Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Don't Clearcut Oregon's Forests - Sign Petition!

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Willow's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Last Online
    Monday, February 21st, 2011 @ 07:09 PM
    Prolonged Absence
    North-Atlantid/Galatizied Cromagnid
    Don't know
    Scotland Scotland
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    Thanked in
    4 Posts

    Post Don't Clearcut Oregon's Forests - Sign Petition!

    If you follow the link at the end of this article, you'll see the link you can follow to sign the petition...

    As a child growing up in rural Oregon, I spent countless hours enjoying all of the outdoor splendor of my home state's wildlands. Hiking and camping with my family, I enjoyed being out amidst Oregon's towering old-growth trees. To this day, I marvel at trees that have stood in Oregon's forest for hundreds of years.

    The trees in Oregon's forests are a national treasure in my mind. That's why I'm so upset at a Bush-era plan to open more than 2.5 million acres of public forest land in Oregon up to logging.

    It all stems from a Bush Administration agreement with big timber called the Western Oregon Plan Revision (or WOPR). In 2007, Bush released a draft of this plan -- and 27,000 people commented, demanding that the Bureau of Land Management act to save the forests. But the BLM ignored their pleas.

    The Sierra Club Oregon's website lists what will happen to western Oregon's forests during the first decade if the WOPR isn't stopped. They say the WOPR will:

    1. Remove BLM forests from the scientific framework of the Northwest Forest Plan.
    2. Ramp up clearcut logging across hundreds of thousands of acres and get over 70% of the timber volume from clearcuts.
    3. Reduce streamside buffers that protect clean water and fish by 50%.
    4. Log some of the last remaining older forests in western Oregon.
    5. Increase logging by nearly 400% compared to current logging levels.
    6. Add 180 million tons more carbon to the atmosphere compared to no logging (equivalent to the greenhouse gas emissions from 1 million cars driven for 132 years).
    7. Result in 1,300 miles of new logging roads.

    The Wilderness Society is leading the charge, asking Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar to stop this plan. In a blog post on their site, the Wilderness Society writes: "The fate of over 2.5 million acres of forest, which is home to over 1,000 different wildlife species, now lies in the hands of the Obama Administration. President Obama and Interior Secretary Ken Salazar have pledged to restore scientific integrity and ethical responsibility to public lands management. To live up to their pledge, the administration should act based on science, law and the interests of the American people and withdraw Bush’s WOPR."

    I couldn't agree more. If you've ever visited Oregon's forests, you know just how majestic they are. If you haven't, you're really missing out on an amazing display of our natural world. Either way, please join me in urging Secretary Salazar to stop the plan to clearcut Oregon's forests. (follow the link to the article...)
    Love all living things whose humble task is not opposed in any way to yours, to ours: men with simple hearts, honest, without vanity and malice, and all the animals, because they are beautiful, without exception and without exception indifferent to whatever "idea" there may be. Love them, and you will see the eternal in the glance of their eyes of jet, amber, or emerald. Savitri Devi

  2. #2
    Funding Member
    „Friend of Germanics”
    Funding Membership Inactive
    Zimobog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Last Online
    Monday, June 20th, 2011 @ 07:01 PM
    Don't know
    Alaska Alaska
    Mat-Su Valley
    Married with Children
    disaster mitigation
    I want my country back now
    HFR Heathenry
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    Thanked in
    7 Posts
    Are they really going to "clearcut" it or is that an emotional trigger word for "any logging whatsoever"?

    I wouldn't feel any better if these forests burned down, either so I support selective logging. The issue I have is these people don't want to cut, but they want men and women to risk their lives fighting fires in the same woods "to save" the forests that are full of deafall and prime to burn.

    I wonder how many millons tons of carbon a big forest fire puts off?

    Why not have a management policy that includes cutting instead of burning?

Similar Threads

  1. Sign the Migration Watch Petition
    By Sehnsucht in forum England
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: Thursday, November 3rd, 2011, 01:30 AM
  2. Sign This Petition (Stop Dr. Uwe Boll)
    By Ralf in forum Film, TV, & Performing Arts
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: Saturday, November 13th, 2010, 06:18 PM
  3. Please sign this petition
    By NatRev in forum The Hearth
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: Thursday, November 29th, 2007, 12:45 AM


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts