I split the thread "Who knows in depth about Volkish asatru?" since the topic had split away from Aryan character/folkish beliefs (my own fault it seems).
------------------
That a religious entente must exist, subliminated by the greater concern of race and character, seems to me a given. But the matter is not without major problems. Christianity on the whole can morph into a racially aware faith, but it is a stretch. I see three areas where 'tolerance' will only breed division.
1) Christian militancy, briefly mentioned in Point 24, whether its form is evangelism, abortion or 'Christians for Diversity', is unquestionably distractive and divisive. Militancy has only one acceptable place.
2) Any mode which de-emphasizes race, tribal character and Aryan idiom is bad news. And let's face it, only the most submissive (to the cause) forms of Xianity avoid these. How can we argue for the pre-eminence of community and race while others ~believe~ in the paramount individual soul?
This means it is not we pagan/atheists who need to compromise and adapt but Xians and particularly...
3) Old guard Americans. Whether we like it or not, America will probably be a leader due to her size and large white population. But she is strangled by this Americo-Christian remnant with fifty years of failure culminating in capitulation to the Racial Marxists. These people, Buchannan, Duke, SF, can not acknowledge that the right's intelligensia has always been primarily pagan/atheist - that the very character is heathen replete with a little splash of fatalism. They shudder like children in the dark at the mention of 'nihilism' which is integral to the barbarian spirit and then wonder why 'their' movement is so weak. They are already outnumbered in America and have long been outnumbered in Europe. It's time to assert - they can ride along or get out.
Tolerance on these three points means still more stasis, or worse, outlawry.
Bookmarks