I've read many opinions of peoples supporting preservation, that having children is the key element of preservation. There are enough discussions about peoples who don't want children. But what about the peoples who can't have children at all, because of infertility? Do you consider them worthy, or unworthy to the preservationist cause?
My view is they could contribute in many other ways: politics, education, science and more, because nationalism isn't limited to child rearing. Anyway, what's your view on the infertile?
Bookmarks