Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: UN Slams Australia's Aboriginal Policies

  1. #1
    Funding Member
    „Friend of Germanics”
    Funding Membership Inactive
    Nachtengel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last Online
    Sunday, April 18th, 2021 @ 12:09 AM
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    Thanked in
    750 Posts

    UN Slams Australia's Aboriginal Policies

    A UN expert on indigenous rights says the ongoing intervention into remote Aboriginal communities in the Northern Territory is overtly discriminatory and Australia must tackle its "entrenched" racism.

    The critical comments by the UN's special rapporteur on indigenous rights, James Anaya, came just hours after a proposed new indigenous representative body was unveiled by Australia's Aboriginal social justice commissioner Tom Calma.

    Mr Calma told the National Press Club indigenous people had suffered from the absence of a strong national body since the abolition of ATSIC in 2005.

    "We have lacked the most fundamental of requirements for a reconciled nation - a robust genuine partnership between government and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples," he said.

    But Professor Anaya believes that's not all that's been holding back indigenous Australia.

    He says NT intervention measures, including compulsory income management and blanket bans on alcohol and pornography, are "overtly discriminatory" and further stigmatise already stigmatised communities.

    They're incompatible with various international conventions, covenants, treaties and declarations, he said.

    "Some kind of special measures could be justified but they need to be narrowly tailored to the specific circumstances that exist," the rapporteur told reporters in Canberra.

    "(But currently) people who have a demonstrated capacity to manage their income are included.

    "It's inappropriate to their circumstances but is also, as expressed by them, demeaning."

    Prof Anaya was also scathing of Labor's insistence that housing funds would only flow if indigenous communities leased their land to the government for 40 years.

    "It's a mistake to assume that indigenous peoples ... aren't capable of taking care of their homes," he said.

    Prof Anaya said the Rudd government should "swiftly" reinstate the Racial Discrimination Act, which was suspended by the Howard government so the intervention's more extreme measures could be rolled out.

    Indigenous Affairs Minister Jenny Macklin has promised to introduce legislation to reinstate the act in the spring session of parliament, but wants to continue many of the compulsory measures.

    A new national representative body could be up and running by October next year if Mr Calma gets his way.

    It won't deliver services or wield real power, but rather provide "credible and robust" advice on policies such as the intervention.

    The body will be independent from government and operate as a registered company, comprising an eight-member national executive, a 128 seat national congress and an ethics council to ensure its members are all "fit and proper persons".

    There'll be an equal number of men and women members, and two full-time co-chairs, one male and one female.

    Mr Calma's model, which draws on 12 months of extensive consultations with indigenous people, would be set up using $5 million of commonwealth funds.

    But after 10 years it would be "self sufficient, self determining and truly independent of government".

    The social justice commissioner envisages government, corporate and charity dollars would contribute to a $200 million investment fund "to ensure a sufficient recurrent expenditure base for the organisation".

    But that vision's already somewhat cloudy.

    "The government has no plans to contribute to such a fund at this time," Ms Macklin said in a statement after Mr Calma released his model.

    "The government is prepared to provide modest and appropriate recurrent funding for the national representative body once it is established, as well as providing support in its critical establishment phase."

    Mr Calma believes the new representative body will help Australia own its history - both good and bad - within 20 years.

    Prof Anaya also sees reasons for hope.

    "I have been impressed by the strength, resilience and vision of indigenous communities determined to move towards a better future despite having endured tremendous suffering at the hands of historical forces and entrenched racism," he said at the end of his 11-day visit.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    prodeutsch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Last Online
    Saturday, July 28th, 2012 @ 01:36 PM
    Prolonged Absence
    United States United States
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    Thanked in
    8 Posts
    So what does the UN say about the Indigenous peoples of Europe.....Oh, that is right, shut up and take it, the white race has kept everyone down for centuries. I am hating the UN more and more!

Similar Threads

  1. Aboriginal and Dingo DNA
    By Catterick in forum Population Genetics
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: Tuesday, October 4th, 2016, 09:43 PM
  2. Gillard's Aboriginal Comments Criticised
    By celticviking in forum Australia & New Zealand
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Wednesday, June 8th, 2011, 08:31 PM
  3. Sydney's Aboriginal Ghetto Demolished
    By Alfadur in forum Australia & New Zealand
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: Wednesday, June 1st, 2011, 10:55 PM
  4. What do you believe welfare policies should be like?
    By Dagna in forum Law, Ethics, & Morals
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: Tuesday, May 20th, 2008, 09:23 AM
  5. Aboriginal Traditions Myths and Legend
    By Hoarsewhisper in forum Comparative Religion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Sunday, December 3rd, 2006, 12:15 PM


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts