Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Is History a Science or Art?

  1. #1
    Senior Member Ediruc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Last Online
    Thursday, August 1st, 2019 @ 06:29 PM
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    German-American
    Ancestry
    German-American and proud
    Subrace
    Alpinid-Nordid
    Country
    United States United States
    Gender
    Posts
    1,295
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8
    Thanked in
    8 Posts

    Is History a Science or Art?

    Hey everyone, new to this forum and all, and seeing as how this is my first actual thread, I'll just start off.

    I'm planning on majoring in history in college, and recently it was brought to my attention just what the subject of history is considered. Seeing as how I'm going into it, I think I need to make the clarification whether history is a social science or art.

    I'm kinda leaning on it being a science, considering that in history you gather data of a certain event, analyze it, and do a cause&effect assessment of the data. That's my two cents

    Thanks for having me!

  2. #2
    Moderator "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member

    Sigurd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Last Online
    5 Days Ago @ 05:01 PM
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    German
    Ancestry
    Bavarii, Saxones, Suebi, Alamanni
    Subrace
    Borreby + Atlantonordoid
    Country
    Germany Germany
    Location
    Einöde in den Alpen
    Gender
    Age
    31
    Zodiac Sign
    Libra
    Family
    Engaged
    Politics
    Tradition & Homeland
    Religion
    Odinist
    Posts
    9,100
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    71
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    211
    Thanked in
    124 Posts
    I would say it is in an art. The certain key points, dates and facts of a particular event are the canvas and the brush, the presentation thereof is the colour and technique. It is entirely up to the artist how to represent a certain event: no two historians' conclusion will be the same.

    If it was a science then there would be certain applicable laws to History. There could be different theories, but one would work with certain natural laws. It lacks continuity, system, constants, and predicability and universality: What is history in England may not be history in Poland, they might have two entirely different run-down of events, and see two entirely different patterns.

    What do I mean by a lack of laws? One would have to assume that if exactly the same men, exactly the same generals, exactly the same techniques were applied again in Teutoburg forest, it would have the same result. Re-enacting such a situation might however not render the same result, the constant of Soldier #1798's strike to the head with the sword has the variable outcome of Warrior #54's surviving in Scenario 1 and perishing in Scenario 2.
    -In kalte Schatten versunken... /Germaniens Volk erstarrt / Gefroren von Lügen / In denen die Welt verharrt-
    -Die alte Seele trauernd und verlassen / Verblassend in einer erklärbaren Welt / Schwebend in einem Dunst der Wehmut / Ein Schrei der nur unmerklich gellt-
    -Auch ich verspüre Demut / Vor dem alten Geiste der Ahnen / Wird es mir vergönnt sein / Gen Walhalla aufzufahren?-

    (Heimdalls Wacht, In kalte Schatten versunken, stanzas 4-6)

  3. #3
    Funding Member
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member

    Siebenbürgerin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    German
    Ancestry
    Transylvanian Saxon
    Subrace
    Alpinid/Baltid
    State
    Transylvania Transylvania
    Location
    Hermannstadt
    Gender
    Age
    33
    Family
    Married
    Politics
    Ethno-Cultural
    Religion
    Lutheran
    Posts
    2,736
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    216
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    414
    Thanked in
    204 Posts
    History is a social science, but I think most social sciences classify as arts. I don't think I know a university, which hands you a Bachelor or Master's Degree in Science if you studied History. I got mine in Arts at least, even if I picked Archeology, which uses some scientific methods. But in history, you've no 1+1=2 rules like in mathematics. It's not exact. You find something buried, you try to date it, you make the scientific steps in the laboratory, but it doesn't end there. Because you've still to put together pieces of the puzzle and establish who the person was, who the goods belonged to and so forth.

    In history, you could easily go wrong by making a false assumption, jumping to a false conclusion. The events are the interpretation of the historian, and not few times the interpretations caused harsh criticism and debates.

  4. #4
    Moderator "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member

    Stormraaf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Afrikaner
    Country
    Netherlands Netherlands
    Gender
    Age
    34
    Posts
    961
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    52
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    20
    Thanked in
    12 Posts
    I agree with the above insofar history cannot strictly be considered a science, but I don't think of it as an art either, because I see art as everything of which the only purpose is producing an emotional reaction. The knowledge of where we come from and who we are is contained within the domain of history, and as such our attitudes and ideals should be subject to it, with our attitudes and ideals hopefully aligned with our emotional investments, but not solely dictated thereby.

    Frankly, I think history sits outside both the realms of science and art.

  5. #5
    Proffessional Hickerbilly
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member

    SpearBrave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Last Online
    @
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    American of German decent
    Ancestry
    Bavaria/Switzerland
    Country
    Other Other
    State
    Kentucky Kentucky
    Location
    Central
    Gender
    Age
    53
    Zodiac Sign
    Libra
    Family
    Married
    Occupation
    Kunstschmiede
    Politics
    Self-Reliance
    Religion
    Asatru
    Posts
    4,573
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,794
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,311
    Thanked in
    609 Posts
    Here are the some definitions of Art and History-

    Art:
    the quality, production, expression, or realm, according to aesthetic principles, of what is beautiful, appealing, or of more than ordinary significance.

    History:
    the record of past events and times, esp. in connection with the human race

    IMO art is creative of imagination and history should be factual and relevant to things that happened in the past.

    I would have to agree with Stormraaf that history should be in its own class. You can use history to create art, but you should never use art to create history.

    Science is based on facts and data collected and educated conclusions of those facts and data. You can use science to create art and record history. in that sense history is closer to science.

    History and Science should be separate yet lend themselves to create art.

    When you use art to create history and make scientific conclusions you end up with people trying to control either for their own benefit.

  6. #6
    Moderator "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member

    Sigurd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Last Online
    5 Days Ago @ 05:01 PM
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    German
    Ancestry
    Bavarii, Saxones, Suebi, Alamanni
    Subrace
    Borreby + Atlantonordoid
    Country
    Germany Germany
    Location
    Einöde in den Alpen
    Gender
    Age
    31
    Zodiac Sign
    Libra
    Family
    Engaged
    Politics
    Tradition & Homeland
    Religion
    Odinist
    Posts
    9,100
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    71
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    211
    Thanked in
    124 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Siebenbürgerin View Post
    I don't think I know a university, which hands you a Bachelor or Master's Degree in Science if you studied History. I got mine in Arts at least, even if I picked Archeology, which uses some scientific methods.
    I wouldn't say that this classification is automatically reliable. Sometimes, disciplines are classed by their historical evolution in certain academic fields.

    Since for instance Psychology originally arose from Philosophy, some universities offer Degrees in Arts, but since it approaches Psychiatry and Neurology, some award them in Science, and some in both (Aberdeen, for instance, used both - you could study Psychology as an Art OR a Science).

    Linguistics is another such "quarrelsome" case. There was much argument to include it as a science - Generative Grammar suggested an inherited universal grammar, and there are several laws for phonetic change, etc. pp.

    For example, Grimm's Law suggests that phonetic change is always systematic, which Verner's Law qualifies further as to being dependant on the position of the accent at the stage of when most European IG languages lost the mobility of their accent. Leskien's Law dictates shortenings of final syllable long vowels and certain diphthongs in Baltic and Slavic languages, etc. Furthermore, you will find that certain phoneme combinations in a given language will always, over time, end in predictable assimilation.

    On the other hand, you'd have certain fields of Sociolinguistics and Patholinguistics which approach sociological fields, also Language Policy, which would move the whole thing more towards being an Art.

    In History there cannot even be a question. History simply doesn't follow any given laws. As such, the argument for it to be a science are fairly scarce. Even Archeology doesn't fulfill the requirement of being a science; whilst it certainly uses some scientific methods, there is very little system, continuity, predictability or general rules to the subject.
    -In kalte Schatten versunken... /Germaniens Volk erstarrt / Gefroren von Lügen / In denen die Welt verharrt-
    -Die alte Seele trauernd und verlassen / Verblassend in einer erklärbaren Welt / Schwebend in einem Dunst der Wehmut / Ein Schrei der nur unmerklich gellt-
    -Auch ich verspüre Demut / Vor dem alten Geiste der Ahnen / Wird es mir vergönnt sein / Gen Walhalla aufzufahren?-

    (Heimdalls Wacht, In kalte Schatten versunken, stanzas 4-6)

  7. #7
    Senior Member Ulfvaldr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Last Online
    Friday, June 22nd, 2012 @ 04:21 AM
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    Dutch
    Ancestry
    English, Dutch.
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    Montana Montana
    Location
    laurel
    Gender
    Family
    Single adult
    Occupation
    laboer
    Politics
    n/a
    Religion
    Asatru
    Posts
    225
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post
    A Science. Art is creating something, History has already been created. unless you are a politician, then maybe you would create history.
    The coward believes he will live forever
    If he holds back in the battle,
    But in old age he shall have no peace
    Though spears have spared his limbs

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 4
    Last Post: Thursday, January 5th, 2017, 11:49 AM
  2. Is Science Racist? Liberals Want to Drop Science Classes
    By Nachtengel in forum Immigration & Multiculturalism
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Wednesday, January 27th, 2010, 03:40 PM
  3. 'Natural History of Ashkenazi Intelligence': Replaying the Game of Race Science
    By Thruthheim in forum Bio-Anthropology & Human Variation
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Sunday, February 5th, 2006, 02:45 AM
  4. Art Spiegelman's "Maus" used as a history book
    By Death and the Sun in forum Articles & Current Affairs
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Wednesday, June 29th, 2005, 04:22 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •