Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: The Ineffectivity of Megan's Law

  1. #1
    „Friend of Germanics”
    Funding Membership Inactive
    ladybright's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Last Online
    Saturday, July 31st, 2010 @ 07:14 PM
    Prolonged Absence
    Swedish Irish ?English?
    Don't know
    United States United States
    Michigan Michigan
    Married parent
    Classical liberal
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    Thanked in
    8 Posts

    The Ineffectivity of Megan's Law

    Make a registry of sex offenders. Sounds like a good idea, right? How does this protect children?
    As public outrage builds, politicians remain calm—they know (from long experience) that the public is easily appeased by naming (still another) hollow law after (still another) dead child. Remember the "Little Lisa" law? If you don't, I rest my case. And if you do, tell me what impact it has had on child abuse. The law, named after Lisa Steinberg, attacked bogus adoptions rather than the child abuse that led to her death.
    Andrew Vachss

    - New Jersey, as a whole, has experienced a consistent downward trend of sexual offense rates with a significant change in the trend in 1994.
    - In all but two counties, sexual offense rates were highest prior to 1994 and were lowest after 1995.
    - County trends exhibit substantial variation and do not reflect the statewide trend, suggesting that the statewide change point in 1994 is an artifact of aggregation.
    -In the offender release sample, there is a consistent downward trend in re-arrests, reconvictions and re-incarcerations over time similar to that observed in the trend study, except in 1995 when all measures spiked to a high for that period. This resulted in significant differences between cohorts (i.e., those released prior to and after Megan’s Law was implemented).
    - Re-arrests for violent crime (whether sexual or not) also declined steadily over the same period, resulting in a significant difference between cohorts (i.e., those released prior to and after Megan’s Law was implemented).
    - Megan’s Law has no effect on community tenure (i.e., time to first re-arrest).
    - Megan’s Law showed no demonstrable effect in reducing sexual re-offenses.
    - Megan’s Law has no effect on the type of sexual re-offense or first time sexual offense (still largely child molestation/incest).
    - Megan’s Law has no effect on reducing the number of victims involved in sexual offenses.
    - Sentences received prior to Megan’s Law were nearly twice as long as those received after Megan’s Law was passed, but time served was approximately the same.
    - Significantly fewer sexual offenders have been paroled after the implementation of Megan’s Law than before (this is largely due to changes in sentencing).
    - Costs associated with the initial implementation as well as ongoing expenditures continue to grow over time. Start up costs totaled $555,565 and current costs (in 2007) totaled approximately 3.9 million dollars for the responding counties.
    - Given the lack of demonstrated effect of Megan’s Law on sexual offenses, the growing costs may not be justifiable.
    Land of the Free because of the Brave.
    "Do not seek death. Death will find you. But seek the road which makes death a fulfillment." Dag Hammarskjold
    "Children know the truth. Love is not an emotion. Love is behavior." Andrew Vachss

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Patrioten's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Last Online
    Saturday, June 27th, 2020 @ 10:02 PM
    Sweden Sweden
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    Thanked in
    9 Posts
    I think people are looking at it from the wrong perspective. Parents shouldn't have to monitor whether there are any convicted sex offenders living close to their home as a means of protecting their children from abuse because there shouldn't be any convicted sex offenders living out in the rest of society. Sex offenders should be permanently removed from society and under no circumstances should they ever, ever be in a position to repeat their crime. I support the death penalty for their kind, but at the very least should these people be locked up, for life, with no chance in hell of parole. If people should think that these conditions sound to harsh then they should be told to think twice about molesting any children or raping any women, and that's all that needs to be said about that.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 5
    Last Post: Thursday, May 31st, 2018, 02:41 AM
  2. Classify Megan McCormick American TV Host
    By Wulfaz in forum Anthropological Taxonomy
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: Monday, July 2nd, 2012, 06:19 PM
  3. It Should Be Against the Law To.....What....???
    By Mouse Shadow in forum Law, Ethics, & Morals
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: Friday, July 8th, 2011, 03:39 AM
  4. Classify Megan Fox
    By Peoples Observer in forum Anthropological Taxonomy
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: Thursday, February 11th, 2010, 09:13 PM
  5. Evolution comes with a twist (Megan Morris)
    By morfrain_encilgar in forum Paleoanthropology
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Sunday, March 20th, 2005, 10:17 PM


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts