Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: The Rise and Rise of the Regulators

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    theTasmanian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Last Online
    Wednesday, March 20th, 2019 @ 11:24 AM
    Ethnicity
    Prussian X Anglo/Celt
    Country
    Australia Australia
    State
    Tasmania Tasmania
    Location
    Hobart
    Gender
    Age
    45
    Family
    Single adult
    Occupation
    Back to Boilermaker/weldering
    Politics
    not the Greens
    Religion
    Pagan
    Posts
    815
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    9
    Thanked in
    9 Posts

    The Rise and Rise of the Regulators

    Something I have received in an Email


    By Robin Speed, 15th January 2010


    In 2009, more than 50,000 pages of new laws were enacted at the federal, state and territory levels. These were in addition to the 100,00 pages of existing laws. The consequences are serious. The first is that Australia will cease to be a world leader in being governed in accordance with the RULE OF LAW, and instead become RULED BY LAW (there being a fundamental difference). Secondly, the rule of law will be progressively replaced by the rule of the regulator, the antithesis of the rule of law.

    As the number and complexity of laws increase, there is a corresponding decrease in knowing and voluntarily observing the laws by the community. And, as it becomes impossible for the community to know, let alone apply the law, ensuring compliance is passed to the persons charged with administrating the laws – such as ASIC, ACCC, ATO – the regulators.

    However it is not practical for the regulators to enforce the mass of laws against everyone, nor even against one person, all the time. They therefore announce how they will apply the law, impose penalties on those who act otherwise, and reward those who act in accordance with their blessings. A few are prosecuted as a warning to the rest of the community. In this way, the rule of the regulator begins.

    Increasingly, the relationship is not of the individual knowing and complying with what the law states, but of knowing and complying with what the regulators state the law states, and then knowing the extent to which the regulators will apply the law as stated by them. For many, the new relationship focuses on not being seen by the regulators, keeping the lowest profile on those matters that the regulators prioritise for enforcement.

    What is of practical importance is the relationship of the individual with the regulators. For in such an environment few have the time, fortitude or money to be visible to the regulators and to apply the law in a way that differs from the one taken b the regulators. This new relationship can also be readily observed by the practical necessity of going cap in hand to the regulators for approval to carry out many transactions. For example, in the last eight years the ATO has issued more than 80,000 private rulings on what it says the law says (these rulings become law to the applicant, regardless of what the High Court might declare the law to mean for the rest of the community). No new law administers itself. More and more people are required to be employed by regulators to enforce the increasing number of laws. This becomes difficult, and the next stage in the shift to regulator rule begins.

    One of the first signs of this shift is the conferral on the regulators of more and more powers of search, access to private property, detention, telephone tapping, together with the increase in penalties. This happens not because a material number of Australians have suddenly become terrorists or members of organised crime. Rather, the intimidation of existing powers is believed insufficient to obtain compliance, so greater powers and harsher penalties are deemed necessary. Yet the futility of forcing compliance in this way was seen centuries ago by the penalty of hanging for stealing a loaf of bread. Further, the regulators increasingly find it difficult before an independent court to obtain a conviction. The regulators know that a crime has been committed, but are frustrated because they have not the powers to get the evidence or get the court to agree with their view of the law. For those who doubt whether Australia is at this stage, we need look no further than the recent unsuccessful prosecutions by ASIC.

    One of the other signs of the rule of the regulators is the attempt to reverse the onus of proof so that regulators can get convictions to send a clear message to the rest of the community. The Australian courts are a real impediment to regulators in this regards they insist that no-one is presumed to be guilty unless proved so. However, if an Act reverses this onus of proof, a court can do nothing. The legislative attempts to reverse the onus of proof come in several forms, often behind a government announcement (Regardless of political persuasion) that it is “streamlining” or “codifying” the existing laws. This is often accompanied by government publicity demonising the group to be subject to the new law. It is fundamental to the Australian way of life that everyone, whether an alleged terrorist or a member of an organised crime group, or an ordinary Australian, is presumed to be innocent until the prosecution proves otherwise. Any attempts to weaken that principle must be strongly and loudly resisted.


    Robin Speed is president of the Rule of Law Association of Australia.
    and their web site
    http://www.ruleoflawaustralia.com.au/objectives.aspx
    Tasmanian twice the heads!!.......twice the intelligence!?

  2. #2
    Anachronism
    „Friend of Germanics”
    Funding Membership Inactive
    Huginn ok Muninn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ancestry
    Germany, Norway, England
    Subrace
    Nordeby
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    Texas Texas
    Gender
    Zodiac Sign
    Leo
    Family
    Single adult
    Politics
    Farther right than you.
    Posts
    3,154
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    825
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    950
    Thanked in
    476 Posts
    This is a problem throughout the Europeanized nations. There is something quite evil behind it, and the essence of it is that the purpose is to make everyone a criminal so that those who displease any individual in power may be selectively prosecuted. This reminds me of the "heart plug" installed by the Harkonnens in the Dune stories. If you displeased the master, he pulled out your heart plug and that was the end of you.

Similar Threads

  1. Are Nazis On The Rise?
    By Ljót-fulfr in forum Politics & Geopolitics
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: Wednesday, December 1st, 2010, 02:38 PM
  2. The Rise of Hate 2.0
    By Nachtengel in forum Articles & Current Affairs
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Tuesday, June 23rd, 2009, 02:56 AM
  3. Will Nationalsocialism Ever Rise Again?
    By Nachtengel in forum Political Theory
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: Friday, March 27th, 2009, 02:42 AM
  4. Immigrations 42% rise
    By Kith of woden in forum England
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Friday, April 20th, 2007, 07:29 PM
  5. The Rise and Rise of China
    By Ahnenerbe in forum Strategic Intelligence
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: Thursday, May 4th, 2006, 02:36 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •