Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Holiday of White Conquest Persists in South Africa

  1. #1
    Funding Member
    „Friend of Germanics”
    Funding Membership Inactive
    Nachtengel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    German
    Gender
    Posts
    6,413
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    201
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,203
    Thanked in
    698 Posts

    Holiday of White Conquest Persists in South Africa

    By BARRY BEARAK
    Published: December 16, 2009

    PRETORIA, South Africa — The 16th of December was once a day of rival holidays here, two opposing flows of memory colliding at a junction.

    Afrikaners, the descendants of white settlers, celebrated the Day of the Vow, a covenant said to be made between their ancestors and God in 1838 that led to the slaughter of 3,000 Zulus. Blacks commemorated the same day on the calendar, marking the start of armed struggle against the apartheid regime by the African National Congress in 1961.

    With the arrival of multiracial democracy in 1994, lawmakers considered it wise to maintain Dec. 16 as a holiday, proclaiming it a Day of Reconciliation, a time for all races to come together in the spirit of national unity.

    But 15 years later, that happily-ever-after ending is a long way off, and the ideal of a rainbow nation now seems little more than a deft turn of phrase. According to a poll released last week by the highly regarded Institute for Justice and Reconciliation, 31 percent of South Africans believe that race relations have not improved since the end of apartheid, and 16 percent actually think they have gotten worse. (About 50 percent said relations had improved.)

    As for the holiday itself, most Afrikaners have found it hard to set aside one of their most sacred occasions, and on Wednesday, thousands of them gathered, as they do every year, inside the marble chamber of a mammoth granite monument near Pretoria. The structure is a shrine to the Great Trek, when white pioneers migrated north with their ox-drawn wagons and ramrod-loading muskets, completing a conquest they saw as the fulfillment of a divine mission.

    “The Day of Reconciliation may be a good idea, but for Afrikaners, the Day of the Vow is still what’s in our hearts,” said Johan de Beer, 46, a teacher waiting on the steps for the gates of the monument to open in the early morning. “This is a religious holiday that is based on our people’s history.”

    In his inauguration address, Nelson Mandela spoke of a covenant of his own, longing for “a rainbow nation at peace with itself and the world.” Viewers of the new American movie “Invictus” might be tempted to conclude that such racial harmony prevailed in the aftermath of a long-shot upset in a rugby game.

    The recent survey results would probably stun someone who went to sleep during apartheid and awakened in the present. After all, blacks not only control the government, they mingle in the finest restaurants and swankiest malls. The so-called black diamonds include liberation struggle heroes who have been welcomed into the boardrooms of the nation’s largest corporations.

    But while South Africa is the continent’s wealthiest country, income inequality here remains among the worst in the world. About 29 percent of blacks are unemployed, compared with 5 percent of whites, according to recent figures. When statistics include discouraged workers — dropouts from the labor force — the jobless rate climbs to nearly 50 percent. Most of the unemployed have never held a single job, according to a study by a panel of international economists.

    The recent poll results also showed that nearly one in four South Africans never speaks to people of other races in a typical day. “In the upper income groups there is a lot of integration, but very little among the poor,” said Fanie du Toit, the executive director of the institute that released the poll. “About 40 to 50 percent of blacks are slum dwellers or rural people who never come in contact with whites.”

    At the Voortrekker Monument, among those celebrating the Day of the Vow, barely a black person was in sight but for the men in blue uniforms picking up the trash. “I don’t know anything about their holiday,” said one of those workers, Elias Selema.

    The earliest attendees took seats beneath the monument’s dome in the main hall, a huge room encircled by friezes made from Italian marble that depict the epic migration. Others sat a level below, surrounding the cenotaph, the empty tomb that is the symbolic resting place of those who died during the trek. Still more took seats on the surrounding lawns and in the gardens.

    “This is my day of thanksgiving,” said Callie van Merwe, an 89-year-old woman dressed in the loose frock and white cotton bonnet of a settler. She added: “Today is a happy time, but I feel bad about the future. This country is changing, changing too much.”

    There are several versions of the Day of the Vow and the Battle of Blood River that followed. The historical record is one-sided, and no doubt the retellings lend themselves to myth. One historian, Leonard Thompson, has said the mythology came to serve a political purpose, used to justify the racial oppression of apartheid as God’s will.

    In the story’s most common rendition, a brigade of 468 voortrekkers, or pioneers, and about 60 of their slaves set out to avenge hundreds of deaths at the hands of the Zulus. Their leader, Andries Pretorius, cleverly selected a place to camp that was protected by a steep ravine and the Ncome River, which broadened at that spot into a deep hippopotamus pool.

    Preceding the Zulu attack that was sure to come, the trekkers came together to recite a vow. In part it read, “If he will protect us and give our enemy into our hand, we shall keep this day and date every year as a day of thanksgiving like a Sabbath, and that we shall erect a church in his honor.”

    The Afrikaners chained their covered wagons together, placing barbed shrubs beneath them. Wave after wave of Zulus charged, trying to use their short spears in close combat, but instead dying in heaps as smoke rose from muskets and cannons. As the story goes, 3,000 Zulus died while the trekkers suffered only three injuries. So many warriors fell dead in the Ncome it then became known as Blood River.

    “We believe it was God’s will to have Christians lead the way in this land,” said Lukas de Kock, one of the leaders of Wednesday’s worship. “On that day, the Day of the Vow, God made a clear statement that this was his will for South Africa.”

    The reading of the vow is one of the two most solemn moments of the prayer service. The other comes precisely at midday as families lean over the parapets that overlook the cenotaph.

