stance on white nationalist-turned-child porn enthusiast Kevin Strom? His work was both influential and well-received in these circles, after all. Personally, I want no association with either Duke or Strom, in an activist or racial sense.

[Æmeric]

If David Duke wants to help the Tea Party movement he will stay away from it. As Loyalist as pointed out, he is a discredited clown. Duke is an opportunist who is only associating with the TPM for his own personal benefit.

This doesn't mean that what Duke says about certain subjects isn't true, but he is the wrong messenger.

[Wulfram]

If David Duke wants to help the Tea Party movement he will stay away from it. As Loyalist as pointed out, he is a discredited clown. Duke is an opportunist who is only associating with the TPM for his own personal benefit.

This doesn't mean that what Duke says about certain subjects isn't true, but he is the wrong messenger.

Æmeric, Duke has been willing to get his hands dirty and place his own safety at risk where many others prefer the safety of an anonymous and sanitized domain name.
As you admit, he speaks quite a bit of truth. So, if not him then who?
He faces constant death threats for his troubles and basically anywhere he goes he is a marked man.
He is only a clown to the public's warped sense of integrity, and I would no more trust their opinion than the jews who tell them how to think.
He is rarely given a platform to speak. Not because he is a clown but because he makes too much sense.
If he were the incoherent rambling type then I am sure the media would have let him spout long ago, just to quell any suspicions in the public mind that what he says more resembles the truth than what the conspirators expect us all to believe.