    Careful calculations were made by the monument’s designers, and exactly at noon on each Dec. 16, the sun shines through a small opening in the dome, alighting on the empty tomb 138 feet below and yet again signaling for many that it was the Lord’s will that the land be theirs.
    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/17/wo...rikaner&st=cse

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    lioness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Last Online
    Thursday, November 24th, 2011 @ 12:22 PM
    Ethnicity
    South African
    Ancestry
    Netherlands
    Country
    South Africa South Africa
    Location
    Jakarandastad
    Gender
    Family
    Single parent
    Occupation
    Personal Assistant
    Politics
    Right Wing
    Posts
    27
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    1. The Zulu's attacked the Voortrekkers. About 400 men, women and children had to protect themselves. The Zulu's were therefore not slaughtered.
    2. Just across the hill from where the Monument is situated the new government erected Freedom Park, why was the amount of whites that attended that gathering not counted? Why are we always singled out? The blacks are aloud to have as many BLACK movements as they want but the moment whites get together we get questioned? (Slaughtered?)
    3. The Voortrekkers had nothing to do with Apartheid.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    oryx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last Online
    Sunday, April 7th, 2019 @ 06:38 PM
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    Afrikaner
    Subrace
    Don't know
    Country
    South Africa South Africa
    State
    Transvaal Transvaal
    Location
    Pretoria
    Gender
    Family
    In a steady relationship
    Occupation
    Software Developer
    Politics
    Conservative
    Posts
    41
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Events that lead to the "slaughter" at Blood River:

    Negotiations for land:



    The slaughter of unarmed Piet Retief and his men after the Zulus decided to discontinue negotiations:



    Zulus attacking voortrekker women and children after the murder of Piet Retief:



    Zulus attacking voortrekker women and children after the murder of Piet Retief:



    The battle of Blood River that followed:


  4. #4
    Eala Freia Fresena
    „Friend of Germanics”
    Funding Membership Inactive
    Ocko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Last Online
    Sunday, April 12th, 2020 @ 08:31 PM
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    Friese
    Ancestry
    Friesland
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    Montana Montana
    Location
    Glacier park
    Gender
    Family
    Married
    Occupation
    selfemployed
    Politics
    rightwing
    Religion
    none/pagan
    Posts
    2,926
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    51
    Thanked in
    49 Posts
    The story I always hear is that the land was devoid of negroes except a few bushmen (who are a different race). How is it then that Zulus were already there fighting the trekkers?

    What is the truth about it?

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Last Online
    Monday, August 20th, 2012 @ 01:12 AM
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    German, Irish, English, Scottish-American
    Ancestry
    german irish english scottish
    Subrace
    Don't know
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    California California
    Location
    Nevada City, California
    Gender
    Family
    Grandparent
    Occupation
    Juvenile Corrections
    Politics
    Right
    Religion
    Asatru
    Posts
    6
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Holiday of White Conquest Persists in South Africa

    Hello, Ocko -

    It's been a while since I studied South African history, but let me give it a try.

    The first permanent colony was at the Cape in 1652. The Afrikaners first met the various southward-moving Bantu tribes about 120 years later or roughly 1772. If so, the 1838 date is not improbable. It still suggests that huge stretches of South Africa were not occupied by the Bantu at the time of the European arrival.

    Hey! Good to meet a fellow Californian. I live right up the road from you.

    Regards,

    Steve McNallen

    Quote Originally Posted by Ocko View Post
    The story I always hear is that the land was devoid of negroes except a few bushmen (who are a different race). How is it then that Zulus were already there fighting the trekkers?

    What is the truth about it?

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    oryx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last Online
    Sunday, April 7th, 2019 @ 06:38 PM
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    Afrikaner
    Subrace
    Don't know
    Country
    South Africa South Africa
    State
    Transvaal Transvaal
    Location
    Pretoria
    Gender
    Family
    In a steady relationship
    Occupation
    Software Developer
    Politics
    Conservative
    Posts
    41
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Hi, Stephen is more or less correct with his statement. Here is a map showing the frontier of 1798. Beyond that frontier, on the south-east coast of south africa, boers started encountering black tribes - those rivers you see on the map formed natural borders at that time.



    To the north of that frontier, white (and black) expansion was much slower because of the semi-desert and desert found there. Voortrekkers did not kill all blacks on sight, notably the "Barolong" of the orange free state befriended the trekkers, and the trekkers in turn gave them protection against raids by Matabele and Zulu. The voortrekkers moved around the "xhosa" on the south eastern border - but that is history for another day.

    And yes the "SAN" or bushmen occupied much of southern africa in 1652, overlapping with expanding white and black areas, but not in great numbers.

  7. #7
    Funding Member
    „Friend of Germanics”
    Funding Membership Inactive
    Oski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Last Online
    Thursday, August 15th, 2019 @ 03:11 AM
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    American
    Ancestry
    England & Norway
    Subrace
    Faelid + Nordid
    Y-DNA
    R-M405
    mtDNA
    U5a1a1
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    California California
    Gender
    Family
    Single parent
    Occupation
    Property management
    Politics
    Germanic Preservation
    Religion
    Heathen
    Posts
    1,681
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    22
    Thanked in
    20 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by oryx View Post
    Zulus attacking voortrekker women and children after the murder of Piet Retief:



    Zulus attacking voortrekker women and children after the murder of Piet Retief:

    That is enough to historically justify the separatism in SA IMO. Horrible scene.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: Wednesday, June 3rd, 2009, 07:57 PM
  2. South Africa's White Holocaust
    By Parzifal_ in forum Southern Africa
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: Saturday, September 4th, 2004, 12:50 AM
  3. White Slaughter in South Africa?
    By Nordhammer in forum Southern Africa
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: Wednesday, February 11th, 2004, 12:54 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •